Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis

CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2010-09, Vol.304 (9), p.992-1000
Hauptverfasser: Lasswell, Sarah Marie, Barfield, Wanda Denise, Rochat, Roger William, Blackmon, Lillian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1000
container_issue 9
container_start_page 992
container_title JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
container_volume 304
creator Lasswell, Sarah Marie
Barfield, Wanda Denise
Rochat, Roger William
Blackmon, Lillian
description CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages of VLBW infants born in lower-level hospitals. OBJECTIVE To evaluate published data on associations between hospital level at birth and neonatal or predischarge mortality for VLBW and very preterm (VPT) infants. DATA SOURCES Systematic search of published literature (1976–May 2010) in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases and manual searches of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Forty-one publications met a priori inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case-control studies measuring neonatal or predischarge mortality among live-born infants ≤1500 g or ≤32 weeks' gestation delivered at a level III vs lower-level facility). Paired reviewers independently assessed publications for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Discrepancies were decided by a third reviewer. Publications were reviewed for quality by 3 authors based on 2 content areas: adjustment for confounding and description of hospital levels. We calculated weighted, combined odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model and comparative unadjusted pooled mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS We observed increased odds of death for VLBW infants (38% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.83) and VPT infants (15% vs 17%; adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.98) born outside of level III hospitals. Consistent results were obtained when restricted to higher-quality evidence (mortality in VLBW infants, 36% vs 21%; adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.33-1.92 and in VPT infants, 7% vs 12%; adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88) and infants weighing less than 1000 g (59% vs 32%; adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46). No significant differences were found through subgroup analysis of study characteristics. Meta-regression by year of publication did not reveal a change over time (slope, 0.00; P = .87). CONCLUSION For VLBW and VPT infants, birth outside of a level III hospital is significantly associated with increased likelihood of neonatal or predischarge death.
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jama.2010.1226
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753999858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>186516</ama_id><sourcerecordid>753999858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a324t-ecab07d9cf5873bbd7b1cec6eb6df5598ac5c6cd0655a655edd160ee84ab97943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LHDEUhkOxdFftreCNDIXi1azJZDJJvLPix8IWRdp6JcOZzBnNMh_bJEvZ_vpm2FWhgZCEPHnOyUvIEaMzRik7W0IHs4yOxywrPpApE1ylXGi1R6aUapXKXOUTsu_9ksbBuPxEJhlVjHIpp-TpHp3tIUCbPOCzHXpo7V8IcZM0g0t-odski-FP-s268JI-on1-CQn09fbm3mFA1yXzvoE--PPkIvmOAVKImo23_pB8bKD1-Hm3HpCf11c_Lm_Txd3N_PJikQLP8pCigYrKWptGKMmrqpYVM2gKrIq6EfEvYIQpTE0LISBOrGtWUESVQ6WlzvkBOd16V274vUYfys56g20LPQ5rX0rBtdZKqEh--Y9cDmsX2x0hGmWK8QjNtpBxg_cOm3LlbAduUzJajrGXY-zlGHs5xh4fnOys66rD-g1_zTkCX3cAeANt46A31r9znAlJtYjc8ZYb_W9FVSFYwf8BdCuTeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>750979813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Lasswell, Sarah Marie ; Barfield, Wanda Denise ; Rochat, Roger William ; Blackmon, Lillian</creator><creatorcontrib>Lasswell, Sarah Marie ; Barfield, Wanda Denise ; Rochat, Roger William ; Blackmon, Lillian</creatorcontrib><description>CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages of VLBW infants born in lower-level hospitals. OBJECTIVE To evaluate published data on associations between hospital level at birth and neonatal or predischarge mortality for VLBW and very preterm (VPT) infants. DATA SOURCES Systematic search of published literature (1976–May 2010) in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases and manual searches of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Forty-one publications met a priori inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case-control studies measuring neonatal or predischarge mortality among live-born infants ≤1500 g or ≤32 weeks' gestation delivered at a level III vs lower-level facility). Paired reviewers independently assessed publications for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Discrepancies were decided by a third reviewer. Publications were reviewed for quality by 3 authors based on 2 content areas: adjustment for confounding and description of hospital levels. We calculated weighted, combined odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model and comparative unadjusted pooled mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS We observed increased odds of death for VLBW infants (38% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.83) and VPT infants (15% vs 17%; adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.98) born outside of level III hospitals. Consistent results were obtained when restricted to higher-quality evidence (mortality in VLBW infants, 36% vs 21%; adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.33-1.92 and in VPT infants, 7% vs 12%; adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88) and infants weighing less than 1000 g (59% vs 32%; adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46). No significant differences were found through subgroup analysis of study characteristics. Meta-regression by year of publication did not reveal a change over time (slope, 0.00; P = .87). CONCLUSION For VLBW and VPT infants, birth outside of a level III hospital is significantly associated with increased likelihood of neonatal or predischarge death.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1226</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20810377</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Babies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth weight ; Case-Control Studies ; Cohort Studies ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; General aspects ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitals, Special - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight ; Medical sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Neonatal care ; Obstetrics ; Odds Ratio ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Premature Birth ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2010-09, Vol.304 (9), p.992-1000</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Sep 1, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.2010.1226$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2010.1226$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3340,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23157095$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20810377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lasswell, Sarah Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barfield, Wanda Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Roger William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackmon, Lillian</creatorcontrib><title>Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages of VLBW infants born in lower-level hospitals. OBJECTIVE To evaluate published data on associations between hospital level at birth and neonatal or predischarge mortality for VLBW and very preterm (VPT) infants. DATA SOURCES Systematic search of published literature (1976–May 2010) in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases and manual searches of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Forty-one publications met