Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Effects on Soybean and Sorghum Gas Exchange in Conventional and No-Tillage Systems
Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration has led to concerns about potential effects on production agriculture. In the fall of 1997, a study was initiated to compare the response of two crop management systems (conventional tillage and no-tillage) to elevated CO2. The study used a split-plot design...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2010-03, Vol.39 (2), p.596-608 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 608 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 596 |
container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Prior, S.A Runion, G.B Rogers, H.H Arriaga, F.J |
description | Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration has led to concerns about potential effects on production agriculture. In the fall of 1997, a study was initiated to compare the response of two crop management systems (conventional tillage and no-tillage) to elevated CO2. The study used a split-plot design replicated three times with two management systems as main plots and two atmospheric CO2 levels (ambient and twice ambient) as split plots using open-top chambers on a Decatur silt loam soil (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Paleudults). The conventional system was a grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation with winter fallow and spring tillage practices. In the no-tillage system, sorghum and soybean were rotated, and three cover crops were used [crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)]. Over multiple growing seasons, the effect of management and CO2 concentration on leaf-level gas exchange during row crop (soybean in 1999, 2001, and 2003; sorghum in 2000, 2002, and 2004) reproductive growth were evaluated. Treatment effects were fairly consistent across years. In general, higher photosynthetic rates were observed under CO2 enrichment (more so with soybean) regardless of residue management practice. Elevated CO2 led to decreases in stomatal conductance and transpiration, which resulted in increased water use efficiency. The effects of management system on gas exchange measurements were infrequently significant, as were interactions of CO2 and management. These results suggest that better soil moisture conservation and high rates of photosynthesis can occur in both tillage systems in CO2–enriched environments during reproductive growth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2009.0181 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746056914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743273072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5201-790ba728a8ffb58f50e624683b9fbe963f89aeb996dd1512619fcbb4696ade523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9v0zAUxy0EYqVw4wzWLnAgwz-S2D5OJQzQBELdzpaTPLeukrizk7L-97i0cOAw7WD76b2Pv_ra7yH0mpILRnn-cQN3jBB1QaikT9CMFlxkLG1P0YyQPMU5K87Qixg3hFBGRPkcnTFCRSk5n6Fd1cHOjNDiy7H3cbuG4Bq8MKH2A_7k_L1rAVfWQjNGnFJLv6_BDNgMbYrDaj31-MpEXN03azOsALsBL_ywg2F0fjDdH_C7z25c15lUXu7jCH18iZ5Z00V4dTrn6PZzdbP4kl3_uPq6uLzOmiJ5zIQitRFMGmltXUhbEChZnpzXytagSm6lMlArVbYtLSgrqbJNXeelKk0LBeNz9O6ouw3-boI46t7FBpKXAfwUtchLUpSK5o8gOROciEdoci4UlYok8v2DJBVCUCqolAk9_w_d-CmkD4ya56KQuUivnaMPR6gJPsYAVm-D603Ya0r0YRj0aRj0YRgS_uakOdU9tP_gv91PgDoCv1wH-wfF9LfqJzuslDiJvz3etcZrswou6ttlUuapSlTqCP8NgyHIFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>347584796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Effects on Soybean and Sorghum Gas Exchange in Conventional and No-Tillage Systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Prior, S.A ; Runion, G.B ; Rogers, H.H ; Arriaga, F.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Prior, S.A ; Runion, G.B ; Rogers, H.H ; Arriaga, F.J</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration has led to concerns about potential effects on production agriculture. In the fall of 1997, a study was initiated to compare the response of two crop management systems (conventional tillage and no-tillage) to elevated CO2. The study used a split-plot design replicated three times with two management systems as main plots and two atmospheric CO2 levels (ambient and twice ambient) as split plots using open-top chambers on a Decatur silt loam soil (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Paleudults). The conventional system was a grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation with winter fallow and spring tillage practices. In the no-tillage system, sorghum and soybean were rotated, and three cover crops were used [crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)]. Over multiple growing seasons, the effect of management and CO2 concentration on leaf-level gas exchange during row crop (soybean in 1999, 2001, and 2003; sorghum in 2000, 2002, and 2004) reproductive growth were evaluated. Treatment effects were fairly consistent across years. In general, higher photosynthetic rates were observed under CO2 enrichment (more so with soybean) regardless of residue management practice. Elevated CO2 led to decreases in stomatal conductance and transpiration, which resulted in increased water use efficiency. The effects of management system on gas exchange measurements were infrequently significant, as were interactions of CO2 and management. These results suggest that better soil moisture conservation and high rates of photosynthesis can occur in both tillage systems in CO2–enriched environments during reproductive growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2009.0181</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20176833</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agriculture - methods ; air pollution ; Atmosphere - analysis ; Atmospherics ; Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Carbon Dioxide - metabolism ; conventional tillage ; Cover crops ; Crop management ; crop production ; crop rotation ; crop yield ; Crops ; Crotalaria ; Crotalaria juncea ; Elevated ; elevated atmospheric