Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques

Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1979-10, Vol.60 (4), p.760-766
Hauptverfasser: Folland, E D, Parisi, A F, Moynihan, P F, Jones, D R, Feldman, C L, Tow, D E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 766
container_issue 4
container_start_page 760
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 60
creator Folland, E D
Parisi, A F
Moynihan, P F
Jones, D R
Feldman, C L
Tow, D E
description Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in 35 patients. Although all methods correlated positively, the degree of correlation varied with the algorithm used. For EF determination, TDE algorithms (especially those using multiple planes of section) were superior to unidimensional algorithms commonly used with M-mode echocardiography. The best algorithm (modified Simpson's rule) correlated well enough with cine EF (r = 0.78; SEE 0.097) and RVG EF (r = 0.75; SEE 0.087) to make clinically useful estimates. TDE volumes also correlated meaningfully with cine end-diastolic and end-systole volumes (r = 084; n = 70) but were associated with a large standard error of the estimate (43 ml) and offered less advantage over unidimensional volume estimates. Quantitative application of TDE appears to be a useful noninvasive method of evaluating LVEF, but is not as useful for estimating LV volumes.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.cir.60.4.760
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74715340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74715340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-161077b6af5c75da5ff6b496b5d677bdbf60c433b9071a61db985cda3f08e7c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1vEzEQhi1EgVA4c-HgE6fu1o6_sscoglKpEhJqz5bXHreuvHawd1vlJ_Vf4pKIk2esZ56R5kXoCyU9pZJeEtrbUHpJet4rSd6gFRVr3nHBhrdoRQgZOsXW6w_oY62PrZVMiffoHVdyo4YVetnWCrVOkGacPY7gZ_zUmhLsEk3B8Ah2DjlhX8yxMMnhpxyXCSoeD7iAid0cJrjA83PuXKtSbZyJGOxDtqa4kO-L2T8cerzFNk97U0JtorbOhgQm3Z-AYP_Ji2kTabExOMBzk6TwZ4H6CZ15Eyt8Pr3n6O7H99vdz-7m19X1bnvTWTYMpGs3IUqN0nhhlXBGeC9HPshRONn-3eglsZyxcSCKGkndOGyEdYZ5sgFlFTtH347efcmve2c9hWohRpMgL1UrrqhgnDTw8gjakmst4PW-hMmUg6ZEv2ajCdW7699aEs11y6ZNfD2pl3EC958_hsH-AvTWj3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74715340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Folland, E D ; Parisi, A F ; Moynihan, P F ; Jones, D R ; Feldman, C L ; Tow, D E</creator><creatorcontrib>Folland, E D ; Parisi, A F ; Moynihan, P F ; Jones, D R ; Feldman, C L ; Tow, D E</creatorcontrib><description>Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in 35 patients. Although all methods correlated positively, the degree of correlation varied with the algorithm used. For EF determination, TDE algorithms (especially those using multiple planes of section) were superior to unidimensional algorithms commonly used with M-mode echocardiography. The best algorithm (modified Simpson's rule) correlated well enough with cine EF (r = 0.78; SEE 0.097) and RVG EF (r = 0.75; SEE 0.087) to make clinically useful estimates. TDE volumes also correlated meaningfully with cine end-diastolic and end-systole volumes (r = 084; n = 70) but were associated with a large standard error of the estimate (43 ml) and offered less advantage over unidimensional volume estimates. Quantitative application of TDE appears to be a useful noninvasive method of evaluating LVEF, but is not as useful for estimating LV volumes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.60.4.760</identifier><identifier>PMID: 476879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Cineangiography ; Echocardiography ; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Radionuclide Imaging</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1979-10, Vol.60 (4), p.760-766</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-161077b6af5c75da5ff6b496b5d677bdbf60c433b9071a61db985cda3f08e7c73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3687,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/476879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Folland, E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisi, A F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moynihan, P F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tow, D E</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in 35 patients. Although all methods correlated positively, the degree of correlation varied with the algorithm used. For EF determination, TDE algorithms (especially those using multiple planes of section) were superior to unidimensional algorithms commonly used with M-mode echocardiography. The best algorithm (modified Simpson's rule) correlated well enough with cine EF (r = 0.78; SEE 0.097) and RVG EF (r = 0.75; SEE 0.087) to make clinically useful estimates. TDE volumes also correlated meaningfully with cine end-diastolic and end-systole volumes (r = 084; n = 70) but were associated with a large standard error of the estimate (43 ml) and offered less advantage over unidimensional volume estimates. Quantitative application of TDE appears to be a useful noninvasive method of evaluating LVEF, but is not as useful for estimating LV volumes.