Machining tests to identify kinematic errors on five-axis machine tools

The machining of a cone frustum as specified in National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 979 is widely accepted as a final performance test for five-axis machining centers. Although it gives a good demonstration of the machine’s overall machining performance, it is generally difficult to separately identif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Precision engineering 2010-07, Vol.34 (3), p.387-398
Hauptverfasser: Ibaraki, Soichi, Sawada, Masahiro, Matsubara, Atsushi, Matsushita, Tetsuya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 398
container_issue 3
container_start_page 387
container_title Precision engineering
container_volume 34
creator Ibaraki, Soichi
Sawada, Masahiro
Matsubara, Atsushi
Matsushita, Tetsuya
description The machining of a cone frustum as specified in National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 979 is widely accepted as a final performance test for five-axis machining centers. Although it gives a good demonstration of the machine’s overall machining performance, it is generally difficult to separately identify each error source in the machine from the measured error profile of the finished workpiece. This paper proposes a set of machining tests for a five-axis machine tool to identify its kinematic errors, one of its most fundamental error sources. In each machining pattern, a simple straight side cutting using a straight end mill is performed. The relationship between geometric errors of the finished workpiece and the machine’s kinematic errors is formulated based on the kinematic model of a five-axis machine. The identification of kinematic errors from geometric errors of finished workpieces is experimentally demonstrated on a commercial five-axis machining center, and the estimates are compared to those estimated based on ball bar measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.09.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753754180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014163590900169X</els_id><sourcerecordid>753754180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-67702513990faa4ea9c6ad05d75146ec32bef29ac6535ff3595a5ef48f0734833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LAzEQxYMoWKvfYRHE0675s9nsepOqVah40XOI2UlN3SY12Rb77c3aIh6Fgbn83nszD6FzgguCSXW1KFYBtI3WO3DzgmLcFMNgcYBGpBYsp0zQQzTCpCR5xXhzjE5iXOBE1LgcoemT0u_WWTfPeoh9zHqf2RZcb802-7AOlqq3OoMQfIiZd5mxG8jVl43Z8kcJSeG7eIqOjOoinO33GL3e371MHvLZ8_RxcjPLdVnTPq-EwJQT1jTYKFWCanSlWsxbwUlZgWb0DQxtlK4448ake7niYMraYMHKmrExutz5roL_XKeL5dJGDV2nHPh1lIIzwUtS40Re70gdfIwBjFwFu1RhKwmWQ3lyIf-WJ4fy5DApaowu9jEqatWZoFwCfx0orTGvyRByu-Mg_byxEGTUFpyG1ibrXrbe_ifuG1qWjHY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>753754180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machining tests to identify kinematic errors on five-axis machine tools</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ibaraki, Soichi ; Sawada, Masahiro ; Matsubara, Atsushi ; Matsushita, Tetsuya</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibaraki, Soichi ; Sawada, Masahiro ; Matsubara, Atsushi ; Matsushita, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><description>The machining of a cone frustum as specified in National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 979 is widely accepted as a final performance test for five-axis machining centers. Although it gives a good demonstration of the machine’s overall machining performance, it is generally difficult to separately identify each error source in the machine from the measured error profile of the finished workpiece. This paper proposes a set of machining tests for a five-axis machine tool to identify its kinematic errors, one of its most fundamental error sources. In each machining pattern, a simple straight side cutting using a straight end mill is performed. The relationship between geometric errors of the finished workpiece and the machine’s kinematic errors is formulated based on the kinematic model of a five-axis machine. The identification of kinematic errors from geometric errors of finished workpieces is experimentally demonstrated on a commercial five-axis machining center, and the estimates are compared to those estimated based on ball bar measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-6359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.09.007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PREGDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aircraft components ; Applied sciences ; Cone frustum ; Cutting ; Error analysis ; Errors ; Exact sciences and technology ; Five-axis machine tools ; Kinematic errors ; Kinematics ; Machine tools ; Machining ; Machining test ; Measurement ; Mechanical engineering. Machine design ; Precision engineering, watch making ; Workpieces</subject><ispartof>Precision engineering, 2010-07, Vol.34 (3), p.387-398</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-67702513990faa4ea9c6ad05d75146ec32bef29ac6535ff3595a5ef48f0734833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-67702513990faa4ea9c6ad05d75146ec32bef29ac6535ff3595a5ef48f0734833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.09.