Birth weight, sex and childhood cancer: A report from the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study
Abstract Birth weight has been linked to the risk of developing childhood cancer, in particular childhood leukaemia. However, despite many childhood cancers having a male predominance and boys generally weighing more than girls at birth few studies have reported sex-specific associations. The relati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology 2009-11, Vol.33 (5), p.363-367 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 367 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 363 |
container_title | Cancer epidemiology |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Smith, Alexandra Lightfoot, Tracy Simpson, Jill Roman, Eve |
description | Abstract Birth weight has been linked to the risk of developing childhood cancer, in particular childhood leukaemia. However, despite many childhood cancers having a male predominance and boys generally weighing more than girls at birth few studies have reported sex-specific associations. The relationship between birth weight and childhood cancer risk was examined using information from a national case-control study. Children (0–14 years) newly diagnosed with cancer in GB were ascertained between 1991 and 1996 ( n = 3651) and for comparison, controls matched on sex, month and year of birth were identified from primary care population registers ( n = 6337). Birth weights were obtained from the Office of National Statistics for all targeted subjects born in England and Wales. Overall, cases were, on average, 30 g heavier at birth than controls ( p = 0.003) with differences seen by cancer type; those diagnosed with hepatic tumours weighing around 500 g less than controls at birth ( p < 0.0001) and those with leukaemia being, on average, 50 g heavier than those without ( p = 0.001). An interaction between birth weight and sex was found for acute leukaemia ( χ2 = 11.2, p = 0.04) and when data were stratified by sex, an association between high birth weight and risk of ALL was seen with girls (>4000 g, OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.38–2.50, χ2 for trend 20.2, p < 0.0001). Our results support the hypothesis that birth weight is an important determinant for childhood cancer. In addition, the data are consistent with the notion that childhood leukaemia has a prenatal origin. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.canep.2009.10.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746303395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1877782109001416</els_id><sourcerecordid>746303395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-60ffd142132dae056e43aaf9feba20672862e52e133e4d3bd67a3b14b305856a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl9rFDEUxQdR7B_9BIIEfPClu01yZ5IdQaEuthYLPtSCbyGT3OlknZ2sSUbdb2-mu7TQlz7lcvmdG-45tyjeMDpnlInT1dzoATdzTmmdO3PK-LPikC2knMkF_Hx-X3N2UBzFuKJUCMaql8UBq2vgoqwPC_XZhdSRv-huu3RCIv4jerDEdK63nfe50oPB8IGckYAbHxJpg1-T1CG5GVxCS7654dbm1vJesryTkOs02u2r4kWr-4iv9-9xcXP-5cfy6-zq-8Xl8uxqZkoJaSZo21pWcgbcaqSVwBK0busWG82pkHwhOFYcGQCWFhorpIaGlQ3QalEJDcfF-93cTfC_R4xJrV002PfZIj9GJUsBFKCuniahZEIC5Zl894hc-TEMeQ3FKPCqllKKTMGOMsHHGLBVm-DWOmwzpKag1ErdBaWmoKZmDiqr3u5nj80a7YNmn0wGPu4AzK79cRhUNA6zsdYFNElZ75744NMjvend4Izuf-EW48MmKnJF1fV0K9Op0JpSlh2A_0dXt_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032597776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Birth weight, sex and childhood cancer: A report from the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Smith, Alexandra ; Lightfoot, Tracy ; Simpson, Jill ; Roman, Eve</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Alexandra ; Lightfoot, Tracy ; Simpson, Jill ; Roman, Eve ; on behalf of the UKCCS investigators ; UKCCS investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Birth weight has been linked to the risk of developing childhood cancer, in particular childhood leukaemia. However, despite many childhood cancers having a male predominance and boys generally weighing more than girls at birth few studies have reported sex-specific associations. The relationship between birth weight and childhood cancer risk was examined using information from a national case-control study. Children (0–14 years) newly diagnosed with cancer in GB were ascertained between 1991 and 1996 ( n = 3651) and for comparison, controls matched on sex, month and year of birth were identified from primary care population registers ( n = 6337). Birth weights were obtained from the Office of National Statistics for all targeted subjects born in England and Wales. Overall, cases were, on average, 30 g heavier at birth than controls ( p = 0.003) with differences seen by cancer type; those diagnosed with hepatic tumours weighing around 500 g less than controls at birth ( p < 0.0001) and those with leukaemia being, on average, 50 g heavier than those without ( p = 0.001). An interaction between birth weight and sex was found for acute leukaemia ( χ2 = 11.2, p = 0.04) and when data were stratified by sex, an association between high birth weight and risk of ALL was seen with girls (>4000 g, OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.38–2.50, χ2 for trend 20.2, p < 0.0001). Our results support the hypothesis that birth weight is an important determinant for childhood cancer. In addition, the data are consistent with the notion that childhood leukaemia has a prenatal origin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-7821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-783X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2009.10.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19932649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia ; Adolescent ; Birth weight ; Birth Weight - physiology ; Cancer ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Childhood cancer ; Children & youth ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; History, Ancient ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical research ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Registries ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, 2009-11, Vol.33 (5), p.363-367</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-60ffd142132dae056e43aaf9feba20672862e52e133e4d3bd67a3b14b305856a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-60ffd142132dae056e43aaf9feba20672862e52e133e4d3bd67a3b14b305856a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1032597776?