Italian Multicenter Study on Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis: Retrospective Analysis (2007)

A retrospective study—the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis (IMS‐LDLa)—was carried out, which involved 19 centers for LDLa in Italy, distributed all over the country—in the north, center, south, and the major islands. The survey was conducted through two consecutive ques...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis 2010-02, Vol.14 (1), p.79-86
1. Verfasser: Stefanutti, Claudia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis
container_volume 14
creator Stefanutti, Claudia
description A retrospective study—the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis (IMS‐LDLa)—was carried out, which involved 19 centers for LDLa in Italy, distributed all over the country—in the north, center, south, and the major islands. The survey was conducted through two consecutive questionnaires, which can be downloaded online from a dedicated site. The total number of procedures performed until 2007 was 31 012, and the number of patients undergoing treatment until 2007 were 229. The treated patients still surviving consisted of 136 (74 males and 62 females); those surviving but not treated numbered 95, and those deceased numbered 14. The techniques utilized, listed by frequency of use, were the following: dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption, direct adsorption of lipids (DALI), heparin extracorporeal LDL precipitation, immunoadsorption, plasma‐exchange, cascade filtration, and Lipocollect 200. The mean treated plasma and blood volumes per session were 3916.5 mL and 8735.1 mL, respectively. The most frequently utilized vascular access points were: venous 84.4% and arteriovenous fistula 15.5%. Hematoma by venipuncture (230 episodes), low outlet flow (125 episodes), and circuit coagulation (44 episodes) were reported as to be the most frequent side effects. In the second questionnaire (filled in by 19 centers) the centers were asked to report their data on: quality diagnosis of dyslipidemia and referents for genetic‐molecular and clinical diagnosis, cholesterol‐lowering drugs and dosages, typology of cardiovascular check‐ups at the beginning of treatment and in follow‐up, non‐cholesterol‐lowering drugs with priority for cardiologic drugs, including oral anti‐coagulants, and, lastly, information related to the appropriateness of curing patients still under treatment with LDLa and, where possible, news on patients no longer under treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00704.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746004507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>746004507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4614-868a77d8fa0232670fbf4d174f7e1f53ccafd7e5f51819dbf25782f8fc6678bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1DAUtBCIfsBfQL4BhwR_JXYQl1WhpSUUBIWekOV1noW32STETrv593jZslfwxU9-M8_zZhDClOQ0nVernEohsqpSMmeEVDkhkoh88wAd7hsP97WsDtBRCCtCGBOcP0YHjAiuCsYO0Y_zaFpvOvxxaqO30EUY8dc4NTPuO1z3d9lb6IKPM6790A9jH8F3eDH8hBGCD6_xF4hjHwaw0d8CXnSmndM7fpFkyZdP0CNn2gBP7-9j9O303dXJ-6z-dHZ-sqgzK0oqMlUqI2WjnCGMs1ISt3SiSeqdBOoKbq1xjYTCFVTRqlk6VkjFnHK2LKVaWn6Mnu_mJoG_JghRr32w0Lamg34KWoqSEFEQ-W8k55UQStCEVDukTfuFEZweRr8246wp0dsU9EpvDdZbs_U2Bf0nBb1J1Gf3n0zLNTR74l_bE-DNDnDnW5j_e7C-WnxORaJnO7oPETZ7uhlvdCm5LPT15Zm-JqcfvtcXl_qC_wbmiKS1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733944841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Italian Multicenter Study on Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis: Retrospective Analysis (2007)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stefanutti, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Stefanutti, Claudia ; Italian Multicenter Study on Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis Working Group ; the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis Working Group</creatorcontrib><description>A retrospective study—the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis (IMS‐LDLa)—was carried out, which involved 19 centers for LDLa in Italy, distributed all over the country—in the north, center, south, and the major islands. The survey was conducted through two consecutive questionnaires, which can be downloaded online from a dedicated site. The total number of procedures performed until 2007 was 31 012, and the number of patients undergoing treatment until 2007 were 229. The treated patients still surviving consisted of 136 (74 males and 62 females); those surviving but not treated numbered 95, and those deceased numbered 14. The techniques utilized, listed by frequency of use, were the following: dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption, direct adsorption of lipids (DALI), heparin extracorporeal LDL precipitation, immunoadsorption, plasma‐exchange, cascade filtration, and Lipocollect 200. The mean treated plasma and blood volumes per session were 3916.5 mL and 8735.1 mL, respectively. The most frequently utilized vascular access points were: venous 84.4% and arteriovenous fistula 15.5%. Hematoma by venipuncture (230 episodes), low outlet flow (125 episodes), and circuit coagulation (44 episodes) were reported as to be the most frequent side effects. In the second questionnaire (filled in by 19 centers) the centers were asked to report their data on: quality diagnosis of dyslipidemia and referents for genetic‐molecular and clinical diagnosis, cholesterol‐lowering drugs and dosages, typology of cardiovascular check‐ups at the beginning of treatment and in follow‐up, non‐cholesterol‐lowering drugs with priority for cardiologic drugs, including oral anti‐coagulants, and, lastly, information related to the appropriateness of curing patients still under treatment with LDLa and, where possible, news on patients no longer under treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-9987</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00704.