Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes

Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecosystems (New York) 2010-03, Vol.13 (2), p.286-301
Hauptverfasser: Richardson, Barbara A, Richardson, Michael J, González, Grizelle, Shiels, Aaron B, Srivastava, Diane S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 301
container_issue 2
container_start_page 286
container_title Ecosystems (New York)
container_volume 13
creator Richardson, Barbara A
Richardson, Michael J
González, Grizelle
Shiels, Aaron B
Srivastava, Diane S
description Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of this experiment, effects on forest floor invertebrate communities were studied using litterbags. Canopy opening resulted in increased throughfall, soil moisture and light levels, but decreased litter moisture. Of these, only throughfall and soil moisture had returned to control levels 9 months after trimming. Canopy opening was the major determinant of adverse changes in forest floor invertebrate litter communities, by reducing diversity and biomass, irrespective of debris deposition, which played a secondary role. Plots subjected to the most disturbance, with canopy removed and debris added, had the lowest diversity and biomass. These two parameters were higher than control levels when debris was added to plots with an intact canopy, demonstrating that increased nutrient potential or habitat complexity can have a beneficial effect, but only if the abiotic conditions are suitable. Animal abundance remained similar over all treatments, because individual taxa responded differently to canopy trimming. Mites, Collembola, and Psocoptera, all microbiovores feeding mainly on fungal hyphae and spores, responded positively, with higher abundance in trimmed plots, whereas all other taxa, particularly predators and larger detritivores, declined in relative abundance. Litterbag mesh size and litter type had only minor effects on communities, and canopy trimming and debris deposition explained most variation between sites. Effects of trimming on diversity, biomass, and abundance of some invertebrate taxa were still seen when observations finished and canopy closure was complete at 19 months. This suggests that disturbance has a long-lasting effect on litter communities and may, therefore, delay detrital processing, depending on the severity of canopy damage and rate of regrowth.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10021-010-9317-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746300313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713730025</galeid><jstor_id>40603650</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713730025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-557d2c84ff87f195f910381dd61b7a0cfd803390a4d398a42e744eb04facde413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1uFDEMx0cIJErhATggIi6cpjgf88WtWlpaaSVQuz1H2RlnyWonGZIMoq_EU-JlKpA4IBQpseLf33ZiF8VLDmccoHmXaBe8BA5lJ3lT1o-KE65kVUItuse_bFF2rYKnxbOU9gC8apU6KX6sjA_TPdtEN47O79jF9wnJRp-Z8-zzjDEHduP68J5tviC7wTQFn5AFy9YuZ4zs2n8jCLfRZGSrMI6zd9lhYiR8iL4OKTHjB_aBMJfomEIiKPhjEkPZw-R6c2CXIWLK7Hbe7rHPxwhXc4zk8pieF0-sOSR88XCeFneXF5vVVbn-9PF6db4u-0pCLquqGUTfKmvbxvKush0H2fJhqPm2MdDboQUpOzBqkF1rlMBGKdyCsqYfUHF5Wrxd4k4xfJ2pHD261OPhQEWEOelG1RJAcvkfZNWJrm2O5Ju_yH2Yo6dnaMFBcaE6QdDZAu3MAbXzNuRoeloDjtQAj9bR_XnDZUMFiIoEfBH0kT44otUTtc7Ee81BH8dCL2OhaSz0cSx0TRqxaBKxfofxTyX_Er1aRPuUQ_ydRUENsq6A_K8XvzVBmx21WN_dCuASeCugVq38CV92zhM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210412492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Richardson, Barbara A ; Richardson, Michael J ; González, Grizelle ; Shiels, Aaron B ; Srivastava, Diane S</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Barbara A ; Richardson, Michael J ; González, Grizelle ; Shiels, Aaron B ; Srivastava, Diane S</creatorcontrib><description>Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of this experiment, effects on forest floor invertebrate communities were studied using litterbags. Canopy opening resulted in increased throughfall, soil moisture and light levels, but decreased litter moisture. Of these, only throughfall and soil moisture had returned to control levels 9 months after trimming. Canopy opening was the major determinant of adverse changes in forest floor invertebrate litter communities, by reducing diversity and biomass, irrespective of debris deposition, which played a secondary role. Plots subjected to the most disturbance, with canopy removed and debris added, had the lowest diversity and biomass. These two parameters were higher than control levels when debris was added to plots with an intact canopy, demonstrating that increased nutrient potential or habitat complexity can have a beneficial effect, but only if the abiotic conditions are suitable. Animal abundance remained similar over all treatments, because individual taxa responded differently to canopy trimming. Mites, Collembola, and Psocoptera, all microbiovores feeding mainly on fungal hyphae and spores, responded positively, with higher abundance in trimmed plots, whereas all other taxa, particularly predators and larger detritivores, declined in relative abundance. Litterbag mesh size and litter type had only minor effects on communities, and canopy trimming and debris deposition explained most variation between sites. Effects of trimming on diversity, biomass, and abundance of some invertebrate taxa were still seen when observations finished and canopy closure was complete at 19 months. This suggests that disturbance has a long-lasting effect on litter communities and may, therefore, delay detrital processing, depending on the severity of canopy damage and rate of regrowth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-9840</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10021-010-9317-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: New York : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Canopies ; Collembola ; Detritus ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Management ; Forest canopy ; Forest floor ; Forest litter ; Forests ; Fungi ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Hurricanes ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Invertebrata ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Litter ; Mites ; Natural disaster damage ; Plant Sciences ; Predators ; Psocoptera ; Regrowth ; Relative abundance ; Soil moisture ; Soil water ; Taxa ; Throughfall ; Tropical forests ; Tropical rain forests ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Ecosystems (New York), 2010-03, Vol.13 (2), p.286-301</ispartof><rights>2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-557d2c84ff87f195f910381dd61b7a0cfd803390a4d398a42e744eb04facde413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-557d2c84ff87f195f910381dd61b7a0cfd803390a4d398a42e744eb04facde413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40603650$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40603650$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Grizelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiels, Aaron B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Diane S</creatorcontrib><title>Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes</title><title>Ecosystems (New York)</title><addtitle>Ecosystems</addtitle><description>Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of this experiment, effects on forest floor invertebrate communities were studied using litterbags. Canopy opening resulted in increased throughfall, soil moisture and light levels, but decreased litter moisture. Of these, only throughfall and soil moisture had returned to control levels 9 months after trimming. Canopy opening was the major determinant of adverse changes in forest floor invertebrate litter communities, by reducing diversity and biomass, irrespective of debris deposition, which played a secondary role. Plots subjected to the most disturbance, with canopy removed and debris added, had the lowest diversity and biomass. These two parameters were higher than control levels when debris was added to plots with an intact canopy, demonstrating that increased nutrient potential or habitat complexity can have a beneficial effect, but only if the abiotic conditions are suitable. Animal abundance remained similar over all treatments, because individual taxa responded differently to canopy trimming. Mites, Collembola, and Psocoptera, all microbiovores feeding mainly on fungal hyphae and spores, responded positively, with higher abundance in trimmed plots, whereas all other taxa, particularly predators and larger detritivores, declined in relative abundance. Litterbag mesh size and litter type had only minor effects on communities, and canopy trimming and debris deposition explained most variation between sites. Effects of trimming on diversity, biomass, and abundance of some invertebrate taxa were still seen when observations finished and canopy closure was complete at 19 months. This suggests that disturbance has a long-lasting effect on litter communities and may, therefore, delay detrital processing, depending on the severity of canopy damage and rate of regrowth.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Collembola</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Forest canopy</subject><subject>Forest floor</subject><subject>Forest litter</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Invertebrata</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Natural disaster damage</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Psocoptera</subject><subject>Regrowth</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Throughfall</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Tropical rain forests</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1432-9840</issn><issn>1435-0629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1uFDEMx0cIJErhATggIi6cpjgf88WtWlpaaSVQuz1H2RlnyWonGZIMoq_EU-JlKpA4IBQpseLf33ZiF8VLDmccoHmXaBe8BA5lJ3lT1o-KE65kVUItuse_bFF2rYKnxbOU9gC8apU6KX6sjA_TPdtEN47O79jF9wnJRp-Z8-zzjDEHduP68J5tviC7wTQFn5AFy9YuZ4zs2n8jCLfRZGSrMI6zd9lhYiR8iL4OKTHjB_aBMJfomEIiKPhjEkPZw-R6c2CXIWLK7Hbe7rHPxwhXc4zk8pieF0-sOSR88XCeFneXF5vVVbn-9PF6db4u-0pCLquqGUTfKmvbxvKush0H2fJhqPm2MdDboQUpOzBqkF1rlMBGKdyCsqYfUHF5Wrxd4k4xfJ2pHD261OPhQEWEOelG1RJAcvkfZNWJrm2O5Ju_yH2Yo6dnaMFBcaE6QdDZAu3MAbXzNuRoeloDjtQAj9bR_XnDZUMFiIoEfBH0kT44otUTtc7Ee81BH8dCL2OhaSz0cSx0TRqxaBKxfofxTyX_Er1aRPuUQ_ydRUENsq6A_K8XvzVBmx21WN_dCuASeCugVq38CV92zhM</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Richardson, Barbara A</creator><creator>Richardson, Michael J</creator><creator>González, Grizelle</creator><creator>Shiels, Aaron B</creator><creator>Srivastava, Diane S</creator><general>New York : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes</title><author>Richardson, Barbara A ; Richardson, Michael J ; González, Grizelle ; Shiels, Aaron B ; Srivastava, Diane S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-557d2c84ff87f195f910381dd61b7a0cfd803390a4d398a42e744eb04facde413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Collembola</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Forest canopy</topic><topic>Forest floor</topic><topic>Forest litter</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Invertebrata</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Natural disaster damage</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Psocoptera</topic><topic>Regrowth</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Throughfall</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Tropical rain forests</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Grizelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiels, Aaron B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Diane S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Barbara A</au><au>Richardson, Michael J</au><au>González, Grizelle</au><au>Shiels, Aaron B</au><au>Srivastava, Diane S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes</atitle><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Ecosystems</stitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>286-301</pages><issn>1432-9840</issn><eissn>1435-0629</eissn><abstract>Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of this experiment, effects on forest floor invertebrate communities were studied using litterbags. Canopy opening resulted in increased throughfall, soil moisture and light levels, but decreased litter moisture. Of these, only throughfall and soil moisture had returned to control levels 9 months after trimming. Canopy opening was the major determinant of adverse changes in forest floor invertebrate litter communities, by reducing diversity and biomass, irrespective of debris deposition, which played a secondary role. Plots subjected to the most disturbance, with canopy removed and debris added, had the lowest diversity and biomass. These two parameters were higher than control levels when debris was added to plots with an intact canopy, demonstrating that increased nutrient potential or habitat complexity can have a beneficial effect, but only if the abiotic conditions are suitable. Animal abundance remained similar over all treatments, because individual taxa responded differently to canopy trimming. Mites, Collembola, and Psocoptera, all microbiovores feeding mainly on fungal hyphae and spores, responded positively, with higher abundance in trimmed plots, whereas all other taxa, particularly predators and larger detritivores, declined in relative abundance. Litterbag mesh size and litter type had only minor effects on communities, and canopy trimming and debris deposition explained most variation between sites. Effects of trimming on diversity, biomass, and abundance of some invertebrate taxa were still seen when observations finished and canopy closure was complete at 19 months. This suggests that disturbance has a long-lasting effect on litter communities and may, therefore, delay detrital processing, depending on the severity of canopy damage and rate of regrowth.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>New York : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10021-010-9317-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-9840
ispartof Ecosystems (New York), 2010-03, Vol.13 (2), p.286-301
issn 1432-9840
1435-0629
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746300313
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biodiversity
Biomass
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Canopies
Collembola
Detritus
Ecology
Ecosystems
Environmental Management
Forest canopy
Forest floor
Forest litter
Forests
Fungi
Geoecology/Natural Processes
Hurricanes
Hydrology/Water Resources
Invertebrata
Invertebrates
Life Sciences
Litter
Mites
Natural disaster damage
Plant Sciences
Predators
Psocoptera
Regrowth
Relative abundance
Soil moisture
Soil water
Taxa
Throughfall
Tropical forests
Tropical rain forests
Zoology
title Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A46%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Canopy%20Trimming%20Experiment%20in%20Puerto%20Rico:%20The%20Response%20of%20Litter%20Invertebrate%20Communities%20to%20Canopy%20Loss%20and%20Debris%20Deposition%20in%20a%20Tropical%20Forest%20Subject%20to%20Hurricanes&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Richardson,%20Barbara%20A&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=286-301&rft.issn=1432-9840&rft.eissn=1435-0629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10021-010-9317-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713730025%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210412492&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713730025&rft_jstor_id=40603650&rfr_iscdi=true