Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: Should this be regarded as a chronic disease?

Abstract Background The surgical treatment of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma is still controversial due to its different clinical and pathological features. Most studies report local recurrence after relatively short follow-up periods, which is usually 5 years. However there is some eviden...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of surgery (London, England) England), 2010, Vol.8 (5), p.346-352
Hauptverfasser: Anwar, I.F, Down, S.K, Rizvi, S, Farooq, N, Burger, A, Morgan, A, Hussien, M.I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 352
container_issue 5
container_start_page 346
container_title International journal of surgery (London, England)
container_volume 8
creator Anwar, I.F
Down, S.K
Rizvi, S
Farooq, N
Burger, A
Morgan, A
Hussien, M.I
description Abstract Background The surgical treatment of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma is still controversial due to its different clinical and pathological features. Most studies report local recurrence after relatively short follow-up periods, which is usually 5 years. However there is some evidence to suggest that local recurrence may occur late in the course of follow-up. Aim of the study To study the implications and outcome of extending the follow-up period of patients treated for invasive lobular carcinoma. Patients and methods Patients (268) treated between 1989 and 1996 were reviewed. Thirty-three patients were excluded as they had primary hormonal therapy. The outcomes for 235 patients were analyzed. Results Seventy-nine patients (33.6%) had breast conservation surgery (group I), which was followed by re-excision due to positive margins in 23 patients (29%), and 156 patients (66.3%) had mastectomy (group II). Compared to group II, tumours in group I were smaller (mean size17 vs. 37 mm, P = 0.001), multifocal [20 (25%) vs. 14 (9%), P = 0.003] and with more positive margins [23 (29%) vs. 24 (15%), P = 0.0009]. Only 33 patients (21%) in group II, and all patients in group I had post-operative radiotherapy ( P = 0.0001). Forty-eight patients (17.9%) developed local recurrence [27 (34%) in group I and 21 (13.4%) in group II, P = 0.0005] after a median follow-up period of 167.8 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 127 (range 24–196) months. Univariate analysis showed that the type of surgery, margin status, adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly affected local recurrence ( P = 0.0005, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.05 respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that the only factor affected local recurrence was the type of surgery (relative risk 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.22–4.83, P = 0.01) The overall survival was 99.3 months (78.2%). Univariate and Cox regression analyses showed that only the patients age at diagnosis significantly affected survival ( P = 0.003). Conclusion Local recurrence may be a late event in patients treated for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast and extended follow-up may be considered. In this study mastectomy offers better local control.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_749020749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1743919110000658</els_id><sourcerecordid>749020749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-dba08f00505a78110c0be7acfa12d1c9779e19827a8db0ff7c0533595c1a33e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVoaD7aP5BD0a2n3YxkeW2V0lBCviCQQ1p6FGNp3JXjtVLJXsi_r8wmOeSQOWjE8L4vzDOMnQhYChCr027puzQtJeQBqCVAsccORaWKhRal_vD61-KAHaXUASioRf2RHUhQErSSh-zPzbDF5LfE-9BMPUZuMVo_hA3y0PJxTbyJhGn8xu_XYepdHvnEG-KR_mJ05DgmjtyuYxi85c6nrKazT2y_xT7R5-d-zH5fXvw6v17c3l3dnP-8XVhVqnHhGoS6BSihxKoWAiw0VKFtUUgnrK4qTULXssLaNdC2lYWyKEpdWoFFQavimH3d5T7G8G-iNJqNT5b6HgcKUzKV0iAhv1kpd0obQ0qRWvMY_QbjkxFgZp6mMzNPM_M0oEzmmU1fnuOnZkPu1fICMAu-7wSUl9x6iiZZT4Ml5yPZ0bjg38__8cZue585Yv9AT5S6MMUh4zPCJGnA3M8XnQ8qINeqrIv_Reia5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749020749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: Should this be regarded as a chronic disease?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Anwar, I.F ; Down, S.K ; Rizvi, S ; Farooq, N ; Burger, A ; Morgan, A ; Hussien, M.I</creator><creatorcontrib>Anwar, I.F ; Down, S.K ; Rizvi, S ; Farooq, N ; Burger, A ; Morgan, A ; Hussien, M.I</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The surgical treatment of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma is still controversial due to its different clinical and pathological features. Most studies report local recurrence after relatively short follow-up periods, which is usually 5 years. However there is some evidence to suggest that local recurrence may occur late in the course of follow-up. Aim of the study To study the implications and outcome of extending the follow-up period of patients treated for invasive lobular carcinoma. Patients and methods Patients (268) treated between 1989 and 1996 were reviewed. Thirty-three patients were excluded as they had primary hormonal therapy. The outcomes for 235 patients were analyzed. Results Seventy-nine patients (33.6%) had breast conservation surgery (group I), which was followed by re-excision due to positive margins in 23 patients (29%), and 156 patients (66.3%) had mastectomy (group II). Compared to group II, tumours in group I were smaller (mean size17 vs. 37 mm, P = 0.001), multifocal [20 (25%) vs. 14 (9%), P = 0.003] and with more positive margins [23 (29%) vs. 24 (15%), P = 0.0009]. Only 33 patients (21%) in group II, and all patients in group I had post-operative radiotherapy ( P = 0.0001). Forty-eight