Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis

Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the sock...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2010-03, Vol.43 (5), p.871-878
Hauptverfasser: Papaioannou, G, Mitrogiannis, C, Nianios, G, Fiedler, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 878
container_issue 5
container_start_page 871
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 43
creator Papaioannou, G
Mitrogiannis, C
Nianios, G
Fiedler, G
description Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the socket can cause discomfort, internal limb pain, and eventually skin ulcers as a result of excessive pressure and shear within the socket. This study presents a new method of assessment of three-dimensional (3D) socket–stump kinematics/slippage of strenuous activities using Biplane Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis instrumentation. Ten below knee amputees participated in the study. A more holistic representation of the downward slippage trend of all proximal side skin markers with respect to the socket, and an even more characteristic and of higher magnitude downward-and anterioposterior slippage (maximum slippage: 151 mm for the fast-stop task and 19 mm for the step-down task) between the distal markers after impact, was possible for both tasks for all amputees. Displacement between skin-to-skin marker pairs reached maximum values of approximately 10 mm for the step-down trials and up to 24 mm for the fast stop trials. Maximum skin strain was dependent on the position of the skin markers. Distally positioned skin marker pairs demonstrated mainly anterioposterior displacement between each other (maximum relative strain: 13–14%). Maximum relative strain for the proximal markers was 8–10%. This highly accurate, in-vivo, patient-specific, unobtrusive dynamic information, presented using 3D visualization tools that were up to now unavailable to the clinician-prosthetist, can significantly impact the iterative cycle of socket fitting and evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746006021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021929009006496</els_id><sourcerecordid>2744309851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-4d68de7fa87cf0b9ec6f018e4476b6cd627048ad699396a4771580686521d6773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1uEzEQx1cIREPhFSpLCPWUMN4Pe_eCiMqnVAmJwtlyvLPBydobPN5KufEA3HhDngRvk1Kpl0qW5jC_mfF__pNlZxwWHLh4vVlsVnZwaH4scoBmwfkCePEom_FaFvO8qOFxNgPI-bzJGzjJnhFtAECWsnmanaSSUspSzLLfSyIkcugjGzqm3W6MiIwGs8X499cfiqPbpRiQbDvqnq0Gj2xrPTodrSHWjsH6NaMY0I_DSEybaK9ttEhspCn1bu-1s4Z9HdKQNXp2FTHgsA7aOYwhZZZe93uy9Dx70ume8MUxnmbfP7z_dvFpfvnl4-eL5eXcVDyP87IVdYuy07U0HawaNKIDXmNZSrESphW5hLLWrWiaohE6KeVVDaIWVc5bIWVxmp0f-u7C8HNEispZMtj32mOSoNJmAERa3sNkUeQFBzH1fHmP3AxjSMJIcSjKpqrKG0ocKBMGooCd2gXrdNgnSE3Gqo26NVZNxirOVTI2FZ4d248rh-3_slsnE_DqCGgyuu-C9sbSHZdXoqpuFL09cJgWfG0xKDIWvcHWBjRRtYN9-C9v7rUwvfU2Td3iHulOt6JcgbqaznC6QkhPlI0o_gHIu91g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034955467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Papaioannou, G ; Mitrogiannis, C ; Nianios, G ; Fiedler, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Papaioannou, G ; Mitrogiannis, C ; Nianios, G ; Fiedler, G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the socket can cause discomfort, internal limb pain, and eventually skin ulcers as a result of excessive pressure and shear within the socket. This study presents a new method of assessment of three-dimensional (3D) socket–stump kinematics/slippage of strenuous activities using Biplane Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis instrumentation. Ten below knee amputees participated in the study. A more holistic representation of the downward slippage trend of all proximal side skin markers with respect to the socket, and an even more characteristic and of higher magnitude downward-and anterioposterior slippage (maximum slippage: 151 mm for the fast-stop task and 19 mm for the step-down task) between the distal markers after impact, was possible for both tasks for all amputees. Displacement between skin-to-skin marker pairs reached maximum values of approximately 10 mm for the step-down trials and up to 24 mm for the fast stop trials. Maximum skin strain was dependent on the position of the skin markers. Distally positioned skin marker pairs demonstrated mainly anterioposterior displacement between each other (maximum relative strain: 13–14%). Maximum relative strain for the proximal markers was 8–10%. This highly accurate, in-vivo, patient-specific, unobtrusive