Fertility and Female Employment: Problems of Causal Direction
Seemingly contradictory results have been reported recently on the causal relationship between fertility and female employment. Data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics are used to investigate four possible explanations of the contradictions: (1) multicollinearity in nonrecursive models; (2) mis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American sociological review 1980-04, Vol.45 (2), p.167-190 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 190 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | American sociological review |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Cramer, J C |
description | Seemingly contradictory results have been reported recently on the causal relationship between fertility and female employment. Data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics are used to investigate four possible explanations of the contradictions: (1) multicollinearity in nonrecursive models; (2) misspecification of models; (3) discrepancies between attitudes or intentions and behavior; and (4) differences between static and dynamic models. All four explanations are pertinent to the controversy. It is found that the dominant effects are from fertility to employment in the short run and from employment to fertility in the long run. Multicollinearity often is a serious problem in nonrecursive models. Dynamic models are much more informative than static models. Plans generally seem to be consequences more than determinants of behavior. Results (sometimes) depend upon how variables are measured, upon what time intervals are used, and upon aggregate trends and cycles and historical circumstances. Other substantive findings and general methodological issues are discussed briefly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2095117 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75089680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2095117</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2095117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d5a3e4efde8e56c206668afadf7bff06aef4e73f23f947d21bba1d575b471963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9Lw0AQxfeg1FrFL6AQEPQU3f-bFTxIbVUo6KH3sElmIWWTrbvJod_elEYPXnoahvebx8w8hK4IfqAMq0eKtSBEnaApxpilhFJ-hs5j3AwtFlpP0EQxqSXjU_S8hNDVru52iWmrZAmNcZAsmq3zuwba7in5Cr5w0MTE22Ru-mhc8loHKLvatxfo1BoX4XKsM7ReLtbz93T1-fYxf1mlJSdZl1bCMOBgK8hAyJJiKWVmrKmsKqzF0oDloJilzGquKkqKwpBKKFFwRYY9Z-juYLsN_ruH2OVNHUtwzrTg-5grgTMtM3wUlAQPd2N1HMQqE0yLo6DQhDIu9jve_gM3vg_t8JWc0ExnlHCtB-r-QJXBxxjA5ttQNybscoLzfXj5GN5A3ox-fdFA9ceNyQ369UHfxM6HP_l3_AcqdZzu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1289821499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fertility and Female Employment: Problems of Causal Direction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Cramer, J C</creator><creatorcontrib>Cramer, J C</creatorcontrib><description>Seemingly contradictory results have been reported recently on the causal relationship between fertility and female employment. Data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics are used to investigate four possible explanations of the contradictions: (1) multicollinearity in nonrecursive models; (2) misspecification of models; (3) discrepancies between attitudes or intentions and behavior; and (4) differences between static and dynamic models. All four explanations are pertinent to the controversy. It is found that the dominant effects are from fertility to employment in the short run and from employment to fertility in the long run. Multicollinearity often is a serious problem in nonrecursive models. Dynamic models are much more informative than static models. Plans generally seem to be consequences more than determinants of behavior. Results (sometimes) depend upon how variables are measured, upon what time intervals are used, and upon aggregate trends and cycles and historical circumstances. Other substantive findings and general methodological issues are discussed briefly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2095117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7369634</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ASREAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Sociological Association</publisher><subject>ATTITUDES ; Children ; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ; Dynamic modeling ; Economic models ; EMPLOYMENT ; Family size ; Female ; Female fertility ; FEMALE SEX ; Female/Females (see also Woman) ; FERTILITY ; HEAVILY EMPHASIZES METHODOLOGY OR TECHNIQUE OF STUDY ; Humans ; Infants ; Modeling ; MODELING, MODELS ; Models, Psychological ; Population ; Wage rate ; Women ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>American sociological review, 1980-04, Vol.45 (2), p.167-190</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1980 American Sociological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d5a3e4efde8e56c206668afadf7bff06aef4e73f23f947d21bba1d575b471963</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2095117$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2095117$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27869,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7369634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cramer, J C</creatorcontrib><title>Fertility and Female Employment: Problems of Causal Direction</title><title>American sociological review</title><addtitle>Am Sociol Rev</addtitle><description>Seemingly contradictory results have been reported recently on the causal relationship between fertility and female employment. Data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics are used to investigate four possible explanations of the contradictions: (1) multicollinearity in nonrecursive models; (2) misspecification of models; (3) discrepancies between attitudes or intentions and behavior; and (4) differences between static and dynamic models. All four explanations are pertinent to the controversy. It is found that the dominant effects are from fertility to employment in the short run and from employment to fertility in the long run. Multicollinearity often is a serious problem in nonrecursive models. Dynamic models are much more informative than static models. Plans generally seem to be consequences more than determinants of behavior. Results (sometimes) depend upon how variables are measured, upon what time intervals are used, and upon aggregate trends and cycles and historical circumstances. Other substantive findings and general methodological issues are discussed briefly.