On the Predictability of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Three-Dimensional Simulations
Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are a dominant climatological feature of the central United States and are responsible for a substantial fraction of warm-season rainfall. Yet very little is known about the predictability of MCSs. To help address this situation, a previous paper by the authors ex...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Monthly weather review 2010-03, Vol.138 (3), p.863-885 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 885 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 863 |
container_title | Monthly weather review |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | WANDISHIN, Matthew S STENSRUD, David J MULLEN, Steven L WICKER, Louis J |
description | Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are a dominant climatological feature of the central United States and are responsible for a substantial fraction of warm-season rainfall. Yet very little is known about the predictability of MCSs. To help address this situation, a previous paper by the authors examined a series of ensemble MCS simulations using a two-dimensional version of a storm-scale (Δx = 1 km) model. Ensemble member perturbations in the preconvective environment, namely, wind speed, relative humidity, and convective instability, are based on current 24-h forecast errors from the North American Model (NAM). That work is now extended using a full three-dimensional model.
Results from the three-dimensional simulations of the present study resemble those found in two dimensions. The model successfully produces an MCS within 100 km of the location of the control run in around 70% of the ensemble runs using perturbations to the preconvective environment consistent with 24-h forecast errors, while reducing the preconvective environment uncertainty to the level of current analysis errors improves the success rate to nearly 85%. This magnitude of improvement in forecasts of environmental conditions would represent a radical advance in numerical weather prediction. The maximum updraft and surface wind forecast uncertainties are of similar magnitude to their two-dimensional counterparts. However, unlike the two-dimensional simulations, in three dimensions, the improvement in the forecast uncertainty of storm features requires the reduction of preconvective environmental uncertainty for all perturbed variables. The MCSs in many of the runs resemble bow echoes, but surface winds associated with these solutions, and the perturbation profiles that produce them, are nearly indistinguishable from the nonbowing solutions, making any conclusions about the bowlike systems difficult. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/2009MWR2961.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746223017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743713975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-ae8eaed08f7505a430a686226901d05279bb9a36c64099fd60fb915c8e3959b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtrG0EQhIdgQ-THMfclwfi0dk_Payc3I-dhsJCxFHJcZke9aMw-nJmVQf8-KyRCMBh8ahq-Kqgqxj5xuOLcqGsEsLPfj2g1v-If2IQrhBykFUdsAoAmBy3lR3aS0hMAaC1xwpbzLhvWlD1EWgU_uCo0YdhmfZ3NKPXJu4ayad-9kB_CC2WLbRqoTV-z5ToS5behpS6FvnNNtgjtpnHD-KQzdly7JtH54Z6yX9-_Lac_8_v5j7vpzX3uJaohd1SQoxUUtVGgnBTgdKERtQW-AoXGVpV1Qnstwdp6paGuLFe-IGGVrbg4ZZd73-fY_9lQGso2JE9N4zrqN6k0cnQTwM07SGG4sEaN5JdX5FO_iWPAVGKBBqVBa0fq81sUtwWCGAseoXwP-dinFKkun2NoXdyWHMrdYuV_i5W7OBcHU7crvo6u8yH9EyEqAwaN-Au_l5NL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198203000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Predictability of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Three-Dimensional Simulations</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>WANDISHIN, Matthew S ; STENSRUD, David J ; MULLEN, Steven L ; WICKER, Louis J</creator><creatorcontrib>WANDISHIN, Matthew S ; STENSRUD, David J ; MULLEN, Steven L ; WICKER, Louis J</creatorcontrib><description>Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are a dominant climatological feature of the central United States and are responsible for a substantial fraction of warm-season rainfall. Yet very little is known about the predictability of MCSs. To help address this situation, a previous paper by the authors examined a series of ensemble MCS simulations using a two-dimensional version of a storm-scale (Δx = 1 km) model. Ensemble member perturbations in the preconvective environment, namely, wind speed, relative humidity, and convective instability, are based on current 24-h forecast errors from the North American Model (NAM). That work is now extended using a full three-dimensional model.
