fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: Characterising BOLD signal changes
Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes occurring during execution of a simple motor task were measured at field strengths of 1.5, 3 and 7 T using multi-slice, single-shot, gradient echo EPI at a resolution of 1×1×3 mm3, to quantify the benefits offered by ultra-high magnetic field f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2009-10, Vol.47 (4), p.1425-1434 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1434 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1425 |
container_title | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | van der Zwaag, Wietske Francis, Susan Head, Kay Peters, Andrew Gowland, Penny Morris, Peter Bowtell, Richard |
description | Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes occurring during execution of a simple motor task were measured at field strengths of 1.5, 3 and 7 T using multi-slice, single-shot, gradient echo EPI at a resolution of 1×1×3 mm3, to quantify the benefits offered by ultra-high magnetic field for functional MRI. Using four different echo times at each field strength allowed quantification of the relaxation rate, R2⁎ and the change in relaxation rate on activation, ΔR2⁎. This work adds to previous studies of the field strength dependence of BOLD signal characteristics, through its: (i) focus on motor rather than visual cortex; (ii) use of single-shot, multi-slice, gradient echo EPI for data acquisition; (iii) co-registration of images acquired at different field strengths to allow assessment of the BOLD signal changes in the same region at each field strength. ΔR2⁎ was found to increase linearly with field strength (0.51±0.06 s−1 at 1.5 T; 0.98±0.08 s−1 at 3 T; 2.55±0.22 s−1 at 7 T), while the ratio of ΔR2⁎/R2, which dictates the accessible BOLD contrast was also found to increase (0.042±0.002 at 1.5 T; 0.054±0.002 at 3 T; 0.084±0.003 at 7 T). The number of pixels classified as active, the t-value calculated over a common region of interest and the percentage signal change in the same region were all found to peak at TE∼T2⁎ and increase significantly with field strength. An earlier onset of the haemodynamic response at higher field provides some evidence for a reduced venous contribution to the BOLD signal at 7 T. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746080429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S105381190900500X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3244734881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-281d9ae01feea27bd1c5cd9f7148ec5658a26cc55c296a1f285fa60145872ceb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpaNK0f6EICu2ldmZkSZZyS7YfCWwJlPQstPJ4o2XXTiW70H8fLbsQ6KE9zRyedz7elzGOUCOgvtjUA81pjDu_ploA2BpUDahesDMEqyqrWvFy36umMoj2lL3OeQMFRGlesVO0Umot8Yxd9t9_3HI_cazVJ95wP3S85feXfPHgkw8TpZjjsObXd8vPPMf14Lc8PPhhTfkNO-n9NtPbYz1nP79-uV_cVMu7b7eLq2UVZCOmShjsrCfAnsiLdtVhUKGzfVtOoaC0Ml7oEJQKwmqPvTCq9xpQKtOKQKvmnH08zH1M46-Z8uR2MQfabv1A45xdKzUYkMIW8sM_Sd0qiULrAr7_C9yMcyq_ZYcKtAFoDBTKHKiQxpwT9e4xFcvTH4fg9jm4jXvOwe1zcKBcyaFI3x0XzKsddc_Co_EFuD4AVJz7HSm5HCINgbqYKEyuG-P_tzwBE9SZ2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506800380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: Characterising BOLD signal changes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>van der Zwaag, Wietske ; Francis, Susan ; Head, Kay ; Peters, Andrew ; Gowland, Penny ; Morris, Peter ; Bowtell, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Zwaag, Wietske ; Francis, Susan ; Head, Kay ; Peters, Andrew ; Gowland, Penny ; Morris, Peter ; Bowtell, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes occurring during execution of a simple motor task were measured at field strengths of 1.5, 3 and 7 T using multi-slice, single-shot, gradient echo EPI at a resolution of 1×1×3 mm3, to quantify the benefits offered by ultra-high magnetic field for functional MRI. Using four different echo times at each field strength allowed quantification of the relaxation rate, R2⁎ and the change in relaxation rate on activation, ΔR2⁎. This work adds to previous studies of the field strength dependence of BOLD signal characteristics, through its: (i) focus on motor rather than visual cortex; (ii) use of single-shot, multi-slice, gradient echo EPI for data acquisition; (iii) co-registration of images acquired at different field strengths to allow assessment of the BOLD signal changes in the same region at each field strength. ΔR2⁎ was found to increase linearly with field strength (0.51±0.06 s−1 at 1.5 T; 0.98±0.08 s−1 at 3 T; 2.55±0.22 s−1 at 7 T), while the ratio of ΔR2⁎/R2, which dictates the accessible BOLD contrast was also found to increase (0.042±0.002 at 1.5 T; 0.054±0.002 at 3 T; 0.084±0.003 at 7 T). The number of pixels classified as active, the t-value calculated over a common region of interest and the percentage signal change in the same region were all found to peak at TE∼T2⁎ and increase significantly with field strength. An earlier onset of the haemodynamic response at higher field provides some evidence for a reduced venous contribution to the BOLD signal at 7 T.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19446641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood ; Brain ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Experiments ; Female ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Motor Cortex - physiology ; NMR ; Noise ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2009-10, Vol.47 (4), p.1425-1434</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 1, 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-281d9ae01feea27bd1c5cd9f7148ec5658a26cc55c296a1f285fa60145872ceb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-281d9ae01feea27bd1c5cd9f7148ec5658a26cc55c296a1f285fa60145872ceb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1506800380?