Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors
Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion tec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1980-10, Vol.138 (3), p.307-312 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 312 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 307 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Chi, I-cheng Mumford, Stephen D. Laufe, Leonard E. |
description | Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion techniques. The tubal ring was associated with a higher failure rate than electrocoagulation, the Rocket clip, or the modified Pomeroy technique. Of 1,035 tubal ring sterilizations, there were 38 technical failures. Reasons given by the operators for the failures, by frequency of occurrence, were surgical complications, conditions preexisting in the patients, and problems with the instruments. Most of these failures were remediated by changing to other techniques. In two patients, the procedure was completed by changing the approach from laparoscopy to laparotomy. In five others, sterilization was not completed. Case-control analysis was performed and three risk factors were delineated: obesity, prior use of an intrauterine contraceptive device and previous abdominal operations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75271794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002937880902549</els_id><sourcerecordid>75271794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-ddddff6a8436536e78f07e95d161e41a0457ee90a468cae392f43dc03274c8b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4WeRGGrSZPmw4Mg4hcIXvQcsulUo91kTVpBf72pu3g0l2HmffMO8yB0QPApwYSfYYyrUlEhjyU-UbiqWak20IRgJUouudxEkz_LDtpN6W1sK1Vto23OmMSYTtDLE9hX76zpita4boiQCueLfpjnSXT-pUg9RNe5b9O74M-Le29dA97CrFhCtOA-oSkimBR8mhVh6G1YZM34PHXpPafaPsS0h7Za0yXYX9cper65frq6Kx8eb--vLh9KS2vRl01-bcuNZJTXlIOQLRag6oZwAowYzGoBoLBhXFoDVFUto43FtBLMynlNp-holbuM4WOA1OuFSxa6zngIQ9KirgQRimUjWxltDClFaPUyuoWJX5pgPfLVIy09wtMS61--uZuiw3X-MF9A8_dpDTTrFysd8pGfDqJO1o24GhfB9roJ7v8FP4lUiqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75271794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chi, I-cheng ; Mumford, Stephen D. ; Laufe, Leonard E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chi, I-cheng ; Mumford, Stephen D. ; Laufe, Leonard E.</creatorcontrib><description>Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion techniques. The tubal ring was associated with a higher failure rate than electrocoagulation, the Rocket clip, or the modified Pomeroy technique. Of 1,035 tubal ring sterilizations, there were 38 technical failures. Reasons given by the operators for the failures, by frequency of occurrence, were surgical complications, conditions preexisting in the patients, and problems with the instruments. Most of these failures were remediated by changing to other techniques. In two patients, the procedure was completed by changing the approach from laparoscopy to laparotomy. In five others, sterilization was not completed. Case-control analysis was performed and three risk factors were delineated: obesity, prior use of an intrauterine contraceptive device and previous abdominal operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6448003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen - surgery ; Culdoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy ; Obesity ; Population ; Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects ; Sterilization, Tubal - methods</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1980-10, Vol.138 (3), p.307-312</ispartof><rights>1980 The C. V. Mosby Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-ddddff6a8436536e78f07e95d161e41a0457ee90a468cae392f43dc03274c8b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-ddddff6a8436536e78f07e95d161e41a0457ee90a468cae392f43dc03274c8b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6448003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chi, I-cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufe, Leonard E.</creatorcontrib><title>Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion techniques. The tubal ring was associated with a higher failure rate than electrocoagulation, the Rocket clip, or the modified Pomeroy technique. Of 1,035 tubal ring sterilizations, there were 38 technical failures. Reasons given by the operators for the failures, by frequency of occurrence, were surgical complications, conditions preexisting in the patients, and problems with the instruments. Most of these failures were remediated by changing to other techniques. In two patients, the procedure was completed by changing the approach from laparoscopy to laparotomy. In five others, sterilization was not completed. Case-control analysis was performed and three risk factors were delineated: obesity, prior use of an intrauterine contraceptive device and previous abdominal operations.</description><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>Culdoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal - methods</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4WeRGGrSZPmw4Mg4hcIXvQcsulUo91kTVpBf72pu3g0l2HmffMO8yB0QPApwYSfYYyrUlEhjyU-UbiqWak20IRgJUouudxEkz_LDtpN6W1sK1Vto23OmMSYTtDLE9hX76zpita4boiQCueLfpjnSXT-pUg9RNe5b9O74M-Le29dA97CrFhCtOA-oSkimBR8mhVh6G1YZM34PHXpPafaPsS0h7Za0yXYX9cper65frq6Kx8eb--vLh9KS2vRl01-bcuNZJTXlIOQLRag6oZwAowYzGoBoLBhXFoDVFUto43FtBLMynlNp-holbuM4WOA1OuFSxa6zngIQ9KirgQRimUjWxltDClFaPUyuoWJX5pgPfLVIy09wtMS61--uZuiw3X-MF9A8_dpDTTrFysd8pGfDqJO1o24GhfB9roJ7v8FP4lUiqg</recordid><startdate>19801001</startdate><enddate>19801001</enddate><creator>Chi, I-cheng</creator><creator>Mumford, Stephen D.</creator><creator>Laufe, Leonard E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19801001</creationdate><title>Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors</title><author>Chi, I-cheng ; Mumford, Stephen D. ; Laufe, Leonard E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-ddddff6a8436536e78f07e95d161e41a0457ee90a468cae392f43dc03274c8b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>Culdoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chi, I-cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufe, Leonard E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chi, I-cheng</au><au>Mumford, Stephen D.</au><au>Laufe, Leonard E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1980-10-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>307-312</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion techniques. The tubal ring was associated with a higher failure rate than electrocoagulation, the Rocket clip, or the modified Pomeroy technique. Of 1,035 tubal ring sterilizations, there were 38 technical failures. Reasons given by the operators for the failures, by frequency of occurrence, were surgical complications, conditions preexisting in the patients, and problems with the instruments. Most of these failures were remediated by changing to other techniques. In two patients, the procedure was completed by changing the approach from laparoscopy to laparotomy. In five others, sterilization was not completed. Case-control analysis was performed and three risk factors were delineated: obesity, prior use of an intrauterine contraceptive device and previous abdominal operations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>6448003</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1980-10, Vol.138 (3), p.307-312 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75271794 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Abdomen - surgery Culdoscopy Female Humans Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects Laparoscopy Obesity Population Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects Sterilization, Tubal - methods |
title | Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A53%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20failures%20in%20tubal%20ring%20sterilization:%20Incidence,%20perceived%20reasons,%20outcome,%20and%20risk%20factors&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Chi,%20I-cheng&rft.date=1980-10-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=307-312&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75271794%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75271794&rft_id=info:pmid/6448003&rft_els_id=0002937880902549&rfr_iscdi=true |