a priori inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case-control studies measuring neonatal or predischarge mortality among live-born infants ≤1500 g or ≤32 weeks' gestation delivered at a level III vs lower-level facility). Paired reviewers independently assessed publications for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Discrepancies were decided by a third reviewer. Publications were reviewed for quality by 3 authors based on 2 content areas: adjustment for confounding and description of hospital levels. We calculated weighted, combined odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model and comparative unadjusted pooled mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS We observed increased odds of death for VLBW infants (38% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.83) and VPT infants (15% vs 17%; adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.98) born outside of level III hospitals. Consistent results were obtained when restricted to higher-quality evidence (mortality in VLBW infants, 36% vs 21%; adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.33-1.92 and in VPT infants, 7% vs 12%; adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88) and infants weighing less than 1000 g (59% vs 32%; adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46). No significant differences were found through subgroup analysis of study characteristics. Meta-regression by year of publication did not reveal a change over time (slope, 0.00; P = .87). CONCLUSION For VLBW and VPT infants, birth outside of a level III hospital is significantly associated with increased likelihood of neonatal or predischarge death.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospitals, Special - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>Infant, Very Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Premature Birth</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF1LHDEUhkOxdFftreCNDIXi1azJZDJJvLPix8IWRdp6JcOZzBnNMh_bJEvZ_vpm2FWhgZCEPHnOyUvIEaMzRik7W0IHs4yOxywrPpApE1ylXGi1R6aUapXKXOUTsu_9ksbBuPxEJhlVjHIpp-TpHp3tIUCbPOCzHXpo7V8IcZM0g0t-odski-FP-s268JI-on1-CQn09fbm3mFA1yXzvoE--PPkIvmOAVKImo23_pB8bKD1-Hm3HpCf11c_Lm_Txd3N_PJikQLP8pCigYrKWptGKMmrqpYVM2gKrIq6EfEvYIQpTE0LISBOrGtWUESVQ6WlzvkBOd16V274vUYfys56g20LPQ5rX0rBtdZKqEh--Y9cDmsX2x0hGmWK8QjNtpBxg_cOm3LlbAduUzJajrGXY-zlGHs5xh4fnOys66rD-g1_zTkCX3cAeANt46A31r9znAlJtYjc8ZYb_W9FVSFYwf8BdCuTeA</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Lasswell, Sarah Marie</creator><creator>Barfield, Wanda Denise</creator><creator>Rochat, Roger William</creator><creator>Blackmon, Lillian</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis</title><author>Lasswell, Sarah Marie ; Barfield, Wanda Denise ; Rochat, Roger William ; Blackmon, Lillian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a324t-ecab07d9cf5873bbd7b1cec6eb6df5598ac5c6cd0655a655edd160ee84ab97943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospitals, Special - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>Infant, Very Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Premature Birth</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasswell, Sarah Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barfield, Wanda Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Roger William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackmon, Lillian</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasswell, Sarah Marie</au><au>Barfield, Wanda Denise</au><au>Rochat, Roger William</au><au>Blackmon, Lillian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>304</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>992</spage><epage>1000</epage><pages>992-1000</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><coden>JAMAAP</coden><abstract>CONTEXT For more than 30 years, guidelines for perinatal regionalization have recommended that very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants be born at highly specialized hospitals, most commonly designated as level III hospitals. Despite these recommendations, some regions continue to have large percentages of VLBW infants born in lower-level hospitals. OBJECTIVE To evaluate published data on associations between hospital level at birth and neonatal or predischarge mortality for VLBW and very preterm (VPT) infants. DATA SOURCES Systematic search of published literature (1976–May 2010) in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed databases and manual searches of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Forty-one publications met a priori inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trial, cohort, and case-control studies measuring neonatal or predischarge mortality among live-born infants ≤1500 g or ≤32 weeks' gestation delivered at a level III vs lower-level facility). Paired reviewers independently assessed publications for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Discrepancies were decided by a third reviewer. Publications were reviewed for quality by 3 authors based on 2 content areas: adjustment for confounding and description of hospital levels. We calculated weighted, combined odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model and comparative unadjusted pooled mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS We observed increased odds of death for VLBW infants (38% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.83) and VPT infants (15% vs 17%; adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.98) born outside of level III hospitals. Consistent results were obtained when restricted to higher-quality evidence (mortality in VLBW infants, 36% vs 21%; adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.33-1.92 and in VPT infants, 7% vs 12%; adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88) and infants weighing less than 1000 g (59% vs 32%; adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46). No significant differences were found through subgroup analysis of study characteristics. Meta-regression by year of publication did not reveal a change over time (slope, 0.00; P = .87). CONCLUSION For VLBW and VPT infants, birth outside of a level III hospital is significantly associated with increased likelihood of neonatal or predischarge death.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>20810377</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.2010.1226</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-7484
ispartof JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2010-09, Vol.304 (9), p.992-1000
issn 0098-7484
1538-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753999858
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Babies
Biological and medical sciences
Birth weight
Case-Control Studies
Cohort Studies
Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy
General aspects
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Hospital Mortality
Hospitals, Special - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infant Mortality
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
Medical sciences
Meta-analysis
Neonatal care
Obstetrics
Odds Ratio
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Premature Birth
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Systematic review
title Perinatal Regionalization for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A04%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perinatal%20Regionalization%20for%20Very%20Low-Birth-Weight%20and%20Very%20Preterm%20Infants:%20A%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Lasswell,%20Sarah%20Marie&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=304&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=992&rft.epage=1000&rft.pages=992-1000&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft.coden=JAMAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.2010.1226&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E753999858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=750979813&rft_id=info:pmid/20810377&rft_ama_id=186516&rfr_iscdi=true