Pacemaker and Patient Response to the "Point of Sale" Terminal as an Actual and Simulated Electromagnetic Interference Source
In response to two instances of pacemaker patient complaints of symptomatic episodes in the presence of a “point‐of‐sale” terminal, comprehensive tests were performed for possible electromagnetic interference effects. Power line frequency and radar transmitter tests in the laboratory indicated that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 1980-07, Vol.3 (4), p.461-469 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 469 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 461 |
container_title | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | PANNIZZO, FRANK FURMAN, SEYMOUR |
description | In response to two instances of pacemaker patient complaints of symptomatic episodes in the presence of a “point‐of‐sale” terminal, comprehensive tests were performed for possible electromagnetic interference effects. Power line frequency and radar transmitter tests in the laboratory indicated that no significant problems exist for recently manufactured pacemakers in the everyday environment. Laboratory and clinical tests with 271 patients and 54 pacer models demonstrated no hazard from “point‐of‐sale” terminals. Patients showed a generally benign attitude toward potential interference and very low occurrence of random intermittent pacer malfunction or effects from myopotentials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1980.tb05256.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75366413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75366413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-653a6ac4c2661f5f83720aaefdd82cbd0a0d25650134624471b6fa7c4a3d7e503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEuP0zAURi0EGsrAT0CyumCXYMePpGxQVZVhNA8iWsTSunVuIJ08OrYjOov57-OqVfd4Y9nfd4_lQ8iUs5TH9XmbciVZUnA1S_msYGnYMJUpne5fkck5ek0mjMs8KUQxe0veeb9ljGkm1QW50Fyz2JuQ5xIsdvCAjkJf0RJCg32gP9Hvht4jDQMNf5FOy6GJ10NNV9DilK7RdU0PLQUf5-jchvFwiIRV040tBKzoskUb3NDBnx5DY-l1H9DV6LC3SFfD6Cy-J29qaD1-OO2X5Ne35XrxPbn9cXW9mN8mVrKCJ1oJ0GClzbTmtaoLkWcMAOuqKjK7qRiwKn5fMS6kzqTM-UbXkFsJospRMXFJPh25Ozc8juiD6RpvsW2hx2H0JldCa8lFLH45Fq0bvHdYm51rOnBPhjNzcG-25iDYHASbg3tzcm_2cfjj6ZVx02F1Hj3JjvnXY_6vafHpP8imnC-WUvNISI6ExgfcnwngHozORa7M7_src3NXyvXdvTA34gUPyaP2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75366413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pacemaker and Patient Response to the "Point of Sale" Terminal as an Actual and Simulated Electromagnetic Interference Source</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>PANNIZZO, FRANK ; FURMAN, SEYMOUR</creator><creatorcontrib>PANNIZZO, FRANK ; FURMAN, SEYMOUR</creatorcontrib><description>In response to two instances of pacemaker patient complaints of symptomatic episodes in the presence of a “point‐of‐sale” terminal, comprehensive tests were performed for possible electromagnetic interference effects. Power line frequency and radar transmitter tests in the laboratory indicated that no significant problems exist for recently manufactured pacemakers in the everyday environment. Laboratory and clinical tests with 271 patients and 54 pacer models demonstrated no hazard from “point‐of‐sale” terminals. Patients showed a generally benign attitude toward potential interference and very low occurrence of random intermittent pacer malfunction or effects from myopotentials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1980.tb05256.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6160540</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>"point of sale" terminal ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Attitude ; Child ; Electromagnetic Fields ; electromagnetic interference ; Electromagnetic Phenomena ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; subjective response</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1980-07, Vol.3 (4), p.461-469</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-653a6ac4c2661f5f83720aaefdd82cbd0a0d25650134624471b6fa7c4a3d7e503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-653a6ac4c2661f5f83720aaefdd82cbd0a0d25650134624471b6fa7c4a3d7e503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1980.tb05256.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1980.tb05256.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6160540$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PANNIZZO, FRANK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FURMAN, SEYMOUR</creatorcontrib><title>Pacemaker and Patient Response to the "Point of Sale" Terminal as an Actual and Simulated Electromagnetic Interference Source</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>In response to two instances of pacemaker patient complaints of symptomatic episodes in the presence of a “point‐of‐sale” terminal, comprehensive tests were performed for possible electromagnetic interference effects. Power line frequency and radar transmitter tests in the laboratory indicated that no significant problems exist for recently manufactured pacemakers in the everyday environment. Laboratory and clinical tests with 271 patients and 54 pacer models demonstrated no hazard from “point‐of‐sale” terminals. Patients showed a generally benign attitude toward potential interference and very low occurrence of random intermittent pacer malfunction or effects from myopotentials.