Xeroradiography for imaging biomaterials—A comparison with conventional radiography
Our visual comparison of dental xeroradiographs versus conventional film radiographs demonstrated the superiority of the dental xeroradiographic technique for the imaging of all radiolucent and mild-to-moderately radiopaque materials. Both systems were equally valuable for the imaging of very dense...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1980-11, Vol.44 (5), p.567-572 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 572 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 567 |
| container_title | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Gratt, Barton M. Sickles, Edward A. Lacy, Alton M. |
| description | Our visual comparison of dental xeroradiographs versus conventional film radiographs demonstrated the superiority of the dental xeroradiographic technique for the imaging of all radiolucent and mild-to-moderately radiopaque materials. Both systems were equally valuable for the imaging of very dense radiographic materials such as gold and amalgam alloys. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90081-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75355236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0022391380900815</els_id><sourcerecordid>75355236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-228175a17dc30b8d57d0ce9ac6180a3955d05f1308da65b503a2455b88a84e8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotVbfQGFWoovRm8lkJrMRSvEPBDcW3IVMkmkjM5MxmVa68yF8Qp_E1JbiytXlcs85l_MhdIrhCgPOrgGSJCYFJhcMLgsAhmO6h4YYijzOWIr30XAnOURH3r9BENEcD9AgK0iaFOkQTV-1s04oY2dOdPNVVFkXmUbMTDuLSmMb0WtnRO2_P7_GkbRNJ5zxto0-TD8Pe7vUbW9sK-roT8oxOqiCR59s5whN725fJg_x0_P942T8FEtC8z5OEoZzKnCuJIGSKZorkLoQMsMMBCkoVUArTIApkdGSAhFJSmnJmGCpZhUZofNNbufs-0L7njfGS13XotV24XlOCaUJyYIw3Qils947XfHOhZZuxTHwNU2-RsXXqDgD_kuT02A72-YvykarnWmLL9xvNncdSi6NdtxLo1uplXFa9lxZ8_-DH4OVhXU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75355236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Xeroradiography for imaging biomaterials—A comparison with conventional radiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gratt, Barton M. ; Sickles, Edward A. ; Lacy, Alton M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gratt, Barton M. ; Sickles, Edward A. ; Lacy, Alton M.</creatorcontrib><description>Our visual comparison of dental xeroradiographs versus conventional film radiographs demonstrated the superiority of the dental xeroradiographic technique for the imaging of all radiolucent and mild-to-moderately radiopaque materials. Both systems were equally valuable for the imaging of very dense radiographic materials such as gold and amalgam alloys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90081-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6934294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials ; Dental Materials ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Radiographic Image Enhancement ; Radiography, Dental - instrumentation ; Radiography, Dental - methods ; Xeroradiography - instrumentation ; Xeroradiography - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1980-11, Vol.44 (5), p.567-572</ispartof><rights>1980 The C. V. Mosby Co.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-228175a17dc30b8d57d0ce9ac6180a3955d05f1308da65b503a2455b88a84e8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-228175a17dc30b8d57d0ce9ac6180a3955d05f1308da65b503a2455b88a84e8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90081-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6934294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gratt, Barton M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sickles, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacy, Alton M.</creatorcontrib><title>Xeroradiography for imaging biomaterials—A comparison with conventional radiography</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Our visual comparison of dental xeroradiographs versus conventional film radiographs demonstrated the superiority of the dental xeroradiographic technique for the imaging of all radiolucent and mild-to-moderately radiopaque materials. Both systems were equally valuable for the imaging of very dense radiographic materials such as gold and amalgam alloys.</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - methods</subject><subject>Xeroradiography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Xeroradiography - methods</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotVbfQGFWoovRm8lkJrMRSvEPBDcW3IVMkmkjM5MxmVa68yF8Qp_E1JbiytXlcs85l_MhdIrhCgPOrgGSJCYFJhcMLgsAhmO6h4YYijzOWIr30XAnOURH3r9BENEcD9AgK0iaFOkQTV-1s04oY2dOdPNVVFkXmUbMTDuLSmMb0WtnRO2_P7_GkbRNJ5zxto0-TD8Pe7vUbW9sK-roT8oxOqiCR59s5whN725fJg_x0_P942T8FEtC8z5OEoZzKnCuJIGSKZorkLoQMsMMBCkoVUArTIApkdGSAhFJSmnJmGCpZhUZofNNbufs-0L7njfGS13XotV24XlOCaUJyYIw3Qils947XfHOhZZuxTHwNU2-RsXXqDgD_kuT02A72-YvykarnWmLL9xvNncdSi6NdtxLo1uplXFa9lxZ8_-DH4OVhXU</recordid><startdate>198011</startdate><enddate>198011</enddate><creator>Gratt, Barton M.</creator><creator>Sickles, Edward A.</creator><creator>Lacy, Alton M.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198011</creationdate><title>Xeroradiography for imaging biomaterials—A comparison with conventional radiography</title><author>Gratt, Barton M. ; Sickles, Edward A. ; Lacy, Alton M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-228175a17dc30b8d57d0ce9ac6180a3955d05f1308da65b503a2455b88a84e8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - methods</topic><topic>Xeroradiography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Xeroradiography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gratt, Barton M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sickles, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacy, Alton M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gratt, Barton M.</au><au>Sickles, Edward A.</au><au>Lacy, Alton M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Xeroradiography for imaging biomaterials—A comparison with conventional radiography</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>1980-11</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>572</epage><pages>567-572</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Our visual comparison of dental xeroradiographs versus conventional film radiographs demonstrated the superiority of the dental xeroradiographic technique for the imaging of all radiolucent and mild-to-moderately radiopaque materials. Both systems were equally valuable for the imaging of very dense radiographic materials such as gold and amalgam alloys.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>6934294</pmid><doi>10.1016/0022-3913(80)90081-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3913 |
| ispartof | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1980-11, Vol.44 (5), p.567-572 |
| issn | 0022-3913 1097-6841 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75355236 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Biocompatible Materials Dental Materials Dentistry Humans Radiographic Image Enhancement Radiography, Dental - instrumentation Radiography, Dental - methods Xeroradiography - instrumentation Xeroradiography - methods |
| title | Xeroradiography for imaging biomaterials—A comparison with conventional radiography |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A20%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Xeroradiography%20for%20imaging%20biomaterials%E2%80%94A%20comparison%20with%20conventional%20radiography&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Gratt,%20Barton%20M.&rft.date=1980-11&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=572&rft.pages=567-572&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90081-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75355236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75355236&rft_id=info:pmid/6934294&rft_els_id=0022391380900815&rfr_iscdi=true |