Results from the three-dimensional simulations of the present study resemble those found in two dimensions. The model successfully produces an MCS within 100 km of the location of the control run in around 70% of the ensemble runs using perturbations to the preconvective environment consistent with 24-h forecast errors, while reducing the preconvective environment uncertainty to the level of current analysis errors improves the success rate to nearly 85%. This magnitude of improvement in forecasts of environmental conditions would represent a radical advance in numerical weather prediction. The maximum updraft and surface wind forecast uncertainties are of similar magnitude to their two-dimensional counterparts. However, unlike the two-dimensional simulations, in three dimensions, the improvement in the forecast uncertainty of storm features requires the reduction of preconvective environmental uncertainty for all perturbed variables. The MCSs in many of the runs resemble bow echoes, but surface winds associated with these solutions, and the perturbation profiles that produce them, are nearly indistinguishable from the nonbowing solutions, making any conclusions about the bowlike systems difficult.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2009MWR2961.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MWREAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Convective instability ; Earth, ocean, space ; Echoes ; Environmental conditions ; Errors ; Exact sciences and technology ; Experiments ; External geophysics ; Forecast errors ; Humidity ; Mathematical models ; Mesoscale convective complexes ; Mesoscale convective systems ; Mesoscale phenomena ; Meteorology ; Modelling ; Numerical prediction ; Numerical weather forecasting ; Perturbation ; Perturbations ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Relative humidity ; Simulation ; Storm forecasting ; Storms ; Studies ; Success ; Surface wind ; Three dimensional models ; Tornadoes ; Turbulence models ; Two dimensional models ; Uncertainty ; Updraft ; Warm seasons ; Weather forecasting ; Wind ; Wind speed ; Winds</subject><ispartof>Monthly weather review, 2010-03, Vol.138 (3), p.863-885</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Mar 2010</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-ae8eaed08f7505a430a686226901d05279bb9a36c64099fd60fb915c8e3959b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-ae8eaed08f7505a430a686226901d05279bb9a36c64099fd60fb915c8e3959b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22570727$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WANDISHIN, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STENSRUD, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLEN, Steven L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WICKER, Louis J</creatorcontrib><title>On the Predictability of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Three-Dimensional Simulations</title><title>Monthly weather review</title><description>Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are a dominant climatological feature of the central United States and are responsible for a substantial fraction of warm-season rainfall. Yet very little is known about the predictability of MCSs. To help address this situation, a previous paper by the authors examined a series of ensemble MCS simulations using a two-dimensional version of a storm-scale (Δx = 1 km) model. Ensemble member perturbations in the preconvective environment, namely, wind speed, relative humidity, and convective instability, are based on current 24-h forecast errors from the North American Model (NAM). That work is now extended using a full three-dimensional model.
Results from the three-dimensional simulations of the present study resemble those found in two dimensions. The model successfully produces an MCS within 100 km of the location of the control run in around 70% of the ensemble runs using perturbations to the preconvective environment consistent with 24-h forecast errors, while reducing the preconvective environment uncertainty to the level of current analysis errors improves the success rate to nearly 85%. This magnitude of improvement in forecasts of environmental conditions would represent a radical advance in numerical weather prediction. The maximum updraft and surface wind forecast uncertainties are of similar magnitude to their two-dimensional counterparts. However, unlike the two-dimensional simulations, in three dimensions, the improvement in the forecast uncertainty of storm features requires the reduction of preconvective environmental uncertainty for all perturbed variables. The MCSs in many of the runs resemble bow echoes, but surface winds associated with these solutions, and the perturbation profiles that produce them, are nearly indistinguishable from the nonbowing solutions, making any conclusions about the bowlike systems difficult.</description><subject>Convective instability</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Echoes</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Forecast errors</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mesoscale convective complexes</subject><subject>Mesoscale convective systems</subject><subject>Mesoscale phenomena</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Numerical prediction</subject><subject>Numerical weather forecasting</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Perturbations</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Storm forecasting</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surface wind</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Tornadoes</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><subject>Two dimensional models</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Updraft</subject><subject>Warm seasons</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><subject>Winds</subject><issn>0027-0644</issn><issn>1520-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtrG0EQhIdgQ-THMfclwfi0dk_Payc3I-dhsJCxFHJcZke9aMw-nJmVQf8-KyRCMBh8ahq-Kqgqxj5xuOLcqGsEsLPfj2g1v-If2IQrhBykFUdsAoAmBy3lR3aS0hMAaC1xwpbzLhvWlD1EWgU_uCo0YdhmfZ3NKPXJu4ayad-9kB_CC2WLbRqoTV-z5ToS5behpS6FvnNNtgjtpnHD-KQzdly7JtH54Z6yX9-_Lac_8_v5j7vpzX3uJaohd1SQoxUUtVGgnBTgdKERtQW-AoXGVpV1Qnstwdp6paGuLFe-IGGVrbg4ZZd73-fY_9lQGso2JE9N4zrqN6k0cnQTwM07SGG4sEaN5JdX5FO_iWPAVGKBBqVBa0fq81sUtwWCGAseoXwP-dinFKkun2NoXdyWHMrdYuV_i5W7OBcHU7crvo6u8yH9EyEqAwaN-Au_l5NL</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>WANDISHIN, Matthew