Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes
Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecosystems (New York) 2010-03, Vol.13 (2), p.286-301 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 301 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 286 |
container_title | Ecosystems (New York) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Richardson, Barbara A Richardson, Michael J González, Grizelle Shiels, Aaron B Srivastava, Diane S |
description | Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of this experiment, effects on forest floor invertebrate communities were studied using litterbags. Canopy opening resulted in increased throughfall, soil moisture and light levels, but decreased litter moisture. Of these, only throughfall and soil moisture had returned to control levels 9 months after trimming. Canopy opening was the major determinant of adverse changes in forest floor invertebrate litter communities, by reducing diversity and biomass, irrespective of debris deposition, which played a secondary role. Plots subjected to the most disturbance, with canopy removed and debris added, had the lowest diversity and biomass. These two parameters were higher than control levels when debris was added to plots with an intact canopy, demonstrating that increased nutrient potential or habitat complexity can have a beneficial effect, but only if the abiotic conditions are suitable. Animal abundance remained similar over all treatments, because individual taxa responded differently to canopy trimming. Mites, Collembola, and Psocoptera, all microbiovores feeding mainly on fungal hyphae and spores, responded positively, with higher abundance in trimmed plots, whereas all other taxa, particularly predators and larger detritivores, declined in relative abundance. Litterbag mesh size and litter type had only minor effects on communities, and canopy trimming and debris deposition explained most variation between sites. Effects of trimming on diversity, biomass, and abundance of some invertebrate taxa were still seen when observations finished and canopy closure was complete at 19 months. This suggests that disturbance has a long-lasting effect on litter communities and may, therefore, delay detrital processing, depending on the severity of canopy damage and rate of regrowth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10021-010-9317-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746300313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713730025</galeid><jstor_id>40603650</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713730025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-557d2c84ff87f195f910381dd61b7a0cfd803390a4d398a42e744eb04facde413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1uFDEMx0cIJErhATggIi6cpjgf88WtWlpaaSVQuz1H2RlnyWonGZIMoq_EU-JlKpA4IBQpseLf33ZiF8VLDmccoHmXaBe8BA5lJ3lT1o-KE65kVUItuse_bFF2rYKnxbOU9gC8apU6KX6sjA_TPdtEN47O79jF9wnJRp-Z8-zzjDEHduP68J5tviC7wTQFn5AFy9YuZ4zs2n8jCLfRZGSrMI6zd9lhYiR8iL4OKTHjB_aBMJfomEIiKPhjEkPZw-R6c2CXIWLK7Hbe7rHPxwhXc4zk8pieF0-sOSR88XCeFneXF5vVVbn-9PF6db4u-0pCLquqGUTfKmvbxvKush0H2fJhqPm2MdDboQUpOzBqkF1rlMBGKdyCsqYfUHF5Wrxd4k4xfJ2pHD261OPhQEWEOelG1RJAcvkfZNWJrm2O5Ju_yH2Yo6dnaMFBcaE6QdDZAu3MAbXzNuRoeloDjtQAj9bR_XnDZUMFiIoEfBH0kT44otUTtc7Ee81BH8dCL2OhaSz0cSx0TRqxaBKxfofxTyX_Er1aRPuUQ_ydRUENsq6A_K8XvzVBmx21WN_dCuASeCugVq38CV92zhM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210412492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Richardson, Barbara A ; Richardson, Michael J ; González, Grizelle ; Shiels, Aaron B ; Srivastava, Diane S</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Barbara A ; Richardson, Michael J ; González, Grizelle ; Shiels, Aaron B ; Srivastava, Diane S</creatorcontrib><description>Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of this experiment, effects on forest floor invertebrate communities were studied using litterbags. Canopy opening resulted in increased throughfall, soil moisture and light levels, but decreased litter moisture. Of these, only throughfall and soil moisture had returned to control levels 9 months after trimming. Canopy opening was the major determinant of adverse changes in forest floor invertebrate litter communities, by reducing diversity and biomass, irrespective of debris deposition, which played a secondary role. Plots subjected to the most disturbance, with canopy removed and debris added, had the lowest diversity and biomass. These two parameters were higher than control levels when debris was added to plots with an intact canopy, demonstrating that increased nutrient potential or habitat complexity can have a beneficial effect, but only if the abiotic conditions are suitable. Animal abundance remained similar over all treatments, because individual taxa responded differently to canopy trimming. Mites, Collembola, and Psocoptera, all microbiovores feeding mainly on fungal hyphae and spores, responded positively, with higher abundance in trimmed plots, whereas all other taxa, particularly predators and larger detritivores, declined in relative abundance. Litterbag mesh size and litter type had only minor effects on communities, and canopy trimming and debris deposition explained most variation between sites. Effects of trimming on diversity, biomass, and abundance of some invertebrate taxa were still seen when