Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition
Subjects were asked to rehearse word trigrams in a particular prefamiliarized male or female voice for 5, 10, or 15 sec. In Experiment 1, recognition performance improved with the amount of primary (maintenance) rehearsal only if the speaker's voice at test matched the rehearsal voice, but reco...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cognitive psychology 1980-04, Vol.12 (2), p.188-205 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 205 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 188 |
| container_title | Cognitive psychology |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Geiselman, Ralph E. Bjork, Robert A. |
| description | Subjects were asked to rehearse word trigrams in a particular prefamiliarized male or female voice for 5, 10, or 15 sec. In Experiment 1, recognition performance improved with the amount of primary (maintenance) rehearsal only if the speaker's voice at test matched the rehearsal voice, but recognition performance improved with the amount of secondary (elaborative) rehearsal regardless of the sex of the speaker at test. With a visual testing procedure in Experiments 2 and 3, the amount of primary rehearsal given to a trigram had no effect on recognition performance unless the original voice context was reinstated mentally at test. These results suggest that: (a) Secondary rehearsal builds up semantic associations, whereas primary rehearsal serves to associate items with their physical characteristics at presentation. (b) There is an important memory search component in recognition as well as in recall. (c) Imaginal operations can yield a product in memory that is similar to that left by perceptual operations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90008-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75095181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0010028580900080</els_id><sourcerecordid>1293430284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fc312a6953e36b0eefce6b344feb9dd9f252d1f9d0616f9b91db8467f82d6bff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4WCIHqoTpo2bTwIsn6CoAe9eAltMtHIbqJJu-C_N-suHjx4ypB53pnhIWSPwgkFyk8BKORQNNVRA8cCAJoc1siIgqjyihdsnYx-kS2yHeN7YgrOq02yWbOaspqPyMtjsLM2fGVzDHGIWUTlnV58BHzDNsR2mlmXJebVOtTZ3FuF8Sy7tMZgQNfbBGCqVR8z71JK-Vdne-vdDtkw7TTi7uodk-frq6fJbX7_cHM3ubjPVVnRPjeK0aLlomLIeAeIRiHvWFka7ITWwhRVoakRGjjlRnSC6q4peW2aQvPOGDYmh8u5H8F_Dhh7ObNR4XTaOvRDlHWVjNCGJvDgD_juh-DSbZIWgpUsmSoTVS4pFXyMAY38WCqSFORCvFxYlQursgH5I15Ciu2vhg_dDPVvaGU69c-XfUwq5haDjMqiU6htctZL7e3_C74B-PqS0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1293430284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Geiselman, Ralph E. ; Bjork, Robert A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Geiselman, Ralph E. ; Bjork, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><description>Subjects were asked to rehearse word trigrams in a particular prefamiliarized male or female voice for 5, 10, or 15 sec. In Experiment 1, recognition performance improved with the amount of primary (maintenance) rehearsal only if the speaker's voice at test matched the rehearsal voice, but recognition performance improved with the amount of secondary (elaborative) rehearsal regardless of the sex of the speaker at test. With a visual testing procedure in Experiments 2 and 3, the amount of primary rehearsal given to a trigram had no effect on recognition performance unless the original voice context was reinstated mentally at test. These results suggest that: (a) Secondary rehearsal builds up semantic associations, whereas primary rehearsal serves to associate items with their physical characteristics at presentation. (b) There is an important memory search component in recognition as well as in recall. (c) Imaginal operations can yield a product in memory that is similar to that left by perceptual operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-5623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90008-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7371376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Communication disorders ; Female ; Humans ; Imagination ; Male ; Paired-Associate Learning ; Practice (Psychology) ; Sex Factors ; Speech Perception ; Voice</subject><ispartof>Cognitive psychology, 1980-04, Vol.12 (2), p.188-205</ispartof><rights>1980</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fc312a6953e36b0eefce6b344feb9dd9f252d1f9d0616f9b91db8467f82d6bff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fc312a6953e36b0eefce6b344feb9dd9f252d1f9d0616f9b91db8467f82d6bff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010028580900080$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27848,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7371376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geiselman, Ralph E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjork, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><title>Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition</title><title>Cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Cogn Psychol</addtitle><description>Subjects