Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis
CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2010-09, Vol.304 (9), p.992-1000 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1000 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 992 |
container_title | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association |
container_volume | 304 |
creator | Lasswell, Sarah Marie Barfield, Wanda Denise Rochat, Roger William Blackmon, Lillian |
description | CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages of VLBW infants born in lower-level hospitals. OBJECTIVE To evaluate published data on associations between hospital level at birth and neonatal or predischarge mortality for VLBW and very preterm (VPT) infants. DATA SOURCES Systematic search of published literature (1976–May 2010) in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases and manual searches of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Forty-one publications met a priori inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case-control studies measuring neonatal or predischarge mortality among live-born infants ≤1500 g or ≤32 weeks' gestation delivered at a level III vs lower-level facility). Paired reviewers independently assessed publications for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Discrepancies were decided by a third reviewer. Publications were reviewed for quality by 3 authors based on 2 content areas: adjustment for confounding and description of hospital levels. We calculated weighted, combined odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model and comparative unadjusted pooled mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS We observed increased odds of death for VLBW infants (38% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.83) and VPT infants (15% vs 17%; adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.98) born outside of level III hospitals. Consistent results were obtained when restricted to higher-quality evidence (mortality in VLBW infants, 36% vs 21%; adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.33-1.92 and in VPT infants, 7% vs 12%; adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88) and infants weighing less than 1000 g (59% vs 32%; adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46). No significant differences were found through subgroup analysis of study characteristics. Meta-regression by year of publication did not reveal a change over time (slope, 0.00; P = .87). CONCLUSION For VLBW and VPT infants, birth outside of a level III hospital is significantly associated with increased likelihood of neonatal or predischarge death. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jama.2010.1226 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753999858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>186516</ama_id><sourcerecordid>753999858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a324t-ecab07d9cf5873bbd7b1cec6eb6df5598ac5c6cd0655a655edd160ee84ab97943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LHDEUhkOxdFftreCNDIXi1azJZDJJvLPix8IWRdp6JcOZzBnNMh_bJEvZ_vpm2FWhgZCEPHnOyUvIEaMzRik7W0IHs4yOxywrPpApE1ylXGi1R6aUapXKXOUTsu_9ksbBuPxEJhlVjHIpp-TpHp3tIUCbPOCzHXpo7V8IcZM0g0t-odski-FP-s268JI-on1-CQn09fbm3mFA1yXzvoE--PPkIvmOAVKImo23_pB8bKD1-Hm3HpCf11c_Lm_Txd3N_PJikQLP8pCigYrKWptGKMmrqpYVM2gKrIq6EfEvYIQpTE0LISBOrGtWUESVQ6WlzvkBOd16V274vUYfys56g20LPQ5rX0rBtdZKqEh--Y9cDmsX2x0hGmWK8QjNtpBxg_cOm3LlbAduUzJajrGXY-zlGHs5xh4fnOys66rD-g1_zTkCX3cAeANt46A31r9znAlJtYjc8ZYb_W9FVSFYwf8BdCuTeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>750979813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Lasswell, Sarah Marie ; Barfield, Wanda Denise ; Rochat, Roger William ; Blackmon, Lillian</creator><creatorcontrib>Lasswell, Sarah Marie ; Barfield, Wanda Denise ; Rochat, Roger William ; Blackmon, Lillian</creatorcontrib><description>CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages of VLBW infants born in lower-level hospitals. OBJECTIVE To evaluate published data on associations between hospital level at birth and neonatal or predischarge mortality for VLBW and very preterm (VPT) infants. DATA SOURCES Systematic search of published literature (1976–May 2010) in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases and manual searches of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Forty-one publications met a priori inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case-control studies measuring neonatal or predischarge mortality among live-born infants ≤1500 g or ≤32 weeks' gestation delivered at a level III vs lower-level facility). Paired reviewers independently assessed publications for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Discrepancies were decided by a third reviewer. Publications were reviewed for quality by 3 authors based on 2 content areas: adjustment for confounding and description of hospital levels. We calculated weighted, combined odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model and comparative unadjusted pooled mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS We observed increased odds of death for VLBW infants (38% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.83) and VPT infants (15% vs 17%; adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.98) born outside of level III hospitals. Consistent results were obtained when restricted to higher-quality evidence (mortality in VLBW infants, 36% vs 21%; adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.33-1.92 and in VPT infants, 7% vs 12%; adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88) and infants weighing less than 1000 g (59% vs 32%; adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46). No significant differences were found through subgroup analysis of study characteristics. Meta-regression by year of publication did not reveal a change over time (slope, 0.00; P = .87). CONCLUSION For VLBW and VPT infants, birth outside of a level III hospital is significantly associated with increased likelihood of neonatal or predischarge death.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1226</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20810377</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Babies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth weight ; Case-Control Studies ; Cohort Studies ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; General aspects ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitals, Special - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight ; Medical sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Neonatal care ; Obstetrics ; Odds Ratio ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Premature Birth ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2010-09, Vol.304 (9), p.992-1000</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Sep 1, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.2010.1226$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2010.1226$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3340,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23157095$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20810377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lasswell, Sarah Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barfield, Wanda Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Roger William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackmon, Lillian</creatorcontrib><title>Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages of VLBW infants born in lower-level hospitals. OBJECTIVE To evaluate published data on associations between hospital level at birth and neonatal or predischarge mortality for VLBW and very preterm (VPT) infants. DATA SOURCES Systematic search of published literature (1976–May 2010) in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases and manual searches of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Forty-one publications met a priori inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case-control studies measuring neonatal or predischarge mortality among live-born infants ≤1500 g or ≤32 weeks' gestation delivered at a level III vs lower-level facility). Paired reviewers independently assessed publications for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Discrepancies were decided by a third reviewer. Publications were reviewed for quality by 3 authors based on 2 content areas: adjustment for confounding and description of hospital levels. We calculated weighted, combined odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model and comparative unadjusted pooled mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS We observed increased odds of death for VLBW infants (38% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.83) and VPT infants (15% vs 17%; adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.98) born outside of level III hospitals. Consistent results were obtained when restricted to higher-quality evidence (mortality in VLBW infants, 36% vs 21%; adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.33-1.92 and in VPT infants, 7% vs 12%; adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88) and infants weighing less than 1000 g (59% vs 32%; adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46). No significant differences were found through subgroup analysis of study characteristics. Meta-regression by year of publication did not reveal a change over time (slope, 0.00; P = .87). CONCLUSION For VLBW and VPT infants, birth outside of a level III hospital is significantly associated with increased likelihood of neonatal or predischarge death.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospitals, Special - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>Infant, Very Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Premature Birth</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF1LHDEUhkOxdFftreCNDIXi1azJZDJJvLPix8IWRdp6JcOZzBnNMh_bJEvZ_vpm2FWhgZCEPHnOyUvIEaMzRik7W0IHs4yOxywrPpApE1ylXGi1R6aUapXKXOUTsu_9ksbBuPxEJhlVjHIpp-TpHp3tIUCbPOCzHXpo7V8IcZM0g0t-odski-FP-s268JI-on1-CQn09fbm3mFA1yXzvoE--PPkIvmOAVKImo23_pB8bKD1-Hm3HpCf11c_Lm_Txd3N_PJikQLP8pCigYrKWptGKMmrqpYVM2gKrIq6EfEvYIQpTE0LISBOrGtWUESVQ6WlzvkBOd16V274vUYfys56g20LPQ5rX0rBtdZKqEh--Y9cDmsX2x0hGmWK8QjNtpBxg_cOm3LlbAduUzJajrGXY-zlGHs5xh4fnOys66rD-g1_zTkCX3cAeANt46A31r9znAlJtYjc8ZYb_W9FVSFYwf8BdCuTeA</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Lasswell, Sarah Marie</creator><creator>Barfield, Wanda Denise</creator><creator>Rochat, Roger William</creator><creator>Blackmon, Lillian</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis</title><author>Lasswell, Sarah Marie ; Barfield, Wanda Denise ; Rochat, Roger William ; Blackmon, Lillian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a324t-ecab07d9cf5873bbd7b1cec6eb6df5598ac5c6cd0655a655edd160ee84ab97943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospitals, Special - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>Infant, Very Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Premature Birth</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasswell, Sarah Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barfield, Wanda Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Roger William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackmon, Lillian</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasswell, Sarah Marie</au><au>Barfield, Wanda Denise</au><au>Rochat, Roger William</au><au>Blackmon, Lillian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>304</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>992</spage><epage>1000</epage><pages>992-1000</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><coden>JAMAAP</coden><abstract>CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages of VLBW infants born in lower-level hospitals. OBJECTIVE To evaluate published data on associations between hospital level at birth and neonatal or predischarge mortality for VLBW and very preterm (VPT) infants. DATA SOURCES Systematic search of published literature (1976–May 2010) in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases and manual searches of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Forty-one publications met a priori inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case-control studies measuring neonatal or predischarge mortality among live-born infants ≤1500 g or ≤32 weeks' gestation delivered at a level III vs lower-level facility). Paired reviewers independently assessed publications for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Discrepancies were decided by a third reviewer. Publications were reviewed for quality by 3 authors based on 2 content areas: adjustment for confounding and description of hospital levels. We calculated weighted, combined odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model and comparative unadjusted pooled mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS We observed increased odds of death for VLBW infants (38% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.83) and VPT infants (15% vs 17%; adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.98) born outside of level III hospitals. Consistent results were obtained when restricted to higher-quality evidence (mortality in VLBW infants, 36% vs 21%; adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.33-1.92 and in VPT infants, 7% vs 12%; adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88) and infants weighing less than 1000 g (59% vs 32%; adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46). No significant differences were found through subgroup analysis of study characteristics. Meta-regression by year of publication did not reveal a change over time (slope, 0.00; P = .87). CONCLUSION For VLBW and VPT infants, birth outside of a level III hospital is significantly associated with increased likelihood of neonatal or predischarge death.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>20810377</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.2010.1226</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-7484 |
ispartof | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2010-09, Vol.304 (9), p.992-1000 |
issn | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753999858 |
source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals |
subjects | Babies Biological and medical sciences Birth weight Case-Control Studies Cohort Studies Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy General aspects Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Hospital Mortality Hospitals, Special - statistics & numerical data Humans Infant Mortality Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature Infant, Very Low Birth Weight Medical sciences Meta-analysis Neonatal care Obstetrics Odds Ratio Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta Premature Birth Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Systematic review |
title | Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A04%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perinatal%20Regionalization%20for%20Very%20Low-Birth-Weight%20and%20Very%20Preterm%20Infants:%20A%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Lasswell,%20Sarah%20Marie&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=304&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=992&rft.epage=1000&rft.pages=992-1000&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft.coden=JAMAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.2010.1226&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E753999858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=750979813&rft_id=info:pmid/20810377&rft_ama_id=186516&rfr_iscdi=true |