New Developments in the Treatment of Localized Penile Cancer

Objectives To analyze the current trends in local therapy approaches in patients with penile carcinoma. Methods The relevant published data since 2000 were reviewed; important series published before 2000 were also included. The reports were classified according to the level of evidence. Review stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2010-08, Vol.76 (2), p.S36-S42
Hauptverfasser: Solsona, Eduardo, Bahl, Amit, Brandes, Steven B, Dickerson, David, Puras-Baez, Antonio, van Poppel, Hendrik, Watkin, Nick A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S42
container_issue 2
container_start_page S36
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 76
creator Solsona, Eduardo
Bahl, Amit
Brandes, Steven B
Dickerson, David
Puras-Baez, Antonio
van Poppel, Hendrik
Watkin, Nick A
description Objectives To analyze the current trends in local therapy approaches in patients with penile carcinoma. Methods The relevant published data since 2000 were reviewed; important series published before 2000 were also included. The reports were classified according to the level of evidence. Review studies and others indirectly related to the topic were also included but not classified. Results New information has suggested that surgical margins of only a few millimeters might be adequate for most localized tumors. A trend toward the use of more conservative therapies instead of amputative surgery has been observed, especially in developed countries. Although the local recurrence rate has been greater after conservative therapies than after amputative surgery, this increased rate does not seemed to have had a negative effect on cancer-specific survival. The quality of life has been superior after conservative procedures with preservation of the penis that seems to give the best results with regard to sexual function. Reconstructive surgery can be performed in selected patients after amputative surgery. Conclusions Although the level of evidence is low, conservative therapies can be recommended for selected patients with penile carcinoma. Despite the trend for conservative approaches, these patients need psychological support.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748960321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429510005108</els_id><sourcerecordid>748960321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-47f16ca6479809c10e8f2abc7f78b9f010fa919cfb9fcd3c299b30d0f323dc4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtPGzEUhS1U1AToT6CaXVczvfZ4HpaqIhRKQYqgEmFtOZ7r1ulkHOyZVOmvx6MEFmzY2PLRuQ9_h5BzChkFWn5dZYN3rfu9yxhEDXgGII7IlBasSoUQxQcyjQqknIliQk5CWAFAWZbVRzJhUApa13xKvt3hv-QKt9i6zRq7PiS2S_o_mCw8qn5UEmeSudOqtf-xSX5hZ1tMZqrT6M_IsVFtwE-H-5Q8Xv9YzG7S-f3P29nlPNW8LvqUV4aWWpW8EjUITQFrw9RSV6aql8LE9Y0SVGgTH7rJNRNimUMDJmd5oznmp-TLvu_Gu6cBQy_XNmhsW9WhG4KseC1KyBmNzmLv1N6F4NHIjbdr5XeSghy5yZU8cJMjNwlcRkqx7vNhwrBcY_Na9QIqGi72Boz_3Fr0MmiLEUJjPepeNs6-O-L7mw66tZ2NYP_iDsPKDb6LECWVgUmQD2N4Y3Y0xhaPOn8GciyV_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748960321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Developments in the Treatment of Localized Penile Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Solsona, Eduardo ; Bahl, Amit ; Brandes, Steven B ; Dickerson, David ; Puras-Baez, Antonio ; van Poppel, Hendrik ; Watkin, Nick A</creator><creatorcontrib>Solsona, Eduardo ; Bahl, Amit ; Brandes, Steven B ; Dickerson, David ; Puras-Baez, Antonio ; van Poppel, Hendrik ; Watkin, Nick A</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To analyze the current trends in local therapy approaches in patients with penile carcinoma. Methods The relevant published data since 2000 were reviewed; important series published before 2000 were also included. The reports were classified according to the level of evidence. Review studies and others indirectly related to the topic were also included but not classified. Results New information has suggested that surgical margins of only a few millimeters might be adequate for most localized tumors. A trend toward the use of more conservative therapies instead of amputative surgery has been observed, especially in developed countries. Although the local recurrence rate has been greater after conservative therapies than after amputative surgery, this increased rate does not seemed to have had a negative effect on cancer-specific survival. The quality of life has been superior after conservative procedures with preservation of the penis that seems to give the best results with regard to sexual function. Reconstructive surgery can be performed in selected patients after amputative surgery. Conclusions Although the level of evidence is low, conservative therapies can be recommended for selected patients with penile carcinoma. Despite the trend for conservative approaches, these patients need psychological support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20691884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Consensus ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy ; Penile Neoplasms - therapy ; Quality of Life ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2010-08, Vol.76 (2), p.S36-S42</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-47f16ca6479809c10e8f2abc7f78b9f010fa919cfb9fcd3c299b30d0f323dc4e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-47f16ca6479809c10e8f2abc7f78b9f010fa919cfb9fcd3c299b30d0f323dc4e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20691884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solsona, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahl, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Steven B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puras-Baez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Poppel, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkin, Nick A</creatorcontrib><title>New Developments in the Treatment of Localized Penile