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20438522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Component Removal - methods ; Blood Component Removal - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Coronary artery disease ; Dyslipidemia ; Female ; Humans ; Italy ; Lipoproteins, LDL ; Low-density lipoprotein apheresis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multicenter study ; Retrospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis, 2010-02, Vol.14 (1), p.79-86</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 International Society for Apheresis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4614-868a77d8fa0232670fbf4d174f7e1f53ccafd7e5f51819dbf25782f8fc6678bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4614-868a77d8fa0232670fbf4d174f7e1f53ccafd7e5f51819dbf25782f8fc6678bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1744-9987.2009.00704.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1744-9987.2009.00704.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20438522$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stefanutti, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Italian Multicenter Study on Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis Working Group</creatorcontrib><title>Italian Multicenter Study on Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis: Retrospective Analysis (2007)</title><title>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis</title><addtitle>Ther Apher Dial</addtitle><description>A retrospective study—the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis (IMS‐LDLa)—was carried out, which involved 19 centers for LDLa in Italy, distributed all over the country—in the north, center, south, and the major islands. The survey was conducted through two consecutive questionnaires, which can be downloaded online from a dedicated site. The total number of procedures performed until 2007 was 31 012, and the number of patients undergoing treatment until 2007 were 229. The treated patients still surviving consisted of 136 (74 males and 62 females); those surviving but not treated numbered 95, and those deceased numbered 14. The techniques utilized, listed by frequency of use, were the following: dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption, direct adsorption of lipids (DALI), heparin extracorporeal LDL precipitation, immunoadsorption, plasma‐exchange, cascade filtration, and Lipocollect 200. The mean treated plasma and blood volumes per session were 3916.5 mL and 8735.1 mL, respectively. The most frequently utilized vascular access points were: venous 84.4% and arteriovenous fistula 15.5%. Hematoma by venipuncture (230 episodes), low outlet flow (125 episodes), and circuit coagulation (44 episodes) were reported as to be the most frequent side effects. In the second questionnaire (filled in by 19 centers) the centers were asked to report their data on: quality diagnosis of dyslipidemia and referents for genetic‐molecular and clinical diagnosis, cholesterol‐lowering drugs and dosages, typology of cardiovascular check‐ups at the beginning of treatment and in follow‐up, non‐cholesterol‐lowering drugs with priority for cardiologic drugs, including oral anti‐coagulants, and, lastly, information related to the appropriateness of curing patients still under treatment with LDLa and, where possible, news on patients no longer under treatment.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Blood Component Removal - methods</subject><subject>Blood Component Removal - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Dyslipidemia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Lipoproteins, LDL</subject><subject>Low-density lipoprotein apheresis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multicenter study</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1744-9979</issn><issn>1744-9987</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUU1v1DAUtBCIfsBfQL4BhwR_JXYQl1WhpSUUBIWekOV1noW32STETrv593jZslfwxU9-M8_zZhDClOQ0nVernEohsqpSMmeEVDkhkoh88wAd7hsP97WsDtBRCCtCGBOcP0YHjAiuCsYO0Y_zaFpvOvxxaqO30EUY8dc4NTPuO1z3d9lb6IKPM6790A9jH8F3eDH8hBGCD6_xF4hjHwaw0d8CXnSmndM7fpFkyZdP0CNn2gBP7-9j9O303dXJ-6z-dHZ-sqgzK0oqMlUqI2WjnCGMs1ISt3SiSeqdBOoKbq1xjYTCFVTRqlk6VkjFnHK2LKVaWn6Mnu_mJoG_JghRr32w0Lamg34KWoqSEFEQ-W8k55UQStCEVDukTfuFEZweRr8246wp0dsU9EpvDdZbs_U2Bf0nBb1J1Gf3n0zLNTR74l_bE-DNDnDnW5j_e7C-WnxORaJnO7oPETZ7uhlvdCm5LPT15Zm-JqcfvtcXl_qC_wbmiKS1</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Stefanutti, Claudia</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Italian