S</creator><creator>STENSRUD, David J</creator><creator>MULLEN, Steven L</creator><creator>WICKER, Louis J</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>On the Predictability of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Three-Dimensional Simulations</title><author>WANDISHIN, Matthew S ; STENSRUD, David J ; MULLEN, Steven L ; WICKER, Louis J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-ae8eaed08f7505a430a686226901d05279bb9a36c64099fd60fb915c8e3959b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Convective instability</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Echoes</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Forecast errors</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mesoscale convective complexes</topic><topic>Mesoscale convective systems</topic><topic>Mesoscale phenomena</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Numerical prediction</topic><topic>Numerical weather forecasting</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Perturbations</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Storm forecasting</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surface wind</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Tornadoes</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><topic>Two dimensional models</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Updraft</topic><topic>Warm seasons</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><topic>Winds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WANDISHIN, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STENSRUD, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLEN, Steven L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WICKER, Louis J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WANDISHIN, Matthew S</au><au>STENSRUD, David J</au><au>MULLEN, Steven L</au><au>WICKER, Louis J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Predictability of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Three-Dimensional Simulations</atitle><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>863</spage><epage>885</epage><pages>863-885</pages><issn>0027-0644</issn><eissn>1520-0493</eissn><coden>MWREAB</coden><abstract>Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are a dominant climatological feature of the central United States and are responsible for a substantial fraction of warm-season rainfall. Yet very little is known about the predictability of MCSs. To help address this situation, a previous paper by the authors examined a series of ensemble MCS simulations using a two-dimensional version of a storm-scale (Δx = 1 km) model. Ensemble member perturbations in the preconvective environment, namely, wind speed, relative humidity, and convective instability, are based on current 24-h forecast errors from the North American Model (NAM). That work is now extended using a full three-dimensional model.
Results from the three-dimensional simulations of the present study resemble those found in two dimensions. The model successfully produces an MCS within 100 km of the location of the control run in around 70% of the ensemble runs using perturbations to the preconvective environment consistent with 24-h forecast errors, while reducing the preconvective environment uncertainty to the level of current analysis errors improves the success rate to nearly 85%. This magnitude of improvement in forecasts of environmental conditions would represent a radical advance in numerical weather prediction. The maximum updraft and surface wind forecast uncertainties are of similar magnitude to their two-dimensional counterparts. However, unlike the two-dimensional simulations, in three dimensions, the improvement in the forecast uncertainty of storm features requires the reduction of preconvective environmental uncertainty for all perturbed variables. The MCSs in many of the runs resemble bow echoes, but surface winds associated with these solutions, and the perturbation profiles that produce them, are nearly indistinguishable from the nonbowing solutions, making any conclusions about the bowlike systems difficult.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2009MWR2961.1</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-0644 |
ispartof | Monthly weather review, 2010-03, Vol.138 (3), p.863-885 |
issn | 0027-0644 1520-0493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746223017 |
source | American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Convective instability Earth, ocean, space Echoes Environmental conditions Errors Exact sciences and technology Experiments External geophysics Forecast errors Humidity Mathematical models Mesoscale convective complexes Mesoscale convective systems Mesoscale phenomena Meteorology Modelling Numerical prediction Numerical weather forecasting Perturbation Perturbations Rain Rainfall Relative humidity Simulation Storm forecasting Storms Studies Success Surface wind Three dimensional models Tornadoes Turbulence models Two dimensional models Uncertainty Updraft Warm seasons Weather forecasting Wind Wind speed Winds |
title | On the Predictability of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Three-Dimensional Simulations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A06%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Predictability%20of%20Mesoscale%20Convective%20Systems:%20Three-Dimensional%20Simulations&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20weather%20review&rft.au=WANDISHIN,%20Matthew%20S&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=863&rft.epage=885&rft.pages=863-885&rft.issn=0027-0644&rft.eissn=1520-0493&rft.coden=MWREAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2009MWR2961.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743713975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198203000&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |