Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis
Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the sock...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2010-03, Vol.43 (5), p.871-878 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 878 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 871 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Papaioannou, G Mitrogiannis, C Nianios, G Fiedler, G |
description | Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the socket can cause discomfort, internal limb pain, and eventually skin ulcers as a result of excessive pressure and shear within the socket. This study presents a new method of assessment of three-dimensional (3D) socket–stump kinematics/slippage of strenuous activities using Biplane Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis instrumentation. Ten below knee amputees participated in the study. A more holistic representation of the downward slippage trend of all proximal side skin markers with respect to the socket, and an even more characteristic and of higher magnitude downward-and anterioposterior slippage (maximum slippage: 151 mm for the fast-stop task and 19 mm for the step-down task) between the distal markers after impact, was possible for both tasks for all amputees. Displacement between skin-to-skin marker pairs reached maximum values of approximately 10 mm for the step-down trials and up to 24 mm for the fast stop trials. Maximum skin strain was dependent on the position of the skin markers. Distally positioned skin marker pairs demonstrated mainly anterioposterior displacement between each other (maximum relative strain: 13–14%). Maximum relative strain for the proximal markers was 8–10%. This highly accurate, in-vivo, patient-specific, unobtrusive dynamic information, presented using 3D visualization tools that were up to now unavailable to the clinician-prosthetist, can significantly impact the iterative cycle of socket fitting and evaluation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746006021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021929009006496</els_id><sourcerecordid>2744309851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-4d68de7fa87cf0b9ec6f018e4476b6cd627048ad699396a4771580686521d6773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1uEzEQx1cIREPhFSpLCPWUMN4Pe_eCiMqnVAmJwtlyvLPBydobPN5KufEA3HhDngRvk1Kpl0qW5jC_mfF__pNlZxwWHLh4vVlsVnZwaH4scoBmwfkCePEom_FaFvO8qOFxNgPI-bzJGzjJnhFtAECWsnmanaSSUspSzLLfSyIkcugjGzqm3W6MiIwGs8X499cfiqPbpRiQbDvqnq0Gj2xrPTodrSHWjsH6NaMY0I_DSEybaK9ttEhspCn1bu-1s4Z9HdKQNXp2FTHgsA7aOYwhZZZe93uy9Dx70ume8MUxnmbfP7z_dvFpfvnl4-eL5eXcVDyP87IVdYuy07U0HawaNKIDXmNZSrESphW5hLLWrWiaohE6KeVVDaIWVc5bIWVxmp0f-u7C8HNEispZMtj32mOSoNJmAERa3sNkUeQFBzH1fHmP3AxjSMJIcSjKpqrKG0ocKBMGooCd2gXrdNgnSE3Gqo26NVZNxirOVTI2FZ4d248rh-3_slsnE_DqCGgyuu-C9sbSHZdXoqpuFL09cJgWfG0xKDIWvcHWBjRRtYN9-C9v7rUwvfU2Td3iHulOt6JcgbqaznC6QkhPlI0o_gHIu91g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034955467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Papaioannou, G ; Mitrogiannis, C ; Nianios, G ; Fiedler, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Papaioannou, G ; Mitrogiannis, C ; Nianios, G ; Fiedler, G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the socket can cause discomfort, internal limb pain, and eventually skin ulcers as a result of excessive pressure and shear within the socket. This study presents a new method of assessment of three-dimensional (3D) socket–stump kinematics/slippage of strenuous activities using Biplane Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis instrumentation. Ten below knee amputees participated in the study. A more holistic representation of the downward slippage trend of all proximal side skin markers with respect to the socket, and an even more characteristic and of higher magnitude downward-and anterioposterior slippage (maximum slippage: 151 mm for the fast-stop task and 19 mm for the step-down task) between the distal markers after impact, was possible for both tasks for all amputees. Displacement between skin-to-skin marker pairs reached maximum values of approximately 10 mm for the step-down trials and up to 24 mm for the fast stop trials. Maximum skin strain was dependent on the position of the skin markers. Distally positioned skin marker pairs demonstrated mainly anterioposterior displacement between each other (maximum relative strain: 13–14%). Maximum relative strain for the proximal markers was 8–10%. This highly accurate, in-vivo, patient-specific, unobtrusive dynamic information, presented using 3D visualization tools that were up to now unavailable to the clinician-prosthetist, can