Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: The role of visual memory

Pylyshyn, Z.W. and Storm, R.W. (1988) (Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179–197) proposed that human observers could simultaneously track up to five dots when presented with an array of dots moving in a random manner. In contras...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vision research (Oxford) 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.10-27
Hauptverfasser: Narasimhan, Sathyasri, Tripathy, Srimant P., Barrett, Brendan T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 10
container_title Vision research (Oxford)
container_volume 49
creator Narasimhan, Sathyasri
Tripathy, Srimant P.
Barrett, Brendan T.
description Pylyshyn, Z.W. and Storm, R.W. (1988) (Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179–197) proposed that human observers could simultaneously track up to five dots when presented with an array of dots moving in a random manner. In contrast, Tripathy, S.P., and Barrett, B.T. (2004) (Severe loss of positional information when detecting deviations in multiple trajectories. Journal of Vision, 4(12):4, 1020–1043, http://journalofvision.org/4/14/4/, doi: 10.1167/4.12.4) showed that when a threshold paradigm was employed, observers’ ability to track deviations in straight-line trajectories is severely compromised when attending to two or more dots. In this study we present a series of four experiments that investigates the role of attention and visual memory while tracking deviations in multiple trajectories using a threshold paradigm. Our stimuli consisted of several linear, non-parallel, left-to-right trajectories, each moving at the same speed. At the trajectory mid-point (reached simultaneously by all dots), one of the dots (target) deviated clockwise or counter-clockwise. The observers’ task was to identify the direction of deviation. The target trajectory was cued in the second half of the trial either by disappearance of distractors at the monitor’s mid-line (Experiment 1) or by means of a change in colour of the target (Experiment 2); in both cases deviation thresholds rose steeply when the number of distractor trajectories was increased from 0 (typical threshold ∼ 2°) to 3 (typical threshold > 20°). When all the trajectories were presented statically in a single frame (Experiment 3), thresholds for identifying the orientation change of the target trajectory remained relatively unchanged as the number of distractor trajectories was increased. When a temporal delay of a few hundred milliseconds was introduced between the first and second halves of trajectories (Experiment 4), deviation thresholds increased steeply. These results suggest that the persistence of trajectory-traces in visual sensory memory may play an important part in determining thresholds for detecting deviations in trajectories.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746228973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0042698908004641</els_id><sourcerecordid>66731526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cb4909e34fb71c977f984f8883c775c0b9dc11902e86c8393bb8b6784398fc903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAURkVpaCZp_0Ep2rRZ2bl6WI8uAiX0BQPZpLuCkGW50dS2ppI9Jf8-MjO0u6wu3-Xcj8tB6C2BmgAR17v6EHLyuaYAqgZdA2Uv0IYoqapGcPESbQA4rYRW-hxd5LwDANlQ_QqdE6VZCXyDfm5jzjj2eB9zmEOc7IDD1Mc02jXhvw9-wnOy7neYfuFxGeawHzwe42HNXZzzR3z_4HGKZVtqyk9LqRj9GNPja3TW2yH7N6d5iX58-Xx_-63a3n39fvtpWzlO6Vy5lmvQnvG-lcRpKXuteK-UYk7KxkGrO0eIBuqVcIpp1raqFVJxplXvNLBLdHXs3af4Z_F5NmPIzg-DnXxcspFcUKq0ZIX88CwphGSkoaKA_Ai6VAQl35t9CqNNj4aAWf2bnTn6N6t_A9oU_-Xs3al_aUff_T86CS_A-xNgs7NDn-zkQv7HUQKUNmzlbo6cL94OwSeTXfCT811I3s2mi-H5T54ATpGlzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66731526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: The role of visual memory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Narasimhan, Sathyasri ; Tripathy, Srimant P. ; Barrett, Brendan T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Narasimhan, Sathyasri ; Tripathy, Srimant P. ; Barrett, Brendan T.</creatorcontrib><description>Pylyshyn, Z.W. and Storm, R.W. (1988) (Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179–197) proposed that human observers could simultaneously track up to five dots when presented with an array of dots moving in a random manner. In contrast, Tripathy, S.P., and Barrett, B.T. (2004) (Severe loss of positional information when detecting deviations in multiple trajectories. Journal of Vision, 4(12):4, 1020–1043, http://journalofvision.org/4/14/4/, doi: 10.1167/4.12.4) showed that when a threshold paradigm was employed, observers’ ability to track deviations in straight-line trajectories is severely compromised when attending to two or more dots. In this study we present a series of four experiments that investigates the role of attention and visual memory while tracking deviations in multiple trajectories using a threshold paradigm. Our stimuli consisted of several linear, non-parallel, left-to-right trajectories, each moving at the same speed. At the trajectory mid-point (reached simultaneously by all dots), one of the dots (target) deviated clockwise or counter-clockwise. The observers’ task was to identify the direction of deviation. The target trajectory was cued in the second