</description><subject>"point of sale" terminal</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>electromagnetic interference</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Phenomena</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>subjective response</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEuP0zAURi0EGsrAT0CyumCXYMePpGxQVZVhNA8iWsTSunVuIJ08OrYjOov57-OqVfd4Y9nfd4_lQ8iUs5TH9XmbciVZUnA1S_msYGnYMJUpne5fkck5ek0mjMs8KUQxe0veeb9ljGkm1QW50Fyz2JuQ5xIsdvCAjkJf0RJCg32gP9Hvht4jDQMNf5FOy6GJ10NNV9DilK7RdU0PLQUf5-jchvFwiIRV040tBKzoskUb3NDBnx5DY-l1H9DV6LC3SFfD6Cy-J29qaD1-OO2X5Ne35XrxPbn9cXW9mN8mVrKCJ1oJ0GClzbTmtaoLkWcMAOuqKjK7qRiwKn5fMS6kzqTM-UbXkFsJospRMXFJPh25Ozc8juiD6RpvsW2hx2H0JldCa8lFLH45Fq0bvHdYm51rOnBPhjNzcG-25iDYHASbg3tzcm_2cfjj6ZVx02F1Hj3JjvnXY_6vafHpP8imnC-WUvNISI6ExgfcnwngHozORa7M7_src3NXyvXdvTA34gUPyaP2</recordid><startdate>198007</startdate><enddate>198007</enddate><creator>PANNIZZO, FRANK</creator><creator>FURMAN, SEYMOUR</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198007</creationdate><title>Pacemaker and Patient Response to the "Point of Sale" Terminal as an Actual and Simulated Electromagnetic Interference Source</title><author>PANNIZZO, FRANK ; FURMAN, SEYMOUR</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-653a6ac4c2661f5f83720aaefdd82cbd0a0d25650134624471b6fa7c4a3d7e503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>"point of sale" terminal</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>electromagnetic interference</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Phenomena</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>subjective response</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PANNIZZO, FRANK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FURMAN, SEYMOUR</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PANNIZZO, FRANK</au><au>FURMAN, SEYMOUR</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pacemaker and Patient Response to the "Point of Sale" Terminal as an Actual and Simulated Electromagnetic Interference Source</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>1980-07</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>461-469</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>In response to two instances of pacemaker patient complaints of symptomatic episodes in the presence of a “point‐of‐sale” terminal, comprehensive tests were performed for possible electromagnetic interference effects. Power line frequency and radar transmitter tests in the laboratory indicated that no significant problems exist for recently manufactured pacemakers in the everyday environment. Laboratory and clinical tests with 271 patients and 54 pacer models demonstrated no hazard from “point‐of‐sale” terminals. Patients showed a generally benign attitude toward potential interference and very low occurrence of random intermittent pacer malfunction or effects from myopotentials.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>6160540</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.1980.tb05256.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-8389 |
ispartof | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1980-07, Vol.3 (4), p.461-469 |
issn | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75366413 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | "point of sale" terminal Adolescent Adult Aged Attitude Child Electromagnetic Fields electromagnetic interference Electromagnetic Phenomena Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pacemaker, Artificial subjective response |
title | Pacemaker and Patient Response to the "Point of Sale" Terminal as an Actual and Simulated Electromagnetic Interference Source |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A02%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pacemaker%20and%20Patient%20Response%20to%20the%20%22Point%20of%20Sale%22%20Terminal%20as%20an%20Actual%20and%20Simulated%20Electromagnetic%20Interference%20Source&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=PANNIZZO,%20FRANK&rft.date=1980-07&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=461-469&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1980.tb05256.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75366413%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75366413&rft_id=info:pmid/6160540&rfr_iscdi=true |