Peripheral contributions to the mechanical hyperalgesia following a lumbar 5 spinal nerve lesion in rats

Abstract Using lumbar 5 (L5) dorsal root rhizotomy-bearing rats, we examined the extent to which L5 spinal nerve lesion (SNL)-induced mechanical hyperalgesia was governed by two peripheral components, that is Wallerian degeneration (WD) and peripherally-propagating injury discharge (PID). The contri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience 2010-01, Vol.165 (1), p.221-232
Hauptverfasser: Jang, J.H, Lee, B.H, Nam, T.S, Kim, J.W, Kim, D.W, Leem, J.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 1
container_start_page 221
container_title Neuroscience
container_volume 165
creator Jang, J.H
Lee, B.H
Nam, T.S
Kim, J.W
Kim, D.W
Leem, J.W
description Abstract Using lumbar 5 (L5) dorsal root rhizotomy-bearing rats, we examined the extent to which L5 spinal nerve lesion (SNL)-induced mechanical hyperalgesia was governed by two peripheral components, that is Wallerian degeneration (WD) and peripherally-propagating injury discharge (PID). The contribution of WD to SNL-induced hyperalgesia was studied by excluding PID with lidocaine treatment that blocked nerve conduction temporarily, but completely at the time of injury, whereas PID was examined separately by using brief tetanic electrical stimulation of the spinal nerve mimicking PID. Following the disappearance of L5 rhizotomy-induced transient hyperalgesia, L5 SNL resulted in long-lasting mechanical hyperalgesia as early as one day post-SNL despite a PID block, highlighting the role of WD. In a comparative experiment, a delayed onset of hyperalgesia (7 days) was measured in L3 rhizotomy-bearing rats following L3 SNL with a PID block, in which injured fiber (L3) was separated from intact fibers (L4 and L5) anatomically until they meet at the peripheral terminals, supporting the importance of interactions between degenerating and adjacent intact fibers for WD-induced hyperalgesia. Tetanic electrical stimulation of decentralized L5 spinal nerve resulted in mechanical hyperalgesia developing within 1 day and persisting for 7 days. This hyperalgesia was prevented by lidocaine blockade of the L5 nerve, and was unaffected by lidocaine blockades of the central inputs from L3 and L4 fibers during L5 nerve stimulation, suggesting the mediation of PID-induced hyperalgesia by sensitization, not activation, of peripheral terminals of adjacent intact afferents. The similar hyperalgesia was also observed following electrical stimulation of decentralized L3 spinal nerve. Prior elimination of L4 C-fibers by local capsaicin prevented hyperalgesia induced either by L5 SNL with a PID block or by L5 nerve stimulation. These results suggest that neighboring C-afferents remaining intact after partial nerve injury play a critical role in the development of mechanical hyperalgesia through interaction with degenerating afferents, and also via peripheral sensitization by PID.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.082
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746302949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306452209016406</els_id><sourcerecordid>746302949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b872c5b99c86b5028654437f1900441e470cade828509f745f2e92a84b8c1963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0IRvfTkrT5tqYdCST8hkEBzF7J2HGtrS65kJ-y_r9xdaOklGQbmoGfeQfMOQm8o2VJC63f7bYAlxew8BAdbRojerqnYE7ShquFVI4V4ijaEk7oSkrEz9CLnPSkhBX-OzqhWRChab1B_DclPPSQ7YBfDnHy7zD6GjOeI5x7wCK63wbvy3h-mlbuF7C3u4jDEex9uscXDMrY2YYnz5EMBA6Q7wEPhYsA-4GTn_BI96-yQ4dWpnqObL59vLr5Vl1dfv198vKyc5GyuWtUwJ1utnapbSZiqy1d401FNiBAUREOc3YFiShLdNUJ2DDSzSrTKUV3zc_T2KDul-GuBPJvRZwfDYAPEJZtG1JwwLfTDJOe15lrKQr4_kq4sPSfozJT8aNPBUGJWR8ze_OuIWR0xaypWml-fxiztCLu_rScLCvDpCEDZyp2HZE4yO5_AzWYX_ePmfPhPxg3-j28_4QB5H5dUrMmGmswMMT_W21hPg-giLEjNfwOFPbjZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733693955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peripheral contributions to the mechanical hyperalgesia following a lumbar 5 spinal nerve lesion in rats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jang, J.H ; Lee, B.H ; Nam, T.S ; Kim, J.W ; Kim, D.W ; Leem, J.