Prediction Models for Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Validation Study

Several models have been developed to predict prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery. However, no extensive quantitative validation of these models has yet been conducted. This study sought to identify and validate existing prediction models for prolonged ICU length of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2010-08, Vol.122 (7), p.682-689
Hauptverfasser: ETTEMA, Roelof G. A, PEELEN, Linda M, SCHUURMANS, Marieke J, NIERICH, Arno P, KALKMAN, Cor J, MOONS, Karel G. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 689
container_issue 7
container_start_page 682
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 122
creator ETTEMA, Roelof G. A
PEELEN, Linda M
SCHUURMANS, Marieke J
NIERICH, Arno P
KALKMAN, Cor J
MOONS, Karel G. M
description Several models have been developed to predict prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery. However, no extensive quantitative validation of these models has yet been conducted. This study sought to identify and validate existing prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay after cardiac surgery. After a systematic review of the literature, the identified models were applied on a large registry database comprising 11 395 cardiac surgical interventions. The probabilities of prolonged ICU length of stay based on the models were compared with the actual outcome to assess the discrimination and calibration performance of the models. Literature review identified 20 models, of which 14 could be included. Of the 6 models for the general cardiac surgery population, the Parsonnet model showed the best discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.75 [95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.76]), followed by the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) (0.71 [0.70 to 0.72]) and a model by Huijskes and colleagues (0.71 [0.70 to 0.73]). Most of the models showed good calibration. In this validation of prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay, 2 widely implemented models (Parsonnet, EuroSCORE), although originally designed for prediction of mortality, were superior in identifying patients with prolonged ICU length of stay.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.926808
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748955601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>748955601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-fc66480906245de4425e281c1c50f173e35b8d9cedf48f187acc9109f87281e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1v1DAQhi0EokvLX0DmgDhl68_E5hZF0K60_VC3yzVy7XFllE2K7SzKv2_KLiBOo3n1vDPSg9BHSpaUlvS8Wd0123V9v7q5ri_rJSV6qVmpiHqFFlQyUQjJ9Wu0IIToouKMnaB3Kf2Y15JX8i06YaSstBR6gfa3EVywOQw9vhocdAn7IeLbOHRD_wgOr_oMfQp7wI2JgLd9yHiTzYRrnyG-hC4YizdjfIQ4fcGbKWXYmRwsvoN9gF_Y9A5_N11w5veXTR7ddIbeeNMleH-cp2j77et9c1msby5WTb0uLNMkF96WpVBEk5IJ6UAIJoEpaqmVxNOKA5cPymkLzgvlqaqMtXrW4VU1Y8D5Kfp8uPsUh58jpNzuQrLQdaaHYUxtJZSWsiR0JvWBtHFIKYJvn2LYmTi1lLQv1tv_rc-xbg_W5-6H45fxYQfub_OP5hn4dARMsqbz0fQ2pH8cp6JUFeHPwaWNDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748955601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction Models for Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Validation Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>ETTEMA, Roelof G. A ; PEELEN, Linda M ; SCHUURMANS, Marieke J ; NIERICH, Arno P ; KALKMAN, Cor J ; MOONS, Karel G. M</creator><creatorcontrib>ETTEMA, Roelof G. A ; PEELEN, Linda M ; SCHUURMANS, Marieke J ; NIERICH, Arno P ; KALKMAN, Cor J ; MOONS, Karel G. M</creatorcontrib><description>Several models have been developed to predict prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery. However, no extensive quantitative validation of these models has yet been conducted. This study sought to identify and validate existing prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay after cardiac surgery. After a systematic review of the literature, the identified models were applied on a large registry database comprising 11 395 cardiac surgical interventions. The probabilities of prolonged ICU length of stay based on the models were compared with the actual outcome to assess the discrimination and calibration performance of the models. Literature review identified 20 models, of which 14 could be included. Of the 6 models for the general cardiac surgery population, the Parsonnet model showed the best discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.75 [95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.76]), followed by the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) (0.71 [0.70 to 0.72]) and a model by Huijskes and colleagues (0.71 [0.70 to 0.73]). Most of the models showed good calibration. In this validation of prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay, 2 widely implemented models (Parsonnet, EuroSCORE), although originally designed for prediction of mortality, were superior in identifying patients with prolonged ICU length of stay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.926808</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20679549</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - standards ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - standards ; Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Postoperative Period ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Factors ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2010-08, Vol.122 (7), p.682-689</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-fc66480906245de4425e281c1c50f173e35b8d9cedf48f187acc9109f87281e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23146870$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20679549$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ETTEMA, Roelof G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEELEN, Linda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHUURMANS, Marieke J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIERICH, Arno P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KALKMAN, Cor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOONS, Karel G. M</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction Models for Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Validation Study</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>Several models have been developed to predict prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery. However, no extensive quantitative validation of these models has yet