Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism
In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentienti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied philosophy 2010-02, Vol.27 (1), p.84-99 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 99 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | Journal of applied philosophy |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | RODOGNO, RAFFAELE |
description | In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentientism insofar as it claims that sentience is not a prerequisite for moral consideration. Radical as it may sound, this view does not take us as far as the holism favoured by some environmentalists. In particular, on this view, the interests of collectives such as ecosystems and species are a positive function of the interests of the entities that make them up rather than something of an entirely different kind. Collectives are not the direct object of moral consideration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00475.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746224045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24355969</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24355969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5455-a1f8e8046a2bbef380c794b9aa5bda21ad580a2481a1aae648f88da22dfd642c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r2zAYhcVoYWm7nzAIg7JexN4rWZKli16E0O_QlX2QS_Haloddx06lpE3_feW6pLCLMYGQ4Dzn8OogQsYUYhrWtzqmXKpI6ARiBqBjAJ6KePuBjHbCHhkBkzxKUqE-kgPvawAQQNmITH7adl312y8n44VtmsxW7Z_JGNtifNY-Vq5rl0HGJgBHZL_ExttPb-ch-X1-9mt2Gc2_X1zNpvMoF1yICGmprAIukWWZLRMFeap5phFFViCjWAgFyLiiSBGt5KpUKgisKAvJWZ4ckq9D7sp1Dxvr12ZZ-TzMhq3tNt6kXDLGgYtAnvyTpJAIraRIk4B--Qutu41rwzsMg6BTzXSA1ADlrvPe2dKsXLVE9xySTN-3qU1fq-lrNX3f5rVvsw3W47d89Dk2pcM2r_zO3w8MmvHAnQ7cU9XY5__ON9fTu7twC_7Pg7_268695_NECC37J0SDXvm13e50dPdGpuEHmMXthWG3MIPrmx_mPHkBAPyp_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207331929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creator><creatorcontrib>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentientism insofar as it claims that sentience is not a prerequisite for moral consideration. Radical as it may sound, this view does not take us as far as the holism favoured by some environmentalists. In particular, on this view, the interests of collectives such as ecosystems and species are a positive function of the interests of the entities that make them up rather than something of an entirely different kind. Collectives are not the direct object of moral consideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-3758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5930</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00475.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternatives ; Applied philosophy ; Automobiles ; Cognition & reasoning ; Ecosystems ; Environmental ethics ; Hedonism ; Holism ; Humans ; Morality ; Philosophy ; Pleasure ; Theory of values and moral philosophy ; Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied philosophy, 2010-02, Vol.27 (1), p.84-99</ispartof><rights>Society for Applied Philosophy 2010</rights><rights>Society for Applied Philosophy, 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 Society for Applied Philosophy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5455-a1f8e8046a2bbef380c794b9aa5bda21ad580a2481a1aae648f88da22dfd642c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24355969$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24355969$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22400924$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creatorcontrib><title>Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism</title><title>Journal of applied philosophy</title><description>In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentientism insofar as it claims that sentience is not a prerequisite for moral consideration. Radical as it may sound, this view does not take us as far as the holism favoured by some environmentalists. In particular, on this view, the interests of collectives such as ecosystems and species are a positive function of the interests of the entities that make them up rather than something of an entirely different kind. Collectives are not the direct object of moral consideration.</description><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Applied philosophy</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental ethics</subject><subject>Hedonism</subject><subject>Holism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Pleasure</subject><subject>Theory of values and moral philosophy</subject><subject>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>0264-3758</issn><issn>1468-5930</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl1r2zAYhcVoYWm7nzAIg7JexN4rWZKli16E0O_QlX2QS_Haloddx06lpE3_feW6pLCLMYGQ4Dzn8OogQsYUYhrWtzqmXKpI6ARiBqBjAJ6KePuBjHbCHhkBkzxKUqE-kgPvawAQQNmITH7adl312y8n44VtmsxW7Z_JGNtifNY-Vq5rl0HGJgBHZL_ExttPb-ch-X1-9mt2Gc2_X1zNpvMoF1yICGmprAIukWWZLRMFeap5phFFViCjWAgFyLiiSBGt5KpUKgisKAvJWZ4ckq9D7sp1Dxvr12ZZ-TzMhq3tNt6kXDLGgYtAnvyTpJAIraRIk4B--Qutu41rwzsMg6BTzXSA1ADlrvPe2dKsXLVE9xySTN-3qU1fq-lrNX3f5rVvsw3W47d89Dk2pcM2r_zO3w8MmvHAnQ7cU9XY5__ON9fTu7twC_7Pg7_268695_NECC37J0SDXvm13e50dPdGpuEHmMXthWG3MIPrmx_mPHkBAPyp_A</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism</title><author>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5455-a1f8e8046a2bbef380c794b9aa5bda21ad580a2481a1aae648f88da22dfd642c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Applied philosophy</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental ethics</topic><topic>Hedonism</topic><topic>Holism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Pleasure</topic><topic>Theory of values and moral philosophy</topic><topic>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied philosophy</jtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>84-99</pages><issn>0264-3758</issn><eissn>1468-5930</eissn><abstract>In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentientism insofar as it claims that sentience is not a prerequisite for moral consideration. Radical as it may sound, this view does not take us as far as the holism favoured by some environmentalists. In particular, on this view, the interests of collectives such as ecosystems and species are a positive function of the interests of the entities that make them up rather than something of an entirely different kind. Collectives are not the direct object of moral consideration.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00475.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-3758 |
ispartof | Journal of applied philosophy, 2010-02, Vol.27 (1), p.84-99 |
issn | 0264-3758 1468-5930 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746224045 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Alternatives Applied philosophy Automobiles Cognition & reasoning Ecosystems Environmental ethics Hedonism Holism Humans Morality Philosophy Pleasure Theory of values and moral philosophy Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action Wellbeing |
title | Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sentientism,%20Wellbeing,%20and%20Environmentalism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20philosophy&rft.au=RODOGNO,%20RAFFAELE&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=84-99&rft.issn=0264-3758&rft.eissn=1468-5930&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00475.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24355969%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207331929&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24355969&rfr_iscdi=true |