Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology

Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2010-09, Vol.94 (4), p.1432-1436
Hauptverfasser: Jungheim, Emily S., M.D, Ryan, Ginny L., M.D, Levens, Eric D., M.D, Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H, Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E, Carson, Kenneth R., M.D, Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D, Odem, Randall R., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1436
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1432
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 94
creator Jungheim, Emily S., M.D
Ryan, Ginny L., M.D
Levens, Eric D., M.D
Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H
Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E
Carson, Kenneth R., M.D
Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D
Odem, Randall R., M.D
description Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Prevalence of clinicians reporting following embryo transfer guidelines recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), prevalence among these clinicians to deviate from ASRM guidelines in commonly encountered clinical scenarios, and practice patterns related to single embryo transfer. Result(s) Six percent of respondents reported following their own, independent guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer after IVF. Of the 94% of respondents who reported routinely following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, 52% would deviate from these guidelines for patient request, 51% for cycles involving the transfer of frozen embryos, and 70% for patients with previously failed IVF cycles. All respondents reported routinely discussing the risks of multiple gestations associated with standard embryo transfer practices, whereas only 34% reported routinely discussing single embryo transfer with all patients. Conclusion(s) Although the majority of clinicians responding to our survey reported following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, at least half would deviate from these guidelines in a number of different situations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753997606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0015028209024832</els_id><sourcerecordid>753997606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-d4d262cb1217932415c3a8fb4cc5668fa30a4c036f8cc83877c24714fea6b64d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhSMEokvhLyBfEKcsYzuxHQ5IbVVapEpIbHu2vM6k6yUbL7azKHd-OA67ohInLp6Dv5l5em-KglBYUqDiw3bZYUhDTPldMoBmCXLZKPmsWNC6FmUtav68WADQugSm2FnxKsYtAAgq2cvijDayUqCaRfHrercOkycpmCHmoWQfjE3OYiRuIGmD5GFwCVuySiZh_EgMiWM44ER8R2zvBmcjCfjoZi0Z--nS5k_byluHaSKdD-Qixvm_Jd9wH3w75gUHJPdoN4Pv_eP0unjRmT7im1M9Lx4-X99f3ZZ3X2--XF3clbYGlcq2aplgdk0ZlQ1nFa0tN6pbV9bWQqjOcDCVBS46Za3iSkrLKkmrDo1Yi6rl58X749ys4seIMemdixb73gzox6hlzZtGChCZVEfSBh9jwE7vg9uZMGkKeo5Ab_VTBHqOQIPUOYLc-va0ZFzvsH1qPHmegXcnwERr-i47b138yzFOm0bxmbs8cpgtOTgMOmZLB4utC2iTbr37HzWf_hlyDM3033HCuPVjGLLlmurINOjVfDLzxUADrFKc8d-iQ8G5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>753997606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D ; Ryan, Ginny L., M.D ; Levens, Eric D., M.D ; Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H ; Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E ; Carson, Kenneth R., M.D ; Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D ; Odem, Randall R., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D ; Ryan, Ginny L., M.D ; Levens, Eric D., M.D ; Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H ; Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E ; Carson, Kenneth R., M.D ; Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D ; Odem, Randall R., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Prevalence of clinicians reporting following embryo transfer guidelines recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), prevalence among these clinicians to deviate from ASRM guidelines in commonly encountered clinical scenarios, and practice patterns related to single embryo transfer. Result(s) Six percent of respondents reported following their own, independent guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer after IVF. Of the 94% of respondents who reported routinely following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, 52% would deviate from these guidelines for patient request, 51% for cycles involving the transfer of frozen embryos, and 70% for patients with previously failed IVF cycles. All respondents reported routinely discussing the risks of multiple gestations associated with standard embryo transfer practices, whereas only 34% reported routinely discussing single embryo transfer with all patients. Conclusion(s) Although the majority of clinicians responding to our survey reported following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, at least half would deviate from these guidelines in a number of different situations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19748089</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Ambulatory Care Facilities - legislation & jurisprudence ; Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data ; ASRM embryo transfer guidelines ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Counseling ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Embryo Transfer - ethics ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data ; Embryo transfer practices ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Guidelines as Topic ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Internal Medicine ; IVF insurance coverage ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data ; Registries ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - legislation & jurisprudence ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data ; single embryo transfer ; Societies, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence ; Societies, Medical - organization & administration ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; United States]]></subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2010-09, Vol.94 (4), p.1432-1436</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-d4d262cb1217932415c3a8fb4cc5668fa30a4c036f8cc83877c24714fea6b64d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-d4d262cb1217932415c3a8fb4cc5668fa30a4c036f8cc83877c24714fea6b64d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23199839$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19748089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Ginny L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levens, Eric D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Kenneth R., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odem, Randall R., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Prevalence of clinicians reporting following embryo transfer guidelines recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), prevalence among these clinicians to deviate from ASRM guidelines in commonly encountered clinical scenarios, and practice patterns related to single embryo transfer. Result(s) Six percent of respondents reported following their own, independent guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer after IVF. Of the 94% of respondents who reported routinely following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, 52% would deviate from these guidelines for patient request, 51% for cycles involving the transfer of frozen embryos, and 70% for patients with previously failed IVF cycles. All respondents reported routinely discussing the risks of multiple gestations associated with standard embryo transfer practices, whereas only 34% reported routinely discussing single embryo transfer with all patients. Conclusion(s) Although the majority of clinicians responding to our survey reported following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, at least half would deviate from these guidelines in a number of different situations.