half of the trial either by disappearance of distractors at the monitor’s mid-line (Experiment 1) or by means of a change in colour of the target (Experiment 2); in both cases deviation thresholds rose steeply when the number of distractor trajectories was increased from 0 (typical threshold ∼ 2°) to 3 (typical threshold &gt; 20°). When all the trajectories were presented statically in a single frame (Experiment 3), thresholds for identifying the orientation change of the target trajectory remained relatively unchanged as the number of distractor trajectories was increased. When a temporal delay of a few hundred milliseconds was introduced between the first and second halves of trajectories (Experiment 4), deviation thresholds increased steeply. These results suggest that the persistence of trajectory-traces in visual sensory memory may play an important part in determining thresholds for detecting deviations in trajectories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18930074</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VISRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Color Perception - physiology ; Cues ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Iconic memory ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Motion ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Multiple object tracking ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychophysics ; Pursuit, Smooth - physiology ; Sensory memory ; Sensory Thresholds - physiology ; Space Perception - physiology ; Tracking ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Working memory</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.10-27</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cb4909e34fb71c977f984f8883c775c0b9dc11902e86c8393bb8b6784398fc903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cb4909e34fb71c977f984f8883c775c0b9dc11902e86c8393bb8b6784398fc903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698908004641$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21022534$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18930074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Narasimhan, Sathyasri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathy, Srimant P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Brendan T.</creatorcontrib><title>Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: The role of visual memory</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>Pylyshyn, Z.W. and Storm, R.W. (1988) (Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179–197) proposed that human observers could simultaneously track up to five dots when presented with an array of dots moving in a random manner. In contrast, Tripathy, S.P., and Barrett, B.T. (2004) (Severe loss of positional information when detecting deviations in multiple trajectories. Journal of Vision, 4(12):4, 1020–1043, http://journalofvision.org/4/14/4/, doi: 10.1167/4.12.4) showed that when a threshold paradigm was employed, observers’ ability to track deviations in straight-line trajectories is severely compromised when attending to two or more dots. In this study we present a series of four experiments that investigates the role of attention and visual memory while tracking deviations in multiple trajectories using a threshold paradigm. Our stimuli consisted of several linear, non-parallel, left-to-right trajectories, each moving at the same speed. At the trajectory mid-point (reached simultaneously by all dots), one of the dots (target) deviated clockwise or counter-clockwise. The observers’ task was to identify the direction of deviation. The target trajectory was cued in the second half of the trial either by disappearance of distractors at the monitor’s mid-line (Experiment 1) or by means of a change in colour of the target (Experiment 2); in both cases deviation thresholds rose steeply when the number of distractor trajectories was increased from 0 (typical threshold ∼ 2°) to 3 (typical threshold &gt; 20°). When all the trajectories were presented statically in a single frame (Experiment 3), thresholds for identifying the orientation change of the target trajectory remained relatively unchanged as the number of distractor trajectories was increased. When a temporal delay of a few hundred milliseconds was introduced between the first and second halves of trajectories (Experiment 4), deviation thresholds increased steeply. These results suggest that the persistence of trajectory-traces in visual sensory memory may play an important part in determining thresholds for detecting deviations in trajectories.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Color Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iconic memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Multiple object tracking</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Pursuit, Smooth - physiology</subject><subject>Sensory memory</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Working memory</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAURkVpaCZp_0Ep2rRZ2bl6WI8uAiX0BQPZpLuCkGW50dS2ppI9Jf8-MjO0u6wu3-Xcj8tB6C2BmgAR17v6EHLyuaYAqgZdA2Uv0IYoqapGcPESbQA4rYRW-hxd5LwDANlQ_QqdE6VZCXyDfm5jzjj2eB9zmEOc7IDD1Mc02jXhvw9-wnOy7neYfuFxGeawHzwe42HNXZzzR3z_4HGKZVtqyk9LqRj9GNPja3TW2yH7N6d5iX58-Xx_-63a3n39fvtpWzlO6Vy5lmvQnvG-lcRpKXuteK-UYk7KxkGrO0eIBuqVcIpp1raqFVJxplXvNLBLdHXs3af4Z_F5NmPIzg-DnXxcspFcUKq0ZIX88CwphGSkoaKA_Ai6VAQl35t9CqNNj4aAWf2bnTn6N6t_A9oU_-Xs3al_aUff_T86CS_A-xNgs7NDn-zkQv7HUQKUNmzlbo6cL94OwSeTXfCT811I3s2mi-H5T54ATpGlzQ</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Narasimhan, Sathyasri</creator><creator>Tripathy, Srimant P.