Abnormal Breath Testing in IBS: A Meta-Analysis
Background Recent evidence suggests a role for enteric bacteria in the development of symptoms in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The concept was initially based on the common finding of an abnormal lactulose breath test to suggest the presence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Digestive diseases and sciences 2010-09, Vol.55 (9), p.2441-2449 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2449 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2441 |
container_title | Digestive diseases and sciences |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Shah, Eric D Basseri, Robert J Chong, Kelly Pimentel, Mark |
description | Background Recent evidence suggests a role for enteric bacteria in the development of symptoms in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The concept was initially based on the common finding of an abnormal lactulose breath test to suggest the presence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Despite successful antibiotic studies based on these findings, the premise of bacterial overgrowth was met with skepticism due to the perceived inaccuracies of breath testing in humans. In this study, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies using breath testing in IBS subjects with comparison to healthy controls. Methods A literature search was conducted to identify studies in which breath testing was conducted in subjects with IBS. Once abstract titles were identified, studies that examined breath testing in a case-control fashion were identified for paper review. After exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining papers were examined using meta-analysis, among which the prevalence of an abnormal breath test in IBS subjects was compared. Further analysis was conducted among studies with appropriate age- and sex-matched controls. Results Eleven studies met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Although heterogeneity was identified among studies on the basis of substrate used, lactulose was the most common substrate. In pooling the 11 studies, breath testing was more often abnormal among IBS subjects than health controls (OR = 4.46, 95% CI = 1.69-11.80). This was further evident in more appropriately designed age- and sex-matched studies (OR = 9.64, 95% CI = 4.26-21.82). The overall sensitivity and specificity for breath testing in separating IBS from healthy controls was 43.6 and 83.6%. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the breath test findings in IBS appear to be valid. While this meta-analysis does not suggest that the breath test findings imply SIBO, the abnormal fermentation timing and dynamics of the breath test findings support a role for abnormal intestinal bacterial distribution in IBS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10620-010-1276-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748935286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A712949521</galeid><sourcerecordid>A712949521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-e375a1b65566451148ebb3fa34f8ee4bce38f22d294a69fe791491d56e2394a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PFTEUhhujkQv6A9zoRGJ0M3BOv8tuIAokGBfAuunMba9D5gPbuQv-PZ3MVaIxpIu2p8_79m0PIe8QjhBAHScESaEEhBKpkiV_QVYoFCupkPolWQHKvEaUe2Q_pTsAMArla7JHgUuljVyR46oexti7rjiN3k0_ixufpnbYFO1QXJ5enxRV8d1PrqwG1z2kNr0hr4Lrkn-7mw_I7bevN2cX5dWP88uz6qpshIGp9EwJh7UUQkouELn2dc2CYzxo73ndeKYDpWtquJMmeGWQG1wL6SnLJc0OyOfF9z6Ov7Y5k-3b1Piuc4Mft8kqrg0TVMtMfnmWRMNp_gMleEY__oPejduYXzb7MSOBmxk6XKCN67xthzBO0TWzp60U5sBGUMzU0X-oPNa-b5tx8KHN9b8EuAiaOKYUfbD3se1dfLAIdu6mXbppYd7nbto5yvtd3m3d-_Ufxe_2ZeDTDnCpcV2Ibmja9MQxVIYpyBxduJSPho2PTw9_7vYPiyi40bpNzMa31xSQAWolNBPsEVpxucI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>743960494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abnormal Breath Testing in IBS: A Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Shah, Eric D ; Basseri, Robert J ; Chong, Kelly ; Pimentel, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Shah, Eric D ; Basseri, Robert J ; Chong, Kelly ; Pimentel, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Background Recent evidence suggests a role for enteric bacteria in the development of symptoms in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The concept was initially based on the common finding of an abnormal lactulose breath test to suggest the presence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Despite successful antibiotic studies based on these findings, the premise of bacterial overgrowth was met with skepticism due to the perceived inaccuracies of breath testing in humans. In this study, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies using breath testing in IBS subjects with comparison to healthy controls. Methods A literature search was conducted to identify studies in which breath testing was conducted in subjects with IBS. Once abstract titles were identified, studies that examined breath testing in a case-control fashion were identified for paper review. After exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining papers were examined using meta-analysis, among which the prevalence of an abnormal breath test in IBS subjects was compared. Further analysis was conducted among studies with appropriate age- and sex-matched controls. Results Eleven studies met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Although heterogeneity was identified among studies on the basis of substrate used, lactulose was the most common substrate. In pooling the 11 studies, breath testing was more often abnormal among IBS subjects than health controls (OR = 4.46, 95% CI = 1.69-11.80). This was further evident in more appropriately designed age- and sex-matched studies (OR = 9.64, 95% CI = 4.26-21.82). The overall sensitivity and specificity for breath testing in separating IBS from healthy controls was 43.6 and 83.6%. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the breath test findings in IBS appear to be valid. While this meta-analysis does not suggest that the breath test findings imply SIBO, the abnormal fermentation timing and dynamics of the breath test findings support a role for abnormal intestinal bacterial distribution in IBS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2116</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1276-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20467896</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DDSCDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Boston : Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics ; Biochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breath Tests ; Carbohydrates ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; Fermentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Intestine, Small - microbiology ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome - diagnosis ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome - drug therapy ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome - microbiology ; Lactulose ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Odds Ratio ; Oncology ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Transplant Surgery ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>Digestive diseases and sciences, 2010-09, Vol.55 (9), p.2441-2449</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-e375a1b65566451148ebb3fa34f8ee4bce38f22d294a69fe791491d56e2394a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-e375a1b65566451148ebb3fa34f8ee4bce38f22d294a69fe791491d56e2394a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10620-010-1276-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10620-010-1276-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23179370$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20467896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shah, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basseri, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimentel, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Abnormal Breath Testing in IBS: A Meta-Analysis</title><title>Digestive diseases and sciences</title><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><description>Background Recent evidence suggests a role for enteric bacteria in the development of symptoms in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The concept was initially based on the common finding of an abnormal lactulose breath test to suggest the presence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Despite successful antibiotic studies based on these findings, the premise of bacterial overgrowth was met with skepticism due to the perceived inaccuracies of breath testing in humans. In this study, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies using breath testing in IBS subjects with comparison to healthy controls. Methods A literature search was conducted to identify studies in which breath testing was conducted in subjects with IBS. Once abstract titles were identified, studies that examined breath testing in a case-control fashion were identified for paper review. After exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining papers were examined using meta-analysis, among which the prevalence of an abnormal breath test in IBS subjects was compared. Further analysis was conducted among studies with appropriate age- and sex-matched controls. Results Eleven studies met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Although heterogeneity was identified among studies on the basis of substrate used, lactulose was the most common substrate. In pooling the 11 studies, breath testing was more often abnormal among IBS subjects than health controls (OR = 4.46, 95% CI = 1.69-11.80). This was further evident in more appropriately designed age- and sex-matched studies (OR = 9.64, 95% CI = 4.26-21.82). The overall sensitivity and specificity for breath testing in separating IBS from healthy controls was 43.6 and 83.6%. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the breath test findings in IBS appear to be valid. While this meta-analysis does not suggest that the breath test findings imply SIBO, the abnormal fermentation timing and dynamics of the breath test findings support a role for abnormal intestinal bacterial distribution in IBS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breath Tests</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - microbiology</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - drug therapy</subject><subject>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - microbiology</subject><subject>Lactulose</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Transplant Surgery</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>0163-2116</issn><issn>1573-2568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1PFTEUhhujkQv6A9zoRGJ0M3BOv8tuIAokGBfAuunMba9D5gPbuQv-PZ3MVaIxpIu2p8_79m0PIe8QjhBAHScESaEEhBKpkiV_QVYoFCupkPolWQHKvEaUe2Q_pTsAMArla7JHgUuljVyR46oexti7rjiN3k0_ixufpnbYFO1QXJ5enxRV8d1PrqwG1z2kNr0hr4Lrkn-7mw_I7bevN2cX5dWP88uz6qpshIGp9EwJh7UUQkouELn2dc2CYzxo73ndeKYDpWtquJMmeGWQG1wL6SnLJc0OyOfF9z6Ov7Y5k-3b1Piuc4Mft8kqrg0TVMtMfnmWRMNp_gMleEY__oPejduYXzb7MSOBmxk6XKCN67xthzBO0TWzp60U5sBGUMzU0X-oPNa-b5tx8KHN9b8EuAiaOKYUfbD3se1dfLAIdu6mXbppYd7nbto5yvtd3m3d-_Ufxe_2ZeDTDnCpcV2Ibmja9MQxVIYpyBxduJSPho2PTw9_7vYPiyi40bpNzMa31xSQAWolNBPsEVpxucI</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Shah, Eric