Protective mechanisms of the common fibular nerve in and around the fibular tunnel: A new concept
The most frequent site at which the common fibular nerve is affected by compression, trauma, traction, masses, and surgery is within and around the fibular tunnel. The aim of this study was to determine whether there were protective mechanisms at this site that guard against compression of the nerve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2009-09, Vol.22 (6), p.738-746 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 746 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 738 |
container_title | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | El Gharbawy, Ramadan M. Skandalakis, Lee J. Skandalakis, John E. |
description | The most frequent site at which the common fibular nerve is affected by compression, trauma, traction, masses, and surgery is within and around the fibular tunnel. The aim of this study was to determine whether there were protective mechanisms at this site that guard against compression of the nerve. Twenty‐six lower limbs of 13 preserved adult cadavers (11 males and two females) were used. Proximal to the entrance of the tunnel, three anatomical configurations seemed to afford the required protection for the nerve: reinforcement of the deep fascia; tethering of the common fibular nerve to both the tendon of the biceps femoris and the reinforced fascia; and the particular arrangement of the deep fascia, fibular head, and soleus and gastrocnemius muscles. At the entrance of the tunnel, contraction of the first segment of fibularis longus muscle could afford the required protection. In the tunnel, contraction of the second and third segments of fibularis longus muscle could guard against compression of the nerve. The tough fascia on the surface of fibularis longus muscle and the fascial band within it, which have long been accused of compression of the nerve, may actually be elements of the protective mechanisms. We conclude that there are innate, anatomical protective mechanisms which should be taken into consideration when decompressing the common fibular nerve. To preserve these mechanisms whenever possible, the technique should be planned and varied according to the underlying etiology. Clin. Anat. 22:738–746, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ca.20844 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746296397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67609250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3894-c511c6bc5bca0ab6defbe37a1724f3a44ad78bf37720ae05730956951938146a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1v1DAQBmALgehSkPoLKp8Kl7R2_N3bagUFVFEOi3q0Jt6JmjZxFjuh9N_jsls4wWkO88yr0UvIEWennLH6LMBpzayUz8iCM2erWijxnCyYdaYSlukD8irnW8Y4l8a-JAfcaSmdYQsCX9M4YZi6H0gHDDcQuzxkOrZ0ukEaxmEYI227Zu4h0YipsC5SiBsKaZzLeGRP-2mOEftzuizyvhzHgNvpNXnRQp_xzX4ekm8f3q9XH6vLq4tPq-VlFYR1sgqK86CboJoADBq9wbZBYYCbWrYCpISNsU0rjKkZIFNGMKe0U9wJy6UGcUje7nK3afw-Y5780OWAfQ8Rxzl7I3XttHCmyJP_Sm00c7ViBb7bwZDGnBO2fpu6AdKD58w_Fu8D-N_FF3q8z5ybATd_4b7pAqoduO96fPhnkF8tnwL3vssT_vzjId2V_4RR_vrLhXd6rT5bvvbX4hd9NJoj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67609250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protective mechanisms of the common fibular nerve in and around the fibular tunnel: A new concept</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>El Gharbawy, Ramadan M. ; Skandalakis, Lee J. ; Skandalakis, John E.</creator><creatorcontrib>El Gharbawy, Ramadan M. ; Skandalakis, Lee J. ; Skandalakis, John E.</creatorcontrib><description>The most frequent site at which the common fibular nerve is affected by compression, trauma, traction, masses, and surgery is within and around the fibular tunnel. The aim of this study was to determine whether there were protective mechanisms at this site that guard against compression of the nerve. Twenty‐six lower limbs of 13 preserved adult cadavers (11 males and two females) were used. Proximal to the entrance of the tunnel, three anatomical configurations seemed to afford the required protection for the nerve: reinforcement of the deep fascia; tethering of the common fibular nerve to both the tendon of the biceps femoris and the reinforced fascia; and the particular arrangement of the deep fascia, fibular head, and soleus and gastrocnemius muscles. At the entrance of the tunnel, contraction of the first segment of fibularis longus muscle could afford the required protection. In the tunnel, contraction of the second and third segments of fibularis longus muscle could guard against compression of the nerve. The tough fascia on the surface of fibularis longus muscle and the fascial band within it, which have long been accused of compression of the nerve, may actually be elements of the protective mechanisms. We conclude that there are innate, anatomical protective mechanisms which should be taken into consideration when decompressing the common fibular nerve. To preserve these mechanisms whenever possible, the technique should be planned and varied according to the underlying etiology. Clin. Anat. 22:738–746, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ca.20844</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19644970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; biceps femoris ; compression ; deep fascia ; Fascia - anatomy & histology ; Female ; fibularis longus ; Humans ; Leg - innervation ; Male ; Nerve Compression Syndromes - prevention & control ; Peroneal Nerve - anatomy & histology ; segment</subject><ispartof>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2009-09, Vol.22 (6), p.738-746</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3894-c511c6bc5bca0ab6defbe37a1724f3a44ad78bf37720ae05730956951938146a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3894-c511c6bc5bca0ab6defbe37a1724f3a44ad78bf37720ae05730956951938146a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fca.20844$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fca.20844$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19644970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El Gharbawy, Ramadan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skandalakis, Lee J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skandalakis, John E.