Two Approaches to Religion and Politics: Moral Cosmology and Subcultural Identity
We explore two competing approaches to internal religious divisions and their political consequences. The "moral cosmology" approach focuses on religious worldviews. It juxtaposes the religiously orthodox to modernists, arguing that the former are theologically communitarian in belief whil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal for the scientific study of religion 2009-12, Vol.48 (4), p.650-669 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 669 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 650 |
container_title | Journal for the scientific study of religion |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Starks, Brian Robinson, Robert V. |
description | We explore two competing approaches to internal religious divisions and their political consequences. The "moral cosmology" approach focuses on religious worldviews. It juxtaposes the religiously orthodox to modernists, arguing that the former are theologically communitarian in belief while the latterare individualistic. The religiously orthodox worldview (relative to modernists) is posited to lead to politically conservative stances on cultural issues of abortion, sexuality, and family but politically liberal stances on economic issues. In contrast, the "subcultural identity" approach focuses on identity rather than worldview. According to this approach, self-identified evangelicals and fundamentalists are expected to be more politically conservative on both cultural and economic issues when compared to mainline or liberal Protestants. Through analyses of the 1998 GSS, which allows operationalization of the two approaches and their extension to Catholic identities, we find that cosmology and identity are associated, but they have independent—and sometimes opposite—effects on Americans' political beliefs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01471.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753833413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40405661</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40405661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5251-5a507688129ab06b5f036a4f44bdc77de11943841952bc0c6d396da1bb04afc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhSMEEkPhJyBFSMAqwW_HLJCqEVNalUc7RSwtx3GKgyce7ESd-fd1JtUsWKB6cy2d7x5f35NlOQQlTOdDV0LCqoIKwEoEgCgBJByWuyfZ4ig8zRYAIFhUSJDn2YsYOwAAwYItsqubO5-fbrfBK_3bxHzw-bVx9tb6Pld9k__wzg5Wx4_5Vx-Uy5c-brzzt_uDuh5rPbphnJTzxvSDHfYvs2etctG8eqgn2c_V55vll-Ly-9n58vSy0BRRWFBFAWdVBZFQNWA1bQFmirSE1I3mvDEQCoIrAgVFtQaaNWneRsG6BkS1muGT7P3sm2b_O5o4yI2N2jineuPHKDnFFcYE4kS--y_JAKk4IuARIKaQI5HAN_-AnR9Dn74rEeJptZyhBFUzpIOPMZhWboPdqLCXEMgpO9nJKSI5RSSn7OQhO7lLrW8f_FXUyrVB9drGYz9CiAnKYOI-zdyddWb_aH95sV5fT9dk8Ho26OLgw9GAAAIoOzxQzLqNg9kddRX-SMYxp_LXtzMpEFrxKyrkCt8DF7zDTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227043762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two Approaches to Religion and Politics: Moral Cosmology and Subcultural Identity</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Starks, Brian ; Robinson, Robert V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Starks, Brian ; Robinson, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><description>We explore two competing approaches to internal religious divisions and their political consequences. The "moral cosmology" approach focuses on religious worldviews. It juxtaposes the religiously orthodox to modernists, arguing that the former are theologically communitarian in belief while the latterare individualistic. The religiously orthodox worldview (relative to modernists) is posited to lead to politically conservative stances on cultural issues of abortion, sexuality, and family but politically liberal stances on economic issues. In contrast, the "subcultural identity" approach focuses on identity rather than worldview. According to this approach, self-identified evangelicals and fundamentalists are expected to be more politically conservative on both cultural and economic issues when compared to mainline or liberal Protestants. Through analyses of the 1998 GSS, which allows operationalization of the two approaches and their extension to Catholic identities, we find that cosmology and identity are associated, but they have independent—and sometimes opposite—effects on Americans' political beliefs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5906</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01471.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSSRBT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Beliefs ; Catholicism ; Christianity ; Conservatism ; Contemporary period ; Cosmology ; Cultural identity ; Economic models ; Ethics ; General subjects ; History and sciences of religions ; Identity ; Liberalism ; Modernist art ; Orthodoxy ; Political attitudes ; Political identity ; Protestantism ; Protestants ; Religion & politics ; Religion and politics ; Religious ideas ; Religious identity ; Religious Orthodoxy ; Sexuality ; Sociological studies ; Theology ; U.S.A ; World view</subject><ispartof>Journal for the scientific study of religion, 2009-12, Vol.48 (4), p.650-669</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Society for the Scientific Study of Religion</rights><rights>2009 The Society for the Scientific Study of Religion</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5251-5a507688129ab06b5f036a4f44bdc77de11943841952bc0c6d396da1bb04afc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5251-5a507688129ab06b5f036a4f44bdc77de11943841952bc0c6d396da1bb04afc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40405661$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40405661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,33751,33752,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22269561$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Starks, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><title>Two Approaches to Religion and Politics: Moral Cosmology and Subcultural Identity</title><title>Journal for the scientific study of religion</title><description>We explore two competing approaches to internal religious divisions and their political consequences. The "moral cosmology" approach focuses on religious worldviews. It juxtaposes the religiously orthodox to modernists, arguing that the former are theologically communitarian in belief while the latterare individualistic. The religiously orthodox worldview (relative to modernists) is posited to lead to politically conservative stances on cultural issues of abortion, sexuality, and family but politically liberal stances on economic issues. In contrast, the "subcultural identity" approach focuses on identity rather than worldview. According to this approach, self-identified evangelicals and fundamentalists are expected to be more politically conservative on both cultural and economic issues when compared to mainline or liberal Protestants. Through analyses of the 1998 GSS, which allows operationalization of the two approaches and their extension to Catholic identities, we find that cosmology and identity are associated, but they have independent—and sometimes opposite—effects on Americans' political beliefs.