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19932649$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lightfoot, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the UKCCS investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UKCCS investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Birth weight, sex and childhood cancer: A report from the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study</title><title>Cancer epidemiology</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Birth weight has been linked to the risk of developing childhood cancer, in particular childhood leukaemia. However, despite many childhood cancers having a male predominance and boys generally weighing more than girls at birth few studies have reported sex-specific associations. The relationship between birth weight and childhood cancer risk was examined using information from a national case-control study. Children (0–14 years) newly diagnosed with cancer in GB were ascertained between 1991 and 1996 ( n = 3651) and for comparison, controls matched on sex, month and year of birth were identified from primary care population registers ( n = 6337). Birth weights were obtained from the Office of National Statistics for all targeted subjects born in England and Wales. Overall, cases were, on average, 30 g heavier at birth than controls ( p = 0.003) with differences seen by cancer type; those diagnosed with hepatic tumours weighing around 500 g less than controls at birth ( p < 0.0001) and those with leukaemia being, on average, 50 g heavier than those without ( p = 0.001). An interaction between birth weight and sex was found for acute leukaemia ( χ2 = 11.2, p = 0.04) and when data were stratified by sex, an association between high birth weight and risk of ALL was seen with girls (>4000 g, OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.38–2.50, χ2 for trend 20.2, p < 0.0001). Our results support the hypothesis that birth weight is an important determinant for childhood cancer. In addition, the data are consistent with the notion that childhood leukaemia has a prenatal origin.</description><subject>Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Birth Weight - physiology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Childhood cancer</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>History, Ancient</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>1877-7821</issn><issn>1877-783X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl9rFDEUxQdR7B_9BIIEfPClu01yZ5IdQaEuthYLPtSCbyGT3OlknZ2sSUbdb2-mu7TQlz7lcvmdG-45tyjeMDpnlInT1dzoATdzTmmdO3PK-LPikC2knMkF_Hx-X3N2UBzFuKJUCMaql8UBq2vgoqwPC_XZhdSRv-huu3RCIv4jerDEdK63nfe50oPB8IGckYAbHxJpg1-T1CG5GVxCS7654dbm1vJesryTkOs02u2r4kWr-4iv9-9xcXP-5cfy6-zq-8Xl8uxqZkoJaSZo21pWcgbcaqSVwBK0busWG82pkHwhOFYcGQCWFhorpIaGlQ3QalEJDcfF-93cTfC_R4xJrV002PfZIj9GJUsBFKCuniahZEIC5Zl894hc-TEMeQ3FKPCqllKKTMGOMsHHGLBVm-DWOmwzpKag1ErdBaWmoKZmDiqr3u5nj80a7YNmn0wGPu4AzK79cRhUNA6zsdYFNElZ75744NMjvend4Izuf-EW48MmKnJF1fV0K9Op0JpSlh2A_0dXt_M</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Smith, Alexandra</creator><creator>Lightfoot, Tracy</creator><creator>Simpson, Jill</creator><creator>Roman, Eve</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Birth weight, sex and childhood cancer: A report from the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study</title><author>Smith, Alexandra ; Lightfoot, Tracy ; Simpson, Jill ; Roman, Eve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-60ffd142132dae056e43aaf9feba20672862e52e133e4d3bd67a3b14b305856a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Birth Weight - physiology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Childhood cancer</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>History, Ancient</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lightfoot, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the UKCCS investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UKCCS investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Alexandra</au><au>Lightfoot, Tracy</au><au>Simpson, Jill</au><au>Roman, Eve</au><aucorp>on behalf of the UKCCS investigators</aucorp><aucorp>UKCCS investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Birth weight, sex and childhood cancer: A report from the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>363-367</pages><issn>1877-7821</issn><eissn>1877-783X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Birth weight has been linked to the risk of developing childhood cancer, in particular childhood leukaemia. However, despite many childhood cancers having a male predominance and boys generally weighing more than girls at birth few studies have reported sex-specific associations. The relationship between birth weight and childhood cancer risk was examined using information from a national case-control study. Children (0–14 years) newly diagnosed with cancer in GB were ascertained between 1991 and 1996 ( n = 3651) and for comparison, controls matched on sex, month and year of birth were identified from primary care population registers ( n = 6337). Birth weights were obtained from the Office of National Statistics for all targeted subjects born in England and Wales. Overall, cases were, on average, 30 g heavier at birth than controls ( p = 0.003) with differences seen by cancer type; those diagnosed with hepatic tumours weighing around 500 g less than controls at birth ( p < 0.0001) and those with leukaemia being, on average, 50 g heavier than those without ( p = 0.001). An interaction between birth weight and sex was found for acute leukaemia ( χ2 = 11.2, p = 0.04) and when data were stratified by sex, an association between high birth weight and risk of ALL was seen with girls (>4000 g, OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.38–2.50, χ2 for trend 20.2, p < 0.0001). Our results support the hypothesis that birth weight is an important determinant for childhood cancer. In addition, the data are consistent with the notion that childhood leukaemia has a prenatal origin.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19932649</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.canep.2009.10.012</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1877-7821 |
ispartof | Cancer epidemiology, 2009-11, Vol.33 (5), p.363-367 |
issn | 1877-7821 1877-783X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746303395 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia Adolescent Birth weight Birth Weight - physiology Cancer Case-Control Studies Child Child, Preschool Childhood cancer Children & youth Epidemiology Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine History, Ancient Humans Infant, Newborn Internal Medicine Male Medical research Neoplasms - epidemiology Registries Risk Factors Sex Factors United Kingdom - epidemiology |
title | Birth weight, sex and childhood cancer: A report from the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T03%3A05%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Birth%20weight,%20sex%20and%20childhood%20cancer:%20A%20report%20from%20the%20United%20Kingdom%20Childhood%20Cancer%20Study&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology&rft.au=Smith,%20Alexandra&rft.aucorp=on%20behalf%20of%20the%20UKCCS%20investigators&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=363-367&rft.issn=1877-7821&rft.eissn=1877-783X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.canep.2009.10.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E746303395%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032597776&rft_id=info:pmid/19932649&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1877782109001416&rfr_iscdi=true |