A preliminary evaluation of Cave's roentgenographic method of fetal cephalometry

A brief review of the literature relating to roentgenographic cephalometry has been presented. Particular emphasis has been given to the recent work of Cave, and his so-called precision method has been evaluated. If grossly unsatisfactory roentgenograms are excluded—and we are of the opinion that su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1951-03, Vol.61 (3), p.487-497
Hauptverfasser: McElin, Thomas W., Lovelady, Sim B., Brandes, Robert W., Hunter, James S., Good, C.Allen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 497
container_issue 3
container_start_page 487
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 61
creator McElin, Thomas W.
Lovelady, Sim B.
Brandes, Robert W.
Hunter, James S.
Good, C.Allen
description A brief review of the literature relating to roentgenographic cephalometry has been presented. Particular emphasis has been given to the recent work of Cave, and his so-called precision method has been evaluated. If grossly unsatisfactory roentgenograms are excluded—and we are of the opinion that such roentgenograms can usually be excluded—accurate measurements of diameters of the fetal skull in the uterus to within ±6.6 per cent can be obtained by this method in approximately 85 per cent of the cases. In the case of measurements of fetal skulls adjudged to be of grade A in the roentgenogram, accuracy to within ±5.5 per cent was consistently obtained (92 per cent). We believe that a simple, inexpensive, and relatively precise technique of roentgenographic cephalometry might well represent a helpful adjunct in the management of suspected cephalopelvic disproportion in the primigravid woman for whom a trial of labor has been planned and a fetal development above the average is suspected. Although this method, in our limited experience, does not seem to be a method of precision, it is certainly deserving of further investigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0002-9378(51)91395-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74819039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002937851913956</els_id><sourcerecordid>74819039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f5c3b4ea26e49f9a7359b4afb0de5803bfd5e16f0a7123f3fd360357a3eeaeeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUiv_LioJk2TNjfCGH7BQC_0OqTpyRZpm5q0g_17Wzf0zqtDDs97wvsgdE7wLcGE32GMk1jQLL9m5EYQKljMD9CUYJHFPOf5IZr-IhN0EsLn-ExEcowmJM0JzgSford51HqobG0b5bcRbFTVq866JnImWqgNXIXIO2i6FTRu5VW7tjqqoVu7ciQMdKqKNLRrVblh7ben6MioKsDZfs7Qx-PD--I5Xr4-vSzmy1hTjrvYME2LFFTCIRVGqIwyUaTKFLgElmNamJIB4QarjCTUUFMOMcoyRQEUQEFn6HJ3t_Xuq4fQydoGDVWlGnB9kNlQUWAqBjDdgdq7EDwY2XpbD2UlwXI0KUcvctQkGZE_JiUfYhf7-31RQ_kX2qsbgPsdAEPLjQUvg7bQaCitB93J0tn_f_gGcImEAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74819039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A preliminary evaluation of Cave's roentgenographic method of fetal cephalometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>McElin, Thomas W. ; Lovelady, Sim B. ; Brandes, Robert W. ; Hunter, James S. ; Good, C.Allen</creator><creatorcontrib>McElin, Thomas W. ; Lovelady, Sim B. ; Brandes, Robert W. ; Hunter, James S. ; Good, C.Allen</creatorcontrib><description>A brief review of the literature relating to roentgenographic cephalometry has been presented. Particular emphasis has been given to the recent work of Cave, and his so-called precision method has been evaluated. If grossly unsatisfactory roentgenograms are excluded—and we are of the opinion that such roentgenograms can usually be excluded—accurate measurements of diameters of the fetal skull in the uterus to within ±6.6 per cent can be obtained by this method in approximately 85 per cent of the cases. In the case of measurements of fetal skulls adjudged to be of grade A in the roentgenogram, accuracy to within ±5.5 per cent was consistently obtained (92 per cent). We believe that a simple, inexpensive, and relatively precise technique of roentgenographic cephalometry might well represent a helpful adjunct in the management of suspected cephalopelvic disproportion in the primigravid woman for whom a trial of labor has been planned and a fetal development above the average is suspected. Although this method, in our limited experience, does not seem to be a method of precision, it is certainly deserving of further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(51)91395-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14810796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bone and Bones ; Cephalometry ; Fetus ; Head ; Humans ; Old Medline ; Skull</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1951-03, Vol.61 (3), p.487-497</ispartof><rights>1951</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f5c3b4ea26e49f9a7359b4afb0de5803bfd5e16f0a7123f3fd360357a3eeaeeb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f5c3b4ea26e49f9a7359b4afb0de5803bfd5e16f0a7123f3fd360357a3eeaeeb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(51)91395-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14810796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McElin, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovelady, Sim B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, C.Allen</creatorcontrib><title>A preliminary evaluation of Cave's roentgenographic method of fetal cephalometry</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>A brief review of the literature relating to roentgenographic