Valuing Recreational Benefits of Coral Reefs: The Case of Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya

A contingent valuation study was conducted with adult Kenyan citizens and foreign tourists to estimate the value of recreational benefits arising from coral reefs at Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve (MMNPR), and to assess the implications for local reef management. Citizen and foreign visito...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental management (New York) 2010, Vol.45 (1), p.145-154
Hauptverfasser: Ransom, Kevin P., Mangi, Stephen C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 154
container_issue 1
container_start_page 145
container_title Environmental management (New York)
container_volume 45
creator Ransom, Kevin P.
Mangi, Stephen C.
description A contingent valuation study was conducted with adult Kenyan citizens and foreign tourists to estimate the value of recreational benefits arising from coral reefs at Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve (MMNPR), and to assess the implications for local reef management. Citizen and foreign visitors to MMNPR were willing to pay an extra $2.2 (median = $1.6) and $8 (median = $6.7) per visit respectively, in addition to current park entrance fees, to support reef quality improvements. By aggregating visitors’ willingness to pay bids over the number of visitors to MMNPR in 2006–2007 the value of benefits was estimated at $346,733, which was more than twice the total annual operational expenditure of $152,383 for MMNPR. The findings indicate that annual revenues from citizen and foreign visitors may be increased by 60% to $261,932 through the implementation of proposed higher park fees of $3.10 for citizens and $15 for foreign visitors. However, any fee increase would serve to intensify concerns among citizens that only relatively affluent Kenyans can afford to visit MMNPR. Park managers need to demonstrate that the extra revenue would be used to fund the proposed conservation activities. This valuation study demonstrates that visitors are prepared to pay higher user fees for access to the marine protected area revealing considerable untapped resource to finance reef quality improvements.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00267-009-9402-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746081693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1960316881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-3425be8302711220531b69f0dce850105ca4b029f3e9759207052bb0a7e6d4173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOo7-ADcS3LixevNqGnc6-MIng4q7kHZutdppNZkK_nszzIggiK4COd85gXyEbDDYZQB6LwDwVCcAJjESeGIWSI9JwZOYmkXSA5HKhCn-sEJWQ3gGAJFlapmsMGOEBs56pLp3dVc1j3SIhUc3qdrG1fQQGyyrSaBtSQetjzdDxDLs09snpAMXcBpctuPcBUcvna8apFdf5RvnX6hrRrET0L_jDj3H5sOtkaXS1QHX52ef3B0f3Q5Ok4vrk7PBwUVSSCEniZBc5ZgJ4JoxzkEJlqemhFGBmQIGqnAyB25KgUYrw0GD4nkOTmM6kkyLPtme7b769q3DMLHjKhRY167BtgtWyxQylhrxD1KkQpgs-5uMGBdcsUhu_SCf287HbwmWQ6q0EdJEiM2gwrcheCztq6_Gzn9YBnZq1s7M2qjRTs3aaWdzPtzlYxx9N-YqI8BnQIhR84j---XfVz8B5VCqVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206579349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Valuing Recreational Benefits of Coral Reefs: The Case of Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Ransom, Kevin P. ; Mangi, Stephen C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ransom, Kevin P. ; Mangi, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><description>A contingent valuation study was conducted with adult Kenyan citizens and foreign tourists to estimate the value of recreational benefits arising from coral reefs at Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve (MMNPR), and to assess the implications for local reef management. Citizen and foreign visitors to MMNPR were willing to pay an extra $2.2 (median = $1.6) and $8 (median = $6.7) per visit respectively, in addition to current park entrance fees, to support reef quality improvements. By aggregating visitors’ willingness to pay bids over the number of visitors to MMNPR in 2006–2007 the value of benefits was estimated at $346,733, which was more than twice the total annual operational expenditure of $152,383 for MMNPR. The findings indicate that annual revenues from citizen and foreign visitors may be increased by 60% to $261,932 through the implementation of proposed higher park fees of $3.10 for citizens and $15 for foreign visitors. However, any fee increase would serve to intensify concerns among citizens that only relatively affluent Kenyans can afford to visit MMNPR. Park managers need to demonstrate that the extra revenue would be used to fund the proposed conservation activities. This valuation study demonstrates that visitors are prepared to pay higher user fees for access to the marine protected area revealing considerable untapped resource to finance reef quality improvements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9402-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19937021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthozoa ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bias ; Biodiversity ; Citizens ; Community support ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Coral reefs ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Fees &amp; charges ; Financial Support ; Forestry Management ; Humans ; Kenya ; Management ; Marine ; Marine protected areas ; National parks ; Nature Conservation ; Parks ; Recreation ; Recreation - economics ; Reefs ; Reserves ; Revenues ; Scuba &amp; skin diving ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tourism ; Travel ; User fees ; Valuation ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Wildlife conservation ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2010, Vol.45 (1), p.145-154</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-3425be8302711220531b69f0dce850105ca4b029f3e9759207052bb0a7e6d4173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-3425be8302711220531b69f0dce850105ca4b029f3e9759207052bb0a7e6d4173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00267-009-9402-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-009-9402-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19937021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ransom, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangi, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><title>Valuing Recreational Benefits of Coral Reefs: The Case of Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environmental Management</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>A contingent valuation study was conducted with adult Kenyan citizens and foreign tourists to estimate the value of recreational benefits arising from coral reefs at Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve (MMNPR), and to assess the