Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques
Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1979-10, Vol.60 (4), p.760-766 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 766 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 760 |
container_title | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Folland, E D Parisi, A F Moynihan, P F Jones, D R Feldman, C L Tow, D E |
description | Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in 35 patients. Although all methods correlated positively, the degree of correlation varied with the algorithm used. For EF determination, TDE algorithms (especially those using multiple planes of section) were superior to unidimensional algorithms commonly used with M-mode echocardiography. The best algorithm (modified Simpson's rule) correlated well enough with cine EF (r = 0.78; SEE 0.097) and RVG EF (r = 0.75; SEE 0.087) to make clinically useful estimates. TDE volumes also correlated meaningfully with cine end-diastolic and end-systole volumes (r = 084; n = 70) but were associated with a large standard error of the estimate (43 ml) and offered less advantage over unidimensional volume estimates. Quantitative application of TDE appears to be a useful noninvasive method of evaluating LVEF, but is not as useful for estimating LV volumes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/01.cir.60.4.760 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74715340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74715340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-161077b6af5c75da5ff6b496b5d677bdbf60c433b9071a61db985cda3f08e7c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1vEzEQhi1EgVA4c-HgE6fu1o6_sscoglKpEhJqz5bXHreuvHawd1vlJ_Vf4pKIk2esZ56R5kXoCyU9pZJeEtrbUHpJet4rSd6gFRVr3nHBhrdoRQgZOsXW6w_oY62PrZVMiffoHVdyo4YVetnWCrVOkGacPY7gZ_zUmhLsEk3B8Ah2DjlhX8yxMMnhpxyXCSoeD7iAid0cJrjA83PuXKtSbZyJGOxDtqa4kO-L2T8cerzFNk97U0JtorbOhgQm3Z-AYP_Ji2kTabExOMBzk6TwZ4H6CZ15Eyt8Pr3n6O7H99vdz-7m19X1bnvTWTYMpGs3IUqN0nhhlXBGeC9HPshRONn-3eglsZyxcSCKGkndOGyEdYZ5sgFlFTtH347efcmve2c9hWohRpMgL1UrrqhgnDTw8gjakmst4PW-hMmUg6ZEv2ajCdW7699aEs11y6ZNfD2pl3EC958_hsH-AvTWj3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74715340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Folland, E D ; Parisi, A F ; Moynihan, P F ; Jones, D R ; Feldman, C L ; Tow, D E</creator><creatorcontrib>Folland, E D ; Parisi, A F ; Moynihan, P F ; Jones, D R ; Feldman, C L ; Tow, D E</creatorcontrib><description>Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in 35 patients. Although all methods correlated positively, the degree of correlation varied with the algorithm used. For EF determination, TDE algorithms (especially those using multiple planes of section) were superior to unidimensional algorithms commonly used with M-mode echocardiography. The best algorithm (modified Simpson's rule) correlated well enough with cine EF (r = 0.78; SEE 0.097) and RVG EF (r = 0.75; SEE 0.087) to make clinically useful estimates. TDE volumes also correlated meaningfully with cine end-diastolic and end-systole volumes (r = 084; n = 70) but were associated with a large standard error of the estimate (43 ml) and offered less advantage over unidimensional volume estimates. Quantitative application of TDE appears to be a useful noninvasive method of evaluating LVEF, but is not as useful for estimating LV volumes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.60.4.760</identifier><identifier>PMID: 476879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Cineangiography ; Echocardiography ; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Radionuclide Imaging</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1979-10, Vol.60 (4), p.760-766</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-161077b6af5c75da5ff6b496b5d677bdbf60c433b9071a61db985cda3f08e7c73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3687,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/476879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Folland, E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisi, A F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moynihan, P F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tow, D E</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in 35 patients. Although all methods correlated positively, the degree of correlation varied with the algorithm used. For EF determination, TDE algorithms (especially those using multiple planes of section) were superior to unidimensional algorithms commonly used with M-mode echocardiography. The best algorithm (modified Simpson's rule) correlated well enough with cine EF (r = 0.78; SEE 0.097) and RVG EF (r = 0.75; SEE 0.087) to make clinically useful estimates. TDE volumes also correlated meaningfully with cine end-diastolic and end-systole volumes (r = 084; n = 70) but were associated with a large standard error of the estimate (43 ml) and offered less advantage over unidimensional volume estimates. Quantitative application of TDE appears to be a useful noninvasive method of evaluating LVEF, but is not as useful for estimating LV volumes.