Postoperative Assessment of Clipped Aneurysms With 64-Slice Computerized Tomography Angiography
Abstract BACKGROUND Multidetector computerized tomography angiography (MDCTA) is now a widely accepted technique for the management of intracranial aneurysms. OBJECTIVE To evaluate its accuracy for the postoperative assessment of clipped intracranial aneurysms. METHODS We analyzed a consecutive seri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurosurgery 2010-09, Vol.67 (3), p.844-854 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 854 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 844 |
container_title | Neurosurgery |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Thines, Laurent Dehdashti, Amir R. Howard, Peter Costa, Leodante Da Wallace, M. Christopher Willinsky, Robert A. Tymianski, Michael Lejeune, Jean-Paul Agid, Ronit |
description | Abstract
BACKGROUND
Multidetector computerized tomography angiography (MDCTA) is now a widely accepted technique for the management of intracranial aneurysms.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate its accuracy for the postoperative assessment of clipped intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS
We analyzed a consecutive series of 31 patients that underwent direct surgical clipping procedures of 38 aneurysms. A 64 slice MDCT scanner (Aquilion 64, Toshiba) was used and results were compared with digital subtraction angiographies (DSA). Two independent neuroradiologists analyzed the following data: examination quality, artifacts, aneurysm remnant, and patency of collateral branches. Interobserver agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.
RESULTS
Seventy-nine percent of the aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation. Significant artifacts were found with multiple and cobalt-alloy clips. According to DSA, remnants >2 mm were found in 21% of the cases, and 2 patients had one collateral branch occluded. Sensitivity and specificity of 64-MDCTA for the detection of aneurysm remnants were 50% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of 64-MDCTA for the detection of a significant remnant (>2 mm) and the detection of the occlusion of a collateral branch were, respectively, 67% and 100% and 50% and 100%. No relationship was found with the location, type, shape, size, or number of clips, but missed remnants tended to be larger with cobalt-alloy clips.
CONCLUSIONS
64-MDCTA is a valuable technique to assess the presence of a significant postoperative remnant in single titanium clip application cases and might be useful for long-term follow-up. DSA remains the most accurate postoperative radiological examination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1227/01.NEU.0000374684.10920.A2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_749005775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1227/01.NEU.0000374684.10920.A2</oup_id><sourcerecordid>749005775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-5a081a4e58ac025133272cf020425cfb4b2be477f04ae3cc5e69e34aaa8f94a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkUFP3DAQhS0EgoXyF1BED5wSxvY4TnqLVrRUQoDUXbU3y2smEJSsUzuptP31Dd0tSL0xl5nDN2-e5jF2ziHjQuhL4Nnt1TKDqaTGvMCMQykgq8Qem3ElMEVA2Gcz4Fikssx_HLHjGJ8BeI66OGRHAnKlJdczZu59HHxPwQ7NL0qqGCnGjtZD4utk3jZ9Tw9JtaYxbGIXk-_N8JTkmH5rG0fJ3Hf9OFBofk_Qwnf-Mdj-aTPxj81u_sAOattGOt31E7b8fLWYX6c3d1--zqub1MlSDKmyUHCLpArrQCgupdDC1SAAhXL1CldiRah1DWhJOqcoL0mitbaoS7RCnrCLrW4f_M-R4mC6JjpqW7smP0ajsQRQWquJ_Pgf-ezHsJ7MGSE55iDKEifq05ZywccYqDZ9aDobNoaDeUnBADdTCuYtBfM3BVO9mDnbnRhXHT28rv57-wSoLeDH_j3CfwDcepMJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2314602994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postoperative Assessment of Clipped Aneurysms With 64-Slice Computerized Tomography Angiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Thines, Laurent ; Dehdashti, Amir R. ; Howard, Peter ; Costa, Leodante Da ; Wallace, M. Christopher ; Willinsky, Robert A. ; Tymianski, Michael ; Lejeune, Jean-Paul ; Agid, Ronit</creator><creatorcontrib>Thines, Laurent ; Dehdashti, Amir R. ; Howard, Peter ; Costa, Leodante Da ; Wallace, M. Christopher ; Willinsky, Robert A. ; Tymianski, Michael ; Lejeune, Jean-Paul ; Agid, Ronit</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
BACKGROUND
Multidetector computerized tomography angiography (MDCTA) is now a widely accepted technique for the management of intracranial aneurysms.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate its accuracy for the postoperative assessment of clipped intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS
We analyzed a consecutive series of 31 patients that underwent direct surgical clipping procedures of 38 aneurysms. A 64 slice MDCT scanner (Aquilion 64, Toshiba) was used and results were compared with digital subtraction angiographies (DSA). Two independent neuroradiologists analyzed the following data: examination quality, artifacts, aneurysm remnant, and patency of collateral branches. Interobserver agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.
