Enhancing Avifauna in Commercial Plantations
The occurrence of fauna in commercial plantations is often associated with structural complexity. Through a meta-analysis, we tested whether the structural complexity of plantations could enhance bird species assemblages and whether bird assemblages respond differently depending on taxonomic affilia...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2010-02, Vol.24 (1), p.319-324 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 324 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 319 |
| container_title | Conservation biology |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | NÁJERA, ANDREA SIMONETTI, JAVIER A |
| description | The occurrence of fauna in commercial plantations is often associated with structural complexity. Through a meta-analysis, we tested whether the structural complexity of plantations could enhance bird species assemblages and whether bird assemblages respond differently depending on taxonomic affiliation, body size, and diet. Our analyses included 167 case studies in 31 countries in which bird assemblages in forests and plantations were compared and 42 case studies in 14 countries in which bird assemblages in plantations of different structural complexity were compared. Species richness, but not abundance, was higher in forests than in plantations. Both species richness and abundance were significantly higher in complex than in structurally simple plantations. Taxonomic representation and body size did not differ between forest and plantations, except that there were fewer insectivorous birds in plantations than in forests. In the comparison of simple versus complex plantations, abundance of all taxonomic and dietary groups was higher in complex plantations. Body size did not affect bird species richness or abundance. Independent of the type of plantation, bird richness and abundance were greater in structurally complex plantations. Enhancing the structural complexity of plantations may mitigate their impact and offer habitat for some native species. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01350.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746159519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40419658</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40419658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5700-8e50363483b50ebec6d49551f6ea823cbf5526c416c5bd8cf39d206abaca5f523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EotPCTwAiJNQNCX4_NkidUSlFLS2PiqXleOySNI9iJzD99zhkNEhsqDe2dL97fO49AGQIFiidN3WBGCY5EkQVGEJVQEQYLDYPwGJXeAgWUEqZS6nwHtiPsYaJZIg-BntISSExkQvw-rj7bjpbddfZ0c_Km7EzWdVlq75tXbCVabLLxnSDGaq-i0_AI2-a6J5u7wNw9e746-p9fnZxcro6OsstExDm0jFIOKGSlAy60lm-poox5Lkz6VdbesYwtxRxy8q1tJ6oNYbclMYa5pP_A3A4696G_sfo4qDbKlrXJCeuH6MWlCOWRlH3ICnHRCj4f5IQhbkQIpEv_yHrfgxdGljjtGesJKQJkjNkQx9jcF7fhqo14U4jqKeMdK2nKPQUhZ4y0n8y0pvU-nyrP5atW_9t3IaSgFdbwERrGh-mgOKOw4lRHE5G387cr6pxd_c2oFcXy9PpmQSezQJ1HPqwE6CQIsXZZCSf61Uc3GZXN-FGc0EE098-nujPH9Cn5fL8Up8n_sXMe9Nrcx2S6asv084gEphjychvMBjLpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201329804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing Avifauna in Commercial Plantations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>NÁJERA, ANDREA ; SIMONETTI, JAVIER A</creator><creatorcontrib>NÁJERA, ANDREA ; SIMONETTI, JAVIER A</creatorcontrib><description>The occurrence of fauna in commercial plantations is often associated with structural complexity. Through a meta-analysis, we tested whether the structural complexity of plantations could enhance bird species assemblages and whether bird assemblages respond differently depending on taxonomic affiliation, body size, and diet. Our analyses included 167 case studies in 31 countries in which bird assemblages in forests and plantations were compared and 42 case studies in 14 countries in which bird assemblages in plantations of different structural complexity were compared. Species richness, but not abundance, was higher in forests than in plantations. Both species richness and abundance were significantly higher in complex than in structurally simple plantations. Taxonomic representation and body size did not differ between forest and plantations, except that there were fewer insectivorous birds in plantations than in forests. In the comparison of simple versus complex plantations, abundance of all taxonomic and dietary groups was higher in complex plantations. Body size did not affect bird species richness or abundance. Independent of the type of plantation, bird richness and abundance were greater in structurally complex plantations. Enhancing the structural complexity of plantations may mitigate their impact and offer habitat for some native species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01350.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19878238</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; agroforestería ; agroforestry ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Aves ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity conservation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; complejidad estructural ; Coniferous forests ; Conservation biology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Dry forests ; Forest conservation ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat conservation ; Insectivora ; Meta-analysis ; meta-análisis ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Pero ; Plantation forestry ; Plantations ; Research Notes ; sotobosque ; Species ; Species Specificity ; structural complexity ; Trees ; understory ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2010-02, Vol.24 (1), p.319-324</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 Society for Convervation Biology</rights><rights>2009 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5700-8e50363483b50ebec6d49551f6ea823cbf5526c416c5bd8cf39d206abaca5f523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5700-8e50363483b50ebec6d49551f6ea823cbf5526c416c5bd8cf39d206abaca5f523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40419658$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40419658$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22389607$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19878238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NÁJERA, ANDREA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMONETTI, JAVIER A</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing Avifauna in Commercial Plantations</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>The occurrence of fauna in commercial plantations is often associated with structural complexity. Through a meta-analysis, we tested whether the structural complexity of plantations could enhance bird species assemblages and whether bird assemblages respond differently depending on taxonomic affiliation, body size, and diet. Our analyses included 167 case studies in 31 countries in which bird assemblages in forests and plantations were compared and 42 case studies in 14 countries in which bird assemblages in plantations of different structural complexity were compared. Species richness, but not abundance, was higher in forests than in plantations. Both species richness and abundance were significantly higher in complex than in structurally simple plantations. Taxonomic representation and body size did not differ between forest and plantations, except that there were fewer insectivorous birds in plantations than in forests. In the comparison of simple versus complex plantations, abundance of all taxonomic and dietary groups was higher in complex plantations. Body size did not affect bird species richness or abundance. Independent of the type of plantation, bird richness and abundance were greater in structurally complex plantations. Enhancing the structural complexity of plantations may mitigate their impact and offer habitat for some native species.