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>ASRM embryo transfer guidelines</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - ethics</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Embryo transfer practices</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>IVF insurance coverage</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Professional Practice - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>single embryo transfer</subject><subject>Societies, Medical - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Societies, Medical - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhSMEokvhLyBfEKcsYzuxHQ5IbVVapEpIbHu2vM6k6yUbL7azKHd-OA67ohInLp6Dv5l5em-KglBYUqDiw3bZYUhDTPldMoBmCXLZKPmsWNC6FmUtav68WADQugSm2FnxKsYtAAgq2cvijDayUqCaRfHrercOkycpmCHmoWQfjE3OYiRuIGmD5GFwCVuySiZh_EgMiWM44ER8R2zvBmcjCfjoZi0Z--nS5k_byluHaSKdD-Qixvm_Jd9wH3w75gUHJPdoN4Pv_eP0unjRmT7im1M9Lx4-X99f3ZZ3X2--XF3clbYGlcq2aplgdk0ZlQ1nFa0tN6pbV9bWQqjOcDCVBS46Za3iSkrLKkmrDo1Yi6rl58X749ys4seIMemdixb73gzox6hlzZtGChCZVEfSBh9jwE7vg9uZMGkKeo5Ab_VTBHqOQIPUOYLc-va0ZFzvsH1qPHmegXcnwERr-i47b138yzFOm0bxmbs8cpgtOTgMOmZLB4utC2iTbr37HzWf_hlyDM3033HCuPVjGLLlmurINOjVfDLzxUADrFKc8d-iQ8G5</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</creator><creator>Ryan, Ginny L., M.D</creator><creator>Levens, Eric D., M.D</creator><creator>Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H</creator><creator>Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E</creator><creator>Carson, Kenneth R., M.D</creator><creator>Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D</creator><creator>Odem, Randall R., M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</title><author>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D ; Ryan, Ginny L., M.D ; Levens, Eric D., M.D ; Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H ; Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E ; Carson, Kenneth R., M.D ; Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D ; Odem, Randall R., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-d4d262cb1217932415c3a8fb4cc5668fa30a4c036f8cc83877c24714fea6b64d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>ASRM embryo transfer guidelines</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - ethics</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Embryo transfer practices</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>IVF insurance coverage</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Professional Practice - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>single embryo transfer</topic><topic>Societies, Medical - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Societies, Medical - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Ginny L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levens, Eric D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Kenneth R., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odem, Randall R., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</au><au>Ryan, Ginny L., M.D</au><au>Levens, Eric D., M.D</au><au>Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H</au><au>Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E</au><au>Carson, Kenneth R., M.D</au><au>Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D</au><au>Odem, Randall R., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1432</spage><epage>1436</epage><pages>1432-1436</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Prevalence of clinicians reporting following embryo transfer guidelines recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), prevalence among these clinicians to deviate from ASRM guidelines in commonly encountered clinical scenarios, and practice patterns related to single embryo transfer. Result(s) Six percent of respondents reported following their own, independent guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer after IVF. Of the 94% of respondents who reported routinely following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, 52% would deviate from these guidelines for patient request, 51% for cycles involving the transfer of frozen embryos, and 70% for patients with previously failed IVF cycles. All respondents reported routinely discussing the risks of multiple gestations associated with standard embryo transfer practices, whereas only 34% reported routinely discussing single embryo transfer with all patients. Conclusion(s) Although the majority of clinicians responding to our survey reported following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, at least half would deviate from these guidelines in a number of different situations.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19748089</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2010-09, Vol.94 (4), p.1432-1436
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753997606
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Ambulatory Care Facilities - legislation & jurisprudence
Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data
ASRM embryo transfer guidelines
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Counseling
Cross-Sectional Studies
Embryo Transfer - ethics
Embryo Transfer - methods
Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data
Embryo transfer practices
Female
Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data
Guidelines as Topic
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Informed Consent
Internal Medicine
IVF insurance coverage
Medical sciences
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy
Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data
Registries
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - legislation & jurisprudence
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data
single embryo transfer
Societies, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence
Societies, Medical - organization & administration
Sterility. Assisted procreation
United States
title Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A04%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Embryo%20transfer%20practices%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20a%20survey%20of%20clinics%20registered%20with%20the%20Society%20for%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Jungheim,%20Emily%20S.,%20M.D&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1432&rft.epage=1436&rft.pages=1432-1436&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E753997606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=753997606&rft_id=info:pmid/19748089&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0015028209024832&rfr_iscdi=true