Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SA...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2010-09, Vol.94 (4), p.1432-1436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1436 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1432 |
container_title | Fertility and sterility |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Jungheim, Emily S., M.D Ryan, Ginny L., M.D Levens, Eric D., M.D Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E Carson, Kenneth R., M.D Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D Odem, Randall R., M.D |
description | Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Prevalence of clinicians reporting following embryo transfer guidelines recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), prevalence among these clinicians to deviate from ASRM guidelines in commonly encountered clinical scenarios, and practice patterns related to single embryo transfer. Result(s) Six percent of respondents reported following their own, independent guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer after IVF. Of the 94% of respondents who reported routinely following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, 52% would deviate from these guidelines for patient request, 51% for cycles involving the transfer of frozen embryos, and 70% for patients with previously failed IVF cycles. All respondents reported routinely discussing the risks of multiple gestations associated with standard embryo transfer practices, whereas only 34% reported routinely discussing single embryo transfer with all patients. Conclusion(s) Although the majority of clinicians responding to our survey reported following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, at least half would deviate from these guidelines in a number of different situations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753997606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0015028209024832</els_id><sourcerecordid>753997606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-d4d262cb1217932415c3a8fb4cc5668fa30a4c036f8cc83877c24714fea6b64d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhSMEokvhLyBfEKcsYzuxHQ5IbVVapEpIbHu2vM6k6yUbL7azKHd-OA67ohInLp6Dv5l5em-KglBYUqDiw3bZYUhDTPldMoBmCXLZKPmsWNC6FmUtav68WADQugSm2FnxKsYtAAgq2cvijDayUqCaRfHrercOkycpmCHmoWQfjE3OYiRuIGmD5GFwCVuySiZh_EgMiWM44ER8R2zvBmcjCfjoZi0Z--nS5k_byluHaSKdD-Qixvm_Jd9wH3w75gUHJPdoN4Pv_eP0unjRmT7im1M9Lx4-X99f3ZZ3X2--XF3clbYGlcq2aplgdk0ZlQ1nFa0tN6pbV9bWQqjOcDCVBS46Za3iSkrLKkmrDo1Yi6rl58X749ys4seIMemdixb73gzox6hlzZtGChCZVEfSBh9jwE7vg9uZMGkKeo5Ab_VTBHqOQIPUOYLc-va0ZFzvsH1qPHmegXcnwERr-i47b138yzFOm0bxmbs8cpgtOTgMOmZLB4utC2iTbr37HzWf_hlyDM3033HCuPVjGLLlmurINOjVfDLzxUADrFKc8d-iQ8G5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>753997606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D ; Ryan, Ginny L., M.D ; Levens, Eric D., M.D ; Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H ; Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E ; Carson, Kenneth R., M.D ; Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D ; Odem, Randall R., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D ; Ryan, Ginny L., M.D ; Levens, Eric D., M.D ; Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H ; Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E ; Carson, Kenneth R., M.D ; Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D ; Odem, Randall R., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Prevalence of clinicians reporting following embryo transfer guidelines recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), prevalence among these clinicians to deviate from ASRM guidelines in commonly encountered clinical scenarios, and practice patterns related to single embryo transfer. Result(s) Six percent of respondents reported following their own, independent guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer after IVF. Of the 94% of respondents who reported routinely following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, 52% would deviate from these guidelines for patient request, 51% for cycles involving the transfer of frozen embryos, and 70% for patients with previously failed IVF cycles. All respondents reported routinely discussing the risks of multiple gestations associated with standard embryo transfer practices, whereas only 34% reported routinely discussing single embryo transfer with all patients. Conclusion(s) Although the majority of clinicians responding to our survey reported following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, at least half would deviate from these guidelines in a number of different situations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19748089</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Ambulatory Care Facilities - legislation & jurisprudence ; Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data ; ASRM embryo transfer guidelines ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Counseling ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Embryo Transfer - ethics ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data ; Embryo transfer practices ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Guidelines as Topic ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Internal Medicine ; IVF insurance coverage ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data ; Registries ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - legislation & jurisprudence ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data ; single embryo transfer ; Societies, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence ; Societies, Medical - organization & administration ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; United States]]></subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2010-09, Vol.94 (4), p.1432-1436</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-d4d262cb1217932415c3a8fb4cc5668fa30a4c036f8cc83877c24714fea6b64d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-d4d262cb1217932415c3a8fb4cc5668fa30a4c036f8cc83877c24714fea6b64d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23199839$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19748089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Ginny L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levens, Eric D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Kenneth R., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odem, Randall R., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Prevalence of clinicians reporting following embryo transfer guidelines recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), prevalence among these clinicians to deviate from ASRM guidelines in commonly encountered clinical scenarios, and practice patterns related to single embryo transfer. Result(s) Six percent of respondents reported following their own, independent guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer after IVF. Of the 94% of respondents who reported routinely following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, 52% would deviate from these guidelines for patient request, 51% for cycles involving the transfer of frozen embryos, and 70% for patients with previously failed IVF cycles. All respondents reported routinely discussing the risks of multiple gestations associated with standard embryo transfer practices, whereas only 34% reported routinely discussing single embryo transfer with all patients. Conclusion(s) Although the majority of clinicians responding to our survey reported following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, at least half would deviate from these guidelines in a number of different situations.