</creator><creator>Barrett, Brendan T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: The role of visual memory</title><author>Narasimhan, Sathyasri ; Tripathy, Srimant P. ; Barrett, Brendan T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cb4909e34fb71c977f984f8883c775c0b9dc11902e86c8393bb8b6784398fc903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Color Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iconic memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Multiple object tracking</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Pursuit, Smooth - physiology</topic><topic>Sensory memory</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Narasimhan, Sathyasri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathy, Srimant P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Brendan T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Narasimhan, Sathyasri</au><au>Tripathy, Srimant P.</au><au>Barrett, Brendan T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: The role of visual memory</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>10-27</pages><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><coden>VISRAM</coden><abstract>Pylyshyn, Z.W. and Storm, R.W. (1988) (Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179–197) proposed that human observers could simultaneously track up to five dots when presented with an array of dots moving in a random manner. In contrast, Tripathy, S.P., and Barrett, B.T. (2004) (Severe loss of positional information when detecting deviations in multiple trajectories. Journal of Vision, 4(12):4, 1020–1043, http://journalofvision.org/4/14/4/, doi: 10.1167/4.12.4) showed that when a threshold paradigm was employed, observers’ ability to track deviations in straight-line trajectories is severely compromised when attending to two or more dots. In this study we present a series of four experiments that investigates the role of attention and visual memory while tracking deviations in multiple trajectories using a threshold paradigm. Our stimuli consisted of several linear, non-parallel, left-to-right trajectories, each moving at the same speed. At the trajectory mid-point (reached simultaneously by all dots), one of the dots (target) deviated clockwise or counter-clockwise. The observers’ task was to identify the direction of deviation. The target trajectory was cued in the second half of the trial either by disappearance of distractors at the monitor’s mid-line (Experiment 1) or by means of a change in colour of the target (Experiment 2); in both cases deviation thresholds rose steeply when the number of distractor trajectories was increased from 0 (typical threshold ∼ 2°) to 3 (typical threshold &gt; 20°). When all the trajectories were presented statically in a single frame (Experiment 3), thresholds for identifying the orientation change of the target trajectory remained relatively unchanged as the number of distractor trajectories was increased. When a temporal delay of a few hundred milliseconds was introduced between the first and second halves of trajectories (Experiment 4), deviation thresholds increased steeply. These results suggest that the persistence of trajectory-traces in visual sensory memory may play an important part in determining thresholds for detecting deviations in trajectories.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18930074</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.023</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-6989
ispartof Vision research (Oxford), 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.10-27
issn 0042-6989
1878-5646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746228973
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Attention
Attention - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Color Perception - physiology
Cues
Discrimination (Psychology)
Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Iconic memory
Memory
Memory - physiology
Motion
Motion Perception - physiology
Multiple object tracking
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychophysics
Pursuit, Smooth - physiology
Sensory memory
Sensory Thresholds - physiology
Space Perception - physiology
Tracking
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
Working memory
title Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: The role of visual memory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A15%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Loss%20of%20positional%20information%20when%20tracking%20multiple%20moving%20dots:%20The%20role%20of%20visual%20memory&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Narasimhan,%20Sathyasri&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=10-27&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft.coden=VISRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66731526%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66731526&rft_id=info:pmid/18930074&rft_els_id=S0042698908004641&rfr_iscdi=true