The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography

Aim Climate change poses significant threats to biodiversity, including impacts on species distributions, abundance and ecological interactions. At a landscape scale, these impacts, and biotic responses such as adaptation and migration, will be mediated by spatial heterogeneity in climate and climat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2010-05, Vol.16 (3), p.476-487
Hauptverfasser: Ackerly, D. D., Loarie, S. R., Cornwell, W. K., Weiss, S. B., Hamilton, H., Branciforte, R., Kraft, N. J. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 487
container_issue 3
container_start_page 476
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 16
creator Ackerly, D. D.
Loarie, S. R.
Cornwell, W. K.
Weiss, S. B.
Hamilton, H.
Branciforte, R.
Kraft, N. J. B.
description Aim Climate change poses significant threats to biodiversity, including impacts on species distributions, abundance and ecological interactions. At a landscape scale, these impacts, and biotic responses such as adaptation and migration, will be mediated by spatial heterogeneity in climate and climate change. We examine several aspects of the geography of climate change and their significance for biodiversity conservation. Location California and Nevada, USA. Methods Using current climate surfaces (PRISM) and two scenarios of future climate (Alb, 2070-2099, warmer-drier and warmer-wetter), we mapped disappearing, declining, expanding and novel climates, and the velocity and direction of climate change in California and Nevada. We also examined finescale spatial heterogeneity in protected areas of the San Francisco Bay Area in relation to reserve size, topographic complexity and distance from the ocean. Results Under the two climate change scenarios, current climates across most of California and Nevada will shrink greatly in extent, and the climates of the highest peaks will disappear from this region. Expanding and novel climates are projected for the Central Valley. Current temperature isoclines are projected to move up to 4.9 km year⁻ⁱ in flatter regions, but substantially slower in mountainous areas because of steep local topoclimate gradients. In the San Francisco Bay Area, climate diversity within currently protected areas increases with reserve size and proximity to the ocean (the latter because of strong coastal climate gradients). However, by 2100 of almost 500 protected areas (> 100 ha), only eight of the largest are projected to experience temperatures within their currently observed range. Topoclimate variability will further increase the range of conditions experienced and needs to be incorporated in future analyses. Main Conclusions Spatial heterogeneity in climate, from mesoclimate to topoclimate scales, represents an important spatial buffer in response to climate change, and merits increased attention in conservation planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00654.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746159993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40604245</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40604245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-ecc88acbc55e87e76572aa1faa94e82292bf179aadd29d309091a9f8b78f3b513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtrGzEURofSQtM0PyGgrLoaR-9H6abkaWIaAg5ZXjSyxp7J2HKlcWv_-8ie4EVX1UaX-31HiFMUiOARyeeyHRGuaMklpyOK8xZjKfho-6E4OQYf88ykLI0g8nPxJaUWY8yYoCfFw3Th0dyHebTrxQ6FGrmuWdreI7ewq7n_jprlumuc7ZuwSqgOEbk8-PjnsEFVE4701-JTbbvkz97v0-L59mZ6dV9OHu_GVz8npeMa89I7p7V1lRPCa-WVFIpaS2prDfeaUkOrmihj7WxGzYxhgw2xptaV0jWrBGGnxbfh3XUMvzc-9bBskvNdZ1c-bBIoLokwxrDcvPin2YZNXOXPgTaUSm1k7uih42JIKfoa1jEbiDsgGPaKoYW9SdibhL1iOCiGbUZ_DOjfpvO7_-bg-nqch4yfD3ib-hCPOMcSc8pFzsshb1Lvt8fcxleQiikBL7_ugEwezNOtoTBlb9VUmrY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>89226896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ackerly, D. D. ; Loarie, S. R. ; Cornwell, W. K. ; Weiss, S. B. ; Hamilton, H. ; Branciforte, R. ; Kraft, N. J. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ackerly, D. D. ; Loarie, S. R. ; Cornwell, W. K. ; Weiss, S. B. ; Hamilton, H. ; Branciforte, R. ; Kraft, N. J. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Climate change poses significant threats to biodiversity, including impacts on species distributions, abundance and ecological interactions. At a landscape scale, these impacts, and biotic responses such as adaptation and migration, will be mediated by spatial heterogeneity in climate and climate change. We examine several aspects of the geography of climate change and their significance for biodiversity conservation. Location California and Nevada, USA. Methods Using current climate surfaces (PRISM) and two scenarios of future climate (Alb, 2070-2099, warmer-drier and warmer-wetter), we mapped disappearing, declining, expanding and novel climates, and the velocity and direction of climate change in California and Nevada. We also examined finescale spatial heterogeneity in protected areas of the San Francisco Bay Area in relation to reserve size, topographic complexity and distance from the ocean. Results Under the two climate change scenarios, current climates across most of California and Nevada will shrink greatly in extent, and the climates of the highest peaks will disappear from this region. Expanding and novel