cephalometry has been presented. Particular emphasis has been given to the recent work of Cave, and his so-called precision method has been evaluated. If grossly unsatisfactory roentgenograms are excluded—and we are of the opinion that such roentgenograms can usually be excluded—accurate measurements of diameters of the fetal skull in the uterus to within ±6.6 per cent can be obtained by this method in approximately 85 per cent of the cases. In the case of measurements of fetal skulls adjudged to be of grade A in the roentgenogram, accuracy to within ±5.5 per cent was consistently obtained (92 per cent). We believe that a simple, inexpensive, and relatively precise technique of roentgenographic cephalometry might well represent a helpful adjunct in the management of suspected cephalopelvic disproportion in the primigravid woman for whom a trial of labor has been planned and a fetal development above the average is suspected. Although this method, in our limited experience, does not seem to be a method of precision, it is certainly deserving of further investigation.</description><subject>Bone and Bones</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Fetus</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Skull</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1951</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUiv_LioJk2TNjfCGH7BQC_0OqTpyRZpm5q0g_17Wzf0zqtDDs97wvsgdE7wLcGE32GMk1jQLL9m5EYQKljMD9CUYJHFPOf5IZr-IhN0EsLn-ExEcowmJM0JzgSford51HqobG0b5bcRbFTVq866JnImWqgNXIXIO2i6FTRu5VW7tjqqoVu7ciQMdKqKNLRrVblh7ben6MioKsDZfs7Qx-PD--I5Xr4-vSzmy1hTjrvYME2LFFTCIRVGqIwyUaTKFLgElmNamJIB4QarjCTUUFMOMcoyRQEUQEFn6HJ3t_Xuq4fQydoGDVWlGnB9kNlQUWAqBjDdgdq7EDwY2XpbD2UlwXI0KUcvctQkGZE_JiUfYhf7-31RQ_kX2qsbgPsdAEPLjQUvg7bQaCitB93J0tn_f_gGcImEAQ</recordid><startdate>195103</startdate><enddate>195103</enddate><creator>McElin, Thomas W.</creator><creator>Lovelady, Sim B.</creator><creator>Brandes, Robert W.</creator><creator>Hunter, James S.</creator><creator>Good, C.Allen</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>195103</creationdate><title>A preliminary evaluation of Cave's roentgenographic method of fetal cephalometry</title><author>McElin, Thomas W. ; Lovelady, Sim B. ; Brandes, Robert W. ; Hunter, James S. ; Good, C.Allen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f5c3b4ea26e49f9a7359b4afb0de5803bfd5e16f0a7123f3fd360357a3eeaeeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1951</creationdate><topic>Bone and Bones</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Fetus</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Skull</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McElin, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovelady, Sim B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, C.Allen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McElin, Thomas W.</au><au>Lovelady, Sim B.</au><au>Brandes, Robert W.</au><au>Hunter, James S.</au><au>Good, C.Allen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A preliminary evaluation of Cave's roentgenographic method of fetal cephalometry</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1951-03</date><risdate>1951</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>487-497</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>A brief review of the literature relating to roentgenographic cephalometry has been presented. Particular emphasis has been given to the recent work of Cave, and his so-called precision method has been evaluated. If grossly unsatisfactory roentgenograms are excluded—and we are of the opinion that such roentgenograms can usually be excluded—accurate measurements of diameters of the fetal skull in the uterus to within ±6.6 per cent can be obtained by this method in approximately 85 per cent of the cases. In the case of measurements of fetal skulls adjudged to be of grade A in the roentgenogram, accuracy to within ±5.5 per cent was consistently obtained (92 per cent). We believe that a simple, inexpensive, and relatively precise technique of roentgenographic cephalometry might well represent a helpful adjunct in the management of suspected cephalopelvic disproportion in the primigravid woman for whom a trial of labor has been planned and a fetal development above the average is suspected. Although this method, in our limited experience, does not seem to be a method of precision, it is certainly deserving of further investigation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>14810796</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9378(51)91395-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1951-03, Vol.61 (3), p.487-497
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74819039
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Bone and Bones
Cephalometry
Fetus
Head
Humans
Old Medline
Skull
title A preliminary evaluation of Cave's roentgenographic method of fetal cephalometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T11%3A51%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20preliminary%20evaluation%20of%20Cave's%20roentgenographic%20method%20of%20fetal%20cephalometry&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=McElin,%20Thomas%20W.&rft.date=1951-03&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=487-497&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9378(51)91395-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74819039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74819039&rft_id=info:pmid/14810796&rft_els_id=0002937851913956&rfr_iscdi=true