The effects of guideline implementation for proton pump inhibitor prescription on two pulmonary medicine wards

Summary Background  It has been demonstrated that 40% of patients admitted to pulmonary medicine wards use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) without a registered indication. Aim  To assess whether implementation of a guideline for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescription on pulmonary medicine wards coul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2009-01, Vol.29 (2), p.213-221
Hauptverfasser: VAN VLIET, E. P. M., STEYERBERG, E. W., OTTEN, H. J. A. M., RUDOLPHUS, A., KNOESTER, P. D., HOOGSTEDEN, H. C., VAN GELDER, T., KUIPERS, E. J., SIERSMA, P. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background  It has been demonstrated that 40% of patients admitted to pulmonary medicine wards use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) without a registered indication. Aim  To assess whether implementation of a guideline for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescription on pulmonary medicine wards could lead to a decrease in use and improved appropriateness of prescription. Methods  This prospective study comprised two periods, i.e. the situation before and after guideline implementation. In each period, 300 consecutive patients were included. We registered patient characteristics, medications and occurrence of upper gastrointestinal‐related disorders. Results  After implementation, fewer patients were started on PPIs [21% vs. 13%; odds ratio (OR): 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33–0.97] and more users discontinued their use; however, the latter was not significant (3% vs. 6%; OR for continuation: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.14–2.23). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed that PPI use during hospitalization decreased after implementation (adjusted pooled OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32–0.90). Implementation did not result in a change in reported reasons for PPI prescription. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of upper GI‐related disorders in the first 3 months after discharge. Conclusions  Guideline implementation for PPI prescription on two pulmonary medicine wards resulted in a reduction in the number of patients starting PPIs during hospitalization, but appropriateness of prescribing PPIs was not affected. Further studies are needed to determine how appropriateness of PPI prescription on pulmonary medicine wards can be further improved.
ISSN:0269-2813
1365-2036
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03875.x