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Jang, J.H ; Lee, B.H ; Nam, T.S ; Kim, J.W ; Kim, D.W ; Leem, J.W</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Using lumbar 5 (L5) dorsal root rhizotomy-bearing rats, we examined the extent to which L5 spinal nerve lesion (SNL)-induced mechanical hyperalgesia was governed by two peripheral components, that is Wallerian degeneration (WD) and peripherally-propagating injury discharge (PID). The contribution of WD to SNL-induced hyperalgesia was studied by excluding PID with lidocaine treatment that blocked nerve conduction temporarily, but completely at the time of injury, whereas PID was examined separately by using brief tetanic electrical stimulation of the spinal nerve mimicking PID. Following the disappearance of L5 rhizotomy-induced transient hyperalgesia, L5 SNL resulted in long-lasting mechanical hyperalgesia as early as one day post-SNL despite a PID block, highlighting the role of WD. In a comparative experiment, a delayed onset of hyperalgesia (7 days) was measured in L3 rhizotomy-bearing rats following L3 SNL with a PID block, in which injured fiber (L3) was separated from intact fibers (L4 and L5) anatomically until they meet at the peripheral terminals, supporting the importance of interactions between degenerating and adjacent intact fibers for WD-induced hyperalgesia. Tetanic electrical stimulation of decentralized L5 spinal nerve resulted in mechanical hyperalgesia developing within 1 day and persisting for 7 days. This hyperalgesia was prevented by lidocaine blockade of the L5 nerve, and was unaffected by lidocaine blockades of the central inputs from L3 and L4 fibers during L5 nerve stimulation, suggesting the mediation of PID-induced hyperalgesia by sensitization, not activation, of peripheral terminals of adjacent intact afferents. The similar hyperalgesia was also observed following electrical stimulation of decentralized L3 spinal nerve. Prior elimination of L4 C-fibers by local capsaicin prevented hyperalgesia induced either by L5 SNL with a PID block or by L5 nerve stimulation. These results suggest that neighboring C-afferents remaining intact after partial nerve injury play a critical role in the development of mechanical hyperalgesia through interaction with degenerating afferents, and also via peripheral sensitization by PID.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-4522</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7544</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19804816</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Action Potentials ; Animals ; antidromic stimulation ; Electric Stimulation ; Hyperalgesia - physiopathology ; injury discharge ; Lumbosacral Region ; Male ; mechanical hyperalgesia ; Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated - physiology ; nerve injury ; Neurology ; neuropathic pain ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Spinal Nerves - injuries ; Spinal Nerves - physiopathology ; Touch ; Wallerian degeneration</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience, 2010-01, Vol.165 (1), p.221-232</ispartof><rights>IBRO</rights><rights>2010 IBRO</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b872c5b99c86b5028654437f1900441e470cade828509f745f2e92a84b8c1963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b872c5b99c86b5028654437f1900441e470cade828509f745f2e92a84b8c1963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452209016406$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19804816$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jang, J.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, B.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, T.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leem, J.W</creatorcontrib><title>Peripheral contributions to the mechanical hyperalgesia following a lumbar 5 spinal nerve lesion in rats</title><title>Neuroscience</title><addtitle>Neuroscience</addtitle><description>Abstract Using lumbar 5 (L5) dorsal root rhizotomy-bearing rats, we examined the extent to which L5 spinal nerve lesion (SNL)-induced mechanical hyperalgesia was governed by two peripheral components, that is Wallerian degeneration (WD) and peripherally-propagating injury discharge (PID). The contribution of WD to SNL-induced hyperalgesia was studied by excluding PID with lidocaine treatment that blocked nerve conduction temporarily, but completely at the time of injury, whereas PID was examined separately by using brief tetanic electrical