Establishment of a database of emission factors for atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants
Field measurements and data investigations were conducted for developing an emission factor database for inventories of atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants. Gaseous pollutants and particulate matter (PM) of different size fractions were measured using a gas analyzer and an el...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atmospheric environment (1994) 2010-04, Vol.44 (12), p.1515-1523 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1523 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1515 |
container_title | Atmospheric environment (1994) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Zhao, Yu Wang, Shuxiao Nielsen, Chris P. Li, Xinghua Hao, Jiming |
description | Field measurements and data investigations were conducted for developing an emission factor database for inventories of atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants. Gaseous pollutants and particulate matter (PM) of different size fractions were measured using a gas analyzer and an electric low-pressure impactor (ELPI), respectively, for ten units in eight coal-fired power plants across the country. Combining results of field tests and literature surveys, emission factors with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by boiler type, fuel quality, and emission control devices using bootstrap and Monte Carlo simulations. The emission factor of uncontrolled SO
2 from pulverized combustion (PC) boilers burning bituminous or anthracite coal was estimated to be 18.0S
kg
t
−1 (i.e., 18.0
×
the percentage sulfur content of coal, S) with a 95% CI of 17.2S–18.5S. NO
X emission factors for pulverized-coal boilers ranged from 4.0 to 11.2
kg
t
−1, with uncertainties of 14–45% for different unit types. The emission factors of uncontrolled PM
2.5, PM
10, and total PM emitted by PC boilers were estimated to be 0.4A (where A is the percentage ash content of coal), 1.5A and 6.9A
kg
t
−1, respectively, with 95% CIs of 0.3A–0.5A, 1.1A–1.9A and 5.8A–7.9A. The analogous PM values for emissions with electrostatic precipitator (ESP) controls were 0.032A (95% CI: 0.021A–0.046A), 0.065A (0.039A–0.092A) and 0.094A (0.0656A–0.132A)
kg
t
−1, and 0.0147A (0.0092–0.0225A), 0.0210A (0.0129A–0.0317A), and 0.0231A (0.0142A–0.0348A) for those with both ESP and wet flue-gas desulfurization (wet-FGD). SO
2 and NO
X emission factors for Chinese power plants were smaller than those of U.S. EPA AP-42 database, due mainly to lower heating values of coals in China. PM emission factors for units with ESP, however, were generally larger than AP-42 values, because of poorer removal efficiencies of Chinese dust collectors. For units with advanced emission control technologies, more field measurements are needed to reduce emission factor uncertainties. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746003037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231010000439</els_id><sourcerecordid>746003037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-f0a8aaf828442f4c69c393ba4c1868deac41c46f1fe3e837a65955b4f72ffc2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhk1poWnav1B0Kc3FG31Zkm8tS9oEArm0ZzErj1gttuVK2pT8-8jZJMcWBiSNntE7eqdpPjO6YZSpy8MGyhQzzvcbTmuSshr6TXPGjBYtN1K-rXvR8ZYLRt83H3I-UEqF7vVZE69ygd0Y8n7CuZDoCZABagoyriecQs4hzsSDKzFl4mMiT3rLHlNwZInjeCwwl3qV4kS2-zBjrXURxtaHhENF_mIiy7hCH5t3HsaMn57X8-b3j6tf2-v29u7nzfb7beukFqX1FAyAN2v33Euneid6sQPpmFFmQHCSOak88yjQCA2q67tuJ73m3js-iPPm6-ndJcU_R8zF1o84HGsTGI_ZaqmqBdWESl78k2Raa2p6rllF1Ql1Keac0NslhQnSg2XUrrOwB_syC7vOwlJWY9X48qwB2cHoE8wu5NdqzjulDF-5bycOqzX3AZPNLuDscKhGumKHGP4n9QhxP6Vf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777089271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishment of a database of emission factors for atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Yu ; Wang, Shuxiao ; Nielsen, Chris P. ; Li, Xinghua ; Hao, Jiming</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yu ; Wang, Shuxiao ; Nielsen, Chris P. ; Li, Xinghua ; Hao, Jiming</creatorcontrib><description>Field measurements and data investigations were conducted for developing an emission factor database for inventories of atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants. Gaseous pollutants and particulate matter (PM) of different size fractions were measured using a gas analyzer and an electric low-pressure impactor (ELPI), respectively, for ten units in eight coal-fired power plants across the country. Combining results of field tests and literature surveys, emission factors with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by boiler type, fuel quality, and emission control devices using bootstrap and Monte Carlo simulations. The emission factor of uncontrolled SO