patients (17.9%) developed local recurrence [27 (34%) in group I and 21 (13.4%) in group II, P = 0.0005] after a median follow-up period of 167.8 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 127 (range 24–196) months. Univariate analysis showed that the type of surgery, margin status, adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly affected local recurrence ( P = 0.0005, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.05 respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that the only factor affected local recurrence was the type of surgery (relative risk 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.22–4.83, P = 0.01) The overall survival was 99.3 months (78.2%). Univariate and Cox regression analyses showed that only the patients age at diagnosis significantly affected survival ( P = 0.003). Conclusion Local recurrence may be a late event in patients treated for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast and extended follow-up may be considered. In this study mastectomy offers better local control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-9191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20420942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast cancer ; Breast conservation surgery ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Carcinoma, Lobular - mortality ; Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary ; Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy ; Chronic Disease ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lobular ; Local recurrence ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mastectomy - methods ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Survival Rate - trends ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of surgery (London, England), 2010, Vol.8 (5), p.346-352</ispartof><rights>Surgical Associates Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Surgical Associates Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-dba08f00505a78110c0be7acfa12d1c9779e19827a8db0ff7c0533595c1a33e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-dba08f00505a78110c0be7acfa12d1c9779e19827a8db0ff7c0533595c1a33e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919110000658$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20420942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anwar, I.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Down, S.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizvi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farooq, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussien, M.I</creatorcontrib><title>Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: Should this be regarded as a chronic disease?</title><title>International journal of surgery (London, England)</title><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The surgical treatment of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma is still controversial due to its different clinical and pathological features. Most studies report local recurrence after relatively short follow-up periods, which is usually 5 years. However there is some evidence to suggest that local recurrence may occur late in the course of follow-up. Aim of the study To study the implications and outcome of extending the follow-up period of patients treated for invasive lobular carcinoma. Patients and methods Patients (268) treated between 1989 and 1996 were reviewed. Thirty-three patients were excluded as they had primary hormonal therapy. The outcomes for 235 patients were analyzed. Results Seventy-nine patients (33.6%) had breast conservation surgery (group I), which was followed by re-excision due to positive margins in 23 patients (29%), and 156 patients (66.3%) had mastectomy (group II). Compared to group II, tumours in group I were smaller (mean size17 vs. 37 mm, P = 0.001), multifocal [20 (25%) vs. 14 (9%), P = 0.003] and with more positive margins [23 (29%) vs. 24 (15%), P = 0.0009]. Only 33 patients (21%) in group II, and all patients in group I had post-operative radiotherapy ( P = 0.0001). Forty-eight patients (17.9%) developed local recurrence [27 (34%) in group I and 21 (13.4%) in group II, P = 0.0005] after a median follow-up period of 167.8 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 127 (range 24–196) months. Univariate analysis showed that the type of surgery, margin status, adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly affected local recurrence ( P = 0.0005, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.05 respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that the only factor affected local recurrence was the type of surgery (relative risk 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.22–4.83, P = 0.01) The overall survival was 99.3 months (78.2%). Univariate and Cox regression analyses showed that only the patients age at diagnosis significantly affected survival ( P = 0.003). Conclusion Local recurrence may be a late event in patients treated for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast and extended follow-up may be considered. In this study mastectomy offers better local control.