Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography to measure lumbar back muscle activity

Mixed model analysis of muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electromyography (EMG) changes in lumbar muscles during trunk extension exercise at varying intensities. To gain insight within the relationship between muscle functional MRI and activity of the lumbar back muscles, which...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2010-08, Vol.35 (17), p.E836-E842
Hauptverfasser: Dickx, Nele, D'Hooge, Roseline, Cagnie, Barbara, Deschepper, Ellen, Verstraete, Koenraad, Danneels, Lieven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E842
container_issue 17
container_start_page E836
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 35
creator Dickx, Nele
D'Hooge, Roseline
Cagnie, Barbara
Deschepper, Ellen
Verstraete, Koenraad
Danneels, Lieven
description Mixed model analysis of muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electromyography (EMG) changes in lumbar muscles during trunk extension exercise at varying intensities. To gain insight within the relationship between muscle functional MRI and activity of the lumbar back muscles, which is related to exercise intensity. It is known that muscle activity during exercise induces a force-sensitive T2 increase; however, it is not known how sensitive this T2 change is. In addition, the association between MRI and EMG measurement was investigated. Multifidus and erector spinae muscle activity was investigated during a trunk extension exercise at 5 increasing loads (from 40% to 80% of 1 repetition maximum), with both MRI and EMG. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis. Our results indicate a linear relationship between MRI and exercise intensity; for both muscles an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of the T2 value with 1.18 (0.89, 1.47) ms. Also for EMG there is a linear relationship with exercise intensity; an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of 6.98 (5.33, 8.62) microV. Furthermore, a linear association between MRI and EMG is acceptable. For the multifidus, an increase of 1 muV (EMG) corresponds with an increase of 0.168 (0.117, 0.219) ms (MRI). For the erector spinae, an increase of 1 microV corresponds with an increase of 0.078 (0.042, 0.114) ms. Both muscle functional MRI and EMG have specific (dis-) advantages and therefore have to be seen as complementary techniques. Nevertheless, our results support the validity of each method and indicate that MRI and EMG can be used independently to quantify lumbar muscle activity.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d79f02
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748945454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>748945454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5811482992db84e953d5a5dfccbbafca70f496e68c200c5ce32fb22905e473163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkElLxDAYhoMozrj8A5HcPHXM2iZHHdxgRHC7liT9WqtdxiQV-u-tzOhBvsN7eRe-B6ETShaU6Oz88vFpQSyhHDhVtMh0SdgOmlPJVEKp1LtoTnjKEiZ4OkMHIbwTQlJO9T6aMZIyxTmfo9d7U3UQa4c9hL4znQNct6aquwqbrsDQgIu-b8e-8mb9NuLY4xZMGDzgZmit8dga94HbIbgGsHGx_qrjeIT2StMEON7qIXq5vnpe3iarh5u75cUqcTxjMZGKUqGY1qywSoCWvJBGFqVz1prSmYyUQqeQKscIcdIBZ6VlTBMJIuM05YfobNO79v3nACHmbR0cNI3poB9CngmlhZxucoqN0_k-BA9lvvbTo37MKcl_gOYT0Pw_0Cl2uh0YbAvFX-iXIP8GN_pzgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748945454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography to measure lumbar back muscle activity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Dickx, Nele ; D'Hooge, Roseline ; Cagnie, Barbara ; Deschepper, Ellen ; Verstraete, Koenraad ; Danneels, Lieven</creator><creatorcontrib>Dickx, Nele ; D'Hooge, Roseline ; Cagnie, Barbara ; Deschepper, Ellen ; Verstraete, Koenraad ; Danneels, Lieven</creatorcontrib><description>Mixed model analysis of muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electromyography (EMG) changes in lumbar muscles during trunk extension exercise at varying intensities. To gain insight within the relationship between muscle functional MRI and activity of the lumbar back muscles, which is related to exercise intensity. It is known that muscle activity during exercise induces a force-sensitive T2 increase; however, it is not known how sensitive this T2 change is. In addition, the association between MRI and EMG measurement was investigated. Multifidus and erector spinae muscle activity was investigated during a trunk extension exercise at 5 increasing loads (from 40% to 80% of 1 repetition maximum), with both MRI and EMG. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis. Our results indicate a linear relationship between MRI and exercise intensity; for both muscles an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of the T2 value with 1.18 (0.89, 1.47) ms. Also for EMG there is a linear relationship with exercise intensity; an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of 6.98 (5.33, 8.62) microV. Furthermore, a linear association between MRI and EMG is acceptable. For the multifidus, an increase of 1 muV (EMG) corresponds with an increase of 0.168 (0.117, 0.219) ms (MRI). For the erector spinae, an increase of 1 microV corresponds with an increase of 0.078 (0.042, 0.114) ms. Both muscle functional MRI and EMG have specific (dis-) advantages and therefore have to be seen as complementary techniques. Nevertheless, our results support the validity of each method and indicate that MRI and EMG can be used independently to quantify lumbar muscle activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d79f02</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20628333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Electromyography ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Lumbosacral Region - physiopathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Weight-Bearing - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2010-08, Vol.35 (17), p.E836-E842</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5811482992db84e953d5a5dfccbbafca70f496e68c200c5ce32fb22905e473163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5811482992db84e953d5a5dfccbbafca70f496e68c200c5ce32fb22905e473163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20628333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dickx, Nele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hooge, Roseline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagnie, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschepper, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verstraete, Koenraad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danneels, Lieven</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography to measure lumbar back muscle activity</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Mixed model analysis of muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electromyography (EMG) changes in lumbar muscles during trunk extension exercise at varying intensities. To gain insight within the relationship between muscle functional MRI and activity of the lumbar back muscles, which is related to exercise intensity. It is known that muscle activity during exercise induces a force-sensitive T2 increase; however, it is not known how sensitive this T2 change is. In addition, the association between MRI and EMG measurement was investigated. Multifidus and erector spinae muscle activity was investigated during a trunk extension exercise at 5 increasing loads (from 40% to 80% of 1 repetition maximum), with both MRI and EMG. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis. Our results indicate a linear relationship between MRI and exercise intensity; for both muscles an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of the T2 value with 1.18 (0.89, 1.47) ms. Also for EMG there is a linear relationship with exercise intensity; an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of 6.98 (5.33, 8.62) microV. Furthermore, a linear association between MRI and EMG is acceptable. For the multifidus, an increase of 1 muV (EMG) corresponds with an increase of 0.168 (0.117, 0.219) ms (MRI). For the erector spinae, an increase of 1 microV corresponds with an increase of 0.078 (0.042, 0.114) ms. Both muscle functional MRI and EMG have specific (dis-) advantages and therefore have to be seen as complementary techniques. Nevertheless, our results support the validity of each method and indicate that MRI and EMG can be used independently to quantify lumbar muscle activity.</description><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region - physiopathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkElLxDAYhoMozrj8A5HcPHXM2iZHHdxgRHC7liT9WqtdxiQV-u-tzOhBvsN7eRe-B6ETShaU6Oz88vFpQSyhHDhVtMh0SdgOmlPJVEKp1LtoTnjKEiZ4OkMHIbwTQlJO9T6aMZIyxTmfo9d7U3UQa4c9hL4znQNct6aquwqbrsDQgIu-b8e-8mb9NuLY4xZMGDzgZmit8dga94HbIbgGsHGx_qrjeIT2StMEON7qIXq5vnpe3iarh5u75cUqcTxjMZGKUqGY1qywSoCWvJBGFqVz1prSmYyUQqeQKscIcdIBZ6VlTBMJIuM05YfobNO79v3nACHmbR0cNI3poB9CngmlhZxucoqN0_k-BA9lvvbTo37MKcl_gOYT0Pw_0Cl2uh0YbAvFX-iXIP8GN_pzgA</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Dickx, Nele</creator><creator>D'Hooge, Roseline</creator><creator>Cagnie, Barbara</creator><creator>Deschepper, Ellen</creator><creator>Verstraete, Koenraad</creator><creator>Danneels, Lieven</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography to measure lumbar back muscle activity</title><author>Dickx, Nele ; D'Hooge, Roseline ; Cagnie, Barbara ; Deschepper, Ellen ; Verstraete, Koenraad ; Danneels, Lieven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5811482992db84e953d5a5dfccbbafca70f496e68c200c5ce32fb22905e473163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region - physiopathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dickx, Nele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hooge, Roseline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagnie, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschepper, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verstraete, Koenraad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danneels, Lieven</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dickx, Nele</au><au>D'Hooge, Roseline</au><au>Cagnie, Barbara</au><au>Deschepper, Ellen</au><au>Verstraete, Koenraad</au><au>Danneels, Lieven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography to measure lumbar back muscle activity</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>E836</spage><epage>E842</epage><pages>E836-E842</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><abstract>Mixed model analysis of muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electromyography (EMG) changes in lumbar muscles during trunk extension exercise at varying intensities. To gain insight within the relationship between muscle functional MRI and activity of the lumbar back muscles, which is related to exercise intensity. It is known that muscle activity during exercise induces a force-sensitive T2 increase; however, it is not known how sensitive this T2 change is. In addition, the association between MRI and EMG measurement was investigated. Multifidus and erector spinae muscle activity was investigated during a trunk extension exercise at 5 increasing loads (from 40% to 80% of 1 repetition maximum), with both MRI and EMG. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis. Our results indicate a linear relationship between MRI and exercise intensity; for both muscles an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of the T2 value with 1.18 (0.89, 1.47) ms. Also for EMG there is a linear relationship with exercise intensity; an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of 6.98 (5.33, 8.62) microV. Furthermore, a linear association between MRI and EMG is acceptable. For the multifidus, an increase of 1 muV (EMG) corresponds with an increase of 0.168 (0.117, 0.219) ms (MRI). For the erector spinae, an increase of 1 microV corresponds with an increase of 0.078 (0.042, 0.114) ms. Both muscle functional MRI and EMG have specific (dis-) advantages and therefore have to be seen as complementary techniques. Nevertheless, our results support the validity of each method and indicate that MRI and EMG can be used independently to quantify lumbar muscle activity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>20628333</pmid><doi>10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d79f02</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2010-08, Vol.35 (17), p.E836-E842
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748945454
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Electromyography
Exercise - physiology
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Lumbosacral Region - physiopathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology
Weight-Bearing - physiology
Young Adult
title Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography to measure lumbar back muscle activity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A37%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20and%20electromyography%20to%20measure%20lumbar%20back%20muscle%20activity&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=Dickx,%20Nele&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=E836&rft.epage=E842&rft.pages=E836-E842&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d79f02&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748945454%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748945454&rft_id=info:pmid/20628333&rfr_iscdi=true