implications for local reef management. Citizen and foreign visitors to MMNPR were willing to pay an extra $2.2 (median = $1.6) and $8 (median = $6.7) per visit respectively, in addition to current park entrance fees, to support reef quality improvements. By aggregating visitors’ willingness to pay bids over the number of visitors to MMNPR in 2006–2007 the value of benefits was estimated at $346,733, which was more than twice the total annual operational expenditure of $152,383 for MMNPR. The findings indicate that annual revenues from citizen and foreign visitors may be increased by 60% to $261,932 through the implementation of proposed higher park fees of $3.10 for citizens and $15 for foreign visitors. However, any fee increase would serve to intensify concerns among citizens that only relatively affluent Kenyans can afford to visit MMNPR. Park managers need to demonstrate that the extra revenue would be used to fund the proposed conservation activities. This valuation study demonstrates that visitors are prepared to pay higher user fees for access to the marine protected area revealing considerable untapped resource to finance reef quality improvements.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthozoa</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Community support</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Financial Support</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Parks</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Recreation - economics</subject><subject>Reefs</subject><subject>Reserves</subject><subject>Revenues</subject><subject>Scuba &amp; skin diving</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>User fees</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOo7-ADcS3LixevNqGnc6-MIng4q7kHZutdppNZkK_nszzIggiK4COd85gXyEbDDYZQB6LwDwVCcAJjESeGIWSI9JwZOYmkXSA5HKhCn-sEJWQ3gGAJFlapmsMGOEBs56pLp3dVc1j3SIhUc3qdrG1fQQGyyrSaBtSQetjzdDxDLs09snpAMXcBpctuPcBUcvna8apFdf5RvnX6hrRrET0L_jDj3H5sOtkaXS1QHX52ef3B0f3Q5Ok4vrk7PBwUVSSCEniZBc5ZgJ4JoxzkEJlqemhFGBmQIGqnAyB25KgUYrw0GD4nkOTmM6kkyLPtme7b769q3DMLHjKhRY167BtgtWyxQylhrxD1KkQpgs-5uMGBdcsUhu_SCf287HbwmWQ6q0EdJEiM2gwrcheCztq6_Gzn9YBnZq1s7M2qjRTs3aaWdzPtzlYxx9N-YqI8BnQIhR84j---XfVz8B5VCqVQ</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Ransom, Kevin P.</creator><creator>Mangi, Stephen C.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Valuing Recreational Benefits of Coral Reefs: The Case of Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya</title><author>Ransom, Kevin P. ; Mangi, Stephen C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-3425be8302711220531b69f0dce850105ca4b029f3e9759207052bb0a7e6d4173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthozoa</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Community support</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Financial Support</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Parks</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Recreation - economics</topic><topic>Reefs</topic><topic>Reserves</topic><topic>Revenues</topic><topic>Scuba &amp; skin diving</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>User fees</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ransom, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangi, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ransom, Kevin P.</au><au>Mangi, Stephen C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Valuing Recreational Benefits of Coral Reefs: The Case of Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Environmental Management</stitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>145-154</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>A contingent valuation study was conducted with adult Kenyan citizens and foreign tourists to estimate the value of recreational benefits arising from coral reefs at Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve (MMNPR), and to assess the implications for local reef management. Citizen and foreign visitors to MMNPR were willing to pay an extra $2.2 (median = $1.6) and $8 (median = $6.7) per visit respectively, in addition to current park entrance fees, to support reef quality improvements. By aggregating visitors’ willingness to pay bids over the number of visitors to MMNPR in 2006–2007 the value of benefits was estimated at $346,733, which was more than twice the total annual operational expenditure of $152,383 for MMNPR. The findings indicate that annual revenues from citizen and foreign visitors may be increased by 60% to $261,932 through the implementation of proposed higher park fees of $3.10 for citizens and $15 for foreign visitors. However, any fee increase would serve to intensify concerns among citizens that only relatively affluent Kenyans can afford to visit MMNPR. Park managers need to demonstrate that the extra revenue would be used to fund the proposed conservation activities. This valuation study demonstrates that visitors are prepared to pay higher user fees for access to the marine protected area revealing considerable untapped resource to finance reef quality improvements.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19937021</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-009-9402-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-152X
ispartof Environmental management (New York), 2010, Vol.45 (1), p.145-154
issn 0364-152X
1432-1009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746081693
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Animals
Anthozoa
Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Bias
Biodiversity
Citizens
Community support
Conservation of Natural Resources - methods
Coral reefs
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Ecosystem
Environment
Environmental Management
Fees & charges
Financial Support
Forestry Management
Humans
Kenya
Management
Marine
Marine protected areas
National parks
Nature Conservation
Parks
Recreation
Recreation - economics
Reefs
Reserves
Revenues
Scuba & skin diving
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tourism
Travel
User fees
Valuation
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Wildlife conservation
Willingness to pay
title Valuing Recreational Benefits of Coral Reefs: The Case of Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A13%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Valuing%20Recreational%20Benefits%20of%20Coral%20Reefs:%20The%20Case%20of%20Mombasa%20Marine%20National%20Park%20and%20Reserve,%20Kenya&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Ransom,%20Kevin%20P.&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=145-154&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-009-9402-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1960316881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206579349&rft_id=info:pmid/19937021&rfr_iscdi=true