Cancer</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Objectives To analyze the current trends in local therapy approaches in patients with penile carcinoma. Methods The relevant published data since 2000 were reviewed; important series published before 2000 were also included. The reports were classified according to the level of evidence. Review studies and others indirectly related to the topic were also included but not classified. Results New information has suggested that surgical margins of only a few millimeters might be adequate for most localized tumors. A trend toward the use of more conservative therapies instead of amputative surgery has been observed, especially in developed countries. Although the local recurrence rate has been greater after conservative therapies than after amputative surgery, this increased rate does not seemed to have had a negative effect on cancer-specific survival. The quality of life has been superior after conservative procedures with preservation of the penis that seems to give the best results with regard to sexual function. Reconstructive surgery can be performed in selected patients after amputative surgery. Conclusions Although the level of evidence is low, conservative therapies can be recommended for selected patients with penile carcinoma. Despite the trend for conservative approaches, these patients need psychological support.</description><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</subject><subject>Penile Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtPGzEUhS1U1AToT6CaXVczvfZ4HpaqIhRKQYqgEmFtOZ7r1ulkHOyZVOmvx6MEFmzY2PLRuQ9_h5BzChkFWn5dZYN3rfu9yxhEDXgGII7IlBasSoUQxQcyjQqknIliQk5CWAFAWZbVRzJhUApa13xKvt3hv-QKt9i6zRq7PiS2S_o_mCw8qn5UEmeSudOqtf-xSX5hZ1tMZqrT6M_IsVFtwE-H-5Q8Xv9YzG7S-f3P29nlPNW8LvqUV4aWWpW8EjUITQFrw9RSV6aql8LE9Y0SVGgTH7rJNRNimUMDJmd5oznmp-TLvu_Gu6cBQy_XNmhsW9WhG4KseC1KyBmNzmLv1N6F4NHIjbdr5XeSghy5yZU8cJMjNwlcRkqx7vNhwrBcY_Na9QIqGi72Boz_3Fr0MmiLEUJjPepeNs6-O-L7mw66tZ2NYP_iDsPKDb6LECWVgUmQD2N4Y3Y0xhaPOn8GciyV_A</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Solsona, Eduardo</creator><creator>Bahl, Amit</creator><creator>Brandes, Steven B</creator><creator>Dickerson, David</creator><creator>Puras-Baez, Antonio</creator><creator>van Poppel, Hendrik</creator><creator>Watkin, Nick A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>New Developments in the Treatment of Localized Penile Cancer</title><author>Solsona, Eduardo ; Bahl, Amit ; Brandes, Steven B ; Dickerson, David ; Puras-Baez, Antonio ; van Poppel, Hendrik ; Watkin, Nick A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-47f16ca6479809c10e8f2abc7f78b9f010fa919cfb9fcd3c299b30d0f323dc4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</topic><topic>Penile Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solsona, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahl, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Steven B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puras-Baez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Poppel, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkin, Nick A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solsona, Eduardo</au><au>Bahl, Amit</au><au>Brandes, Steven B</au><au>Dickerson, David</au><au>Puras-Baez, Antonio</au><au>van Poppel, Hendrik</au><au>Watkin, Nick A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Developments in the Treatment of Localized Penile Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>S36</spage><epage>S42</epage><pages>S36-S42</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>Objectives To analyze the current trends in local therapy approaches in patients with penile carcinoma. Methods The relevant published data since 2000 were reviewed; important series published before 2000 were also included. The reports were classified according to the level of evidence. Review studies and others indirectly related to the topic were also included but not classified. Results New information has suggested that surgical margins of only a few millimeters might be adequate for most localized tumors. A trend toward the use of more conservative therapies instead of amputative surgery has been observed, especially in developed countries. Although the local recurrence rate has been greater after conservative therapies than after amputative surgery, this increased rate does not seemed to have had a negative effect on cancer-specific survival. The quality of life has been superior after conservative procedures with preservation of the penis that seems to give the best results with regard to sexual function. Reconstructive surgery can be performed in selected patients after amputative surgery. Conclusions Although the level of evidence is low, conservative therapies can be recommended for selected patients with penile carcinoma. Despite the trend for conservative approaches, these patients need psychological support.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20691884</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.009</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2010-08, Vol.76 (2), p.S36-S42
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748960321
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Consensus
Humans
Male
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy
Penile Neoplasms - therapy
Quality of Life
Urology
title New Developments in the Treatment of Localized Penile Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A50%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Developments%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Localized%20Penile%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Solsona,%20Eduardo&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=S36&rft.epage=S42&rft.pages=S36-S42&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748960321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748960321&rft_id=info:pmid/20691884&rft_els_id=S0090429510005108&rfr_iscdi=true