The chorioallantoic membrane in the prediction of eye irritation potential

It has been suggested that the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) could be used as an alternative to the rabbit eye test for irritation. Various authors have examined different methods for investigating the irritant potential of materials to the CAM. We used the CAM method as described by Luepke,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicology in vitro 1990, Vol.4 (4), p.321-323
Hauptverfasser: Lawrence, R.S., Ackroyd, D.M., Williams, D.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 323
container_issue 4
container_start_page 321
container_title Toxicology in vitro
container_volume 4
creator Lawrence, R.S.
Ackroyd, D.M.
Williams, D.L.
description It has been suggested that the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) could be used as an alternative to the rabbit eye test for irritation. Various authors have examined different methods for investigating the irritant potential of materials to the CAM. We used the CAM method as described by Luepke, to assess the effect of 34 materials of known in vivo eye irritancy, including fully formulated products ranging from skin creams to industrial detergents. Test materials were applied undiluted to the CAM on day 10 of incubation with rinsing after 20 seconds of contact. Effects to the CAM including vasodilation and haemorrhage were assessed for up to 5 min after application. A comparison was made between the rank order of effect on the CAM and the known ranking for in vivo eye irritancy. There was in general only a limited correlation between in vitro and in vivo results but a reasonable distinction between irritant materials and those of only very slight irritancy was observed. Among products of a similar type there was a better correlation between results from the CAM and in vivo eye results than when all materials were considered together. These data indicate that this method would only have a limited application as a screening procedure for eye irritation potential or as part of a battery of in vitro tests but so far has not been found to be superior to cell culture tests in our laboratory.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0887-2333(90)90073-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748943031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0887233390900733</els_id><sourcerecordid>748943031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-db8f53496b8426341094d01685128118e74110b6269417d4d669947b483860213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVBbaf1ChXChwSDuOHX9cKiEEBYTUCz1bjjMRRkm8tb2V-Pc47JbeOFnyPPPqnYeQLxS-UaDiOygl64YxdqbhXANIVrMPZEWV1DWjUu6R1RtyQA5TegKAVjXwkRw0IKEp5IrcPTxi5R5D9MGOo51z8K6acOqinbHyc5XLfB2x9y77MFdhqPC5DGL02b7-rEPGOXs7fiL7gx0Tft69R-T39dXD5U19_-vn7eXFfe14A7nuOzW0jGvRKd4Ixilo3peDVEsbRalCySmFTjRCcyp73guhNZcdV0yJ0podkdNt7jqGPxtM2Uw-OVzaY9gkI7nSnAFbyK_vkrRVraRaFpBvQRdDShEHs45-svHZUDCLbbOoNItKo8G82jasrB3v8jfdhP3b0j-9BTjZATY5Ow5FqvPpf7huNROtKtyPLYfF21-P0STncXZFe0SXTR_8-01eACxcmG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15857197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The chorioallantoic membrane in the prediction of eye irritation potential</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lawrence, R.S. ; Ackroyd, D.M. ; Williams, D.L.</creator><contributor>Parish, WE ; Hard, GC (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, R.S. ; Ackroyd, D.M. ; Williams, D.L. ; Parish, WE ; Hard, GC (eds)</creatorcontrib><description>It has been suggested that the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) could be used as an alternative to the rabbit eye test for irritation. Various authors have examined different methods for investigating the irritant potential of materials to the CAM. We used the CAM method as described by Luepke, to assess the effect of 34 materials of known in vivo eye irritancy, including fully formulated products ranging from skin creams to industrial detergents. Test materials were applied undiluted to the CAM on day 10 of incubation with rinsing after 20 seconds of contact. Effects to the CAM including vasodilation and haemorrhage were assessed for up to 5 min after application. A comparison was made between the rank order of effect on the CAM and the known ranking for in vivo eye irritancy. There was in general only a limited correlation between in vitro and in vivo results but a reasonable distinction between irritant materials and those of only very slight irritancy was observed. Among products of a similar type there was a better correlation between results from the CAM and in vivo eye results than when all materials were considered together. These data indicate that this method would only have a limited application as a screening procedure for eye irritation potential or as part of a battery of in vitro tests but so far has not been found to be superior to cell culture tests in our laboratory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-2333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3177</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0887-2333(90)90073-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20702187</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TIVIEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; General aspects. Methods ; Medical sciences ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Toxicology in vitro, 1990, Vol.4 (4), p.321-323</ispartof><rights>1990</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-db8f53496b8426341094d01685128118e74110b6269417d4d669947b483860213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-db8f53496b8426341094d01685128118e74110b6269417d4d669947b483860213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0887-2333(90)90073-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,4024,4050,4051,23930,23931,25140,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19593658$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20702187$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Parish, WE</contributor><contributor>Hard, GC (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackroyd, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D.L.