</description><subject>ATTITUDES</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Dynamic modeling</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>EMPLOYMENT</subject><subject>Family size</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female fertility</subject><subject>FEMALE SEX</subject><subject>Female/Females (see also Woman)</subject><subject>FERTILITY</subject><subject>HEAVILY EMPHASIZES METHODOLOGY OR TECHNIQUE OF STUDY</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>MODELING, MODELS</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Wage rate</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0003-1224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9Lw0AQxfeg1FrFL6AQEPQU3f-bFTxIbVUo6KH3sElmIWWTrbvJod_elEYPXnoahvebx8w8hK4IfqAMq0eKtSBEnaApxpilhFJ-hs5j3AwtFlpP0EQxqSXjU_S8hNDVru52iWmrZAmNcZAsmq3zuwba7in5Cr5w0MTE22Ru-mhc8loHKLvatxfo1BoX4XKsM7ReLtbz93T1-fYxf1mlJSdZl1bCMOBgK8hAyJJiKWVmrKmsKqzF0oDloJilzGquKkqKwpBKKFFwRYY9Z-juYLsN_ruH2OVNHUtwzrTg-5grgTMtM3wUlAQPd2N1HMQqE0yLo6DQhDIu9jve_gM3vg_t8JWc0ExnlHCtB-r-QJXBxxjA5ttQNybscoLzfXj5GN5A3ox-fdFA9ceNyQ369UHfxM6HP_l3_AcqdZzu</recordid><startdate>198004</startdate><enddate>198004</enddate><creator>Cramer, J C</creator><general>American Sociological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198004</creationdate><title>Fertility and Female Employment: Problems of Causal Direction</title><author>Cramer, J C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d5a3e4efde8e56c206668afadf7bff06aef4e73f23f947d21bba1d575b471963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>ATTITUDES</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Dynamic modeling</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>EMPLOYMENT</topic><topic>Family size</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female fertility</topic><topic>FEMALE SEX</topic><topic>Female/Females (see also Woman)</topic><topic>FERTILITY</topic><topic>HEAVILY EMPHASIZES METHODOLOGY OR TECHNIQUE OF STUDY</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>MODELING, MODELS</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Wage rate</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cramer, J C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American sociological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cramer, J C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fertility and Female Employment: Problems of Causal Direction</atitle><jtitle>American sociological review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Sociol Rev</addtitle><date>1980-04</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>167-190</pages><issn>0003-1224</issn><coden>ASREAL</coden><abstract>Seemingly contradictory results have been reported recently on the causal relationship between fertility and female employment. Data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics are used to investigate four possible explanations of the contradictions: (1) multicollinearity in nonrecursive models; (2) misspecification of models; (3) discrepancies between attitudes or intentions and behavior; and (4) differences between static and dynamic models. All four explanations are pertinent to the controversy. It is found that the dominant effects are from fertility to employment in the short run and from employment to fertility in the long run. Multicollinearity often is a serious problem in nonrecursive models. Dynamic models are much more informative than static models. Plans generally seem to be consequences more than determinants of behavior. Results (sometimes) depend upon how variables are measured, upon what time intervals are used, and upon aggregate trends and cycles and historical circumstances. Other substantive findings and general methodological issues are discussed briefly.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Sociological Association</pub><pmid>7369634</pmid><doi>10.2307/2095117</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1224 |
ispartof | American sociological review, 1980-04, Vol.45 (2), p.167-190 |
issn | 0003-1224 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75089680 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | ATTITUDES Children COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Dynamic modeling Economic models EMPLOYMENT Family size Female Female fertility FEMALE SEX Female/Females (see also Woman) FERTILITY HEAVILY EMPHASIZES METHODOLOGY OR TECHNIQUE OF STUDY Humans Infants Modeling MODELING, MODELS Models, Psychological Population Wage rate Women Workforce |
title | Fertility and Female Employment: Problems of Causal Direction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fertility%20and%20Female%20Employment:%20Problems%20of%20Causal%20Direction&rft.jtitle=American%20sociological%20review&rft.au=Cramer,%20J%20C&rft.date=1980-04&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=167-190&rft.issn=0003-1224&rft.coden=ASREAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2095117&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2095117%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1289821499&rft_id=info:pmid/7369634&rft_jstor_id=2095117&rfr_iscdi=true |