stimulation of the spinal nerve mimicking PID. Following the disappearance of L5 rhizotomy-induced transient hyperalgesia, L5 SNL resulted in long-lasting mechanical hyperalgesia as early as one day post-SNL despite a PID block, highlighting the role of WD. In a comparative experiment, a delayed onset of hyperalgesia (7 days) was measured in L3 rhizotomy-bearing rats following L3 SNL with a PID block, in which injured fiber (L3) was separated from intact fibers (L4 and L5) anatomically until they meet at the peripheral terminals, supporting the importance of interactions between degenerating and adjacent intact fibers for WD-induced hyperalgesia. Tetanic electrical stimulation of decentralized L5 spinal nerve resulted in mechanical hyperalgesia developing within 1 day and persisting for 7 days. This hyperalgesia was prevented by lidocaine blockade of the L5 nerve, and was unaffected by lidocaine blockades of the central inputs from L3 and L4 fibers during L5 nerve stimulation, suggesting the mediation of PID-induced hyperalgesia by sensitization, not activation, of peripheral terminals of adjacent intact afferents. The similar hyperalgesia was also observed following electrical stimulation of decentralized L3 spinal nerve. Prior elimination of L4 C-fibers by local capsaicin prevented hyperalgesia induced either by L5 SNL with a PID block or by L5 nerve stimulation. These results suggest that neighboring C-afferents remaining intact after partial nerve injury play a critical role in the development of mechanical hyperalgesia through interaction with degenerating afferents, and also via peripheral sensitization by PID.</description><subject>Action Potentials</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>antidromic stimulation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Hyperalgesia - physiopathology</subject><subject>injury discharge</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mechanical hyperalgesia</subject><subject>Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated - physiology</subject><subject>nerve injury</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>neuropathic pain</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Spinal Nerves - injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Nerves - physiopathology</subject><subject>Touch</subject><subject>Wallerian degeneration</subject><issn>0306-4522</issn><issn>1873-7544</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0IRvfTkrT5tqYdCST8hkEBzF7J2HGtrS65kJ-y_r9xdaOklGQbmoGfeQfMOQm8o2VJC63f7bYAlxew8BAdbRojerqnYE7ShquFVI4V4ijaEk7oSkrEz9CLnPSkhBX-OzqhWRChab1B_DclPPSQ7YBfDnHy7zD6GjOeI5x7wCK63wbvy3h-mlbuF7C3u4jDEex9uscXDMrY2YYnz5EMBA6Q7wEPhYsA-4GTn_BI96-yQ4dWpnqObL59vLr5Vl1dfv198vKyc5GyuWtUwJ1utnapbSZiqy1d401FNiBAUREOc3YFiShLdNUJ2DDSzSrTKUV3zc_T2KDul-GuBPJvRZwfDYAPEJZtG1JwwLfTDJOe15lrKQr4_kq4sPSfozJT8aNPBUGJWR8ze_OuIWR0xaypWml-fxiztCLu_rScLCvDpCEDZyp2HZE4yO5_AzWYX_ePmfPhPxg3-j28_4QB5H5dUrMmGmswMMT_W21hPg-giLEjNfwOFPbjZ</recordid><startdate>20100113</startdate><enddate>20100113</enddate><creator>Jang, J.H</creator><creator>Lee, B.H</creator><creator>Nam, T.S</creator><creator>Kim, J.W</creator><creator>Kim, D.W</creator><creator>Leem, J.W</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100113</creationdate><title>Peripheral contributions to the mechanical hyperalgesia following a lumbar 5 spinal nerve lesion in rats</title><author>Jang, J.H ; Lee, B.H ; Nam, T.S ; Kim, J.W ; Kim, D.W ; Leem, J.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b872c5b99c86b5028654437f1900441e470cade828509f745f2e92a84b8c1963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>antidromic stimulation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Hyperalgesia - physiopathology</topic><topic>injury discharge</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mechanical hyperalgesia</topic><topic>Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated - physiology</topic><topic>nerve injury</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>neuropathic pain</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Spinal Nerves - injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Nerves - physiopathology</topic><topic>Touch</topic><topic>Wallerian degeneration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jang, J.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, B.