Hydrodynamic drag versus roughness for rotating disks

Stylus measurements of the microroughness of rotating disks and their significant correlation with hydrodynamic drag measurements were studied. The roughest disks ( R a ≈ 16 μm) were found to have drag coefficients about 30% greater than those of the smoothest disks ( R a ≈ 0.14 μm). For a Reynolds&...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wear 1982-01, Vol.83 (2), p.339-349
Hauptverfasser: Vorburger, T.V., Scire, F.E., Teague, E.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 349
container_issue 2
container_start_page 339
container_title Wear
container_volume 83
creator Vorburger, T.V.
Scire, F.E.
Teague, E.C.
description Stylus measurements of the microroughness of rotating disks and their significant correlation with hydrodynamic drag measurements were studied. The roughest disks ( R a ≈ 16 μm) were found to have drag coefficients about 30% greater than those of the smoothest disks ( R a ≈ 0.14 μm). For a Reynolds' number of 1.5 × 10 6, the following empirical relationship between the drag coefficient C, the average roughness R a and a parameter designated the peak count wavelength λ pc was obtained: C= bR a λ pc 1 2 + C o where b = 3.85 × 10 −3 μm − 1 2 and C 0 = 6.48 × 10 −3 . Other surface parameters and functions were measured in addition to R a and λ pc; however, it seems that knowledge of an amplitude-sensitive parameter and a wavelength-sensitive parameter is adequate for characterizing increases in the drag of rotating disks due to surface roughness. R a is the preferred amplitude-sensitive parameter because it is the most widely used. We propose λ pc as the wavelength parameter because it is sensitive to the larger profile features rather than to the fine structure. However, there is a need for all workers in the field to standardize on measuring the same parameters so that the results of one group can be easily related to the work of other groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0043-1648(82)90188-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746025504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0043164882901880</els_id><sourcerecordid>746025504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-fbe9b9722ef52df9de21fcd09d1cb05b6f1ae1595ecf2fecfa94a1539bf016603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwDxiyAUPAdmInXpBQVShSJRaYLcc-F0MbF19Sqf-ehCJGljud9N47vY-QS0ZvGWXyjtKyyJks6-ua3yjK6jqnR2TC6qrIuaiqYzL5k5ySM8QPSilTQk6IWOxdim7fmk2wmUtmle0gYY9Ziv3qvQXEzMc0XJ3pQrvKXMBPPCcn3qwRLn73lLw9zl9ni3z58vQ8e1jmtihkl_sGVKMqzsEL7rxywJm3jirHbENFIz0zwIQSYD33wzCqNEwUqvFDLUmLKbk65G5T_OoBO70JaGG9Ni3EHnVVSsqFGLpNSXlQ2hQRE3i9TWFj0l4zqkdIeiSgRwK65voHkh4f3B9sMLTYBUgabYDWggsJbKddDP8HfAPBSm73</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>746025504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrodynamic drag versus roughness for rotating disks</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Vorburger, T.V. ; Scire, F.E. ; Teague, E.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vorburger, T.V. ; Scire, F.E. ; Teague, E.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Stylus measurements of the microroughness of rotating disks and their significant correlation with hydrodynamic drag measurements were studied. The roughest disks ( R a ≈ 16 μm) were found to have drag coefficients about 30% greater than those of the smoothest disks ( R a ≈ 0.14 μm). For a Reynolds' number of 1.5 × 10 6, the following empirical relationship between the drag coefficient C, the average roughness R a and a parameter designated the peak count wavelength λ pc was obtained: C= bR a λ pc 1 2 + C o where b = 3.85 × 10 −3 μm − 1 2 and C 0 = 6.48 × 10 −3 . Other surface parameters and functions were measured in addition to R a and λ pc; however, it seems that knowledge of an amplitude-sensitive parameter and a wavelength-sensitive parameter is adequate for characterizing increases in the drag of rotating disks due to surface roughness. R a is the preferred amplitude-sensitive parameter because it is the most widely used. We propose λ pc as the wavelength parameter because it is sensitive to the larger profile features rather than to the fine structure. However, there is a need for all workers in the field to standardize on measuring the same parameters so that the results of one group can be easily related to the work of other groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(82)90188-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>drag ; hydrodynamics ; rotating bodies ; surface properties</subject><ispartof>Wear, 1982-01, Vol.83 (2), p.339-349</ispartof><rights>1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-fbe9b9722ef52df9de21fcd09d1cb05b6f1ae1595ecf2fecfa94a1539bf016603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-fbe9b9722ef52df9de21fcd09d1cb05b6f1ae1595ecf2fecfa94a1539bf016603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(82)90188-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vorburger, T.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scire, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teague, E.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrodynamic drag versus roughness for rotating disks</title><title>Wear</title><description>Stylus measurements of the microroughness of rotating disks and their significant correlation with hydrodynamic drag measurements were studied. The roughest disks ( R a ≈ 16 μm) were found to have drag coefficients about 30% greater than those of the smoothest disks ( R a ≈ 0.14 μm). For a Reynolds' number of 1.5 × 10 6, the following empirical relationship between the drag coefficient C, the average roughness R a and a parameter designated the peak count wavelength λ pc was obtained: C= bR a λ pc 1 2 + C o where b = 3.85 × 10 −3 μm − 1 2 and C 0 = 6.48 × 10 −3 . Other surface parameters and functions were measured in addition to R a and λ pc; however, it seems that knowledge of an amplitude-sensitive parameter and a wavelength-sensitive parameter is adequate for characterizing increases in the drag of rotating disks due to surface roughness. R a is the preferred amplitude-sensitive parameter because it is the most widely used. We propose λ pc as the wavelength parameter because it is sensitive to the larger profile features rather than to the fine structure. However, there is a need for all workers in the field to standardize on measuring the same parameters so that the results of one group can be easily related to the work of other groups.</description><subject>drag</subject><subject>hydrodynamics</subject><subject>rotating bodies</subject><subject>surface properties</subject><issn>0043-1648</issn><issn>1873-2577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwDxiyAUPAdmInXpBQVShSJRaYLcc-F0MbF19Sqf-ehCJGljud9N47vY-QS0ZvGWXyjtKyyJks6-ua3yjK6jqnR2TC6qrIuaiqYzL5k5ySM8QPSilTQk6IWOxdim7fmk2wmUtmle0gYY9Ziv3qvQXEzMc0XJ3pQrvKXMBPPCcn3qwRLn73lLw9zl9ni3z58vQ8e1jmtihkl_sGVKMqzsEL7rxywJm3jirHbENFIz0zwIQSYD33wzCqNEwUqvFDLUmLKbk65G5T_OoBO70JaGG9Ni3EHnVVSsqFGLpNSXlQ2hQRE3i9TWFj0l4zqkdIeiSgRwK65voHkh4f3B9sMLTYBUgabYDWggsJbKddDP8HfAPBSm73</recordid><startdate>19820101</startdate><enddate>19820101</enddate><creator>Vorburger, T.V.</creator><creator>Scire, F.E.</creator><creator>Teague, E.C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820101</creationdate><title>Hydrodynamic drag versus roughness for rotating disks</title><author>Vorburger, T.V. ; Scire, F.E. ; Teague, E.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-fbe9b9722ef52df9de21fcd09d1cb05b6f1ae1595ecf2fecfa94a1539bf016603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>drag</topic><topic>hydrodynamics</topic><topic>rotating bodies</topic><topic>surface properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vorburger, T.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scire, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teague, E.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wear</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vorburger, T.V.</au><au>Scire, F.E.</au><au>Teague, E.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrodynamic drag versus roughness for rotating disks</atitle><jtitle>Wear</jtitle><date>1982-01-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>339-349</pages><issn>0043-1648</issn><eissn>1873-2577</eissn><abstract>Stylus measurements of the microroughness of rotating disks and their significant correlation with hydrodynamic drag measurements were studied. The roughest disks ( R a ≈ 16 μm) were found to have drag coefficients about 30% greater than those of the smoothest disks ( R a ≈ 0.14 μm). For a Reynolds' number of 1.5 × 10 6, the following empirical relationship between the drag coefficient C, the average roughness R a and a parameter designated the peak count wavelength λ pc was obtained: C= bR a λ pc 1 2 + C o where b = 3.85 × 10 −3 μm − 1 2 and C 0 = 6.48 × 10 −3 . Other surface parameters and functions were measured in addition to R a and λ pc; however, it seems that knowledge of an amplitude-sensitive parameter and a wavelength-sensitive parameter is adequate for characterizing increases in the drag of rotating disks due to surface roughness. R a is the preferred amplitude-sensitive parameter because it is the most widely used. We propose λ pc as the wavelength parameter because it is sensitive to the larger profile features rather than to the fine structure. However, there is a need for all workers in the field to standardize on measuring the same parameters so that the results of one group can be easily related to the work of other groups.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0043-1648(82)90188-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1648
ispartof Wear, 1982-01, Vol.83 (2), p.339-349
issn 0043-1648
1873-2577
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746025504
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects drag
hydrodynamics
rotating bodies
surface properties
title Hydrodynamic drag versus roughness for rotating disks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A28%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrodynamic%20drag%20versus%20roughness%20for%20rotating%20disks&rft.jtitle=Wear&rft.au=Vorburger,%20T.V.&rft.date=1982-01-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=339-349&rft.issn=0043-1648&rft.eissn=1873-2577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0043-1648(82)90188-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E746025504%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=746025504&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0043164882901880&rfr_iscdi=true