significantly impact the iterative cycle of socket fitting and evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20047746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Amputation ; Amputation Stumps - diagnostic imaging ; Amputation Stumps - physiopathology ; Amputee ; Artificial Limbs ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanics. Biorheology ; Boundary conditions ; Computer Simulation ; Dynamic radiography ; Elastic Modulus ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Kinematics ; Load ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Motion ; Optimization techniques ; Physical Exertion ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Design ; Shear strain ; Shear Strength ; Socket–stump kinematics ; Stress, Mechanical ; Studies ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Tibia - physiopathology ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2010-03, Vol.43 (5), p.871-878</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-4d68de7fa87cf0b9ec6f018e4476b6cd627048ad699396a4771580686521d6773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-4d68de7fa87cf0b9ec6f018e4476b6cd627048ad699396a4771580686521d6773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929009006496$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22565521$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papaioannou, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitrogiannis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nianios, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, G</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the socket can cause discomfort, internal limb pain, and eventually skin ulcers as a result of excessive pressure and shear within the socket. This study presents a new method of assessment of three-dimensional (3D) socket–stump kinematics/slippage of strenuous activities using Biplane Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis instrumentation. Ten below knee amputees participated in the study. A more holistic representation of the downward slippage trend of all proximal side skin markers with respect to the socket, and an even more characteristic and of higher magnitude downward-and anterioposterior slippage (maximum slippage: 151 mm for the fast-stop task and 19 mm for the step-down task) between the distal markers after impact, was possible for both tasks for all amputees. Displacement between skin-to-skin marker pairs reached maximum values of approximately 10 mm for the step-down trials and up to 24 mm for the fast stop trials. Maximum skin strain was dependent on the position of the skin markers. Distally positioned skin marker pairs demonstrated mainly anterioposterior displacement between each other (maximum relative strain: 13–14%). Maximum relative strain for the proximal markers was 8–10%. This highly accurate, in-vivo, patient-specific, unobtrusive dynamic information, presented using 3D visualization tools that were up to now unavailable to the clinician-prosthetist, can significantly impact the iterative cycle of socket fitting and evaluation.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Amputation Stumps - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Amputation Stumps - physiopathology</subject><subject>Amputee</subject><subject>Artificial Limbs</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanics. Biorheology</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Dynamic radiography</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Physical Exertion</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Shear strain</subject><subject>Shear Strength</subject><subject>Socket–stump kinematics</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1uEzEQx1cIREPhFSpLCPWUMN4Pe_eCiMqnVAmJwtlyvLPBydobPN5KufEA3HhDngRvk1Kpl0qW5jC_mfF__pNlZxwWHLh4vVlsVnZwaH4scoBmwfkCePEom_FaFvO8qOFxNgPI-bzJGzjJnhFtAECWsnmanaSSUspSzLLfSyIkcugjGzqm3W6MiIwGs8X499cfiqPbpRiQbDvqnq0Gj2xrPTodrSHWjsH6NaMY0I_DSEybaK9ttEhspCn1bu-1s4Z9HdKQNXp2FTHgsA7aOYwhZZZe93uy9Dx70ume8MUxnmbfP7z_dvFpfvnl4-eL5eXcVDyP87IVdYuy07U0HawaNKIDXmNZSrESphW5hLLWrWiaohE6KeVVDaIWVc5bIWVxmp0f-u7C8HNEispZMtj32mOSoNJmAERa3sNkUeQFBzH1fHmP3AxjSMJIcSjKpqrKG0ocKBMGooCd2gXrdNgnSE3Gqo26NVZNxirOVTI2FZ4d248rh-3_slsnE_DqCGgyuu-C9sbSHZdXoqpuFL09cJgWfG0xKDIWvcHWBjRRtYN9-C9v7rUwvfU2Td3iHulOt6JcgbqaznC6QkhPlI0o_gHIu91g</recordid><startdate>20100322</startdate><enddate>20100322</enddate><creator>Papaioannou, G</creator><creator>Mitrogiannis, C</creator><creator>Nianios, G</creator><creator>Fiedler, G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100322</creationdate><title>Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis</title><author>Papaioannou, G ; Mitrogiannis, C ; Nianios, G ; Fiedler, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-4d68de7fa87cf0b9ec6f018e4476b6cd627048ad699396a4771580686521d6773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Amputation Stumps - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Amputation Stumps - physiopathology</topic><topic>Amputee</topic><topic>Artificial Limbs</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanics. Biorheology</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Dynamic radiography</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Physical Exertion</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Shear strain</topic><topic>Shear Strength</topic><topic>Socket–stump kinematics</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papaioannou, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitrogiannis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nianios, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papaioannou, G</au><au>Mitrogiannis, C</au><au>Nianios, G</au><au>Fiedler, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2010-03-22</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>871</spage><epage>878</epage><pages>871-878</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Abstract The design, construction, and fitting of artificial limbs remain to this day an art, dependent on the accumulated expertise of the practitioner/prosthetist. Socket fitting is cost ineffective, time consuming, and a source of inconvenience for the amputee. Stump–skin slippage within the socket can cause discomfort, internal limb pain, and eventually skin ulcers as a result of excessive pressure and shear within the socket. This study presents a new method of assessment of three-dimensional (3D) socket–stump kinematics/slippage of strenuous activities using Biplane Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis instrumentation. Ten below knee amputees participated in the study. A more holistic representation of the downward slippage trend of all proximal side skin markers with respect to the socket, and an even more characteristic and of higher magnitude downward-and anterioposterior slippage (maximum slippage: 151 mm for the fast-stop task and 19 mm for the step-down task) between the distal markers after impact, was possible for both tasks for all amputees. Displacement between skin-to-skin marker pairs reached maximum values of approximately 10 mm for the step-down trials and up to 24 mm for the fast stop trials. Maximum skin strain was dependent on the position of the skin markers. Distally positioned skin marker pairs demonstrated mainly anterioposterior displacement between each other (maximum relative strain: 13–14%). Maximum relative strain for the proximal markers was 8–10%. This highly accurate, in-vivo, patient-specific, unobtrusive dynamic information, presented using 3D visualization tools that were up to now unavailable to the clinician-prosthetist, can significantly impact the iterative cycle of socket fitting and evaluation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20047746</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.013</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2010-03, Vol.43 (5), p.871-878 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746006021 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Amputation Amputation Stumps - diagnostic imaging Amputation Stumps - physiopathology Amputee Artificial Limbs Biological and medical sciences Biomechanics. Biorheology Boundary conditions Computer Simulation Dynamic radiography Elastic Modulus Equipment Failure Analysis Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Kinematics Load Male Models, Biological Motion Optimization techniques Physical Exertion Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Prostheses Prosthesis Design Shear strain Shear Strength Socket–stump kinematics Stress, Mechanical Studies Tibia - diagnostic imaging Tibia - physiopathology Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A42%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20amputee%20socket%E2%80%93stump%E2%80%93residual%20bone%20kinematics%20during%20strenuous%20activities%20using%20Dynamic%20Roentgen%20Stereogrammetric%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Papaioannou,%20G&rft.date=2010-03-22&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=871&rft.epage=878&rft.pages=871-878&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2744309851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034955467&rft_id=info:pmid/20047746&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0021929009006496&rfr_iscdi=true |