RESULTS
Seventy-nine percent of the aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation. Significant artifacts were found with multiple and cobalt-alloy clips. According to DSA, remnants >2 mm were found in 21% of the cases, and 2 patients had one collateral branch occluded. Sensitivity and specificity of 64-MDCTA for the detection of aneurysm remnants were 50% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of 64-MDCTA for the detection of a significant remnant (>2 mm) and the detection of the occlusion of a collateral branch were, respectively, 67% and 100% and 50% and 100%. No relationship was found with the location, type, shape, size, or number of clips, but missed remnants tended to be larger with cobalt-alloy clips.
CONCLUSIONS
64-MDCTA is a valuable technique to assess the presence of a significant postoperative remnant in single titanium clip application cases and might be useful for long-term follow-up. DSA remains the most accurate postoperative radiological examination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-396X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000374684.10920.A2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20657317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aneurysms ; Female ; Humans ; Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging ; Intracranial Aneurysm - pathology ; Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Neurosurgical Procedures - methods ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><ispartof>Neurosurgery, 2010-09, Vol.67 (3), p.844-854</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-5a081a4e58ac025133272cf020425cfb4b2be477f04ae3cc5e69e34aaa8f94a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-5a081a4e58ac025133272cf020425cfb4b2be477f04ae3cc5e69e34aaa8f94a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20657317$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thines, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehdashti, Amir R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Leodante Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, M. Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willinsky, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymianski, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lejeune, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agid, Ronit</creatorcontrib><title>Postoperative Assessment of Clipped Aneurysms With 64-Slice Computerized Tomography Angiography</title><title>Neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><description>Abstract
BACKGROUND
Multidetector computerized tomography angiography (MDCTA) is now a widely accepted technique for the management of intracranial aneurysms.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate its accuracy for the postoperative assessment of clipped intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS
We analyzed a consecutive series of 31 patients that underwent direct surgical clipping procedures of 38 aneurysms. A 64 slice MDCT scanner (Aquilion 64, Toshiba) was used and results were compared with digital subtraction angiographies (DSA). Two independent neuroradiologists analyzed the following data: examination quality, artifacts, aneurysm remnant, and patency of collateral branches. Interobserver agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.
RESULTS
Seventy-nine percent of the aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation. Significant artifacts were found with multiple and cobalt-alloy clips. According to DSA, remnants >2 mm were found in 21% of the cases, and 2 patients had one collateral branch occluded. Sensitivity and specificity of 64-MDCTA for the detection of aneurysm remnants were 50% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of 64-MDCTA for the detection of a significant remnant (>2 mm) and the detection of the occlusion of a collateral branch were, respectively, 67% and 100% and 50% and 100%. No relationship was found with the location, type, shape, size, or number of clips, but missed remnants tended to be larger with cobalt-alloy clips.
