The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement
Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost sur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British educational research journal 2010-08, Vol.36 (4), p.611-626 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 626 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 611 |
container_title | British educational research journal |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Panayides, Panayiotis Robinson, Colin Tymms, Peter |
description | Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost surreptitiously. Elsewhere Rasch has assumed dominance. The purpose of this article is to discuss the major criticisms of the Rasch model, which led to its rejection by some, and to give responses to these criticisms whilst encouraging social scientists to appreciate its strengths. The original breakthrough by Georg Rasch in 1960 has been developed and extended to address every reasonable observational situation in the social sciences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01411920903018182 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753826086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ891047</ericid><jstor_id>27823635</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27823635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4735-8ddbdfec1b4fe5b395a7cc74cd5c3fe841e62c10a9110cdf65857eebdef93fc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2P0zAQQC0EEqXwA5BAsrhwCnjib27sqhRWKxDLIo6W40xoSpoUOwH673EU1AMcOPnw3hvbQ8hjYC-AGfaSgQCwJbOMMzBgyjtkBULZgkswd8lq5kUW1H3yIKU9Y0wZZVdke7tD6lPClA7YjzTij6Gbxnbo6bjzI935RI8zr-mm_9r5vqbV6RW98Sns6AF9miLO4UNyr_Fdwkd_zjX5_GZze_m2uP6wfXf5-roIQnNZmLqu6gYDVKJBWXErvQ5Bi1DLwBs0AlCVAZi3ACzUjZJGasSqxsbyJgBfk-fL3GMcvk-YRndoU8AuvwyHKTktuSkVMyqbz_4y98MU-_w4p4UQUpSSZQkWKcQhpYiNO8b24OPJAXPzYt0_i83Nk6XB2Iazv7kyFlj-5JqIBf9sOzz9f5672NxcyZw9XbJ9God4zkqdb1R85sXC2zTirzP38ZtTmmvpvrzfOvHpowWutdvy32vem5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744454250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Panayides, Panayiotis ; Robinson, Colin ; Tymms, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Panayides, Panayiotis ; Robinson, Colin ; Tymms, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost surreptitiously. Elsewhere Rasch has assumed dominance. The purpose of this article is to discuss the major criticisms of the Rasch model, which led to its rejection by some, and to give responses to these criticisms whilst encouraging social scientists to appreciate its strengths. The original breakthrough by Georg Rasch in 1960 has been developed and extended to address every reasonable observational situation in the social sciences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-1926</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01411920903018182</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BERJEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Criticism ; Curricula ; Data ; Data models ; Education ; Educational Assessment ; Educational research ; England ; Factor analysis ; Flowers ; Foreign Countries ; Item Response Theory ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Methodology ; Parametric models ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Rasch, Georg ; Research methods ; Social Science Research ; Social sciences ; Systems Approach ; Test Construction ; Test theory ; Theory ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>British educational research journal, 2010-08, Vol.36 (4), p.611-626</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 British Educational Research Association</rights><rights>2010 British Educational Research Association</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4735-8ddbdfec1b4fe5b395a7cc74cd5c3fe841e62c10a9110cdf65857eebdef93fc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4735-8ddbdfec1b4fe5b395a7cc74cd5c3fe841e62c10a9110cdf65857eebdef93fc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27823635$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27823635$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ891047$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panayides, Panayiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymms, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement</title><title>British educational research journal</title><description>Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost surreptitiously. Elsewhere Rasch has assumed dominance. The purpose of this article is to discuss the major criticisms of the Rasch model, which led to its rejection by some, and to give responses to these criticisms whilst encouraging social scientists to appreciate its strengths. The original breakthrough by Georg Rasch in 1960 has been developed and extended to address every reasonable observational situation in the social sciences.</description><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Data models</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Rasch, Georg</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Systems Approach</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test theory</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0141-1926</issn><issn>1469-3518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2P0zAQQC0EEqXwA5BAsrhwCnjib27sqhRWKxDLIo6W40xoSpoUOwH673EU1AMcOPnw3hvbQ8hjYC-AGfaSgQCwJbOMMzBgyjtkBULZgkswd8lq5kUW1H3yIKU9Y0wZZVdke7tD6lPClA7YjzTij6Gbxnbo6bjzI935RI8zr-mm_9r5vqbV6RW98Sns6AF9miLO4UNyr_Fdwkd_zjX5_GZze_m2uP6wfXf5-roIQnNZmLqu6gYDVKJBWXErvQ5Bi1DLwBs0AlCVAZi3ACzUjZJGasSqxsbyJgBfk-fL3GMcvk-YRndoU8AuvwyHKTktuSkVMyqbz_4y98MU-_w4p4UQUpSSZQkWKcQhpYiNO8b24OPJAXPzYt0_i83Nk6XB2Iazv7kyFlj-5JqIBf9sOzz9f5672NxcyZw9XbJ9God4zkqdb1R85sXC2zTirzP38ZtTmmvpvrzfOvHpowWutdvy32vem5k</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Panayides, Panayiotis</creator><creator>Robinson, Colin</creator><creator>Tymms, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Routledge</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement</title><author>Panayides, Panayiotis ; Robinson, Colin ; Tymms, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4735-8ddbdfec1b4fe5b395a7cc74cd5c3fe841e62c10a9110cdf65857eebdef93fc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Data models</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Rasch, Georg</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Systems Approach</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test theory</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panayides, Panayiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymms, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>British educational research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panayides, Panayiotis</au><au>Robinson, Colin</au><au>Tymms, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ891047</ericid><atitle>The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement</atitle><jtitle>British educational research journal</jtitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>611</spage><epage>626</epage><pages>611-626</pages><issn>0141-1926</issn><eissn>1469-3518</eissn><coden>BERJEL</coden><abstract>Assessment has been dominated by Classical Test Theory for the last half century although the radically different approach known as Rasch measurement briefly blossomed in England during the 1960s and 1970s. Its open development was stopped dead in the 1980s, whilst some work has continued almost surreptitiously. Elsewhere Rasch has assumed dominance. The purpose of this article is to discuss the major criticisms of the Rasch model, which led to its rejection by some, and to give responses to these criticisms whilst encouraging social scientists to appreciate its strengths. The original breakthrough by Georg Rasch in 1960 has been developed and extended to address every reasonable observational situation in the social sciences.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/01411920903018182</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-1926 |
ispartof | British educational research journal, 2010-08, Vol.36 (4), p.611-626 |
issn | 0141-1926 1469-3518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753826086 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Criticism Curricula Data Data models Education Educational Assessment Educational research England Factor analysis Flowers Foreign Countries Item Response Theory Mathematical models Measurement Methodology Parametric models Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Rasch, Georg Research methods Social Science Research Social sciences Systems Approach Test Construction Test theory Theory United Kingdom |
title | The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A09%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20assessment%20revolution%20that%20has%20passed%20England%20by:%20Rasch%20measurement&rft.jtitle=British%20educational%20research%20journal&rft.au=Panayides,%20Panayiotis&rft.date=2010-08&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=611&rft.epage=626&rft.pages=611-626&rft.issn=0141-1926&rft.eissn=1469-3518&rft.coden=BERJEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01411920903018182&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27823635%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744454250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ891047&rft_jstor_id=27823635&rfr_iscdi=true |