were asked to rehearse word trigrams in a particular prefamiliarized male or female voice for 5, 10, or 15 sec. In Experiment 1, recognition performance improved with the amount of primary (maintenance) rehearsal only if the speaker's voice at test matched the rehearsal voice, but recognition performance improved with the amount of secondary (elaborative) rehearsal regardless of the sex of the speaker at test. With a visual testing procedure in Experiments 2 and 3, the amount of primary rehearsal given to a trigram had no effect on recognition performance unless the original voice context was reinstated mentally at test. These results suggest that: (a) Secondary rehearsal builds up semantic associations, whereas primary rehearsal serves to associate items with their physical characteristics at presentation. (b) There is an important memory search component in recognition as well as in recall. (c) Imaginal operations can yield a product in memory that is similar to that left by perceptual operations.</description><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imagination</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Paired-Associate Learning</subject><subject>Practice (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Voice</subject><issn>0010-0285</issn><issn>1095-5623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4WCIHqoTpo2bTwIsn6CoAe9eAltMtHIbqJJu-C_N-suHjx4ypB53pnhIWSPwgkFyk8BKORQNNVRA8cCAJoc1siIgqjyihdsnYx-kS2yHeN7YgrOq02yWbOaspqPyMtjsLM2fGVzDHGIWUTlnV58BHzDNsR2mlmXJebVOtTZ3FuF8Sy7tMZgQNfbBGCqVR8z71JK-Vdne-vdDtkw7TTi7uodk-frq6fJbX7_cHM3ubjPVVnRPjeK0aLlomLIeAeIRiHvWFka7ITWwhRVoakRGjjlRnSC6q4peW2aQvPOGDYmh8u5H8F_Dhh7ObNR4XTaOvRDlHWVjNCGJvDgD_juh-DSbZIWgpUsmSoTVS4pFXyMAY38WCqSFORCvFxYlQursgH5I15Ciu2vhg_dDPVvaGU69c-XfUwq5haDjMqiU6htctZL7e3_C74B-PqS0g</recordid><startdate>198004</startdate><enddate>198004</enddate><creator>Geiselman, Ralph E.</creator><creator>Bjork, Robert A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SDSKB</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198004</creationdate><title>Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition</title><author>Geiselman, Ralph E. ; Bjork, Robert A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fc312a6953e36b0eefce6b344feb9dd9f252d1f9d0616f9b91db8467f82d6bff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imagination</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Paired-Associate Learning</topic><topic>Practice (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Voice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geiselman, Ralph E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjork, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 43</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geiselman, Ralph E.</au><au>Bjork, Robert A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Psychol</addtitle><date>1980-04</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>188-205</pages><issn>0010-0285</issn><eissn>1095-5623</eissn><abstract>Subjects were asked to rehearse word trigrams in a particular prefamiliarized male or female voice for 5, 10, or 15 sec. In Experiment 1, recognition performance improved with the amount of primary (maintenance) rehearsal only if the speaker's voice at test matched the rehearsal voice, but recognition performance improved with the amount of secondary (elaborative) rehearsal regardless of the sex of the speaker at test. With a visual testing procedure in Experiments 2 and 3, the amount of primary rehearsal given to a trigram had no effect on recognition performance unless the original voice context was reinstated mentally at test. These results suggest that: (a) Secondary rehearsal builds up semantic associations, whereas primary rehearsal serves to associate items with their physical characteristics at presentation. (b) There is an important memory search component in recognition as well as in recall. (c) Imaginal operations can yield a product in memory that is similar to that left by perceptual operations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7371376</pmid><doi>10.1016/0010-0285(80)90008-0</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0010-0285 |
| ispartof | Cognitive psychology, 1980-04, Vol.12 (2), p.188-205 |
| issn | 0010-0285 1095-5623 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75095181 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Communication disorders Female Humans Imagination Male Paired-Associate Learning Practice (Psychology) Sex Factors Speech Perception Voice |
| title | Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20versus%20secondary%20rehearsal%20in%20imagined%20voices:%20Differential%20effects%20on%20recognition&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Geiselman,%20Ralph%20E.&rft.date=1980-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=188-205&rft.issn=0010-0285&rft.eissn=1095-5623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90008-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1293430284%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1293430284&rft_id=info:pmid/7371376&rft_els_id=0010028580900080&rfr_iscdi=true |