observations finished and canopy closure was complete at 19 months. This suggests that disturbance has a long-lasting effect on litter communities and may, therefore, delay detrital processing, depending on the severity of canopy damage and rate of regrowth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-9840</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10021-010-9317-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: New York : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Canopies ; Collembola ; Detritus ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Management ; Forest canopy ; Forest floor ; Forest litter ; Forests ; Fungi ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Hurricanes ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Invertebrata ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Litter ; Mites ; Natural disaster damage ; Plant Sciences ; Predators ; Psocoptera ; Regrowth ; Relative abundance ; Soil moisture ; Soil water ; Taxa ; Throughfall ; Tropical forests ; Tropical rain forests ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Ecosystems (New York), 2010-03, Vol.13 (2), p.286-301</ispartof><rights>2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-557d2c84ff87f195f910381dd61b7a0cfd803390a4d398a42e744eb04facde413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-557d2c84ff87f195f910381dd61b7a0cfd803390a4d398a42e744eb04facde413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40603650$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40603650$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Grizelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiels, Aaron B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Diane S</creatorcontrib><title>Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes</title><title>Ecosystems (New York)</title><addtitle>Ecosystems</addtitle><description>Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of this experiment, effects on forest floor invertebrate communities were studied using litterbags. Canopy opening resulted in increased throughfall, soil moisture and light levels, but decreased litter moisture. Of these, only throughfall and soil moisture had returned to control levels 9 months after trimming. Canopy opening was the major determinant of adverse changes in forest floor invertebrate litter communities, by reducing diversity and biomass, irrespective of debris deposition, which played a secondary role. Plots subjected to the most disturbance, with canopy removed and debris added, had the lowest diversity and biomass. These two parameters were higher than control levels when debris was added to plots with an intact canopy, demonstrating that increased nutrient potential or habitat complexity can have a beneficial effect, but only if the abiotic conditions are suitable. Animal abundance remained similar over all treatments, because individual taxa responded differently to canopy trimming. Mites, Collembola, and Psocoptera, all microbiovores feeding mainly on fungal hyphae and spores, responded positively, with higher abundance in trimmed plots, whereas all other taxa, particularly predators and larger detritivores, declined in relative abundance. Litterbag mesh size and litter type had only minor effects on communities, and canopy trimming and debris deposition explained most variation between sites. Effects of trimming on diversity, biomass, and abundance of some invertebrate taxa were still seen when observations finished and canopy closure was complete at 19 months. This suggests that disturbance has a long-lasting effect on litter communities and may, therefore, delay detrital processing, depending on the severity of canopy damage and rate of regrowth.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Collembola</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Forest canopy</subject><subject>Forest floor</subject><subject>Forest litter</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Invertebrata</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Natural disaster damage</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Psocoptera</subject><subject>Regrowth</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Throughfall</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Tropical rain forests</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1432-9840</issn><issn>1435-0629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1uFDEMx0cIJErhATggIi6cpjgf88WtWlpaaSVQuz1H2RlnyWonGZIMoq_EU-JlKpA4IBQpseLf33ZiF8VLDmccoHmXaBe8BA5lJ3lT1o-KE65kVUItuse_bFF2rYKnxbOU9gC8apU6KX6sjA_TPdtEN47O79jF9wnJRp-Z8-zzjDEHduP68J5tviC7wTQFn5AFy9YuZ4zs2n8jCLfRZGSrMI6zd9lhYiR8iL4OKTHjB_aBMJfomEIiKPhjEkPZw-R6c2CXIWLK7Hbe7rHPxwhXc4zk8pieF0-sOSR88XCeFneXF5vVVbn-9PF6db4u-0pCLquqGUTfKmvbxvKush0H2fJhqPm2MdDboQUpOzBqkF1rlMBGKdyCsqYfUHF5Wrxd4k4xfJ2pHD261OPhQEWEOelG1RJAcvkfZNWJrm2O5Ju_yH2Yo6dnaMFBcaE6QdDZAu3MAbXzNuRoeloDjtQAj9bR_XnDZUMFiIoEfBH0kT44otUTtc7Ee81BH8dCL2OhaSz0cSx0TRqxaBKxfofxTyX_Er1aRPuUQ_ydRUENsq6A_K8XvzVBmx21WN_dCuASeCugVq38CV92zhM</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Richardson, Barbara A</creator><creator>Richardson, Michael J</creator><creator>González, Grizelle</creator><creator>Shiels, Aaron B</creator><creator>Srivastava, Diane S</creator><general>New York : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes</title><author>Richardson, Barbara