Communication and documentation of preliminary and final radiology reports
The “wet‐read” consultation has been defined as a rapid response to a clinical question posed by a physician to a radiologist. These preliminary interpretations are often not well documented, have poor fidelity, and are subject to modifications and revisions. Moreover, preliminary interpretations ma...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of healthcare risk management 2010, Vol.30 (1), p.23-25 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 25 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 23 |
| container_title | Journal of healthcare risk management |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Monico, Edward Schwartz, Ian |
| description | The “wet‐read” consultation has been defined as a rapid response to a clinical question posed by a physician to a radiologist. These preliminary interpretations are often not well documented, have poor fidelity, and are subject to modifications and revisions. Moreover, preliminary interpretations may be subject to reinterpretation through a variety of scenarios. Recent technological advances in radiology have further hindered the ability to harmonize differences between preliminary and final interpretations and communicate these differences to treating physicians. High‐fidelity simulation may represent a risk management strategy aimed at bridging the gap between radiology and communication technology. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jhrm.20039 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_749021302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>749021302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2819-b0de4578e4a665ef51a09008d4fd5910150f21289bfc5cd074521d3498975da93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqVw4QFQbkhIgbVjx_ERVVCoCkiIv5vlxg64JHGxE0HfntBAj5x2dvXtSDMIHWI4xQDkbPHmq1MCkIgtNCRAIYYsxdtoiIHTmHLBB2gvhAVAytOU7qIB6RQnFA_RdOyqqq1trhrr6kjVOtIubytTN_3FFdHSm9JWtlZ-tQaKTpaRV9q60r2uIm-WzjdhH-0Uqgzm4HeO0OPlxcP4Kp7dTa7H57M4JxkW8Ry0oYxnhqo0ZaZgWIEAyDQtNBMYMIOCYJKJeZGzXHcRGME6oSITnGklkhE67n2X3n20JjSysiE3Zalq49ogORVAcAKkI096MvcuBG8KufS26mJIDPKnOvlTnVxX18FHv7btvDJ6g_511QG4Bz5taVb_WMnp1f3Nn2nc_9jQmK_Nj_LvMuUJZ_L5diIpnyb3Ty_dknwDXU6ILg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749021302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Communication and documentation of preliminary and final radiology reports</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Monico, Edward ; Schwartz, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Monico, Edward ; Schwartz, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>The “wet‐read” consultation has been defined as a rapid response to a clinical question posed by a physician to a radiologist. These preliminary interpretations are often not well documented, have poor fidelity, and are subject to modifications and revisions. Moreover, preliminary interpretations may be subject to reinterpretation through a variety of scenarios. Recent technological advances in radiology have further hindered the ability to harmonize differences between preliminary and final interpretations and communicate these differences to treating physicians. High‐fidelity simulation may represent a risk management strategy aimed at bridging the gap between radiology and communication technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-0861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhrm.20039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20677241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Communication ; Documentation - standards ; Health administration ; Interprofessional Relations ; Radiology - standards ; Radiology Department, Hospital - organization & administration ; Radiology Information Systems ; Safety Management</subject><ispartof>Journal of healthcare risk management, 2010, Vol.30 (1), p.23-25</ispartof><rights>2010 American Society for Healthcare Risk Management of the American Hospital Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2819-b0de4578e4a665ef51a09008d4fd5910150f21289bfc5cd074521d3498975da93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2819-b0de4578e4a665ef51a09008d4fd5910150f21289bfc5cd074521d3498975da93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhrm.20039$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhrm.20039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20677241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monico, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Communication and documentation of preliminary and final radiology reports</title><title>Journal of healthcare risk management</title><addtitle>J of Healthcare Risk Mgmt</addtitle><description>The “wet‐read” consultation has been defined as a rapid response to a clinical question posed by a physician to a radiologist. These preliminary interpretations are often not well documented, have poor fidelity, and are subject to modifications and revisions. Moreover, preliminary interpretations may be subject to reinterpretation through a variety of scenarios. Recent technological advances in radiology have further hindered the ability to harmonize differences between preliminary and final interpretations and communicate these differences to treating physicians. High‐fidelity simulation may represent a risk management strategy aimed at bridging the gap between radiology and communication technology.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Documentation - standards</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Radiology - standards</subject><subject>Radiology Department, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Radiology Information Systems</subject><subject>Safety Management</subject><issn>1074-4797</issn><issn>2040-0861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqVw4QFQbkhIgbVjx_ERVVCoCkiIv5vlxg64JHGxE0HfntBAj5x2dvXtSDMIHWI4xQDkbPHmq1MCkIgtNCRAIYYsxdtoiIHTmHLBB2gvhAVAytOU7qIB6RQnFA_RdOyqqq1trhrr6kjVOtIubytTN_3FFdHSm9JWtlZ-tQaKTpaRV9q60r2uIm-WzjdhH-0Uqgzm4HeO0OPlxcP4Kp7dTa7H57M4JxkW8Ry0oYxnhqo0ZaZgWIEAyDQtNBMYMIOCYJKJeZGzXHcRGME6oSITnGklkhE67n2X3n20JjSysiE3Zalq49ogORVAcAKkI096MvcuBG8KufS26mJIDPKnOvlTnVxX18FHv7btvDJ6g_511QG4Bz5taVb_WMnp1f3Nn2nc_9jQmK_Nj_LvMuUJZ_L5diIpnyb3Ty_dknwDXU6ILg</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Monico, Edward</creator><creator>Schwartz, Ian</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Communication and documentation of preliminary and final radiology reports</title><author>Monico, Edward ; Schwartz, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2819-b0de4578e4a665ef51a09008d4fd5910150f21289bfc5cd074521d3498975da93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Documentation - standards</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Radiology - standards</topic><topic>Radiology Department, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Radiology Information Systems</topic><topic>Safety Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monico, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of healthcare risk management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monico, Edward</au><au>Schwartz, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Communication and documentation of preliminary and final radiology reports</atitle><jtitle>Journal of healthcare risk management</jtitle><addtitle>J of Healthcare Risk Mgmt</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>23-25</pages><issn>1074-4797</issn><eissn>2040-0861</eissn><abstract>The “wet‐read” consultation has been defined as a rapid response to a clinical question posed by a physician to a radiologist. These preliminary interpretations are often not well documented, have poor fidelity, and are subject to modifications and revisions. Moreover, preliminary interpretations may be subject to reinterpretation through a variety of scenarios. Recent technological advances in radiology have further hindered the ability to harmonize differences between preliminary and final interpretations and communicate these differences to treating physicians. High‐fidelity simulation may represent a risk management strategy aimed at bridging the gap between radiology and communication technology.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>20677241</pmid><doi>10.1002/jhrm.20039</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1074-4797 |
| ispartof | Journal of healthcare risk management, 2010, Vol.30 (1), p.23-25 |
| issn | 1074-4797 2040-0861 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_749021302 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
| subjects | Communication Documentation - standards Health administration Interprofessional Relations Radiology - standards Radiology Department, Hospital - organization & administration Radiology Information Systems Safety Management |
| title | Communication and documentation of preliminary and final radiology reports |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T02%3A16%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Communication%20and%20documentation%20of%20preliminary%20and%20final%20radiology%20reports&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20healthcare%20risk%20management&rft.au=Monico,%20Edward&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=23-25&rft.issn=1074-4797&rft.eissn=2040-0861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhrm.20039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E749021302%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749021302&rft_id=info:pmid/20677241&rfr_iscdi=true |