The extension of labour epidural analgesia for Caesarean section
Seven hundred and twenty-two patients who received epidural analgesia during labour were delivered by Caesarean section. The block was extended in 554 patients to provide analgesia for surgery. In twenty-one cases incomplete analgesia necessitated general anaesthesia. The main complications were mat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Anaesthesia 1979-11, Vol.34 (10), p.992-995 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 995 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 992 |
| container_title | Anaesthesia |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | MILNE, M.K. DALRYMPLE, D.G. ALLISON, R. LAWSON, J.I.M. |
| description | Seven hundred and twenty-two patients who received epidural analgesia during labour were delivered by Caesarean section. The block was extended in 554 patients to provide analgesia for surgery. In twenty-one cases incomplete analgesia necessitated general anaesthesia. The main complications were maternal hypotension (15.9%) and vomiting (17.1%). Almost all patients expressed enthusiasm for the technique. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06246.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74901766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74901766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3692-974ed96ab2c1180db33874e9734208a23f5d11ede43f38de5e49922579d169b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS3EqxT-gIXFgl2CX3FsNlBV5SFVsOnecuIJpEqTYiei_XsSpeqe2Yw0994ZzUHojpKY9vWwjimXScSIEDHVqY7bjEgmZLw7QZOjdIomhBAeMUH0JboKYU0IZYqqC3SecC2FmqDn1Tdg2LVQh7KpcVPgymZN5zFsS9d5W2Fb2-oLQmlx0Xg8txCsB1vjAHnbR67RWWGrADeHPkWrl8Vq_hYtP1_f57NllHOpWaRTAU5Lm7GcUkVcxrnqRzrlghFlGS8SRyk4ELzgykECQmvGklQ7KnXGp-h-XLv1zU8HoTWbMuRQVbaGpgsmFZrQVMre-Dgac9-E4KEwW19urN8bSswAz6zNQMgMhMwAzxzgmV0fvj1c6bINuGN0pNXLT6P8W1aw_8diM_uYLfp_-B-o-n5M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74901766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The extension of labour epidural analgesia for Caesarean section</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MILNE, M.K. ; DALRYMPLE, D.G. ; ALLISON, R. ; LAWSON, J.I.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>MILNE, M.K. ; DALRYMPLE, D.G. ; ALLISON, R. ; LAWSON, J.I.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Seven hundred and twenty-two patients who received epidural analgesia during labour were delivered by Caesarean section. The block was extended in 554 patients to provide analgesia for surgery. In twenty-one cases incomplete analgesia necessitated general anaesthesia. The main complications were maternal hypotension (15.9%) and vomiting (17.1%). Almost all patients expressed enthusiasm for the technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06246.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 539648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>ANAESTHESIA; obstetric, epidural ; Anesthesia, Epidural - adverse effects ; Anesthesia, Epidural - methods ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods ; Bupivacaine ; Cesarean Section ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotension - etiology ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Pregnancy ; Time Factors ; Vomiting - etiology</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 1979-11, Vol.34 (10), p.992-995</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3692-974ed96ab2c1180db33874e9734208a23f5d11ede43f38de5e49922579d169b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3692-974ed96ab2c1180db33874e9734208a23f5d11ede43f38de5e49922579d169b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2044.1979.tb06246.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2044.1979.tb06246.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/539648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MILNE, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALRYMPLE, D.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALLISON, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAWSON, J.I.M.</creatorcontrib><title>The extension of labour epidural analgesia for Caesarean section</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>Seven hundred and twenty-two patients who received epidural analgesia during labour were delivered by Caesarean section. The block was extended in 554 patients to provide analgesia for surgery. In twenty-one cases incomplete analgesia necessitated general anaesthesia. The main complications were maternal hypotension (15.9%) and vomiting (17.1%). Almost all patients expressed enthusiasm for the technique.</description><subject>ANAESTHESIA; obstetric, epidural</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Epidural - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Epidural - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotension - etiology</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vomiting - etiology</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS3EqxT-gIXFgl2CX3FsNlBV5SFVsOnecuIJpEqTYiei_XsSpeqe2Yw0994ZzUHojpKY9vWwjimXScSIEDHVqY7bjEgmZLw7QZOjdIomhBAeMUH0JboKYU0IZYqqC3SecC2FmqDn1Tdg2LVQh7KpcVPgymZN5zFsS9d5W2Fb2-oLQmlx0Xg8txCsB1vjAHnbR67RWWGrADeHPkWrl8Vq_hYtP1_f57NllHOpWaRTAU5Lm7GcUkVcxrnqRzrlghFlGS8SRyk4ELzgykECQmvGklQ7KnXGp-h-XLv1zU8HoTWbMuRQVbaGpgsmFZrQVMre-Dgac9-E4KEwW19urN8bSswAz6zNQMgMhMwAzxzgmV0fvj1c6bINuGN0pNXLT6P8W1aw_8diM_uYLfp_-B-o-n5M</recordid><startdate>197911</startdate><enddate>197911</enddate><creator>MILNE, M.K.</creator><creator>DALRYMPLE, D.G.</creator><creator>ALLISON, R.</creator><creator>LAWSON, J.I.M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197911</creationdate><title>The extension of labour epidural analgesia for Caesarean section</title><author>MILNE, M.K. ; DALRYMPLE, D.G. ; ALLISON, R. ; LAWSON, J.I.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3692-974ed96ab2c1180db33874e9734208a23f5d11ede43f38de5e49922579d169b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>ANAESTHESIA; obstetric, epidural</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Epidural - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Epidural - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotension - etiology</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vomiting - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MILNE, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALRYMPLE, D.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALLISON, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAWSON, J.I.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MILNE, M.K.</au><au>DALRYMPLE, D.G.</au><au>ALLISON, R.</au><au>LAWSON, J.I.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The extension of labour epidural analgesia for Caesarean section</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>1979-11</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>992</spage><epage>995</epage><pages>992-995</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><abstract>Seven hundred and twenty-two patients who received epidural analgesia during labour were delivered by Caesarean section. The block was extended in 554 patients to provide analgesia for surgery. In twenty-one cases incomplete analgesia necessitated general anaesthesia. The main complications were maternal hypotension (15.9%) and vomiting (17.1%). Almost all patients expressed enthusiasm for the technique.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>539648</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06246.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-2409 |
| ispartof | Anaesthesia, 1979-11, Vol.34 (10), p.992-995 |
| issn | 0003-2409 1365-2044 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74901766 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | ANAESTHESIA obstetric, epidural Anesthesia, Epidural - adverse effects Anesthesia, Epidural - methods Anesthesia, General Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods Bupivacaine Cesarean Section Female Humans Hypotension - etiology Patient Acceptance of Health Care Pregnancy Time Factors Vomiting - etiology |
| title | The extension of labour epidural analgesia for Caesarean section |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T09%3A06%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20extension%20of%20labour%20epidural%20analgesia%20for%20Caesarean%20section&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=MILNE,%20M.K.&rft.date=1979-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=992&rft.epage=995&rft.pages=992-995&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06246.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74901766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74901766&rft_id=info:pmid/539648&rfr_iscdi=true |