climates are projected for the Central Valley. Current temperature isoclines are projected to move up to 4.9 km year⁻ⁱ in flatter regions, but substantially slower in mountainous areas because of steep local topoclimate gradients. In the San Francisco Bay Area, climate diversity within currently protected areas increases with reserve size and proximity to the ocean (the latter because of strong coastal climate gradients). However, by 2100 of almost 500 protected areas (&gt; 100 ha), only eight of the largest are projected to experience temperatures within their currently observed range. Topoclimate variability will further increase the range of conditions experienced and needs to be incorporated in future analyses. Main Conclusions Spatial heterogeneity in climate, from mesoclimate to topoclimate scales, represents an important spatial buffer in response to climate change, and merits increased attention in conservation planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00654.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity conservation ; BIODIVERSITY REVIEWS ; Biogeography ; Brackish ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate models ; climatic heterogeneity ; Climatic zones ; conservation ; Conservation biology ; Environmental conservation ; Freshwater ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Paleoclimatology ; protected area networks ; Protected areas ; spatial heterogeneity ; spatial scale ; Species ; topoclimate</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2010-05, Vol.16 (3), p.476-487</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-ecc88acbc55e87e76572aa1faa94e82292bf179aadd29d309091a9f8b78f3b513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-ecc88acbc55e87e76572aa1faa94e82292bf179aadd29d309091a9f8b78f3b513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40604245$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40604245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ackerly, D. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loarie, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornwell, W. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, S. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branciforte, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraft, N. J. B.</creatorcontrib><title>The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><description>Aim Climate change poses significant threats to biodiversity, including impacts on species distributions, abundance and ecological interactions. At a landscape scale, these impacts, and biotic responses such as adaptation and migration, will be mediated by spatial heterogeneity in climate and climate change. We examine several aspects of the geography of climate change and their significance for biodiversity conservation. Location California and Nevada, USA. Methods Using current climate surfaces (PRISM) and two scenarios of future climate (Alb, 2070-2099, warmer-drier and warmer-wetter), we mapped disappearing, declining, expanding and novel climates, and the velocity and direction of climate change in California and Nevada. We also examined finescale spatial heterogeneity in protected areas of the San Francisco Bay Area in relation to reserve size, topographic complexity and distance from the ocean. Results Under the two climate change scenarios, current climates across most of California and Nevada will shrink greatly in extent, and the climates of the highest peaks will disappear from this region. Expanding and novel climates are projected for the Central Valley. Current temperature isoclines are projected to move up to 4.9 km year⁻ⁱ in flatter regions, but substantially slower in mountainous areas because of steep local topoclimate gradients. In the San Francisco Bay Area, climate diversity within currently protected areas increases with reserve size and proximity to the ocean (the latter because of strong coastal climate gradients). However, by 2100 of almost 500 protected areas (&gt; 100 ha), only eight of the largest are projected to experience temperatures within their currently observed range. Topoclimate variability will further increase the range of conditions experienced and needs to be incorporated in future analyses. Main Conclusions Spatial heterogeneity in climate, from mesoclimate to topoclimate scales, represents an important spatial buffer in response to climate change, and merits increased attention in conservation planning.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY REVIEWS</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>climatic heterogeneity</subject><subject>Climatic zones</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Paleoclimatology</subject><subject>protected area networks</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>spatial heterogeneity</subject><subject>spatial scale</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>topoclimate</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtrGzEURofSQtM0PyGgrLoaR-9H6abkaWIaAg5ZXjSyxp7J2HKlcWv_-8ie4EVX1UaX-31HiFMUiOARyeeyHRGuaMklpyOK8xZjKfho-6E4OQYf88ykLI0g8nPxJaUWY8yYoCfFw3Th0dyHebTrxQ6FGrmuWdreI7ewq7n_jprlumuc7ZuwSqgOEbk8-PjnsEFVE4701-JTbbvkz97v0-L59mZ6dV9OHu_GVz8npeMa89I7p7V1lRPCa-WVFIpaS2prDfeaUkOrmihj7WxGzYxhgw2xptaV0jWrBGGnxbfh3XUMvzc-9bBskvNdZ1c-bBIoLokwxrDcvPin2YZNXOXPgTaUSm1k7uih42JIKfoa1jEbiDsgGPaKoYW9SdibhL1iOCiGbUZ_DOjfpvO7_-bg-nqch4yfD3ib-hCPOMcSc8pFzsshb1Lvt8fcxleQiikBL7_ugEwezNOtoTBlb9VUmrY</recordid><startdate>201005</startdate><enddate>201005</enddate><creator>Ackerly, D. D.