</description><subject>Cineangiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1vEzEQhi1EgVA4c-HgE6fu1o6_sscoglKpEhJqz5bXHreuvHawd1vlJ_Vf4pKIk2esZ56R5kXoCyU9pZJeEtrbUHpJet4rSd6gFRVr3nHBhrdoRQgZOsXW6w_oY62PrZVMiffoHVdyo4YVetnWCrVOkGacPY7gZ_zUmhLsEk3B8Ah2DjlhX8yxMMnhpxyXCSoeD7iAid0cJrjA83PuXKtSbZyJGOxDtqa4kO-L2T8cerzFNk97U0JtorbOhgQm3Z-AYP_Ji2kTabExOMBzk6TwZ4H6CZ15Eyt8Pr3n6O7H99vdz-7m19X1bnvTWTYMpGs3IUqN0nhhlXBGeC9HPshRONn-3eglsZyxcSCKGkndOGyEdYZ5sgFlFTtH347efcmve2c9hWohRpMgL1UrrqhgnDTw8gjakmst4PW-hMmUg6ZEv2ajCdW7699aEs11y6ZNfD2pl3EC958_hsH-AvTWj3U</recordid><startdate>197910</startdate><enddate>197910</enddate><creator>Folland, E D</creator><creator>Parisi, A F</creator><creator>Moynihan, P F</creator><creator>Jones, D R</creator><creator>Feldman, C L</creator><creator>Tow, D E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197910</creationdate><title>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques</title><author>Folland, E D ; Parisi, A F ; Moynihan, P F ; Jones, D R ; Feldman, C L ; Tow, D E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-161077b6af5c75da5ff6b496b5d677bdbf60c433b9071a61db985cda3f08e7c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Cineangiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Folland, E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisi, A F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moynihan, P F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tow, D E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Folland, E D</au><au>Parisi, A F</au><au>Moynihan, P F</au><au>Jones, D R</au><au>Feldman, C L</au><au>Tow, D E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>1979-10</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>760</spage><epage>766</epage><pages>760-766</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><abstract>Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in 35 patients. Although all methods correlated positively, the degree of correlation varied with the algorithm used. For EF determination, TDE algorithms (especially those using multiple planes of section) were superior to unidimensional algorithms commonly used with M-mode echocardiography. The best algorithm (modified Simpson's rule) correlated well enough with cine EF (r = 0.78; SEE 0.097) and RVG EF (r = 0.75; SEE 0.087) to make clinically useful estimates. TDE volumes also correlated meaningfully with cine end-diastolic and end-systole volumes (r = 084; n = 70) but were associated with a large standard error of the estimate (43 ml) and offered less advantage over unidimensional volume estimates. Quantitative application of TDE appears to be a useful noninvasive method of evaluating LVEF, but is not as useful for estimating LV volumes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>476879</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.cir.60.4.760</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1979-10, Vol.60 (4), p.760-766
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74715340
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Cineangiography
Echocardiography
Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Radionuclide Imaging
title Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A45%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20left%20ventricular%20ejection%20fraction%20and%20volumes%20by%20real-time,%20two-dimensional%20echocardiography.%20A%20comparison%20of%20cineangiographic%20and%20radionuclide%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Folland,%20E%20D&rft.date=1979-10&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=760&rft.epage=766&rft.pages=760-766&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.cir.60.4.760&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74715340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74715340&rft_id=info:pmid/476879&rfr_iscdi=true