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19446641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Zwaag, Wietske</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Head, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gowland, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowtell, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: Characterising BOLD signal changes</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes occurring during execution of a simple motor task were measured at field strengths of 1.5, 3 and 7 T using multi-slice, single-shot, gradient echo EPI at a resolution of 1×1×3 mm3, to quantify the benefits offered by ultra-high magnetic field for functional MRI. Using four different echo times at each field strength allowed quantification of the relaxation rate, R2⁎ and the change in relaxation rate on activation, ΔR2⁎. This work adds to previous studies of the field strength dependence of BOLD signal characteristics, through its: (i) focus on motor rather than visual cortex; (ii) use of single-shot, multi-slice, gradient echo EPI for data acquisition; (iii) co-registration of images acquired at different field strengths to allow assessment of the BOLD signal changes in the same region at each field strength. ΔR2⁎ was found to increase linearly with field strength (0.51±0.06 s−1 at 1.5 T; 0.98±0.08 s−1 at 3 T; 2.55±0.22 s−1 at 7 T), while the ratio of ΔR2⁎/R2, which dictates the accessible BOLD contrast was also found to increase (0.042±0.002 at 1.5 T; 0.054±0.002 at 3 T; 0.084±0.003 at 7 T). The number of pixels classified as active, the t-value calculated over a common region of interest and the percentage signal change in the same region were all found to peak at TE∼T2⁎ and increase significantly with field strength. An earlier onset of the haemodynamic response at higher field provides some evidence for a reduced venous contribution to the BOLD signal at 7 T.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpaNK0f6EICu2ldmZkSZZyS7YfCWwJlPQstPJ4o2XXTiW70H8fLbsQ6KE9zRyedz7elzGOUCOgvtjUA81pjDu_ploA2BpUDahesDMEqyqrWvFy36umMoj2lL3OeQMFRGlesVO0Umot8Yxd9t9_3HI_cazVJ95wP3S85feXfPHgkw8TpZjjsObXd8vPPMf14Lc8PPhhTfkNO-n9NtPbYz1nP79-uV_cVMu7b7eLq2UVZCOmShjsrCfAnsiLdtVhUKGzfVtOoaC0Ml7oEJQKwmqPvTCq9xpQKtOKQKvmnH08zH1M46-Z8uR2MQfabv1A45xdKzUYkMIW8sM_Sd0qiULrAr7_C9yMcyq_ZYcKtAFoDBTKHKiQxpwT9e4xFcvTH4fg9jm4jXvOwe1zcKBcyaFI3x0XzKsddc_Co_EFuD4AVJz7HSm5HCINgbqYKEyuG-P_tzwBE9SZ2g</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>van der Zwaag, Wietske</creator><creator>Francis, Susan</creator><creator>Head, Kay</creator><creator>Peters, Andrew</creator><creator>Gowland, Penny</creator><creator>Morris, Peter</creator><creator>Bowtell, Richard</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: Characterising BOLD signal changes</title><author>van der Zwaag, Wietske ; Francis, Susan ; Head, Kay ; Peters, Andrew ; Gowland, Penny ; Morris, Peter ; Bowtell, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-281d9ae01feea27bd1c5cd9f7148ec5658a26cc55c296a1f285fa60145872ceb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Zwaag, Wietske</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Head, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gowland, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowtell, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Zwaag, Wietske</au><au>Francis, Susan</au><au>Head, Kay</au><au>Peters, Andrew</au><au>Gowland, Penny</au><au>Morris, Peter</au><au>Bowtell, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: Characterising BOLD signal changes</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1425</spage><epage>1434</epage><pages>1425-1434</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes occurring during execution of a simple motor task were measured at field strengths of 1.5, 3 and 7 T using multi-slice, single-shot, gradient echo EPI at a resolution of 1×1×3 mm3, to quantify the benefits offered by ultra-high magnetic field for functional MRI. Using four different echo times at each field strength allowed quantification of the relaxation rate, R2⁎ and the change in relaxation rate on activation, ΔR2⁎. This work adds to previous studies of the field strength dependence of BOLD signal characteristics, through its: (i) focus on motor rather than visual cortex; (ii) use of single-shot, multi-slice, gradient echo EPI for data acquisition; (iii) co-registration of images acquired at different field strengths to allow assessment of the BOLD signal changes in the same region at each field strength. ΔR2⁎ was found to increase linearly with field strength (0.51±0.06 s−1 at 1.5 T; 0.98±0.08 s−1 at 3 T; 2.55±0.22 s−1 at 7 T), while the ratio of ΔR2⁎/R2, which dictates the accessible BOLD contrast was also found to increase (0.042±0.002 at 1.5 T; 0.054±0.002 at 3 T; 0.084±0.003 at 7 T). The number of pixels classified as active, the t-value calculated over a common region of interest and the percentage signal change in the same region were all found to peak at TE∼T2⁎ and increase significantly with field strength. An earlier onset of the haemodynamic response at higher field provides some evidence for a reduced venous contribution to the BOLD signal at 7 T.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19446641</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.015</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8119 |
ispartof | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2009-10, Vol.47 (4), p.1425-1434 |
issn | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746080429 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adult Blood Brain Brain Mapping - methods Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology Experiments Female Humans Image Enhancement - methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Motor Cortex - physiology NMR Noise Nuclear magnetic resonance Oxygen Consumption - physiology Sensitivity and Specificity Studies |
title | fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: Characterising BOLD signal changes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A04%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=fMRI%20at%201.5,%203%20and%207%20T:%20Characterising%20BOLD%20signal%20changes&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=van%20der%20Zwaag,%20Wietske&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1425&rft.epage=1434&rft.pages=1425-1434&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3244734881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506800380&rft_id=info:pmid/19446641&rft_els_id=S105381190900500X&rfr_iscdi=true |