CONCLUSIONS
64-MDCTA is a valuable technique to assess the presence of a significant postoperative remnant in single titanium clip application cases and might be useful for long-term follow-up. DSA remains the most accurate postoperative radiological examination.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aneurysms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intracranial Aneurysm - pathology</subject><subject>Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><issn>0148-396X</issn><issn>1524-4040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkUFP3DAQhS0EgoXyF1BED5wSxvY4TnqLVrRUQoDUXbU3y2smEJSsUzuptP31Dd0tSL0xl5nDN2-e5jF2ziHjQuhL4Nnt1TKDqaTGvMCMQykgq8Qem3ElMEVA2Gcz4Fikssx_HLHjGJ8BeI66OGRHAnKlJdczZu59HHxPwQ7NL0qqGCnGjtZD4utk3jZ9Tw9JtaYxbGIXk-_N8JTkmH5rG0fJ3Hf9OFBofk_Qwnf-Mdj-aTPxj81u_sAOattGOt31E7b8fLWYX6c3d1--zqub1MlSDKmyUHCLpArrQCgupdDC1SAAhXL1CldiRah1DWhJOqcoL0mitbaoS7RCnrCLrW4f_M-R4mC6JjpqW7smP0ajsQRQWquJ_Pgf-ezHsJ7MGSE55iDKEifq05ZywccYqDZ9aDobNoaDeUnBADdTCuYtBfM3BVO9mDnbnRhXHT28rv57-wSoLeDH_j3CfwDcepMJ</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Thines, Laurent</creator><creator>Dehdashti, Amir R.</creator><creator>Howard, Peter</creator><creator>Costa, Leodante Da</creator><creator>Wallace, M. Christopher</creator><creator>Willinsky, Robert A.</creator><creator>Tymianski, Michael</creator><creator>Lejeune, Jean-Paul</creator><creator>Agid, Ronit</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Postoperative Assessment of Clipped Aneurysms With 64-Slice Computerized Tomography Angiography</title><author>Thines, Laurent ; Dehdashti, Amir R. ; Howard, Peter ; Costa, Leodante Da ; Wallace, M. Christopher ; Willinsky, Robert A. ; Tymianski, Michael ; Lejeune, Jean-Paul ; Agid, Ronit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-5a081a4e58ac025133272cf020425cfb4b2be477f04ae3cc5e69e34aaa8f94a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aneurysms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intracranial Aneurysm - pathology</topic><topic>Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thines, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehdashti, Amir R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Leodante Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, M. Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willinsky, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymianski, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lejeune, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agid, Ronit</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thines, Laurent</au><au>Dehdashti, Amir R.</au><au>Howard, Peter</au><au>Costa, Leodante Da</au><au>Wallace, M. Christopher</au><au>Willinsky, Robert A.</au><au>Tymianski, Michael</au><au>Lejeune, Jean-Paul</au><au>Agid, Ronit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postoperative Assessment of Clipped Aneurysms With 64-Slice Computerized Tomography Angiography</atitle><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>844</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>844-854</pages><issn>0148-396X</issn><eissn>1524-4040</eissn><abstract>Abstract
BACKGROUND
Multidetector computerized tomography angiography (MDCTA) is now a widely accepted technique for the management of intracranial aneurysms.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate its accuracy for the postoperative assessment of clipped intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS
We analyzed a consecutive series of 31 patients that underwent direct surgical clipping procedures of 38 aneurysms. A 64 slice MDCT scanner (Aquilion 64, Toshiba) was used and results were compared with digital subtraction angiographies (DSA). Two independent neuroradiologists analyzed the following data: examination quality, artifacts, aneurysm remnant, and patency of collateral branches. Interobserver agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.
RESULTS
Seventy-nine percent of the aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation. Significant artifacts were found with multiple and cobalt-alloy clips. According to DSA, remnants >2 mm were found in 21% of the cases, and 2 patients had one collateral branch occluded. Sensitivity and specificity of 64-MDCTA for the detection of aneurysm remnants were 50% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of 64-MDCTA for the detection of a significant remnant (>2 mm) and the detection of the occlusion of a collateral branch were, respectively, 67% and 100% and 50% and 100%. No relationship was found with the location, type, shape, size, or number of clips, but missed remnants tended to be larger with cobalt-alloy clips.
CONCLUSIONS
64-MDCTA is a valuable technique to assess the presence of a significant postoperative remnant in single titanium clip application cases and might be useful for long-term follow-up. DSA remains the most accurate postoperative radiological examination.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>20657317</pmid><doi>10.1227/01.NEU.0000374684.10920.A2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-396X |
ispartof | Neurosurgery, 2010-09, Vol.67 (3), p.844-854 |
issn | 0148-396X 1524-4040 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_749005775 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aneurysms Female Humans Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging Intracranial Aneurysm - pathology Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery Male Medical imaging Middle Aged Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation Neurosurgical Procedures - methods Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods Postoperative Care - methods Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Vascular Surgical Procedures - instrumentation Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods |
title | Postoperative Assessment of Clipped Aneurysms With 64-Slice Computerized Tomography Angiography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T13%3A51%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postoperative%20Assessment%20of%20Clipped%20Aneurysms%20With%2064-Slice%20Computerized%20Tomography%20Angiography&rft.jtitle=Neurosurgery&rft.au=Thines,%20Laurent&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=844&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=844-854&rft.issn=0148-396X&rft.eissn=1524-4040&rft_id=info:doi/10.1227/01.NEU.0000374684.10920.A2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E749005775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2314602994&rft_id=info:pmid/20657317&rft_oup_id=10.1227/01.NEU.0000374684.10920.A2&rfr_iscdi=true |