Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism

In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentienti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied philosophy 2010-02, Vol.27 (1), p.84-99
1. Verfasser: RODOGNO, RAFFAELE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 84
container_title Journal of applied philosophy
container_volume 27
creator RODOGNO, RAFFAELE
description In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentientism insofar as it claims that sentience is not a prerequisite for moral consideration. Radical as it may sound, this view does not take us as far as the holism favoured by some environmentalists. In particular, on this view, the interests of collectives such as ecosystems and species are a positive function of the interests of the entities that make them up rather than something of an entirely different kind. Collectives are not the direct object of moral consideration.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00475.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746224045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24355969</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24355969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5455-a1f8e8046a2bbef380c794b9aa5bda21ad580a2481a1aae648f88da22dfd642c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r2zAYhcVoYWm7nzAIg7JexN4rWZKli16E0O_QlX2QS_Haloddx06lpE3_feW6pLCLMYGQ4Dzn8OogQsYUYhrWtzqmXKpI6ARiBqBjAJ6KePuBjHbCHhkBkzxKUqE-kgPvawAQQNmITH7adl312y8n44VtmsxW7Z_JGNtifNY-Vq5rl0HGJgBHZL_ExttPb-ch-X1-9mt2Gc2_X1zNpvMoF1yICGmprAIukWWZLRMFeap5phFFViCjWAgFyLiiSBGt5KpUKgisKAvJWZ4ckq9D7sp1Dxvr12ZZ-TzMhq3tNt6kXDLGgYtAnvyTpJAIraRIk4B--Qutu41rwzsMg6BTzXSA1ADlrvPe2dKsXLVE9xySTN-3qU1fq-lrNX3f5rVvsw3W47d89Dk2pcM2r_zO3w8MmvHAnQ7cU9XY5__ON9fTu7twC_7Pg7_268695_NECC37J0SDXvm13e50dPdGpuEHmMXthWG3MIPrmx_mPHkBAPyp_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207331929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creator><creatorcontrib>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentientism insofar as it claims that sentience is not a prerequisite for moral consideration. Radical as it may sound, this view does not take us as far as the holism favoured by some environmentalists. In particular, on this view, the interests of collectives such as ecosystems and species are a positive function of the interests of the entities that make them up rather than something of an entirely different kind. Collectives are not the direct object of moral consideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-3758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5930</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00475.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternatives ; Applied philosophy ; Automobiles ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Ecosystems ; Environmental ethics ; Hedonism ; Holism ; Humans ; Morality ; Philosophy ; Pleasure ; Theory of values and moral philosophy ; Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied philosophy, 2010-02, Vol.27 (1), p.84-99</ispartof><rights>Society for Applied Philosophy 2010</rights><rights>Society for Applied Philosophy, 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 Society for Applied Philosophy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5455-a1f8e8046a2bbef380c794b9aa5bda21ad580a2481a1aae648f88da22dfd642c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24355969$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24355969$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22400924$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creatorcontrib><title>Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism</title><title>Journal of applied philosophy</title><description>In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentientism insofar as it claims that sentience is not a prerequisite for moral consideration. Radical as it may sound, this view does not take us as far as the holism favoured by some environmentalists. In particular, on this view, the interests of collectives such as ecosystems and species are a positive function of the interests of the entities that make them up rather than something of an entirely different kind. Collectives are not the direct object of moral consideration.</description><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Applied philosophy</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental ethics</subject><subject>Hedonism</subject><subject>Holism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Pleasure</subject><subject>Theory of values and moral philosophy</subject><subject>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>0264-3758</issn><issn>1468-5930</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl1r2zAYhcVoYWm7nzAIg7JexN4rWZKli16E0O_QlX2QS_Haloddx06lpE3_feW6pLCLMYGQ4Dzn8OogQsYUYhrWtzqmXKpI6ARiBqBjAJ6KePuBjHbCHhkBkzxKUqE-kgPvawAQQNmITH7adl312y8n44VtmsxW7Z_JGNtifNY-Vq5rl0HGJgBHZL_ExttPb-ch-X1-9mt2Gc2_X1zNpvMoF1yICGmprAIukWWZLRMFeap5phFFViCjWAgFyLiiSBGt5KpUKgisKAvJWZ4ckq9D7sp1Dxvr12ZZ-TzMhq3tNt6kXDLGgYtAnvyTpJAIraRIk4B--Qutu41rwzsMg6BTzXSA1ADlrvPe2dKsXLVE9xySTN-3qU1fq-lrNX3f5rVvsw3W47d89Dk2pcM2r_zO3w8MmvHAnQ7cU9XY5__ON9fTu7twC_7Pg7_268695_NECC37J0SDXvm13e50dPdGpuEHmMXthWG3MIPrmx_mPHkBAPyp_A</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism</title><author>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5455-a1f8e8046a2bbef380c794b9aa5bda21ad580a2481a1aae648f88da22dfd642c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Applied philosophy</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental ethics</topic><topic>Hedonism</topic><topic>Holism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Pleasure</topic><topic>Theory of values and moral philosophy</topic><topic>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RODOGNO, RAFFAELE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied philosophy</jtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>84-99</pages><issn>0264-3758</issn><eissn>1468-5930</eissn><abstract>In this article, I wish to explore a plausible alternative to both sentientist ethics and holistic environmental ethics. In particular, I put forward the claim that creatures other than sentient ones have interests and, in virtue of that, moral standing. This thesis is in disagreement with sentientism insofar as it claims that sentience is not a prerequisite for moral consideration. Radical as it may sound, this view does not take us as far as the holism favoured by some environmentalists. In particular, on this view, the interests of collectives such as ecosystems and species are a positive function of the interests of the entities that make them up rather than something of an entirely different kind. Collectives are not the direct object of moral consideration.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00475.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-3758
ispartof Journal of applied philosophy, 2010-02, Vol.27 (1), p.84-99
issn 0264-3758
1468-5930
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746224045
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Alternatives
Applied philosophy
Automobiles
Cognition & reasoning
Ecosystems
Environmental ethics
Hedonism
Holism
Humans
Morality
Philosophy
Pleasure
Theory of values and moral philosophy
Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action
Wellbeing
title Sentientism, Wellbeing, and Environmentalism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sentientism,%20Wellbeing,%20and%20Environmentalism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20philosophy&rft.au=RODOGNO,%20RAFFAELE&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=84-99&rft.issn=0264-3758&rft.eissn=1468-5930&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00475.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24355969%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207331929&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24355969&rfr_iscdi=true