Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors

Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion tec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1980-10, Vol.138 (3), p.307-312
Hauptverfasser: Chi, I-cheng, Mumford, Stephen D., Laufe, Leonard E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 312
container_issue 3
container_start_page 307
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 138
creator Chi, I-cheng
Mumford, Stephen D.
Laufe, Leonard E.
description Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion techniques. The tubal ring was associated with a higher failure rate than electrocoagulation, the Rocket clip, or the modified Pomeroy technique. Of 1,035 tubal ring sterilizations, there were 38 technical failures. Reasons given by the operators for the failures, by frequency of occurrence, were surgical complications, conditions preexisting in the patients, and problems with the instruments. Most of these failures were remediated by changing to other techniques. In two patients, the procedure was completed by changing the approach from laparoscopy to laparotomy. In five others, sterilization was not completed. Case-control analysis was performed and three risk factors were delineated: obesity, prior use of an intrauterine contraceptive device and previous abdominal operations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75271794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002937880902549</els_id><sourcerecordid>75271794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-ddddff6a8436536e78f07e95d161e41a0457ee90a468cae392f43dc03274c8b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4WeRGGrSZPmw4Mg4hcIXvQcsulUo91kTVpBf72pu3g0l2HmffMO8yB0QPApwYSfYYyrUlEhjyU-UbiqWak20IRgJUouudxEkz_LDtpN6W1sK1Vto23OmMSYTtDLE9hX76zpita4boiQCueLfpjnSXT-pUg9RNe5b9O74M-Le29dA97CrFhCtOA-oSkimBR8mhVh6G1YZM34PHXpPafaPsS0h7Za0yXYX9cper65frq6Kx8eb--vLh9KS2vRl01-bcuNZJTXlIOQLRag6oZwAowYzGoBoLBhXFoDVFUto43FtBLMynlNp-holbuM4WOA1OuFSxa6zngIQ9KirgQRimUjWxltDClFaPUyuoWJX5pgPfLVIy09wtMS61--uZuiw3X-MF9A8_dpDTTrFysd8pGfDqJO1o24GhfB9roJ7v8FP4lUiqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75271794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chi, I-cheng ; Mumford, Stephen D. ; Laufe, Leonard E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chi, I-cheng ; Mumford, Stephen D. ; Laufe, Leonard E.</creatorcontrib><description>Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion techniques. The tubal ring was associated with a higher failure rate than electrocoagulation, the Rocket clip, or the modified Pomeroy technique. Of 1,035 tubal ring sterilizations, there were 38 technical failures. Reasons given by the operators for the failures, by frequency of occurrence, were surgical complications, conditions preexisting in the patients, and problems with the instruments. Most of these failures were remediated by changing to other techniques. In two patients, the procedure was completed by changing the approach from laparoscopy to laparotomy. In five others, sterilization was not completed. Case-control analysis was performed and three risk factors were delineated: obesity, prior use of an intrauterine contraceptive device and previous abdominal operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6448003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen - surgery ; Culdoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy ; Obesity ; Population ; Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects ; Sterilization, Tubal - methods</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1980-10, Vol.138 (3), p.307-312</ispartof><rights>1980 The C. V. Mosby Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-ddddff6a8436536e78f07e95d161e41a0457ee90a468cae392f43dc03274c8b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-ddddff6a8436536e78f07e95d161e41a0457ee90a468cae392f43dc03274c8b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6448003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chi, I-cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufe, Leonard E.</creatorcontrib><title>Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion techniques. The tubal ring was associated with a higher failure rate than electrocoagulation, the Rocket clip, or the modified Pomeroy technique. Of 1,035 tubal ring sterilizations, there were 38 technical failures. Reasons given by the operators for the failures, by frequency of occurrence, were surgical complications, conditions preexisting in the patients, and problems with the instruments. Most of these failures were remediated by changing to other techniques. In two patients, the procedure was completed by changing the approach from laparoscopy to laparotomy. In five others, sterilization was not completed. Case-control analysis was performed and three risk factors were delineated: obesity, prior use of an intrauterine contraceptive device and previous abdominal operations.</description><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>Culdoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal - methods</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4WeRGGrSZPmw4Mg4hcIXvQcsulUo91kTVpBf72pu3g0l2HmffMO8yB0QPApwYSfYYyrUlEhjyU-UbiqWak20IRgJUouudxEkz_LDtpN6W1sK1Vto23OmMSYTtDLE9hX76zpita4boiQCueLfpjnSXT-pUg9RNe5b9O74M-Le29dA97CrFhCtOA-oSkimBR8mhVh6G1YZM34PHXpPafaPsS0h7Za0yXYX9cper65frq6Kx8eb--vLh9KS2vRl01-bcuNZJTXlIOQLRag6oZwAowYzGoBoLBhXFoDVFUto43FtBLMynlNp-holbuM4WOA1OuFSxa6zngIQ9KirgQRimUjWxltDClFaPUyuoWJX5pgPfLVIy09wtMS61--uZuiw3X-MF9A8_dpDTTrFysd8pGfDqJO1o24GhfB9roJ7v8FP4lUiqg</recordid><startdate>19801001</startdate><enddate>19801001</enddate><creator>Chi, I-cheng</creator><creator>Mumford, Stephen D.</creator><creator>Laufe, Leonard E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19801001</creationdate><title>Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors</title><author>Chi, I-cheng ; Mumford, Stephen D. ; Laufe, Leonard E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-ddddff6a8436536e78f07e95d161e41a0457ee90a468cae392f43dc03274c8b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>Culdoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chi, I-cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufe, Leonard E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chi, I-cheng</au><au>Mumford, Stephen D.</au><au>Laufe, Leonard E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1980-10-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>307-312</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the International Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion techniques. The tubal ring was associated with a higher failure rate than electrocoagulation, the Rocket clip, or the modified Pomeroy technique. Of 1,035 tubal ring sterilizations, there were 38 technical failures. Reasons given by the operators for the failures, by frequency of occurrence, were surgical complications, conditions preexisting in the patients, and problems with the instruments. Most of these failures were remediated by changing to other techniques. In two patients, the procedure was completed by changing the approach from laparoscopy to laparotomy. In five others, sterilization was not completed. Case-control analysis was performed and three risk factors were delineated: obesity, prior use of an intrauterine contraceptive device and previous abdominal operations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>6448003</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1980-10, Vol.138 (3), p.307-312
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75271794
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abdomen - surgery
Culdoscopy
Female
Humans
Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects
Laparoscopy
Obesity
Population
Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects
Sterilization, Tubal - methods
title Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A53%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20failures%20in%20tubal%20ring%20sterilization:%20Incidence,%20perceived%20reasons,%20outcome,%20and%20risk%20factors&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Chi,%20I-cheng&rft.date=1980-10-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=307-312&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75271794%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75271794&rft_id=info:pmid/6448003&rft_els_id=0002937880902549&rfr_iscdi=true