</description><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Catholicism</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Contemporary period</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>General subjects</subject><subject>History and sciences of religions</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Modernist art</subject><subject>Orthodoxy</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political identity</subject><subject>Protestantism</subject><subject>Protestants</subject><subject>Religion & politics</subject><subject>Religion and politics</subject><subject>Religious ideas</subject><subject>Religious identity</subject><subject>Religious Orthodoxy</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Sociological studies</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>World view</subject><issn>0021-8294</issn><issn>1468-5906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhSMEEkPhJyBFSMAqwW_HLJCqEVNalUc7RSwtx3GKgyce7ESd-fd1JtUsWKB6cy2d7x5f35NlOQQlTOdDV0LCqoIKwEoEgCgBJByWuyfZ4ig8zRYAIFhUSJDn2YsYOwAAwYItsqubO5-fbrfBK_3bxHzw-bVx9tb6Pld9k__wzg5Wx4_5Vx-Uy5c-brzzt_uDuh5rPbphnJTzxvSDHfYvs2etctG8eqgn2c_V55vll-Ly-9n58vSy0BRRWFBFAWdVBZFQNWA1bQFmirSE1I3mvDEQCoIrAgVFtQaaNWneRsG6BkS1muGT7P3sm2b_O5o4yI2N2jineuPHKDnFFcYE4kS--y_JAKk4IuARIKaQI5HAN_-AnR9Dn74rEeJptZyhBFUzpIOPMZhWboPdqLCXEMgpO9nJKSI5RSSn7OQhO7lLrW8f_FXUyrVB9drGYz9CiAnKYOI-zdyddWb_aH95sV5fT9dk8Ho26OLgw9GAAAIoOzxQzLqNg9kddRX-SMYxp_LXtzMpEFrxKyrkCt8DF7zDTg</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>Starks, Brian</creator><creator>Robinson, Robert V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Two Approaches to Religion and Politics: Moral Cosmology and Subcultural Identity</title><author>Starks, Brian ; Robinson, Robert V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5251-5a507688129ab06b5f036a4f44bdc77de11943841952bc0c6d396da1bb04afc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Catholicism</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Contemporary period</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>General subjects</topic><topic>History and sciences of religions</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Modernist art</topic><topic>Orthodoxy</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political identity</topic><topic>Protestantism</topic><topic>Protestants</topic><topic>Religion & politics</topic><topic>Religion and politics</topic><topic>Religious ideas</topic><topic>Religious identity</topic><topic>Religious Orthodoxy</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Sociological studies</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>World view</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Starks, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal for the scientific study of religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Starks, Brian</au><au>Robinson, Robert V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two Approaches to Religion and Politics: Moral Cosmology and Subcultural Identity</atitle><jtitle>Journal for the scientific study of religion</jtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>650</spage><epage>669</epage><pages>650-669</pages><issn>0021-8294</issn><eissn>1468-5906</eissn><coden>JSSRBT</coden><abstract>We explore two competing approaches to internal religious divisions and their political consequences. The "moral cosmology" approach focuses on religious worldviews. It juxtaposes the religiously orthodox to modernists, arguing that the former are theologically communitarian in belief while the latterare individualistic. The religiously orthodox worldview (relative to modernists) is posited to lead to politically conservative stances on cultural issues of abortion, sexuality, and family but politically liberal stances on economic issues. In contrast, the "subcultural identity" approach focuses on identity rather than worldview. According to this approach, self-identified evangelicals and fundamentalists are expected to be more politically conservative on both cultural and economic issues when compared to mainline or liberal Protestants. Through analyses of the 1998 GSS, which allows operationalization of the two approaches and their extension to Catholic identities, we find that cosmology and identity are associated, but they have independent—and sometimes opposite—effects on Americans' political beliefs.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01471.x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8294 |
ispartof | Journal for the scientific study of religion, 2009-12, Vol.48 (4), p.650-669 |
issn | 0021-8294 1468-5906 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753833413 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Beliefs Catholicism Christianity Conservatism Contemporary period Cosmology Cultural identity Economic models Ethics General subjects History and sciences of religions Identity Liberalism Modernist art Orthodoxy Political attitudes Political identity Protestantism Protestants Religion & politics Religion and politics Religious ideas Religious identity Religious Orthodoxy Sexuality Sociological studies Theology U.S.A World view |
title | Two Approaches to Religion and Politics: Moral Cosmology and Subcultural Identity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A58%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20Approaches%20to%20Religion%20and%20Politics:%20Moral%20Cosmology%20and%20Subcultural%20Identity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20the%20scientific%20study%20of%20religion&rft.au=Starks,%20Brian&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=650&rft.epage=669&rft.pages=650-669&rft.issn=0021-8294&rft.eissn=1468-5906&rft.coden=JSSRBT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01471.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40405661%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227043762&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40405661&rfr_iscdi=true |