</description><subject>Cineangiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1vEzEQhi1EgVA4c-HgE6fu1o6_sscoglKpEhJqz5bXHreuvHawd1vlJ_Vf4pKIk2esZ56R5kXoCyU9pZJeEtrbUHpJet4rSd6gFRVr3nHBhrdoRQgZOsXW6w_oY62PrZVMiffoHVdyo4YVetnWCrVOkGacPY7gZ_zUmhLsEk3B8Ah2DjlhX8yxMMnhpxyXCSoeD7iAid0cJrjA83PuXKtSbZyJGOxDtqa4kO-L2T8cerzFNk97U0JtorbOhgQm3Z-AYP_Ji2kTabExOMBzk6TwZ4H6CZ15Eyt8Pr3n6O7H99vdz-7m19X1bnvTWTYMpGs3IUqN0nhhlXBGeC9HPshRONn-3eglsZyxcSCKGkndOGyEdYZ5sgFlFTtH347efcmve2c9hWohRpMgL1UrrqhgnDTw8gjakmst4PW-hMmUg6ZEv2ajCdW7699aEs11y6ZNfD2pl3EC958_hsH-AvTWj3U</recordid><startdate>197910</startdate><enddate>197910</enddate><creator>Folland, E D</creator><creator>Parisi, A F</creator><creator>Moynihan, P F</creator><creator>Jones, D R</creator><creator>Feldman, C L</creator><creator>Tow, D E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197910</creationdate><title>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques</title><author>Folland, E D ; Parisi, A F ; Moynihan, P F ; Jones, D R ; Feldman, C L ; Tow, D E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3990-161077b6af5c75da5ff6b496b5d677bdbf60c433b9071a61db985cda3f08e7c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Cineangiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Folland, E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisi, A F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moynihan, P F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tow, D E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Folland, E D</au><au>Parisi, A F</au><au>Moynihan, P F</au><au>Jones, D R</au><au>Feldman, C L</au><au>Tow, D E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>1979-10</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>760</spage><epage>766</epage><pages>760-766</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><abstract>Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in 35 patients. Although all methods correlated positively, the degree of correlation varied with the algorithm used. For EF determination, TDE algorithms (especially those using multiple planes of section) were superior to unidimensional algorithms commonly used with M-mode echocardiography. The best algorithm (modified Simpson's rule) correlated well enough with cine EF (r = 0.78; SEE 0.097) and RVG EF (r = 0.75; SEE 0.087) to make clinically useful estimates. TDE volumes also correlated meaningfully with cine end-diastolic and end-systole volumes (r = 084; n = 70) but were associated with a large standard error of the estimate (43 ml) and offered less advantage over unidimensional volume estimates. Quantitative application of TDE appears to be a useful noninvasive method of evaluating LVEF, but is not as useful for estimating LV volumes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>476879</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.cir.60.4.760</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-7322 |
ispartof | Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1979-10, Vol.60 (4), p.760-766 |
issn | 0009-7322 1524-4539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74715340 |
source | MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Cineangiography Echocardiography Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging Humans Radionuclide Imaging |
title | Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A45%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20left%20ventricular%20ejection%20fraction%20and%20volumes%20by%20real-time,%20two-dimensional%20echocardiography.%20A%20comparison%20of%20cineangiographic%20and%20radionuclide%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Folland,%20E%20D&rft.date=1979-10&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=760&rft.epage=766&rft.pages=760-766&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.cir.60.4.760&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74715340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74715340&rft_id=info:pmid/476879&rfr_iscdi=true |