A ; Richardson, Michael J ; González, Grizelle ; Shiels, Aaron B ; Srivastava, Diane S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-557d2c84ff87f195f910381dd61b7a0cfd803390a4d398a42e744eb04facde413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Collembola</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Forest canopy</topic><topic>Forest floor</topic><topic>Forest litter</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Invertebrata</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Natural disaster damage</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Psocoptera</topic><topic>Regrowth</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Throughfall</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Tropical rain forests</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Grizelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiels, Aaron B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Diane S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Barbara A</au><au>Richardson, Michael J</au><au>González, Grizelle</au><au>Shiels, Aaron B</au><au>Srivastava, Diane S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes</atitle><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Ecosystems</stitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>286-301</pages><issn>1432-9840</issn><eissn>1435-0629</eissn><abstract>Hurricanes cause canopy removal and deposition of pulses of litter to the forest floor. A Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) was designed to decouple these two factors, and to investigate the separate abiotic and biotic consequences of hurricane-type damage and monitor recovery processes. As part of this experiment, effects on forest floor invertebrate communities were studied using litterbags. Canopy opening resulted in increased throughfall, soil moisture and light levels, but decreased litter moisture. Of these, only throughfall and soil moisture had returned to control levels 9 months after trimming. Canopy opening was the major determinant of adverse changes in forest floor invertebrate litter communities, by reducing diversity and biomass, irrespective of debris deposition, which played a secondary role. Plots subjected to the most disturbance, with canopy removed and debris added, had the lowest diversity and biomass. These two parameters were higher than control levels when debris was added to plots with an intact canopy, demonstrating that increased nutrient potential or habitat complexity can have a beneficial effect, but only if the abiotic conditions are suitable. Animal abundance remained similar over all treatments, because individual taxa responded differently to canopy trimming. Mites, Collembola, and Psocoptera, all microbiovores feeding mainly on fungal hyphae and spores, responded positively, with higher abundance in trimmed plots, whereas all other taxa, particularly predators and larger detritivores, declined in relative abundance. Litterbag mesh size and litter type had only minor effects on communities, and canopy trimming and debris deposition explained most variation between sites. Effects of trimming on diversity, biomass, and abundance of some invertebrate taxa were still seen when observations finished and canopy closure was complete at 19 months. This suggests that disturbance has a long-lasting effect on litter communities and may, therefore, delay detrital processing, depending on the severity of canopy damage and rate of regrowth.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>New York : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10021-010-9317-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1432-9840 |
ispartof | Ecosystems (New York), 2010-03, Vol.13 (2), p.286-301 |
issn | 1432-9840 1435-0629 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746300313 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biodiversity Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Canopies Collembola Detritus Ecology Ecosystems Environmental Management Forest canopy Forest floor Forest litter Forests Fungi Geoecology/Natural Processes Hurricanes Hydrology/Water Resources Invertebrata Invertebrates Life Sciences Litter Mites Natural disaster damage Plant Sciences Predators Psocoptera Regrowth Relative abundance Soil moisture Soil water Taxa Throughfall Tropical forests Tropical rain forests Zoology |
title | Canopy Trimming Experiment in Puerto Rico: The Response of Litter Invertebrate Communities to Canopy Loss and Debris Deposition in a Tropical Forest Subject to Hurricanes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A46%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Canopy%20Trimming%20Experiment%20in%20Puerto%20Rico:%20The%20Response%20of%20Litter%20Invertebrate%20Communities%20to%20Canopy%20Loss%20and%20Debris%20Deposition%20in%20a%20Tropical%20Forest%20Subject%20to%20Hurricanes&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Richardson,%20Barbara%20A&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=286-301&rft.issn=1432-9840&rft.eissn=1435-0629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10021-010-9317-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713730025%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210412492&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713730025&rft_jstor_id=40603650&rfr_iscdi=true |