gases ; fallow ; Field study ; Fossil fuels ; Gas exchange ; Glycine max ; Glycine max - growth & development ; Glycine max - metabolism ; grain sorghum ; Growing season ; leaves ; Loam soils ; net assimilation rate ; no-tillage ; Photosynthesis ; plant growth ; Plant Leaves - metabolism ; plant reproduction ; Plant Transpiration ; Reproduction ; Silt loam ; silt loam soils ; Soil conservation ; Soil moisture ; Sorghum ; Sorghum - growth & development ; Sorghum - metabolism ; Sorghum bicolor ; Soybeans ; spring ; Stomatal conductance ; Testing laboratories ; Tillage ; Transpiration ; Trifolium incarnatum ; Triticum aestivum ; Water use ; Water use efficiency ; Wheat ; winter</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2010-03, Vol.39 (2), p.596-608</ispartof><rights>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5201-790ba728a8ffb58f50e624683b9fbe963f89aeb996dd1512619fcbb4696ade523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5201-790ba728a8ffb58f50e624683b9fbe963f89aeb996dd1512619fcbb4696ade523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2009.0181$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2009.0181$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20176833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prior, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runion, G.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, H.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arriaga, F.J</creatorcontrib><title>Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Effects on Soybean and Sorghum Gas Exchange in Conventional and No-Tillage Systems</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration has led to concerns about potential effects on production agriculture. In the fall of 1997, a study was initiated to compare the response of two crop management systems (conventional tillage and no-tillage) to elevated CO2. The study used a split-plot design replicated three times with two management systems as main plots and two atmospheric CO2 levels (ambient and twice ambient) as split plots using open-top chambers on a Decatur silt loam soil (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Paleudults). The conventional system was a grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation with winter fallow and spring tillage practices. In the no-tillage system, sorghum and soybean were rotated, and three cover crops were used [crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)]. Over multiple growing seasons, the effect of management and CO2 concentration on leaf-level gas exchange during row crop (soybean in 1999, 2001, and 2003; sorghum in 2000, 2002, and 2004) reproductive growth were evaluated. Treatment effects were fairly consistent across years. In general, higher photosynthetic rates were observed under CO2 enrichment (more so with soybean) regardless of residue management practice. Elevated CO2 led to decreases in stomatal conductance and transpiration, which resulted in increased water use efficiency. The effects of management system on gas exchange measurements were infrequently significant, as were interactions of CO2 and management. These results suggest that better soil moisture conservation and high rates of photosynthesis can occur in both tillage systems in CO2–enriched environments during reproductive growth.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>air pollution</subject><subject>Atmosphere - analysis</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - metabolism</subject><subject>conventional tillage</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>Crop management</subject><subject>crop production</subject><subject>crop rotation</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Crotalaria</subject><subject>Crotalaria juncea</subject><subject>Elevated</subject><subject>elevated atmospheric gases</subject><subject>fallow</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Gas exchange</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Glycine max - growth & development</subject><subject>Glycine max - metabolism</subject><subject>grain sorghum</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>net assimilation rate</subject><subject>no-tillage</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>plant growth</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - metabolism</subject><subject>plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plant Transpiration</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Silt loam</subject><subject>silt loam soils</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Sorghum - growth & development</subject><subject>Sorghum - metabolism</subject><subject>Sorghum bicolor</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>spring</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><subject>Testing laboratories</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>Trifolium incarnatum</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water use efficiency</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9v0zAUxy0EYqVw4wzWLnAgwz-S2D5OJQzQBELdzpaTPLeukrizk7L-97i0cOAw7WD76b2Pv_ra7yH0mpILRnn-cQN3jBB1QaikT9CMFlxkLG1P0YyQPMU5K87Qixg3hFBGRPkcnTFCRSk5n6Fd1cHOjNDiy7H3cbuG4Bq8MKH2A_7k_L1rAVfWQjNGnFJLv6_BDNgMbYrDaj31-MpEXN03azOsALsBL_ywg2F0fjDdH_C7z25c15lUXu7jCH18iZ5Z00V4dTrn6PZzdbP4kl3_uPq6uLzOmiJ5zIQitRFMGmltXUhbEChZnpzXytagSm6lMlArVbYtLSgrqbJNXeelKk0LBeNz9O6ouw3-boI46t7FBpKXAfwUtchLUpSK5o8gOROciEdoci4UlYok8v2DJBVCUCqolAk9_w_d-CmkD4ya56KQuUivnaMPR6gJPsYAVm-D603Ya0r0YRj0aRj0YRgS_uakOdU9tP_gv91PgDoCv1wH-wfF9LfqJzuslDiJvz3etcZrswou6ttlUuapSlTqCP8NgyHIFg</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Prior, S.A</creator><creator>Runion, G.B</creator><creator>Rogers, H.H</creator><creator>Arriaga, F.J</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Effects on Soybean and Sorghum Gas Exchange in Conventional and No-Tillage Systems</title><author>Prior, S.A ; Runion, G.B ; Rogers, H.H ; Arriaga, F.