Oligonucleotides Containing Novel 4′-C- or 3′-C-(Aminoalkyl)-Branched Thymidines

The synthesis of four novel 3′‐C‐branched and 4′‐C‐branched nucleosides and their transformation into the corresponding 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite building blocks for automated oligonucleotide synthesis is reported. The 4′‐C‐branched key intermediate 11 was synthesized by a convergent strategy and convert...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Helvetica chimica acta 2000-01, Vol.83 (1), p.128-151
Hauptverfasser: Pfundheller, Henrik M., Bryld, Torsten, Olsen, Carl E., Wengel, Jesper
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 151
container_issue 1
container_start_page 128
container_title Helvetica chimica acta
container_volume 83
creator Pfundheller, Henrik M.
Bryld, Torsten
Olsen, Carl E.
Wengel, Jesper
description The synthesis of four novel 3′‐C‐branched and 4′‐C‐branched nucleosides and their transformation into the corresponding 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite building blocks for automated oligonucleotide synthesis is reported. The 4′‐C‐branched key intermediate 11 was synthesized by a convergent strategy and converted to its 2′‐O‐methyl and 2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro derivatives, leading to the preparation of novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐O‐methyl monomer X and 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro monomer Y (Schemes 2 and 3). In general, increased binding affinity towards complementary single‐stranded DNA and RNA was obtained with these analogues compared to the unmodified references (Table 1). The presence of monomer X or monomer Y in a 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide had a negative effect on the binding affinity of the 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide towards DNA and RNA. Starting from the 3′‐C‐allyl derivative 28, 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐protected nucleosides and 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite derivatives were synthesized, leading to novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)thymidine monomer Z or the corresponding 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐2′‐O,5‐dimethyluridine monomer W (Schemes 4 and 5). Incorporation of the 2′‐deoxy monomer Z induced no significant changes in the binding affinity towards DNA but decreased binding affinity towards RNA, while the 2′‐O‐methyl monomer Z induced decreased binding affinity towards DNA as well as RNA complements (Table 2).
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2675(20000119)83:1<128::AID-HLCA128>3.0.CO;2-Q
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746004682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>746004682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4718-3d91f0463b03fe742be85c6f714e330e45b3fc2b62df99bf7b97194e1e26be5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0Ntu0zAYwPEIMYmy8Q65o71w8SGJk4KQsgBbpaqlooiDkD7l8Hnz5sYjbtl6t2faI_EkuMq2G5DwjQ-yf7L-QZAzOmaU8lfDT9NiOmIx54QnMh5y6gdj2SgVE_aG8XQyyafvyOmsyP3mrRjTcbF4zcnySTB4fPU0GPhHKaEs-_oseO7chUeyjMpBsFoYfWbbbW3QbnSDLixsuyl1q9uzcG5_oQmj37d3pCCh7ULRL4f5Wre2NJc7MyLHXdnW59iEq_PdWje6RXcUHKjSOHxxPx8Gnz-8XxWnZLY4mRb5jNSR9N8RTcYUjRJRUaFQRrzCNK4TJVmEQlCM4kqomlcJb1SWVUpWmWRZhAx5UmGsxGHwsnevOvtzi24Da-1qNKZs0W4dyCih3k-5v_mtv1l31rkOFVx1el12O2AU9qEB9qFhnwz2yeAhNKQCGPi2AD403IcGARSKBXBYevtHb19rg7u_4P-6_2YfjjxPel67Dd488mV3CYkUXvwyP4GP32dzvjz2G_EH10qiGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>746004682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oligonucleotides Containing Novel 4′-C- or 3′-C-(Aminoalkyl)-Branched Thymidines</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Pfundheller, Henrik M. ; Bryld, Torsten ; Olsen, Carl E. ; Wengel, Jesper</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfundheller, Henrik M. ; Bryld, Torsten ; Olsen, Carl E. ; Wengel, Jesper</creatorcontrib><description>The synthesis of four novel 3′‐C‐branched and 4′‐C‐branched nucleosides and their transformation into the corresponding 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite building blocks for automated oligonucleotide synthesis is reported. The 4′‐C‐branched key intermediate 11 was synthesized by a convergent strategy and converted to its 2′‐O‐methyl and 2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro derivatives, leading to the preparation of novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐O‐methyl monomer X and 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro monomer Y (Schemes 2 and 3). In general, increased binding affinity towards complementary single‐stranded DNA and RNA was obtained with these analogues compared to the unmodified references (Table 1). The presence of monomer X or monomer Y in a 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide had a negative effect on the binding affinity of the 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide towards DNA and RNA. Starting from the 3′‐C‐allyl derivative 28, 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐protected nucleosides and 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite derivatives were synthesized, leading to novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)thymidine monomer Z or the corresponding 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐2′‐O,5‐dimethyluridine monomer W (Schemes 4 and 5). Incorporation of the 2′‐deoxy monomer Z induced no significant changes in the binding affinity towards DNA but decreased binding affinity towards RNA, while the 2′‐O‐methyl monomer Z induced decreased binding affinity towards DNA as well as RNA complements (Table 2).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-019X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2675(20000119)83:1&lt;128::AID-HLCA128&gt;3.0.CO;2-Q</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta</publisher><ispartof>Helvetica chimica acta, 2000-01, Vol.83 (1), p.128-151</ispartof><rights>2000 Neue Schweizerische Chemische Gesellschaft, Switzerland</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291522-2675%2820000119%2983%3A1%3C128%3A%3AAID-HLCA128%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291522-2675%2820000119%2983%3A1%3C128%3A%3AAID-HLCA128%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfundheller, Henrik M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryld, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Carl E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wengel, Jesper</creatorcontrib><title>Oligonucleotides Containing Novel 4′-C- or 3′-C-(Aminoalkyl)-Branched Thymidines</title><title>Helvetica chimica acta</title><addtitle>HCA</addtitle><description>The synthesis of four novel 3′‐C‐branched and 4′‐C‐branched nucleosides and their transformation into the corresponding 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite building blocks for automated oligonucleotide synthesis is reported. The 4′‐C‐branched key intermediate 11 was synthesized by a convergent strategy and converted to its 2′‐O‐methyl and 2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro derivatives, leading to the preparation of novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐O‐methyl monomer X and 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro monomer Y (Schemes 2 and 3). In general, increased binding affinity towards complementary single‐stranded DNA and RNA was obtained with these analogues compared to the unmodified references (Table 1). The presence of monomer X or monomer Y in a 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide had a negative effect on the binding affinity of the 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide towards DNA and RNA. Starting from the 3′‐C‐allyl derivative 28, 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐protected nucleosides and 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite derivatives were synthesized, leading to novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)thymidine monomer Z or the corresponding 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐2′‐O,5‐dimethyluridine monomer W (Schemes 4 and 5). Incorporation of the 2′‐deoxy monomer Z induced no significant changes in the binding affinity towards DNA but decreased binding affinity towards RNA, while the 2′‐O‐methyl monomer Z induced decreased binding affinity towards DNA as well as RNA complements (Table 2).</description><issn>0018-019X</issn><issn>1522-2675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0Ntu0zAYwPEIMYmy8Q65o71w8SGJk4KQsgBbpaqlooiDkD7l8Hnz5sYjbtl6t2faI_EkuMq2G5DwjQ-yf7L-QZAzOmaU8lfDT9NiOmIx54QnMh5y6gdj2SgVE_aG8XQyyafvyOmsyP3mrRjTcbF4zcnySTB4fPU0GPhHKaEs-_oseO7chUeyjMpBsFoYfWbbbW3QbnSDLixsuyl1q9uzcG5_oQmj37d3pCCh7ULRL4f5Wre2NJc7MyLHXdnW59iEq_PdWje6RXcUHKjSOHxxPx8Gnz-8XxWnZLY4mRb5jNSR9N8RTcYUjRJRUaFQRrzCNK4TJVmEQlCM4kqomlcJb1SWVUpWmWRZhAx5UmGsxGHwsnevOvtzi24Da-1qNKZs0W4dyCih3k-5v_mtv1l31rkOFVx1el12O2AU9qEB9qFhnwz2yeAhNKQCGPi2AD403IcGARSKBXBYevtHb19rg7u_4P-6_2YfjjxPel67Dd488mV3CYkUXvwyP4GP32dzvjz2G_EH10qiGg</recordid><startdate>20000119</startdate><enddate>20000119</enddate><creator>Pfundheller, Henrik M.</creator><creator>Bryld, Torsten</creator><creator>Olsen, Carl E.</creator><creator>Wengel, Jesper</creator><general>Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000119</creationdate><title>Oligonucleotides Containing Novel 4′-C- or 3′-C-(Aminoalkyl)-Branched Thymidines</title><author>Pfundheller, Henrik M. ; Bryld, Torsten ; Olsen, Carl E. ; Wengel, Jesper</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4718-3d91f0463b03fe742be85c6f714e330e45b3fc2b62df99bf7b97194e1e26be5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfundheller, Henrik M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryld, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Carl E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wengel, Jesper</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Helvetica chimica acta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfundheller, Henrik M.</au><au>Bryld, Torsten</au><au>Olsen, Carl E.</au><au>Wengel, Jesper</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oligonucleotides Containing Novel 4′-C- or 3′-C-(Aminoalkyl)-Branched Thymidines</atitle><jtitle>Helvetica chimica acta</jtitle><addtitle>HCA</addtitle><date>2000-01-19</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>151</epage><pages>128-151</pages><issn>0018-019X</issn><eissn>1522-2675</eissn><abstract>The synthesis of four novel 3′‐C‐branched and 4′‐C‐branched nucleosides and their transformation into the corresponding 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite building blocks for automated oligonucleotide synthesis is reported. The 4′‐C‐branched key intermediate 11 was synthesized by a convergent strategy and converted to its 2′‐O‐methyl and 2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro derivatives, leading to the preparation of novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐O‐methyl monomer X and 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro monomer Y (Schemes 2 and 3). In general, increased binding affinity towards complementary single‐stranded DNA and RNA was obtained with these analogues compared to the unmodified references (Table 1). The presence of monomer X or monomer Y in a 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide had a negative effect on the binding affinity of the 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide towards DNA and RNA. Starting from the 3′‐C‐allyl derivative 28, 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐protected nucleosides and 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite derivatives were synthesized, leading to novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)thymidine monomer Z or the corresponding 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐2′‐O,5‐dimethyluridine monomer W (Schemes 4 and 5). Incorporation of the 2′‐deoxy monomer Z induced no significant changes in the binding affinity towards DNA but decreased binding affinity towards RNA, while the 2′‐O‐methyl monomer Z induced decreased binding affinity towards DNA as well as RNA complements (Table 2).</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1522-2675(20000119)83:1&lt;128::AID-HLCA128&gt;3.0.CO;2-Q</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-019X
ispartof Helvetica chimica acta, 2000-01, Vol.83 (1), p.128-151
issn 0018-019X
1522-2675
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746004682
source Wiley Journals
title Oligonucleotides Containing Novel 4′-C- or 3′-C-(Aminoalkyl)-Branched Thymidines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A06%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oligonucleotides%20Containing%20Novel%204%E2%80%B2-C-%20or%203%E2%80%B2-C-(Aminoalkyl)-Branched%20Thymidines&rft.jtitle=Helvetica%20chimica%20acta&rft.au=Pfundheller,%20Henrik%E2%80%85M.&rft.date=2000-01-19&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=151&rft.pages=128-151&rft.issn=0018-019X&rft.eissn=1522-2675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2675(20000119)83:1%3C128::AID-HLCA128%3E3.0.CO;2-Q&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E746004682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=746004682&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true