D</creator><creator>Basseri, Robert J</creator><creator>Chong, Kelly</creator><creator>Pimentel, Mark</creator><general>Boston : Springer US</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Abnormal Breath Testing in IBS: A Meta-Analysis</title><author>Shah, Eric D ; Basseri, Robert J ; Chong, Kelly ; Pimentel, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-e375a1b65566451148ebb3fa34f8ee4bce38f22d294a69fe791491d56e2394a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breath Tests</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - microbiology</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - drug therapy</topic><topic>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - microbiology</topic><topic>Lactulose</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Transplant Surgery</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shah, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basseri, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimentel, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shah, Eric D</au><au>Basseri, Robert J</au><au>Chong, Kelly</au><au>Pimentel, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abnormal Breath Testing in IBS: A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle><stitle>Dig Dis Sci</stitle><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2441</spage><epage>2449</epage><pages>2441-2449</pages><issn>0163-2116</issn><eissn>1573-2568</eissn><coden>DDSCDJ</coden><abstract>Background Recent evidence suggests a role for enteric bacteria in the development of symptoms in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The concept was initially based on the common finding of an abnormal lactulose breath test to suggest the presence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Despite successful antibiotic studies based on these findings, the premise of bacterial overgrowth was met with skepticism due to the perceived inaccuracies of breath testing in humans. In this study, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies using breath testing in IBS subjects with comparison to healthy controls. Methods A literature search was conducted to identify studies in which breath testing was conducted in subjects with IBS. Once abstract titles were identified, studies that examined breath testing in a case-control fashion were identified for paper review. After exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining papers were examined using meta-analysis, among which the prevalence of an abnormal breath test in IBS subjects was compared. Further analysis was conducted among studies with appropriate age- and sex-matched controls. Results Eleven studies met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Although heterogeneity was identified among studies on the basis of substrate used, lactulose was the most common substrate. In pooling the 11 studies, breath testing was more often abnormal among IBS subjects than health controls (OR = 4.46, 95% CI = 1.69-11.80). This was further evident in more appropriately designed age- and sex-matched studies (OR = 9.64, 95% CI = 4.26-21.82). The overall sensitivity and specificity for breath testing in separating IBS from healthy controls was 43.6 and 83.6%. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the breath test findings in IBS appear to be valid. While this meta-analysis does not suggest that the breath test findings imply SIBO, the abnormal fermentation timing and dynamics of the breath test findings support a role for abnormal intestinal bacterial distribution in IBS.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Boston : Springer US</pub><pmid>20467896</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10620-010-1276-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-2116 |
ispartof | Digestive diseases and sciences, 2010-09, Vol.55 (9), p.2441-2449 |
issn | 0163-2116 1573-2568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_748935286 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adult Analysis Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibiotics Biochemistry Biological and medical sciences Breath Tests Carbohydrates Feeding. Feeding behavior Female Fermentation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gastroenterology Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Hepatology Humans Intestine, Small - microbiology Irritable bowel syndrome Irritable Bowel Syndrome - diagnosis Irritable Bowel Syndrome - drug therapy Irritable Bowel Syndrome - microbiology Lactulose Male Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Odds Ratio Oncology Other diseases. Semiology Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results Review Sensitivity and Specificity Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Transplant Surgery Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems |
title | Abnormal Breath Testing in IBS: A Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A37%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abnormal%20Breath%20Testing%20in%20IBS:%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Digestive%20diseases%20and%20sciences&rft.au=Shah,%20Eric%20D&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2441&rft.epage=2449&rft.pages=2441-2449&rft.issn=0163-2116&rft.eissn=1573-2568&rft.coden=DDSCDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10620-010-1276-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA712949521%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=743960494&rft_id=info:pmid/20467896&rft_galeid=A712949521&rfr_iscdi=true |