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5201-790ba728a8ffb58f50e624683b9fbe963f89aeb996dd1512619fcbb4696ade523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>air pollution</topic><topic>Atmosphere - analysis</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - metabolism</topic><topic>conventional tillage</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>Crop management</topic><topic>crop production</topic><topic>crop rotation</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Crotalaria</topic><topic>Crotalaria juncea</topic><topic>Elevated</topic><topic>elevated atmospheric gases</topic><topic>fallow</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Gas exchange</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Glycine max - growth & development</topic><topic>Glycine max - metabolism</topic><topic>grain sorghum</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>net assimilation rate</topic><topic>no-tillage</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>plant growth</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - metabolism</topic><topic>plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plant Transpiration</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Silt loam</topic><topic>silt loam soils</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Sorghum - growth & development</topic><topic>Sorghum - metabolism</topic><topic>Sorghum bicolor</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>spring</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><topic>Testing laboratories</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>Trifolium incarnatum</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water use efficiency</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prior, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runion, G.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, H.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arriaga, F.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prior, S.A</au><au>Runion, G.B</au><au>Rogers, H.H</au><au>Arriaga, F.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Effects on Soybean and Sorghum Gas Exchange in Conventional and No-Tillage Systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>596</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>596-608</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration has led to concerns about potential effects on production agriculture. In the fall of 1997, a study was initiated to compare the response of two crop management systems (conventional tillage and no-tillage) to elevated CO2. The study used a split-plot design replicated three times with two management systems as main plots and two atmospheric CO2 levels (ambient and twice ambient) as split plots using open-top chambers on a Decatur silt loam soil (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Paleudults). The conventional system was a grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation with winter fallow and spring tillage practices. In the no-tillage system, sorghum and soybean were rotated, and three cover crops were used [crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)]. Over multiple growing seasons, the effect of management and CO2 concentration on leaf-level gas exchange during row crop (soybean in 1999, 2001, and 2003; sorghum in 2000, 2002, and 2004) reproductive growth were evaluated. Treatment effects were fairly consistent across years. In general, higher photosynthetic rates were observed under CO2 enrichment (more so with soybean) regardless of residue management practice. Elevated CO2 led to decreases in stomatal conductance and transpiration, which resulted in increased water use efficiency. The effects of management system on gas exchange measurements were infrequently significant, as were interactions of CO2 and management. These results suggest that better soil moisture conservation and high rates of photosynthesis can occur in both tillage systems in CO2–enriched environments during reproductive growth.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</pub><pmid>20176833</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2009.0181</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2010-03, Vol.39 (2), p.596-608 |
issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746056914 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agriculture - methods air pollution Atmosphere - analysis Atmospherics Carbon Carbon dioxide Carbon Dioxide - analysis Carbon Dioxide - metabolism conventional tillage Cover crops Crop management crop production crop rotation crop yield Crops Crotalaria Crotalaria juncea Elevated elevated atmospheric gases fallow Field study Fossil fuels Gas exchange Glycine max Glycine max - growth & development Glycine max - metabolism grain sorghum Growing season leaves Loam soils net assimilation rate no-tillage Photosynthesis plant growth Plant Leaves - metabolism plant reproduction Plant Transpiration Reproduction Silt loam silt loam soils Soil conservation Soil moisture Sorghum Sorghum - growth & development Sorghum - metabolism Sorghum bicolor Soybeans spring Stomatal conductance Testing laboratories Tillage Transpiration Trifolium incarnatum Triticum aestivum Water use Water use efficiency Wheat winter |
title | Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Effects on Soybean and Sorghum Gas Exchange in Conventional and No-Tillage Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A21%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elevated%20Atmospheric%20Carbon%20Dioxide%20Effects%20on%20Soybean%20and%20Sorghum%20Gas%20Exchange%20in%20Conventional%20and%20No-Tillage%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Prior,%20S.A&rft.date=2010-03&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=596&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=596-608&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2009.0181&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743273072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=347584796&rft_id=info:pmid/20176833&rfr_iscdi=true |