Multicenter Study on Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis: Retrospective Analysis (2007)</title><author>Stefanutti, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4614-868a77d8fa0232670fbf4d174f7e1f53ccafd7e5f51819dbf25782f8fc6678bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Blood Component Removal - methods</topic><topic>Blood Component Removal - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Dyslipidemia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Lipoproteins, LDL</topic><topic>Low-density lipoprotein apheresis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multicenter study</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stefanutti, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Italian Multicenter Study on Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis Working Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stefanutti, Claudia</au><aucorp>Italian Multicenter Study on Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis Working Group</aucorp><aucorp>the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis Working Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Italian Multicenter Study on Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis: Retrospective Analysis (2007)</atitle><jtitle>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis</jtitle><addtitle>Ther Apher Dial</addtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>79-86</pages><issn>1744-9979</issn><eissn>1744-9987</eissn><abstract>A retrospective study—the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐density Lipoprotein Apheresis (IMS‐LDLa)—was carried out, which involved 19 centers for LDLa in Italy, distributed all over the country—in the north, center, south, and the major islands. The survey was conducted through two consecutive questionnaires, which can be downloaded online from a dedicated site. The total number of procedures performed until 2007 was 31 012, and the number of patients undergoing treatment until 2007 were 229. The treated patients still surviving consisted of 136 (74 males and 62 females); those surviving but not treated numbered 95, and those deceased numbered 14. The techniques utilized, listed by frequency of use, were the following: dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption, direct adsorption of lipids (DALI), heparin extracorporeal LDL precipitation, immunoadsorption, plasma‐exchange, cascade filtration, and Lipocollect 200. The mean treated plasma and blood volumes per session were 3916.5 mL and 8735.1 mL, respectively. The most frequently utilized vascular access points were: venous 84.4% and arteriovenous fistula 15.5%. Hematoma by venipuncture (230 episodes), low outlet flow (125 episodes), and circuit coagulation (44 episodes) were reported as to be the most frequent side effects. In the second questionnaire (filled in by 19 centers) the centers were asked to report their data on: quality diagnosis of dyslipidemia and referents for genetic‐molecular and clinical diagnosis, cholesterol‐lowering drugs and dosages, typology of cardiovascular check‐ups at the beginning of treatment and in follow‐up, non‐cholesterol‐lowering drugs with priority for cardiologic drugs, including oral anti‐coagulants, and, lastly, information related to the appropriateness of curing patients still under treatment with LDLa and, where possible, news on patients no longer under treatment.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>20438522</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00704.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-9979
ispartof Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis, 2010-02, Vol.14 (1), p.79-86
issn 1744-9979
1744-9987
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746004507
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood Component Removal - methods
Blood Component Removal - statistics & numerical data
Child
Child, Preschool
Coronary artery disease
Dyslipidemia
Female
Humans
Italy
Lipoproteins, LDL
Low-density lipoprotein apheresis
Male
Middle Aged
Multicenter study
Retrospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Italian Multicenter Study on Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis: Retrospective Analysis (2007)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T07%3A41%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Italian%20Multicenter%20Study%20on%20Low-Density%20Lipoprotein%20Apheresis:%20Retrospective%20Analysis%20(2007)&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic%20apheresis%20and%20dialysis&rft.au=Stefanutti,%20Claudia&rft.aucorp=Italian%20Multicenter%20Study%20on%20Low-density%20Lipoprotein%20Apheresis%20Working%20Group&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=79-86&rft.issn=1744-9979&rft.eissn=1744-9987&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00704.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E746004507%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733944841&rft_id=info:pmid/20438522&rfr_iscdi=true