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22805810$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibaraki, Soichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsubara, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsushita, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><title>Machining tests to identify kinematic errors on five-axis machine tools</title><title>Precision engineering</title><description>The machining of a cone frustum as specified in National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 979 is widely accepted as a final performance test for five-axis machining centers. Although it gives a good demonstration of the machine’s overall machining performance, it is generally difficult to separately identify each error source in the machine from the measured error profile of the finished workpiece. This paper proposes a set of machining tests for a five-axis machine tool to identify its kinematic errors, one of its most fundamental error sources. In each machining pattern, a simple straight side cutting using a straight end mill is performed. The relationship between geometric errors of the finished workpiece and the machine’s kinematic errors is formulated based on the kinematic model of a five-axis machine. The identification of kinematic errors from geometric errors of finished workpieces is experimentally demonstrated on a commercial five-axis machining center, and the estimates are compared to those estimated based on ball bar measurements.</description><subject>Aircraft components</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Cone frustum</subject><subject>Cutting</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Five-axis machine tools</subject><subject>Kinematic errors</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Machine tools</subject><subject>Machining</subject><subject>Machining test</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</subject><subject>Precision engineering, watch making</subject><subject>Workpieces</subject><issn>0141-6359</issn><issn>1873-2372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9LAzEQxYMoWKvfYRHE0675s9nsepOqVah40XOI2UlN3SY12Rb77c3aIh6Fgbn83nszD6FzgguCSXW1KFYBtI3WO3DzgmLcFMNgcYBGpBYsp0zQQzTCpCR5xXhzjE5iXOBE1LgcoemT0u_WWTfPeoh9zHqf2RZcb802-7AOlqq3OoMQfIiZd5mxG8jVl43Z8kcJSeG7eIqOjOoinO33GL3e371MHvLZ8_RxcjPLdVnTPq-EwJQT1jTYKFWCanSlWsxbwUlZgWb0DQxtlK4448ake7niYMraYMHKmrExutz5roL_XKeL5dJGDV2nHPh1lIIzwUtS40Re70gdfIwBjFwFu1RhKwmWQ3lyIf-WJ4fy5DApaowu9jEqatWZoFwCfx0orTGvyRByu-Mg_byxEGTUFpyG1ibrXrbe_ifuG1qWjHY</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Ibaraki, Soichi</creator><creator>Sawada, Masahiro</creator><creator>Matsubara, Atsushi</creator><creator>Matsushita, Tetsuya</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Machining tests to identify kinematic errors on five-axis machine tools</title><author>Ibaraki, Soichi ; Sawada, Masahiro ; Matsubara, Atsushi ; Matsushita, Tetsuya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-67702513990faa4ea9c6ad05d75146ec32bef29ac6535ff3595a5ef48f0734833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aircraft components</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Cone frustum</topic><topic>Cutting</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Five-axis machine tools</topic><topic>Kinematic errors</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Machine tools</topic><topic>Machining</topic><topic>Machining test</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</topic><topic>Precision engineering, watch making</topic><topic>Workpieces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibaraki, Soichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsubara, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsushita, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Precision engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibaraki, Soichi</au><au>Sawada, Masahiro</au><au>Matsubara, Atsushi</au><au>Matsushita, Tetsuya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machining tests to identify kinematic errors on five-axis machine tools</atitle><jtitle>Precision engineering</jtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>387-398</pages><issn>0141-6359</issn><eissn>1873-2372</eissn><coden>PREGDL</coden><abstract>The machining of a cone frustum as specified in National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 979 is widely accepted as a final performance test for five-axis machining centers. Although it gives a good demonstration of the machine’s overall machining performance, it is generally difficult to separately identify each error source in the machine from the measured error profile of the finished workpiece. This paper proposes a set of machining tests for a five-axis machine tool to identify its kinematic errors, one of its most fundamental error sources. In each machining pattern, a simple straight side cutting using a straight end mill is performed. The relationship between geometric errors of the finished workpiece and the machine’s kinematic errors is formulated based on the kinematic model of a five-axis machine. The identification of kinematic errors from geometric errors of finished workpieces is experimentally demonstrated on a commercial five-axis machining center, and the estimates are compared to those estimated based on ball bar measurements.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.09.007</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-6359
ispartof Precision engineering, 2010-07, Vol.34 (3), p.387-398
issn 0141-6359
1873-2372
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_753754180
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aircraft components
Applied sciences
Cone frustum
Cutting
Error analysis
Errors
Exact sciences and technology
Five-axis machine tools
Kinematic errors
Kinematics
Machine tools
Machining
Machining test
Measurement
Mechanical engineering. Machine design
Precision engineering, watch making
Workpieces
title Machining tests to identify kinematic errors on five-axis machine tools
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machining%20tests%20to%20identify%20kinematic%20errors%20on%20five-axis%20machine%20tools&rft.jtitle=Precision%20engineering&rft.au=Ibaraki,%20Soichi&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=387-398&rft.issn=0141-6359&rft.eissn=1873-2372&rft.coden=PREGDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E753754180%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=753754180&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S014163590900169X&rfr_iscdi=true