</creatorcontrib><title>The chorioallantoic membrane in the prediction of eye irritation potential</title><title>Toxicology in vitro</title><addtitle>Toxicol In Vitro</addtitle><description>It has been suggested that the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) could be used as an alternative to the rabbit eye test for irritation. Various authors have examined different methods for investigating the irritant potential of materials to the CAM. We used the CAM method as described by Luepke, to assess the effect of 34 materials of known in vivo eye irritancy, including fully formulated products ranging from skin creams to industrial detergents. Test materials were applied undiluted to the CAM on day 10 of incubation with rinsing after 20 seconds of contact. Effects to the CAM including vasodilation and haemorrhage were assessed for up to 5 min after application. A comparison was made between the rank order of effect on the CAM and the known ranking for in vivo eye irritancy. There was in general only a limited correlation between in vitro and in vivo results but a reasonable distinction between irritant materials and those of only very slight irritancy was observed. Among products of a similar type there was a better correlation between results from the CAM and in vivo eye results than when all materials were considered together. These data indicate that this method would only have a limited application as a screening procedure for eye irritation potential or as part of a battery of in vitro tests but so far has not been found to be superior to cell culture tests in our laboratory.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>General aspects. Methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0887-2333</issn><issn>1879-3177</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVBbaf1ChXChwSDuOHX9cKiEEBYTUCz1bjjMRRkm8tb2V-Pc47JbeOFnyPPPqnYeQLxS-UaDiOygl64YxdqbhXANIVrMPZEWV1DWjUu6R1RtyQA5TegKAVjXwkRw0IKEp5IrcPTxi5R5D9MGOo51z8K6acOqinbHyc5XLfB2x9y77MFdhqPC5DGL02b7-rEPGOXs7fiL7gx0Tft69R-T39dXD5U19_-vn7eXFfe14A7nuOzW0jGvRKd4Ixilo3peDVEsbRalCySmFTjRCcyp73guhNZcdV0yJ0podkdNt7jqGPxtM2Uw-OVzaY9gkI7nSnAFbyK_vkrRVraRaFpBvQRdDShEHs45-svHZUDCLbbOoNItKo8G82jasrB3v8jfdhP3b0j-9BTjZATY5Ow5FqvPpf7huNROtKtyPLYfF21-P0STncXZFe0SXTR_8-01eACxcmG0</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>Lawrence, R.S.</creator><creator>Ackroyd, D.M.</creator><creator>Williams, D.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>The chorioallantoic membrane in the prediction of eye irritation potential</title><author>Lawrence, R.S. ; Ackroyd, D.M. ; Williams, D.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-db8f53496b8426341094d01685128118e74110b6269417d4d669947b483860213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>General aspects. Methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackroyd, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Toxicology in vitro</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawrence, R.S.</au><au>Ackroyd, D.M.</au><au>Williams, D.L.</au><au>Parish, WE</au><au>Hard, GC (eds)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The chorioallantoic membrane in the prediction of eye irritation potential</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology in vitro</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol In Vitro</addtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>321-323</pages><issn>0887-2333</issn><eissn>1879-3177</eissn><coden>TIVIEQ</coden><abstract>It has been suggested that the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) could be used as an alternative to the rabbit eye test for irritation. Various authors have examined different methods for investigating the irritant potential of materials to the CAM. We used the CAM method as described by Luepke, to assess the effect of 34 materials of known in vivo eye irritancy, including fully formulated products ranging from skin creams to industrial detergents. Test materials were applied undiluted to the CAM on day 10 of incubation with rinsing after 20 seconds of contact. Effects to the CAM including vasodilation and haemorrhage were assessed for up to 5 min after application. A comparison was made between the rank order of effect on the CAM and the known ranking for in vivo eye irritancy. There was in general only a limited correlation between in vitro and in vivo results but a reasonable distinction between irritant materials and those of only very slight irritancy was observed. Among products of a similar type there was a better correlation between results from the CAM and in vivo eye results than when all materials were considered together. These data indicate that this method would only have a limited application as a screening procedure for eye irritation potential or as part of a battery of in vitro tests but so far has not been found to be superior to cell culture tests in our laboratory.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20702187</pmid><doi>10.1016/0887-2333(90)90073-3</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-2333
ispartof Toxicology in vitro, 1990, Vol.4 (4), p.321-323
issn 0887-2333
1879-3177
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748943031
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
General aspects. Methods
Medical sciences
Toxicology
title The chorioallantoic membrane in the prediction of eye irritation potential
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A02%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20chorioallantoic%20membrane%20in%20the%20prediction%20of%20eye%20irritation%20potential&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20in%20vitro&rft.au=Lawrence,%20R.S.&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=321-323&rft.issn=0887-2333&rft.eissn=1879-3177&rft.coden=TIVIEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0887-2333(90)90073-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748943031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15857197&rft_id=info:pmid/20702187&rft_els_id=0887233390900733&rfr_iscdi=true