2 from pulverized combustion (PC) boilers burning bituminous or anthracite coal was estimated to be 18.0S
kg
t
−1 (i.e., 18.0
×
the percentage sulfur content of coal, S) with a 95% CI of 17.2S–18.5S. NO
X emission factors for pulverized-coal boilers ranged from 4.0 to 11.2
kg
t
−1, with uncertainties of 14–45% for different unit types. The emission factors of uncontrolled PM
2.5, PM
10, and total PM emitted by PC boilers were estimated to be 0.4A (where A is the percentage ash content of coal), 1.5A and 6.9A
kg
t
−1, respectively, with 95% CIs of 0.3A–0.5A, 1.1A–1.9A and 5.8A–7.9A. The analogous PM values for emissions with electrostatic precipitator (ESP) controls were 0.032A (95% CI: 0.021A–0.046A), 0.065A (0.039A–0.092A) and 0.094A (0.0656A–0.132A)
kg
t
−1, and 0.0147A (0.0092–0.0225A), 0.0210A (0.0129A–0.0317A), and 0.0231A (0.0142A–0.0348A) for those with both ESP and wet flue-gas desulfurization (wet-FGD). SO
2 and NO
X emission factors for Chinese power plants were smaller than those of U.S. EPA AP-42 database, due mainly to lower heating values of coals in China. PM emission factors for units with ESP, however, were generally larger than AP-42 values, because of poorer removal efficiencies of Chinese dust collectors. For units with advanced emission control technologies, more field measurements are needed to reduce emission factor uncertainties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Atmospherics ; Boilers ; China ; Coal ; Coal-fired power plant ; Earth, ocean, space ; Electric power generation ; Electric power plants ; Emission ; Emission factor ; Emissions control ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; General processes of purification and dust removal ; Meteorology ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Particles and aerosols ; Pollution ; Prevention and purification methods ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2010-04, Vol.44 (12), p.1515-1523</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-f0a8aaf828442f4c69c393ba4c1868deac41c46f1fe3e837a65955b4f72ffc2d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231010000439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22566827$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Chris P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jiming</creatorcontrib><title>Establishment of a database of emission factors for atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>Field measurements and data investigations were conducted for developing an emission factor database for inventories of atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants. Gaseous pollutants and particulate matter (PM) of different size fractions were measured using a gas analyzer and an electric low-pressure impactor (ELPI), respectively, for ten units in eight coal-fired power plants across the country. Combining results of field tests and literature surveys, emission factors with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by boiler type, fuel quality, and emission control devices using bootstrap and Monte Carlo simulations. The emission factor of uncontrolled SO
2 from pulverized combustion (PC) boilers burning bituminous or anthracite coal was estimated to be 18.0S
kg
t
−1 (i.e., 18.0
×
the percentage sulfur content of coal, S) with a 95% CI of 17.2S–18.5S. NO
X emission factors for pulverized-coal boilers ranged from 4.0 to 11.2
kg
t
−1, with uncertainties of 14–45% for different unit types. The emission factors of uncontrolled PM
2.5, PM
10, and total PM emitted by PC boilers were estimated to be 0.4A (where A is the percentage ash content of coal), 1.5A and 6.9A
kg
t
−1, respectively, with 95% CIs of 0.3A–0.5A, 1.1A–1.9A and 5.8A–7.9A. The analogous PM values for emissions with electrostatic precipitator (ESP) controls were 0.032A (95% CI: 0.021A–0.046A), 0.065A (0.039A–0.092A) and 0.094A (0.0656A–0.132A)
kg
t
−1, and 0.0147A (0.0092–0.0225A), 0.0210A (0.0129A–0.0317A), and 0.0231A (0.0142A–0.0348A) for those with both ESP and wet flue-gas desulfurization (wet-FGD). SO
2 and NO