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast conservation surgery</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Lobular</subject><subject>Local recurrence</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Mastectomy - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>1743-9191</issn><issn>1743-9159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVoaD7aP5BD0a2n3YxkeW2V0lBCviCQQ1p6FGNp3JXjtVLJXsi_r8wmOeSQOWjE8L4vzDOMnQhYChCr027puzQtJeQBqCVAsccORaWKhRal_vD61-KAHaXUASioRf2RHUhQErSSh-zPzbDF5LfE-9BMPUZuMVo_hA3y0PJxTbyJhGn8xu_XYepdHvnEG-KR_mJ05DgmjtyuYxi85c6nrKazT2y_xT7R5-d-zH5fXvw6v17c3l3dnP-8XVhVqnHhGoS6BSihxKoWAiw0VKFtUUgnrK4qTULXssLaNdC2lYWyKEpdWoFFQavimH3d5T7G8G-iNJqNT5b6HgcKUzKV0iAhv1kpd0obQ0qRWvMY_QbjkxFgZp6mMzNPM_M0oEzmmU1fnuOnZkPu1fICMAu-7wSUl9x6iiZZT4Ml5yPZ0bjg38__8cZue585Yv9AT5S6MMUh4zPCJGnA3M8XnQ8qINeqrIv_Reia5w</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Anwar, I.F</creator><creator>Down, S.K</creator><creator>Rizvi, S</creator><creator>Farooq, N</creator><creator>Burger, A</creator><creator>Morgan, A</creator><creator>Hussien, M.I</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: Should this be regarded as a chronic disease?</title><author>Anwar, I.F ; Down, S.K ; Rizvi, S ; Farooq, N ; Burger, A ; Morgan, A ; Hussien, M.I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-dba08f00505a78110c0be7acfa12d1c9779e19827a8db0ff7c0533595c1a33e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast conservation surgery</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Lobular</topic><topic>Local recurrence</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Mastectomy - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anwar, I.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Down, S.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizvi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farooq, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussien, M.I</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anwar, I.F</au><au>Down, S.K</au><au>Rizvi, S</au><au>Farooq, N</au><au>Burger, A</au><au>Morgan, A</au><au>Hussien, M.I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: Should this be regarded as a chronic disease?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>346-352</pages><issn>1743-9191</issn><eissn>1743-9159</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The surgical treatment of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma is still controversial due to its different clinical and pathological features. Most studies report local recurrence after relatively short follow-up periods, which is usually 5 years. However there is some evidence to suggest that local recurrence may occur late in the course of follow-up. Aim of the study To study the implications and outcome of extending the follow-up period of patients treated for invasive lobular carcinoma. Patients and methods Patients (268) treated between 1989 and 1996 were reviewed. Thirty-three patients were excluded as they had primary hormonal therapy. The outcomes for 235 patients were analyzed. Results Seventy-nine patients (33.6%) had breast conservation surgery (group I), which was followed by re-excision due to positive margins in 23 patients (29%), and 156 patients (66.3%) had mastectomy (group II). Compared to group II, tumours in group I were smaller (mean size17 vs. 37 mm, P = 0.001), multifocal [20 (25%) vs. 14 (9%), P = 0.003] and with more positive margins [23 (29%) vs. 24 (15%), P = 0.0009]. Only 33 patients (21%) in group II, and all patients in group I had post-operative radiotherapy ( P = 0.0001). Forty-eight patients (17.9%) developed local recurrence [27 (34%) in group I and 21 (13.4%) in group II, P = 0.0005] after a median follow-up period of 167.8 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 127 (range 24–196) months. Univariate analysis showed that the type of surgery, margin status, adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly affected local recurrence ( P = 0.0005, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.05 respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that the only factor affected local recurrence was the type of surgery (relative risk 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.22–4.83, P = 0.01) The overall survival was 99.3 months (78.2%). Univariate and Cox regression analyses showed that only the patients age at diagnosis significantly affected survival ( P = 0.003). Conclusion Local recurrence may be a late event in patients treated for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast and extended follow-up may be considered. In this study mastectomy offers better local control.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20420942</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-9191
ispartof International journal of surgery (London, England), 2010, Vol.8 (5), p.346-352
issn 1743-9191
1743-9159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_749020749
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast cancer
Breast conservation surgery
Breast Neoplasms - mortality
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Carcinoma, Lobular - mortality
Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary
Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy
Chronic Disease
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Lobular
Local recurrence
Lymphatic Metastasis
Mastectomy - methods
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Survival Rate - trends
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom - epidemiology
title Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: Should this be regarded as a chronic disease?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A39%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invasive%20lobular%20carcinoma%20of%20the%20breast:%20Should%20this%20be%20regarded%20as%20a%20chronic%20disease?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20surgery%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Anwar,%20I.F&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=346-352&rft.issn=1743-9191&rft.eissn=1743-9159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E749020749%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749020749&rft_id=info:pmid/20420942&rft_els_id=S1743919110000658&rfr_iscdi=true