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, T.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leem, J.W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jang, J.H</au><au>Lee, B.H</au><au>Nam, T.S</au><au>Kim, J.W</au><au>Kim, D.W</au><au>Leem, J.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peripheral contributions to the mechanical hyperalgesia following a lumbar 5 spinal nerve lesion in rats</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroscience</addtitle><date>2010-01-13</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>221-232</pages><issn>0306-4522</issn><eissn>1873-7544</eissn><abstract>Abstract Using lumbar 5 (L5) dorsal root rhizotomy-bearing rats, we examined the extent to which L5 spinal nerve lesion (SNL)-induced mechanical hyperalgesia was governed by two peripheral components, that is Wallerian degeneration (WD) and peripherally-propagating injury discharge (PID). The contribution of WD to SNL-induced hyperalgesia was studied by excluding PID with lidocaine treatment that blocked nerve conduction temporarily, but completely at the time of injury, whereas PID was examined separately by using brief tetanic electrical stimulation of the spinal nerve mimicking PID. Following the disappearance of L5 rhizotomy-induced transient hyperalgesia, L5 SNL resulted in long-lasting mechanical hyperalgesia as early as one day post-SNL despite a PID block, highlighting the role of WD. In a comparative experiment, a delayed onset of hyperalgesia (7 days) was measured in L3 rhizotomy-bearing rats following L3 SNL with a PID block, in which injured fiber (L3) was separated from intact fibers (L4 and L5) anatomically until they meet at the peripheral terminals, supporting the importance of interactions between degenerating and adjacent intact fibers for WD-induced hyperalgesia. Tetanic electrical stimulation of decentralized L5 spinal nerve resulted in mechanical hyperalgesia developing within 1 day and persisting for 7 days. This hyperalgesia was prevented by lidocaine blockade of the L5 nerve, and was unaffected by lidocaine blockades of the central inputs from L3 and L4 fibers during L5 nerve stimulation, suggesting the mediation of PID-induced hyperalgesia by sensitization, not activation, of peripheral terminals of adjacent intact afferents. The similar hyperalgesia was also observed following electrical stimulation of decentralized L3 spinal nerve. Prior elimination of L4 C-fibers by local capsaicin prevented hyperalgesia induced either by L5 SNL with a PID block or by L5 nerve stimulation. These results suggest that neighboring C-afferents remaining intact after partial nerve injury play a critical role in the development of mechanical hyperalgesia through interaction with degenerating afferents, and also via peripheral sensitization by PID.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19804816</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.082</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-4522
ispartof Neuroscience, 2010-01, Vol.165 (1), p.221-232
issn 0306-4522
1873-7544
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746302949
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Action Potentials
Animals
antidromic stimulation
Electric Stimulation
Hyperalgesia - physiopathology
injury discharge
Lumbosacral Region
Male
mechanical hyperalgesia
Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated - physiology
nerve injury
Neurology
neuropathic pain
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Spinal Nerves - injuries
Spinal Nerves - physiopathology
Touch
Wallerian degeneration
title Peripheral contributions to the mechanical hyperalgesia following a lumbar 5 spinal nerve lesion in rats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A11%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peripheral%20contributions%20to%20the%20mechanical%20hyperalgesia%20following%20a%20lumbar%205%20spinal%20nerve%20lesion%20in%20rats&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience&rft.au=Jang,%20J.H&rft.date=2010-01-13&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=221-232&rft.issn=0306-4522&rft.eissn=1873-7544&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E746302949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733693955&rft_id=info:pmid/19804816&rft_els_id=S0306452209016406&rfr_iscdi=true