Rating training and experience
As a possible means of evaluating Army officers' merit the Personnel Research Section developed a simple mechanical system of evaluation whereby 4 variables are objectively rated by reference to a set of specified weights. The evaluations made by the system agreed more closely with the consensu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied psychology 1950-12, Vol.34 (6), p.381-383 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 383 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 381 |
| container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Burke, Laverne K Taylor, Erwin K |
| description | As a possible means of evaluating Army officers' merit the Personnel Research Section developed a simple mechanical system of evaluation whereby 4 variables are objectively rated by reference to a set of specified weights. The evaluations made by the system agreed more closely with the consensus of groups of eight competent evaluators than pairs of evaluators agreed with each other in the subjective rating of the officers' entire records. It is suggested that the technique employed could be of considerable service to merit systems when there are in excess of 1000 applicants to be rated. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0055792 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74726217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74726217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-bab5aaf4a940dfb2c13df2fa1a9141889eafdf9d2a056b2a8f81c166240308923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFFur4C8oRUW8RGd2N8nuUYpfUBBEz8sk2dWUNIm7Cdh_b0orguBp5vDwzvAydopwjSDSmw-AOE4132Nj1EJHqGK5z8YAHCMNCCN2FMISAKXQcMhGKBUIodWYTV-oK-v3WeeprDcL1cXMfrXWl7bO7TE7cFQFe7KbE_Z2f_c6f4wWzw9P89tFRCKJuyijLCZykrSEwmU8R1E47ghJo0SltCVXOF1wgjjJOCmnMMck4RIEKM3FhF1uc1vffPY2dGZVhtxWFdW26YNJZcoTjukAz_7AZdP7evjNJCi5jBXXAzr_DyHXIFOthsMTdrVVuW9C8NaZ1pcr8muDYDa1mp9aBzrdBfbZyha_cNfjAC62gFoybVjn5Lsyr2ww1FZGSJMYoVB8A_Kreyo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614245829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rating training and experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Burke, Laverne K ; Taylor, Erwin K</creator><creatorcontrib>Burke, Laverne K ; Taylor, Erwin K</creatorcontrib><description>As a possible means of evaluating Army officers' merit the Personnel Research Section developed a simple mechanical system of evaluation whereby 4 variables are objectively rated by reference to a set of specified weights. The evaluations made by the system agreed more closely with the consensus of groups of eight competent evaluators than pairs of evaluators agreed with each other in the subjective rating of the officers' entire records. It is suggested that the technique employed could be of considerable service to merit systems when there are in excess of 1000 applicants to be rated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0055792</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14803398</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Army Personnel ; Human ; Humans ; Military Personnel ; Military Training ; Old Medline ; Personnel Evaluation ; Rating</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 1950-12, Vol.34 (6), p.381-383</ispartof><rights>1950 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1950, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-bab5aaf4a940dfb2c13df2fa1a9141889eafdf9d2a056b2a8f81c166240308923</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14803398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burke, Laverne K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Erwin K</creatorcontrib><title>Rating training and experience</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>As a possible means of evaluating Army officers' merit the Personnel Research Section developed a simple mechanical system of evaluation whereby 4 variables are objectively rated by reference to a set of specified weights. The evaluations made by the system agreed more closely with the consensus of groups of eight competent evaluators than pairs of evaluators agreed with each other in the subjective rating of the officers' entire records. It is suggested that the technique employed could be of considerable service to merit systems when there are in excess of 1000 applicants to be rated.</description><subject>Army Personnel</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Military Training</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Personnel Evaluation</subject><subject>Rating</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1950</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFFur4C8oRUW8RGd2N8nuUYpfUBBEz8sk2dWUNIm7Cdh_b0orguBp5vDwzvAydopwjSDSmw-AOE4132Nj1EJHqGK5z8YAHCMNCCN2FMISAKXQcMhGKBUIodWYTV-oK-v3WeeprDcL1cXMfrXWl7bO7TE7cFQFe7KbE_Z2f_c6f4wWzw9P89tFRCKJuyijLCZykrSEwmU8R1E47ghJo0SltCVXOF1wgjjJOCmnMMck4RIEKM3FhF1uc1vffPY2dGZVhtxWFdW26YNJZcoTjukAz_7AZdP7evjNJCi5jBXXAzr_DyHXIFOthsMTdrVVuW9C8NaZ1pcr8muDYDa1mp9aBzrdBfbZyha_cNfjAC62gFoybVjn5Lsyr2ww1FZGSJMYoVB8A_Kreyo</recordid><startdate>19501201</startdate><enddate>19501201</enddate><creator>Burke, Laverne K</creator><creator>Taylor, Erwin K</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19501201</creationdate><title>Rating training and experience</title><author>Burke, Laverne K ; Taylor, Erwin K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-bab5aaf4a940dfb2c13df2fa1a9141889eafdf9d2a056b2a8f81c166240308923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1950</creationdate><topic>Army Personnel</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Military Training</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Personnel Evaluation</topic><topic>Rating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burke, Laverne K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Erwin K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burke, Laverne K</au><au>Taylor, Erwin K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rating training and experience</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>1950-12-01</date><risdate>1950</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>383</epage><pages>381-383</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>As a possible means of evaluating Army officers' merit the Personnel Research Section developed a simple mechanical system of evaluation whereby 4 variables are objectively rated by reference to a set of specified weights. The evaluations made by the system agreed more closely with the consensus of groups of eight competent evaluators than pairs of evaluators agreed with each other in the subjective rating of the officers' entire records. It is suggested that the technique employed could be of considerable service to merit systems when there are in excess of 1000 applicants to be rated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>14803398</pmid><doi>10.1037/h0055792</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 1950-12, Vol.34 (6), p.381-383 |
| issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74726217 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Army Personnel Human Humans Military Personnel Military Training Old Medline Personnel Evaluation Rating |
| title | Rating training and experience |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A55%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rating%20training%20and%20experience&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Burke,%20Laverne%20K&rft.date=1950-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=383&rft.pages=381-383&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0055792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74726217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614245829&rft_id=info:pmid/14803398&rfr_iscdi=true |