</creator><creator>Loarie, S. R.</creator><creator>Cornwell, W. K.</creator><creator>Weiss, S. B.</creator><creator>Hamilton, H.</creator><creator>Branciforte, R.</creator><creator>Kraft, N. J. B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201005</creationdate><title>The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography</title><author>Ackerly, D. D. ; Loarie, S. R. ; Cornwell, W. K. ; Weiss, S. B. ; Hamilton, H. ; Branciforte, R. ; Kraft, N. J. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-ecc88acbc55e87e76572aa1faa94e82292bf179aadd29d309091a9f8b78f3b513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY REVIEWS</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>climatic heterogeneity</topic><topic>Climatic zones</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Paleoclimatology</topic><topic>protected area networks</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>spatial heterogeneity</topic><topic>spatial scale</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>topoclimate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ackerly, D. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loarie, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornwell, W. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, S. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branciforte, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraft, N. J. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ackerly, D. D.</au><au>Loarie, S. R.</au><au>Cornwell, W. K.</au><au>Weiss, S. B.</au><au>Hamilton, H.</au><au>Branciforte, R.</au><au>Kraft, N. J. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><date>2010-05</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>476</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>476-487</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim Climate change poses significant threats to biodiversity, including impacts on species distributions, abundance and ecological interactions. At a landscape scale, these impacts, and biotic responses such as adaptation and migration, will be mediated by spatial heterogeneity in climate and climate change. We examine several aspects of the geography of climate change and their significance for biodiversity conservation. Location California and Nevada, USA. Methods Using current climate surfaces (PRISM) and two scenarios of future climate (Alb, 2070-2099, warmer-drier and warmer-wetter), we mapped disappearing, declining, expanding and novel climates, and the velocity and direction of climate change in California and Nevada. We also examined finescale spatial heterogeneity in protected areas of the San Francisco Bay Area in relation to reserve size, topographic complexity and distance from the ocean. Results Under the two climate change scenarios, current climates across most of California and Nevada will shrink greatly in extent, and the climates of the highest peaks will disappear from this region. Expanding and novel climates are projected for the Central Valley. Current temperature isoclines are projected to move up to 4.9 km year⁻ⁱ in flatter regions, but substantially slower in mountainous areas because of steep local topoclimate gradients. In the San Francisco Bay Area, climate diversity within currently protected areas increases with reserve size and proximity to the ocean (the latter because of strong coastal climate gradients). However, by 2100 of almost 500 protected areas (&gt; 100 ha), only eight of the largest are projected to experience temperatures within their currently observed range. Topoclimate variability will further increase the range of conditions experienced and needs to be incorporated in future analyses. Main Conclusions Spatial heterogeneity in climate, from mesoclimate to topoclimate scales, represents an important spatial buffer in response to climate change, and merits increased attention in conservation planning.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00654.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2010-05, Vol.16 (3), p.476-487
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746159993
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adaptation
Biodiversity
Biodiversity conservation
BIODIVERSITY REVIEWS
Biogeography
Brackish
Climate
Climate change
Climate models
climatic heterogeneity
Climatic zones
conservation
Conservation biology
Environmental conservation
Freshwater
Marine
Meteorology
Paleoclimatology
protected area networks
Protected areas
spatial heterogeneity
spatial scale
Species
topoclimate
title The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A53%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20geography%20of%20climate%20change:%20implications%20for%20conservation%20biogeography&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Ackerly,%20D.%20D.&rft.date=2010-05&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=476&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=476-487&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00654.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40604245%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=89226896&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40604245&rfr_iscdi=true