dynamic information, presented using 3D visualization tools that were up to now unavailable to the clinician-prosthetist, can significantly impact the iterative cycle of socket fitting and evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20047746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Amputation ; Amputation Stumps - diagnostic imaging ; Amputation Stumps - physiopathology ; Amputee ; Artificial Limbs ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanics. Biorheology ; Boundary conditions ; Computer Simulation ; Dynamic radiography ; Elastic Modulus ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Kinematics ; Load ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Motion ; Optimization techniques ; Physical Exertion ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Design ; Shear strain ; Shear Strength ; Socket–stump kinematics ; Stress, Mechanical ; Studies ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Tibia - physiopathology ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2010-03, Vol.43 (5), p.871-878</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-4d68de7fa87cf0b9ec6f018e4476b6cd627048ad699396a4771580686521d6773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-4d68de7fa87cf0b9ec6f018e4476b6cd627048ad699396a4771580686521d6773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929009006496$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22565521$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papaioannou, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitrogiannis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nianios, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, G</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the socket can cause discomfort, internal limb pain, and eventually skin ulcers as a result of excessive pressure and shear within the socket. This study presents a new method of assessment of three-dimensional (3D) socket–stump kinematics/slippage of strenuous activities using Biplane Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis instrumentation. Ten below knee amputees participated in the study. A more holistic representation of the downward slippage trend of all proximal side skin markers with respect to the socket, and an even more characteristic and of higher magnitude downward-and anterioposterior slippage (maximum slippage: 151 mm for the fast-stop task and 19 mm for the step-down task) between the distal markers after impact, was possible for both tasks for all amputees. Displacement between skin-to-skin marker pairs reached maximum values of approximately 10 mm for the step-down trials and up to 24 mm for the fast stop trials. Maximum skin strain was dependent on the position of the skin markers. Distally positioned skin marker pairs demonstrated mainly anterioposterior displacement between each other (maximum relative strain: 13–14%). Maximum relative strain for the proximal markers was 8–10%. This highly accurate, in-vivo, patient-specific, unobtrusive dynamic information, presented using 3D visualization tools that were up to now unavailable to the clinician-prosthetist, can significantly impact the iterative cycle of socket fitting and evaluation.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Amputation Stumps - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Amputation Stumps - physiopathology</subject><subject>Amputee</subject><subject>Artificial Limbs</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanics. Biorheology</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Dynamic radiography</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Physical Exertion</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Shear strain</subject><subject>Shear Strength</subject><subject>Socket–stump kinematics</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1uEzEQx1cIREPhFSpLCPWUMN4Pe_eCiMqnVAmJwtlyvLPBydobPN5KufEA3HhDngRvk1Kpl0qW5jC_mfF__pNlZxwWHLh4vVlsVnZwaH4scoBmwfkCePEom_FaFvO8qOFxNgPI-bzJGzjJnhFtAECWsnmanaSSUspSzLLfSyIkcugjGzqm3W6MiIwGs8X499cfiqPbpRiQbDvqnq0Gj2xrPTodrSHWjsH6NaMY0I_DSEybaK9ttEhspCn1bu-1s4Z9HdKQNXp2FTHgsA7aOYwhZZZe93uy9Dx70ume8MUxnmbfP7z_dvFpfvnl4-eL5eXcVDyP87IVdYuy07U0HawaNKIDXmNZSrESphW5hLLWrWiaohE6KeVVDaIWVc5bIWVxmp0f-u7C8HNEispZMtj32mOSoNJmAERa3sNkUeQFBzH1fHmP3AxjSMJIcSjKpqrKG0ocKBMGooCd2gXrdNgnSE3Gqo26NVZNxirOVTI2FZ4d248rh-3_slsnE_DqCGgyuu-C9sbSHZdXoqpuFL09cJgWfG0xKDIWvcHWBjRRtYN9-C9v7rUwvfU2Td3iHulOt6JcgbqaznC6QkhPlI0o_gHIu91g</recordid><startdate>20100322</startdate><enddate>20100322</enddate><creator>Papaioannou, G</creator><creator>Mitrogiannis, C</creator><creator>Nianios, G</creator><creator>Fiedler, G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100322</creationdate><title>Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis</title><author>Papaioannou, G ; Mitrogiannis, C ; Nianios, G ; Fiedler, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-4d68de7fa87cf0b9ec6f018e4476b6cd627048ad699396a4771580686521d6773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Amputation Stumps - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Amputation Stumps - physiopathology</topic><topic>Amputee</topic><topic>Artificial Limbs</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanics. Biorheology</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Dynamic radiography</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Physical Exertion</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Shear strain</topic><topic>Shear Strength</topic><topic>Socket–stump kinematics</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papaioannou, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitrogiannis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nianios, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papaioannou, G</au><au>Mitrogiannis, C</au><au>Nianios, G</au><au>Fiedler, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2010-03-22</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>871</spage><epage>878</epage><pages>871-878</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the socket can cause discomfort, internal limb pain, and eventually skin ulcers as a result of excessive pressure and shear within the socket. This study presents a new method of assessment of three-dimensional (3D) socket–stump kinematics/slippage of strenuous activities using Biplane Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis instrumentation. Ten below knee amputees participated in the study. A more holistic representation of the downward slippage trend of all proximal side skin markers with respect to the socket, and an even more characteristic and of higher magnitude downward-and anterioposterior slippage (maximum slippage: 151 mm for the fast-stop task and 19 mm for the step-down task) between the distal markers after impact, was possible for both tasks for all amputees. Displacement between skin-to-skin marker pairs reached maximum values of approximately 10 mm for the step-down trials and up to 24 mm for the fast stop trials. Maximum skin strain was dependent on the position of the skin markers. Distally positioned skin marker pairs demonstrated mainly anterioposterior displacement between each other (maximum relative strain: 13–14%). Maximum relative strain for the proximal markers was 8–10%. This highly accurate, in-vivo, patient-specific, unobtrusive dynamic information, presented using 3D visualization tools that were up to now unavailable to the clinician-prosthetist, can significantly impact the iterative cycle of socket fitting and evaluation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20047746</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.013</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2010-03, Vol.43 (5), p.871-878
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746006021
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accuracy
Amputation
Amputation Stumps - diagnostic imaging
Amputation Stumps - physiopathology
Amputee
Artificial Limbs
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanics. Biorheology
Boundary conditions
Computer Simulation
Dynamic radiography
Elastic Modulus
Equipment Failure Analysis
Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Kinematics
Load
Male
Models, Biological
Motion
Optimization techniques
Physical Exertion
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Prostheses
Prosthesis Design
Shear strain
Shear Strength
Socket–stump kinematics
Stress, Mechanical
Studies
Tibia - diagnostic imaging
Tibia - physiopathology
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A42%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20amputee%20socket%E2%80%93stump%E2%80%93residual%20bone%20kinematics%20during%20strenuous%20activities%20using%20Dynamic%20Roentgen%20Stereogrammetric%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Papaioannou,%20G&rft.date=2010-03-22&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=871&rft.epage=878&rft.pages=871-878&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2744309851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034955467&rft_id=info:pmid/20047746&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0021929009006496&rfr_iscdi=true