Feasibility of ultrasound‐guided sacroiliac joint injection considering sonoanatomic landmarks at two different levels in cadavers and patients

Objective Sacroiliitis is often caused by rheumatic diseases, and besides other therapeutic options, treatment consists of intraarticular injection of corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of ultrasound (US)‐guided sacroiliac joint (SI joint) injection at 2 differe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis and rheumatism 2008-11, Vol.59 (11), p.1618-1624
Hauptverfasser: Klauser, Andrea, De Zordo, Tobias, Feuchtner, Gudrun, Sögner, Peter, Schirmer, Michael, Gruber, Johann, Sepp, Norbert, Moriggl, Bernhard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1624
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1618
container_title Arthritis and rheumatism
container_volume 59
creator Klauser, Andrea
De Zordo, Tobias
Feuchtner, Gudrun
Sögner, Peter
Schirmer, Michael
Gruber, Johann
Sepp, Norbert
Moriggl, Bernhard
description Objective Sacroiliitis is often caused by rheumatic diseases, and besides other therapeutic options, treatment consists of intraarticular injection of corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of ultrasound (US)‐guided sacroiliac joint (SI joint) injection at 2 different puncture levels in cadavers and patients when defined sonoanatomic landmarks were considered. Methods After defining sonoanatomic landmarks, US‐guided needle insertion was performed in 10 human cadavers (20 SI joints) at 2 different puncture sites. Upper level was defined at the level of the posterior sacral foramen 1 and lower level at the level of the posterior sacral foramen 2. In 10 patients with unilateral sacroiliitis, injection at the most feasible level was attempted. Results Computed tomography confirmed correct intraarticular needle placement in cadavers by showing the tip of the needle in the joint and intraarticular diffusion of contrast media in 16 (80%) of 20 SI joints (upper level 7 [70%] of 10; lower level 9 [90%] of 10). In all 4 cases in which needle insertion failed, intraarticular SI joint injection at the other level was successful. In patients, 100% of US‐guided injections were successful (8 lower level, 2 upper level), with a mean pain relief of 8.6 after 3 months. Conclusion US guidance of needle insertion into SI joints was feasible at both levels when defined sonoanatomic landmarks were used. If SI joint alterations do not allow for direct visualization of the dorsal joint space of the lower level, which is easier to access, the upper level might offer an appropriate alternative.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/art.24204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746051629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69771284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4514-67d7b1b380613bc9423f1b059d9f3bc08c164866d95601fa3e48e1c44d2204903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c2OFCEQB3BiNO44evAFDBc1HnqXr6bhuNm4arKJiVnPHRroDSMDI9C7mZuPoK_ok1g6Ez2pJ1LhRxWpP0JPKTmlhLAzU9opE4yIe2hFe6Y7Qjm9j1aEENHxXtMT9KjWDZSM9_whOqFKDz3v1Qp9u_SmhinE0PY4z3iJrZial-S-f_l6swTnHa7GlgzCWLzJITUc0sbbFnLCNqcKpoR0g2tO2STT8jZYHE1yW1M-VWwabncZuzDPvnh4Hf2tjxWaYGucufUFTHJ4Z1qA6_oYPZhNrP7J8Vyjj5evry_edlfv37y7OL_qrOip6OTgholOXBFJ-WS1YHymE-m10zPURFkqhZLS6V4SOhvuhfLUCuEYLEoTvkYvD313JX9efG3jNlTrI_zc56WOg5Ckp5JpkC_-KaUeBsqU-C9kRHIOqwf46gBhsbUWP4-7EmBd-5GS8WekI0Q6_ooU7LNj02XaevdHHjME8PwITLUmzsUkG-pvx4gSVEHya3R2cHch-v3fJ47nH64Po38AqHy65A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20633897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of ultrasound‐guided sacroiliac joint injection considering sonoanatomic landmarks at two different levels in cadavers and patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Klauser, Andrea ; De Zordo, Tobias ; Feuchtner, Gudrun ; Sögner, Peter ; Schirmer, Michael ; Gruber, Johann ; Sepp, Norbert ; Moriggl, Bernhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Klauser, Andrea ; De Zordo, Tobias ; Feuchtner, Gudrun ; Sögner, Peter ; Schirmer, Michael ; Gruber, Johann ; Sepp, Norbert ; Moriggl, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Sacroiliitis is often caused by rheumatic diseases, and besides other therapeutic options, treatment consists of intraarticular injection of corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of ultrasound (US)‐guided sacroiliac joint (SI joint) injection at 2 different puncture levels in cadavers and patients when defined sonoanatomic landmarks were considered. Methods After defining sonoanatomic landmarks, US‐guided needle insertion was performed in 10 human cadavers (20 SI joints) at 2 different puncture sites. Upper level was defined at the level of the posterior sacral foramen 1 and lower level at the level of the posterior sacral foramen 2. In 10 patients with unilateral sacroiliitis, injection at the most feasible level was attempted. Results Computed tomography confirmed correct intraarticular needle placement in cadavers by showing the tip of the needle in the joint and intraarticular diffusion of contrast media in 16 (80%) of 20 SI joints (upper level 7 [70%] of 10; lower level 9 [90%] of 10). In all 4 cases in which needle insertion failed, intraarticular SI joint injection at the other level was successful. In patients, 100% of US‐guided injections were successful (8 lower level, 2 upper level), with a mean pain relief of 8.6 after 3 months. Conclusion US guidance of needle insertion into SI joints was feasible at both levels when defined sonoanatomic landmarks were used. If SI joint alterations do not allow for direct visualization of the dorsal joint space of the lower level, which is easier to access, the upper level might offer an appropriate alternative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-3591</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0893-7524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-0131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-0123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/art.24204</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18975358</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARCREG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones - administration &amp; dosage ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cadaver ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Intra-Articular - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Rheumatic Diseases - drug therapy ; Sacroiliac Joint - anatomy &amp; histology ; Sacroiliac Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Arthritis and rheumatism, 2008-11, Vol.59 (11), p.1618-1624</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4514-67d7b1b380613bc9423f1b059d9f3bc08c164866d95601fa3e48e1c44d2204903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4514-67d7b1b380613bc9423f1b059d9f3bc08c164866d95601fa3e48e1c44d2204903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fart.24204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fart.24204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20841802$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18975358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klauser, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Zordo, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feuchtner, Gudrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sögner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schirmer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruber, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sepp, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriggl, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of ultrasound‐guided sacroiliac joint injection considering sonoanatomic landmarks at two different levels in cadavers and patients</title><title>Arthritis and rheumatism</title><addtitle>Arthritis Rheum</addtitle><description>Objective Sacroiliitis is often caused by rheumatic diseases, and besides other therapeutic options, treatment consists of intraarticular injection of corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of ultrasound (US)‐guided sacroiliac joint (SI joint) injection at 2 different puncture levels in cadavers and patients when defined sonoanatomic landmarks were considered. Methods After defining sonoanatomic landmarks, US‐guided needle insertion was performed in 10 human cadavers (20 SI joints) at 2 different puncture sites. Upper level was defined at the level of the posterior sacral foramen 1 and lower level at the level of the posterior sacral foramen 2. In 10 patients with unilateral sacroiliitis, injection at the most feasible level was attempted. Results Computed tomography confirmed correct intraarticular needle placement in cadavers by showing the tip of the needle in the joint and intraarticular diffusion of contrast media in 16 (80%) of 20 SI joints (upper level 7 [70%] of 10; lower level 9 [90%] of 10). In all 4 cases in which needle insertion failed, intraarticular SI joint injection at the other level was successful. In patients, 100% of US‐guided injections were successful (8 lower level, 2 upper level), with a mean pain relief of 8.6 after 3 months. Conclusion US guidance of needle insertion into SI joints was feasible at both levels when defined sonoanatomic landmarks were used. If SI joint alterations do not allow for direct visualization of the dorsal joint space of the lower level, which is easier to access, the upper level might offer an appropriate alternative.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intra-Articular - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Rheumatic Diseases - drug therapy</subject><subject>Sacroiliac Joint - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Sacroiliac Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0004-3591</issn><issn>0893-7524</issn><issn>1529-0131</issn><issn>1529-0123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c2OFCEQB3BiNO44evAFDBc1HnqXr6bhuNm4arKJiVnPHRroDSMDI9C7mZuPoK_ok1g6Ez2pJ1LhRxWpP0JPKTmlhLAzU9opE4yIe2hFe6Y7Qjm9j1aEENHxXtMT9KjWDZSM9_whOqFKDz3v1Qp9u_SmhinE0PY4z3iJrZial-S-f_l6swTnHa7GlgzCWLzJITUc0sbbFnLCNqcKpoR0g2tO2STT8jZYHE1yW1M-VWwabncZuzDPvnh4Hf2tjxWaYGucufUFTHJ4Z1qA6_oYPZhNrP7J8Vyjj5evry_edlfv37y7OL_qrOip6OTgholOXBFJ-WS1YHymE-m10zPURFkqhZLS6V4SOhvuhfLUCuEYLEoTvkYvD313JX9efG3jNlTrI_zc56WOg5Ckp5JpkC_-KaUeBsqU-C9kRHIOqwf46gBhsbUWP4-7EmBd-5GS8WekI0Q6_ooU7LNj02XaevdHHjME8PwITLUmzsUkG-pvx4gSVEHya3R2cHch-v3fJ47nH64Po38AqHy65A</recordid><startdate>20081115</startdate><enddate>20081115</enddate><creator>Klauser, Andrea</creator><creator>De Zordo, Tobias</creator><creator>Feuchtner, Gudrun</creator><creator>Sögner, Peter</creator><creator>Schirmer, Michael</creator><creator>Gruber, Johann</creator><creator>Sepp, Norbert</creator><creator>Moriggl, Bernhard</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081115</creationdate><title>Feasibility of ultrasound‐guided sacroiliac joint injection considering sonoanatomic landmarks at two different levels in cadavers and patients</title><author>Klauser, Andrea ; De Zordo, Tobias ; Feuchtner, Gudrun ; Sögner, Peter ; Schirmer, Michael ; Gruber, Johann ; Sepp, Norbert ; Moriggl, Bernhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4514-67d7b1b380613bc9423f1b059d9f3bc08c164866d95601fa3e48e1c44d2204903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intra-Articular - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Rheumatic Diseases - drug therapy</topic><topic>Sacroiliac Joint - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Sacroiliac Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klauser, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Zordo, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feuchtner, Gudrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sögner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schirmer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruber, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sepp, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriggl, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis and rheumatism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klauser, Andrea</au><au>De Zordo, Tobias</au><au>Feuchtner, Gudrun</au><au>Sögner, Peter</au><au>Schirmer, Michael</au><au>Gruber, Johann</au><au>Sepp, Norbert</au><au>Moriggl, Bernhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of ultrasound‐guided sacroiliac joint injection considering sonoanatomic landmarks at two different levels in cadavers and patients</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis and rheumatism</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Rheum</addtitle><date>2008-11-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1618</spage><epage>1624</epage><pages>1618-1624</pages><issn>0004-3591</issn><issn>0893-7524</issn><eissn>1529-0131</eissn><eissn>1529-0123</eissn><coden>ARCREG</coden><abstract>Objective Sacroiliitis is often caused by rheumatic diseases, and besides other therapeutic options, treatment consists of intraarticular injection of corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of ultrasound (US)‐guided sacroiliac joint (SI joint) injection at 2 different puncture levels in cadavers and patients when defined sonoanatomic landmarks were considered. Methods After defining sonoanatomic landmarks, US‐guided needle insertion was performed in 10 human cadavers (20 SI joints) at 2 different puncture sites. Upper level was defined at the level of the posterior sacral foramen 1 and lower level at the level of the posterior sacral foramen 2. In 10 patients with unilateral sacroiliitis, injection at the most feasible level was attempted. Results Computed tomography confirmed correct intraarticular needle placement in cadavers by showing the tip of the needle in the joint and intraarticular diffusion of contrast media in 16 (80%) of 20 SI joints (upper level 7 [70%] of 10; lower level 9 [90%] of 10). In all 4 cases in which needle insertion failed, intraarticular SI joint injection at the other level was successful. In patients, 100% of US‐guided injections were successful (8 lower level, 2 upper level), with a mean pain relief of 8.6 after 3 months. Conclusion US guidance of needle insertion into SI joints was feasible at both levels when defined sonoanatomic landmarks were used. If SI joint alterations do not allow for direct visualization of the dorsal joint space of the lower level, which is easier to access, the upper level might offer an appropriate alternative.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18975358</pmid><doi>10.1002/art.24204</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-3591
ispartof Arthritis and rheumatism, 2008-11, Vol.59 (11), p.1618-1624
issn 0004-3591
0893-7524
1529-0131
1529-0123
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746051629
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adrenal Cortex Hormones - administration & dosage
Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cadaver
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Injections, Intra-Articular - methods
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Patients
Rheumatic Diseases - drug therapy
Sacroiliac Joint - anatomy & histology
Sacroiliac Joint - diagnostic imaging
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography
Young Adult
title Feasibility of ultrasound‐guided sacroiliac joint injection considering sonoanatomic landmarks at two different levels in cadavers and patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20ultrasound%E2%80%90guided%20sacroiliac%20joint%20injection%20considering%20sonoanatomic%20landmarks%20at%20two%20different%20levels%20in%20cadavers%20and%20patients&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20and%20rheumatism&rft.au=Klauser,%20Andrea&rft.date=2008-11-15&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1618&rft.epage=1624&rft.pages=1618-1624&rft.issn=0004-3591&rft.eissn=1529-0131&rft.coden=ARCREG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/art.24204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69771284%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20633897&rft_id=info:pmid/18975358&rfr_iscdi=true