The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement

Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost sur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British educational research journal 2010-08, Vol.36 (4), p.611-626
Hauptverfasser: Panayides, Panayiotis, Robinson, Colin, Tymms, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 626
container_issue 4
container_start_page 611
container_title British educational research journal
container_volume 36
creator Panayides, Panayiotis
Robinson, Colin
Tymms, Peter
description Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost surreptitiously. Elsewhere Rasch has assumed dominance. The purpose of this article is to discuss the major criticisms of the Rasch model, which led to its rejection by some, and to give responses to these criticisms whilst encouraging social scientists to appreciate its strengths. The original breakthrough by Georg Rasch in 1960 has been developed and extended to address every reasonable observational situation in the social sciences.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01411920903018182
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753826086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ891047</ericid><jstor_id>27823635</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27823635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4735-8ddbdfec1b4fe5b395a7cc74cd5c3fe841e62c10a9110cdf65857eebdef93fc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2P0zAQQC0EEqXwA5BAsrhwCnjib27sqhRWKxDLIo6W40xoSpoUOwH673EU1AMcOPnw3hvbQ8hjYC-AGfaSgQCwJbOMMzBgyjtkBULZgkswd8lq5kUW1H3yIKU9Y0wZZVdke7tD6lPClA7YjzTij6Gbxnbo6bjzI935RI8zr-mm_9r5vqbV6RW98Sns6AF9miLO4UNyr_Fdwkd_zjX5_GZze_m2uP6wfXf5-roIQnNZmLqu6gYDVKJBWXErvQ5Bi1DLwBs0AlCVAZi3ACzUjZJGasSqxsbyJgBfk-fL3GMcvk-YRndoU8AuvwyHKTktuSkVMyqbz_4y98MU-_w4p4UQUpSSZQkWKcQhpYiNO8b24OPJAXPzYt0_i83Nk6XB2Iazv7kyFlj-5JqIBf9sOzz9f5672NxcyZw9XbJ9God4zkqdb1R85sXC2zTirzP38ZtTmmvpvrzfOvHpowWutdvy32vem5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744454250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Panayides, Panayiotis ; Robinson, Colin ; Tymms, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Panayides, Panayiotis ; Robinson, Colin ; Tymms, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost surreptitiously. Elsewhere Rasch has assumed dominance. The purpose of this article is to discuss the major criticisms of the Rasch model, which led to its rejection by some, and to give responses to these criticisms whilst encouraging social scientists to appreciate its strengths. The original breakthrough by Georg Rasch in 1960 has been developed and extended to address every reasonable observational situation in the social sciences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-1926</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01411920903018182</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BERJEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Criticism ; Curricula ; Data ; Data models ; Education ; Educational Assessment ; Educational research ; England ; Factor analysis ; Flowers ; Foreign Countries ; Item Response Theory ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Methodology ; Parametric models ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Rasch, Georg ; Research methods ; Social Science Research ; Social sciences ; Systems Approach ; Test Construction ; Test theory ; Theory ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>British educational research journal, 2010-08, Vol.36 (4), p.611-626</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 British Educational Research Association</rights><rights>2010 British Educational Research Association</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4735-8ddbdfec1b4fe5b395a7cc74cd5c3fe841e62c10a9110cdf65857eebdef93fc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4735-8ddbdfec1b4fe5b395a7cc74cd5c3fe841e62c10a9110cdf65857eebdef93fc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27823635$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27823635$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ891047$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panayides, Panayiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymms, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement</title><title>British educational research journal</title><description>Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost surreptitiously. Elsewhere Rasch has assumed dominance. The purpose of this article is to discuss the major criticisms of the Rasch model, which led to its rejection by some, and to give responses to these criticisms whilst encouraging social scientists to appreciate its strengths. The original breakthrough by Georg Rasch in 1960 has been developed and extended to address every reasonable observational situation in the social sciences.</description><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Data models</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Rasch, Georg</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Systems Approach</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test theory</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0141-1926</issn><issn>1469-3518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2P0zAQQC0EEqXwA5BAsrhwCnjib27sqhRWKxDLIo6W40xoSpoUOwH673EU1AMcOPnw3hvbQ8hjYC-AGfaSgQCwJbOMMzBgyjtkBULZgkswd8lq5kUW1H3yIKU9Y0wZZVdke7tD6lPClA7YjzTij6Gbxnbo6bjzI935RI8zr-mm_9r5vqbV6RW98Sns6AF9miLO4UNyr_Fdwkd_zjX5_GZze_m2uP6wfXf5-roIQnNZmLqu6gYDVKJBWXErvQ5Bi1DLwBs0AlCVAZi3ACzUjZJGasSqxsbyJgBfk-fL3GMcvk-YRndoU8AuvwyHKTktuSkVMyqbz_4y98MU-_w4p4UQUpSSZQkWKcQhpYiNO8b24OPJAXPzYt0_i83Nk6XB2Iazv7kyFlj-5JqIBf9sOzz9f5672NxcyZw9XbJ9God4zkqdb1R85sXC2zTirzP38ZtTmmvpvrzfOvHpowWutdvy32vem5k</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Panayides, Panayiotis</creator><creator>Robinson, Colin</creator><creator>Tymms, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Routledge</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement</title><author>Panayides, Panayiotis ; Robinson, Colin ; Tymms, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4735-8ddbdfec1b4fe5b395a7cc74cd5c3fe841e62c10a9110cdf65857eebdef93fc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Data models</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Rasch, Georg</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Systems Approach</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test theory</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panayides, Panayiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymms, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>British educational research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panayides, Panayiotis</au><au>Robinson, Colin</au><au>Tymms, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ891047</ericid><atitle>The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement</atitle><jtitle>British educational research journal</jtitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>611</spage><epage>626</epage><pages>611-626</pages><issn>0141-1926</issn><eissn>1469-3518</eissn><coden>BERJEL</coden><abstract>Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost surreptitiously. Elsewhere Rasch has assumed dominance. The purpose of this article is to discuss the major criticisms of the Rasch model, which led to its rejection by some, and to give responses to these criticisms whilst encouraging social scientists to appreciate its strengths. The original breakthrough by Georg Rasch in 1960 has been developed and extended to address every reasonable observational situation in the social sciences.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/01411920903018182</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-1926
ispartof British educational research journal, 2010-08, Vol.36 (4), p.611-626
issn 0141-1926
1469-3518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753826086
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Criticism
Curricula
Data
Data models
Education
Educational Assessment
Educational research
England
Factor analysis
Flowers
Foreign Countries
Item Response Theory
Mathematical models
Measurement
Methodology
Parametric models
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Rasch, Georg
Research methods
Social Science Research
Social sciences
Systems Approach
Test Construction
Test theory
Theory
United Kingdom
title The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A09%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20assessment%20revolution%20that%20has%20passed%20England%20by:%20Rasch%20measurement&rft.jtitle=British%20educational%20research%20journal&rft.au=Panayides,%20Panayiotis&rft.date=2010-08&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=611&rft.epage=626&rft.pages=611-626&rft.issn=0141-1926&rft.eissn=1469-3518&rft.coden=BERJEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01411920903018182&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27823635%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744454250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ891047&rft_jstor_id=27823635&rfr_iscdi=true