been conducted. This study sought to identify and validate existing prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay after cardiac surgery. After a systematic review of the literature, the identified models were applied on a large registry database comprising 11 395 cardiac surgical interventions. The probabilities of prolonged ICU length of stay based on the models were compared with the actual outcome to assess the discrimination and calibration performance of the models. Literature review identified 20 models, of which 14 could be included. Of the 6 models for the general cardiac surgery population, the Parsonnet model showed the best discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.75 [95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.76]), followed by the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) (0.71 [0.70 to 0.72]) and a model by Huijskes and colleagues (0.71 [0.70 to 0.73]). Most of the models showed good calibration. In this validation of prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay, 2 widely implemented models (Parsonnet, EuroSCORE), although originally designed for prediction of mortality, were superior in identifying patients with prolonged ICU length of stay.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - standards</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1v1DAQhi0EokvLX0DmgDhl68_E5hZF0K60_VC3yzVy7XFllE2K7SzKv2_KLiBOo3n1vDPSg9BHSpaUlvS8Wd0123V9v7q5ri_rJSV6qVmpiHqFFlQyUQjJ9Wu0IIToouKMnaB3Kf2Y15JX8i06YaSstBR6gfa3EVywOQw9vhocdAn7IeLbOHRD_wgOr_oMfQp7wI2JgLd9yHiTzYRrnyG-hC4YizdjfIQ4fcGbKWXYmRwsvoN9gF_Y9A5_N11w5veXTR7ddIbeeNMleH-cp2j77et9c1msby5WTb0uLNMkF96WpVBEk5IJ6UAIJoEpaqmVxNOKA5cPymkLzgvlqaqMtXrW4VU1Y8D5Kfp8uPsUh58jpNzuQrLQdaaHYUxtJZSWsiR0JvWBtHFIKYJvn2LYmTi1lLQv1tv_rc-xbg_W5-6H45fxYQfub_OP5hn4dARMsqbz0fQ2pH8cp6JUFeHPwaWNDA</recordid><startdate>20100817</startdate><enddate>20100817</enddate><creator>ETTEMA, Roelof G. A</creator><creator>PEELEN, Linda M</creator><creator>SCHUURMANS, Marieke J</creator><creator>NIERICH, Arno P</creator><creator>KALKMAN, Cor J</creator><creator>MOONS, Karel G. M</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100817</creationdate><title>Prediction Models for Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Validation Study</title><author>ETTEMA, Roelof G. A ; PEELEN, Linda M ; SCHUURMANS, Marieke J ; NIERICH, Arno P ; KALKMAN, Cor J ; MOONS, Karel G. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-fc66480906245de4425e281c1c50f173e35b8d9cedf48f187acc9109f87281e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - standards</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ETTEMA, Roelof G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEELEN, Linda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHUURMANS, Marieke J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIERICH, Arno P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KALKMAN, Cor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOONS, Karel G. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ETTEMA, Roelof G. A</au><au>PEELEN, Linda M</au><au>SCHUURMANS, Marieke J</au><au>NIERICH, Arno P</au><au>KALKMAN, Cor J</au><au>MOONS, Karel G. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction Models for Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Validation Study</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>2010-08-17</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>682</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>682-689</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>Several models have been developed to predict prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery. However, no extensive quantitative validation of these models has yet been conducted. This study sought to identify and validate existing prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay after cardiac surgery. After a systematic review of the literature, the identified models were applied on a large registry database comprising 11 395 cardiac surgical interventions. The probabilities of prolonged ICU length of stay based on the models were compared with the actual outcome to assess the discrimination and calibration performance of the models. Literature review identified 20 models, of which 14 could be included. Of the 6 models for the general cardiac surgery population, the Parsonnet model showed the best discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.75 [95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.76]), followed by the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) (0.71 [0.70 to 0.72]) and a model by Huijskes and colleagues (0.71 [0.70 to 0.73]). Most of the models showed good calibration. In this validation of prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay, 2 widely implemented models (Parsonnet, EuroSCORE), although originally designed for prediction of mortality, were superior in identifying patients with prolonged ICU length of stay.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>20679549</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.926808</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2010-08, Vol.122 (7), p.682-689
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748955601
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Blood and lymphatic vessels
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - standards
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
Cardiology. Vascular system
Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous
Female
Humans
Intensive Care Units - standards
Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Postoperative Period
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk Factors
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels
title Prediction Models for Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Validation Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20Models%20for%20Prolonged%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit%20Stay%20After%20Cardiac%20Surgery:%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Validation%20Study&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=ETTEMA,%20Roelof%20G.%20A&rft.date=2010-08-17&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=682&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=682-689&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.926808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748955601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748955601&rft_id=info:pmid/20679549&rfr_iscdi=true