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>ASRM embryo transfer guidelines</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - ethics</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Embryo transfer practices</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>IVF insurance coverage</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>single embryo transfer</subject><subject>Societies, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Societies, Medical - organization & administration</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhSMEokvhLyBfEKcsYzuxHQ5IbVVapEpIbHu2vM6k6yUbL7azKHd-OA67ohInLp6Dv5l5em-KglBYUqDiw3bZYUhDTPldMoBmCXLZKPmsWNC6FmUtav68WADQugSm2FnxKsYtAAgq2cvijDayUqCaRfHrercOkycpmCHmoWQfjE3OYiRuIGmD5GFwCVuySiZh_EgMiWM44ER8R2zvBmcjCfjoZi0Z--nS5k_byluHaSKdD-Qixvm_Jd9wH3w75gUHJPdoN4Pv_eP0unjRmT7im1M9Lx4-X99f3ZZ3X2--XF3clbYGlcq2aplgdk0ZlQ1nFa0tN6pbV9bWQqjOcDCVBS46Za3iSkrLKkmrDo1Yi6rl58X749ys4seIMemdixb73gzox6hlzZtGChCZVEfSBh9jwE7vg9uZMGkKeo5Ab_VTBHqOQIPUOYLc-va0ZFzvsH1qPHmegXcnwERr-i47b138yzFOm0bxmbs8cpgtOTgMOmZLB4utC2iTbr37HzWf_hlyDM3033HCuPVjGLLlmurINOjVfDLzxUADrFKc8d-iQ8G5</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</creator><creator>Ryan, Ginny L., M.D</creator><creator>Levens, Eric D., M.D</creator><creator>Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H</creator><creator>Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E</creator><creator>Carson, Kenneth R., M.D</creator><creator>Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D</creator><creator>Odem, Randall R., M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</title><author>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D ; Ryan, Ginny L., M.D ; Levens, Eric D., M.D ; Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H ; Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E ; Carson, Kenneth R., M.D ; Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D ; Odem, Randall R., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-d4d262cb1217932415c3a8fb4cc5668fa30a4c036f8cc83877c24714fea6b64d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>ASRM embryo transfer guidelines</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - ethics</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Embryo transfer practices</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>IVF insurance coverage</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>single embryo transfer</topic><topic>Societies, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Societies, Medical - organization & administration</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Ginny L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levens, Eric D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Kenneth R., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odem, Randall R., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</au><au>Ryan, Ginny L., M.D</au><au>Levens, Eric D., M.D</au><au>Cunningham, Alexandra F., M.P.H</au><au>Macones, George A., M.D., M.S.C.E</au><au>Carson, Kenneth R., M.D</au><au>Beltsos, Angeline N., M.D</au><au>Odem, Randall R., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1432</spage><epage>1436</epage><pages>1432-1436</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To gain a better understanding of factors influencing clinicians' embryo transfer practices. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Web-based survey conducted in December 2008 of individuals practicing IVF in centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Prevalence of clinicians reporting following embryo transfer guidelines recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), prevalence among these clinicians to deviate from ASRM guidelines in commonly encountered clinical scenarios, and practice patterns related to single embryo transfer. Result(s) Six percent of respondents reported following their own, independent guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer after IVF. Of the 94% of respondents who reported routinely following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, 52% would deviate from these guidelines for patient request, 51% for cycles involving the transfer of frozen embryos, and 70% for patients with previously failed IVF cycles. All respondents reported routinely discussing the risks of multiple gestations associated with standard embryo transfer practices, whereas only 34% reported routinely discussing single embryo transfer with all patients. Conclusion(s) Although the majority of clinicians responding to our survey reported following ASRM embryo transfer guidelines, at least half would deviate from these guidelines in a number of different situations.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19748089</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2010-09, Vol.94 (4), p.1432-1436 |
issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753997606 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Ambulatory Care Facilities - legislation & jurisprudence Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data ASRM embryo transfer guidelines Biological and medical sciences Birth control Counseling Cross-Sectional Studies Embryo Transfer - ethics Embryo Transfer - methods Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data Embryo transfer practices Female Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data Guidelines as Topic Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Informed Consent Internal Medicine IVF insurance coverage Medical sciences Obstetrics and Gynecology Pregnancy Professional Practice - statistics & numerical data Registries Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - legislation & jurisprudence Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data single embryo transfer Societies, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence Societies, Medical - organization & administration Sterility. Assisted procreation United States |
title | Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A04%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Embryo%20transfer%20practices%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20a%20survey%20of%20clinics%20registered%20with%20the%20Society%20for%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Jungheim,%20Emily%20S.,%20M.D&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1432&rft.epage=1436&rft.pages=1432-1436&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E753997606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=753997606&rft_id=info:pmid/19748089&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0015028209024832&rfr_iscdi=true |