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>agroforestería</subject><subject>agroforestry</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>complejidad estructural</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Dry forests</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Insectivora</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>meta-análisis</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Pero</subject><subject>Plantation forestry</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Research Notes</subject><subject>sotobosque</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>structural complexity</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>understory</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EotPCTwAiJNQNCX4_NkidUSlFLS2PiqXleOySNI9iJzD99zhkNEhsqDe2dL97fO49AGQIFiidN3WBGCY5EkQVGEJVQEQYLDYPwGJXeAgWUEqZS6nwHtiPsYaJZIg-BntISSExkQvw-rj7bjpbddfZ0c_Km7EzWdVlq75tXbCVabLLxnSDGaq-i0_AI2-a6J5u7wNw9e746-p9fnZxcro6OsstExDm0jFIOKGSlAy60lm-poox5Lkz6VdbesYwtxRxy8q1tJ6oNYbclMYa5pP_A3A4696G_sfo4qDbKlrXJCeuH6MWlCOWRlH3ICnHRCj4f5IQhbkQIpEv_yHrfgxdGljjtGesJKQJkjNkQx9jcF7fhqo14U4jqKeMdK2nKPQUhZ4y0n8y0pvU-nyrP5atW_9t3IaSgFdbwERrGh-mgOKOw4lRHE5G387cr6pxd_c2oFcXy9PpmQSezQJ1HPqwE6CQIsXZZCSf61Uc3GZXN-FGc0EE098-nujPH9Cn5fL8Up8n_sXMe9Nrcx2S6asv084gEphjychvMBjLpw</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>NÁJERA, ANDREA</creator><creator>SIMONETTI, JAVIER A</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Enhancing Avifauna in Commercial Plantations</title><author>NÁJERA, ANDREA ; SIMONETTI, JAVIER A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5700-8e50363483b50ebec6d49551f6ea823cbf5526c416c5bd8cf39d206abaca5f523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>agroforestería</topic><topic>agroforestry</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>complejidad estructural</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Dry forests</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Insectivora</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>meta-análisis</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Pero</topic><topic>Plantation forestry</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Research Notes</topic><topic>sotobosque</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>structural complexity</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>understory</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NÁJERA, ANDREA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMONETTI, JAVIER A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NÁJERA, ANDREA</au><au>SIMONETTI, JAVIER A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing Avifauna in Commercial Plantations</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>319-324</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>The occurrence of fauna in commercial plantations is often associated with structural complexity. Through a meta-analysis, we tested whether the structural complexity of plantations could enhance bird species assemblages and whether bird assemblages respond differently depending on taxonomic affiliation, body size, and diet. Our analyses included 167 case studies in 31 countries in which bird assemblages in forests and plantations were compared and 42 case studies in 14 countries in which bird assemblages in plantations of different structural complexity were compared. Species richness, but not abundance, was higher in forests than in plantations. Both species richness and abundance were significantly higher in complex than in structurally simple plantations. Taxonomic representation and body size did not differ between forest and plantations, except that there were fewer insectivorous birds in plantations than in forests. In the comparison of simple versus complex plantations, abundance of all taxonomic and dietary groups was higher in complex plantations. Body size did not affect bird species richness or abundance. Independent of the type of plantation, bird richness and abundance were greater in structurally complex plantations. Enhancing the structural complexity of plantations may mitigate their impact and offer habitat for some native species.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>19878238</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01350.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
| ispartof | Conservation biology, 2010-02, Vol.24 (1), p.319-324 |
| issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746159519 |
| source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Agribusiness agroforestería agroforestry Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Aves Biodiversity Biodiversity conservation Biological and medical sciences Birds complejidad estructural Coniferous forests Conservation biology Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Dry forests Forest conservation Forest habitats Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitat conservation Insectivora Meta-analysis meta-análisis Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Pero Plantation forestry Plantations Research Notes sotobosque Species Species Specificity structural complexity Trees understory Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
| title | Enhancing Avifauna in Commercial Plantations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A58%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20Avifauna%20in%20Commercial%20Plantations&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=N%C3%81JERA,%20ANDREA&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=319-324&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01350.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40419658%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201329804&rft_id=info:pmid/19878238&rft_jstor_id=40419658&rfr_iscdi=true |