</creatorcontrib><title>Protective mechanisms of the common fibular nerve in and around the fibular tunnel: A new concept</title><title>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Clin. Anat</addtitle><description>The most frequent site at which the common fibular nerve is affected by compression, trauma, traction, masses, and surgery is within and around the fibular tunnel. The aim of this study was to determine whether there were protective mechanisms at this site that guard against compression of the nerve. Twenty‐six lower limbs of 13 preserved adult cadavers (11 males and two females) were used. Proximal to the entrance of the tunnel, three anatomical configurations seemed to afford the required protection for the nerve: reinforcement of the deep fascia; tethering of the common fibular nerve to both the tendon of the biceps femoris and the reinforced fascia; and the particular arrangement of the deep fascia, fibular head, and soleus and gastrocnemius muscles. At the entrance of the tunnel, contraction of the first segment of fibularis longus muscle could afford the required protection. In the tunnel, contraction of the second and third segments of fibularis longus muscle could guard against compression of the nerve. The tough fascia on the surface of fibularis longus muscle and the fascial band within it, which have long been accused of compression of the nerve, may actually be elements of the protective mechanisms. We conclude that there are innate, anatomical protective mechanisms which should be taken into consideration when decompressing the common fibular nerve. To preserve these mechanisms whenever possible, the technique should be planned and varied according to the underlying etiology. Clin. Anat. 22:738–746, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>biceps femoris</subject><subject>compression</subject><subject>deep fascia</subject><subject>Fascia - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fibularis longus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leg - innervation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nerve Compression Syndromes - prevention & control</subject><subject>Peroneal Nerve - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>segment</subject><issn>0897-3806</issn><issn>1098-2353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1v1DAQBmALgehSkPoLKp8Kl7R2_N3bagUFVFEOi3q0Jt6JmjZxFjuh9N_jsls4wWkO88yr0UvIEWennLH6LMBpzayUz8iCM2erWijxnCyYdaYSlukD8irnW8Y4l8a-JAfcaSmdYQsCX9M4YZi6H0gHDDcQuzxkOrZ0ukEaxmEYI227Zu4h0YipsC5SiBsKaZzLeGRP-2mOEftzuizyvhzHgNvpNXnRQp_xzX4ekm8f3q9XH6vLq4tPq-VlFYR1sgqK86CboJoADBq9wbZBYYCbWrYCpISNsU0rjKkZIFNGMKe0U9wJy6UGcUje7nK3afw-Y5780OWAfQ8Rxzl7I3XttHCmyJP_Sm00c7ViBb7bwZDGnBO2fpu6AdKD58w_Fu8D-N_FF3q8z5ybATd_4b7pAqoduO96fPhnkF8tnwL3vssT_vzjId2V_4RR_vrLhXd6rT5bvvbX4hd9NJoj</recordid><startdate>200909</startdate><enddate>200909</enddate><creator>El Gharbawy, Ramadan M.</creator><creator>Skandalakis, Lee J.</creator><creator>Skandalakis, John E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200909</creationdate><title>Protective mechanisms of the common fibular nerve in and around the fibular tunnel: A new concept</title><author>El Gharbawy, Ramadan M. ; Skandalakis, Lee J. ; Skandalakis, John E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3894-c511c6bc5bca0ab6defbe37a1724f3a44ad78bf37720ae05730956951938146a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>biceps femoris</topic><topic>compression</topic><topic>deep fascia</topic><topic>Fascia - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fibularis longus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leg - innervation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nerve Compression Syndromes - prevention & control</topic><topic>Peroneal Nerve - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>segment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Gharbawy, Ramadan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skandalakis, Lee J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skandalakis, John E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Gharbawy, Ramadan M.</au><au>Skandalakis, Lee J.</au><au>Skandalakis, John E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protective mechanisms of the common fibular nerve in and around the fibular tunnel: A new concept</atitle><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin. Anat</addtitle><date>2009-09</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>746</epage><pages>738-746</pages><issn>0897-3806</issn><eissn>1098-2353</eissn><abstract>The most frequent site at which the common fibular nerve is affected by compression, trauma, traction, masses, and surgery is within and around the fibular tunnel. The aim of this study was to determine whether there were protective mechanisms at this site that guard against compression of the nerve. Twenty‐six lower limbs of 13 preserved adult cadavers (11 males and two females) were used. Proximal to the entrance of the tunnel, three anatomical configurations seemed to afford the required protection for the nerve: reinforcement of the deep fascia; tethering of the common fibular nerve to both the tendon of the biceps femoris and the reinforced fascia; and the particular arrangement of the deep fascia, fibular head, and soleus and gastrocnemius muscles. At the entrance of the tunnel, contraction of the first segment of fibularis longus muscle could afford the required protection. In the tunnel, contraction of the second and third segments of fibularis longus muscle could guard against compression of the nerve. The tough fascia on the surface of fibularis longus muscle and the fascial band within it, which have long been accused of compression of the nerve, may actually be elements of the protective mechanisms. We conclude that there are innate, anatomical protective mechanisms which should be taken into consideration when decompressing the common fibular nerve. To preserve these mechanisms whenever possible, the technique should be planned and varied according to the underlying etiology. Clin. Anat. 22:738–746, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>19644970</pmid><doi>10.1002/ca.20844</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-3806 |
ispartof | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2009-09, Vol.22 (6), p.738-746 |
issn | 0897-3806 1098-2353 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746296397 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adult biceps femoris compression deep fascia Fascia - anatomy & histology Female fibularis longus Humans Leg - innervation Male Nerve Compression Syndromes - prevention & control Peroneal Nerve - anatomy & histology segment |
title | Protective mechanisms of the common fibular nerve in and around the fibular tunnel: A new concept |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A58%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protective%20mechanisms%20of%20the%20common%20fibular%20nerve%20in%20and%20around%20the%20fibular%20tunnel:%20A%20new%20concept&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20anatomy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=El%20Gharbawy,%20Ramadan%20M.&rft.date=2009-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=746&rft.pages=738-746&rft.issn=0897-3806&rft.eissn=1098-2353&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ca.20844&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67609250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67609250&rft_id=info:pmid/19644970&rfr_iscdi=true |