X emission factors for Chinese power plants were smaller than those of U.S. EPA AP-42 database, due mainly to lower heating values of coals in China. PM emission factors for units with ESP, however, were generally larger than AP-42 values, because of poorer removal efficiencies of Chinese dust collectors. For units with advanced emission control technologies, more field measurements are needed to reduce emission factor uncertainties.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Boilers</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plant</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electric power plants</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Emission factor</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>General processes of purification and dust removal</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Particles and aerosols</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Prevention and purification methods</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhk1poWnav1B0Kc3FG31Zkm8tS9oEArm0ZzErj1gttuVK2pT8-8jZJMcWBiSNntE7eqdpPjO6YZSpy8MGyhQzzvcbTmuSshr6TXPGjBYtN1K-rXvR8ZYLRt83H3I-UEqF7vVZE69ygd0Y8n7CuZDoCZABagoyriecQs4hzsSDKzFl4mMiT3rLHlNwZInjeCwwl3qV4kS2-zBjrXURxtaHhENF_mIiy7hCH5t3HsaMn57X8-b3j6tf2-v29u7nzfb7beukFqX1FAyAN2v33Euneid6sQPpmFFmQHCSOak88yjQCA2q67tuJ73m3js-iPPm6-ndJcU_R8zF1o84HGsTGI_ZaqmqBdWESl78k2Raa2p6rllF1Ql1Keac0NslhQnSg2XUrrOwB_syC7vOwlJWY9X48qwB2cHoE8wu5NdqzjulDF-5bycOqzX3AZPNLuDscKhGumKHGP4n9QhxP6Vf</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Zhao, Yu</creator><creator>Wang, Shuxiao</creator><creator>Nielsen, Chris P.</creator><creator>Li, Xinghua</creator><creator>Hao, Jiming</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Establishment of a database of emission factors for atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants</title><author>Zhao, Yu ; Wang, Shuxiao ; Nielsen, Chris P. ; Li, Xinghua ; Hao, Jiming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-f0a8aaf828442f4c69c393ba4c1868deac41c46f1fe3e837a65955b4f72ffc2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Boilers</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plant</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electric power plants</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Emission factor</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>General processes of purification and dust removal</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Particles and aerosols</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Prevention and purification methods</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Chris P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jiming</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Yu</au><au>Wang, Shuxiao</au><au>Nielsen, Chris P.</au><au>Li, Xinghua</au><au>Hao, Jiming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishment of a database of emission factors for atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1515</spage><epage>1523</epage><pages>1515-1523</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Field measurements and data investigations were conducted for developing an emission factor database for inventories of atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants. Gaseous pollutants and particulate matter (PM) of different size fractions were measured using a gas analyzer and an electric low-pressure impactor (ELPI), respectively, for ten units in eight coal-fired power plants across the country. Combining results of field tests and literature surveys, emission factors with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by boiler type, fuel quality, and emission control devices using bootstrap and Monte Carlo simulations. The emission factor of uncontrolled SO
2 from pulverized combustion (PC) boilers burning bituminous or anthracite coal was estimated to be 18.0S
kg
t
−1 (i.e., 18.0
×
the percentage sulfur content of coal, S) with a 95% CI of 17.2S–18.5S. NO
X emission factors for pulverized-coal boilers ranged from 4.0 to 11.2
kg
t
−1, with uncertainties of 14–45% for different unit types. The emission factors of uncontrolled PM
2.5, PM
10, and total PM emitted by PC boilers were estimated to be 0.4A (where A is the percentage ash content of coal), 1.5A and 6.9A
kg
t
−1, respectively, with 95% CIs of 0.3A–0.5A, 1.1A–1.9A and 5.8A–7.9A. The analogous PM values for emissions with electrostatic precipitator (ESP) controls were 0.032A (95% CI: 0.021A–0.046A), 0.065A (0.039A–0.092A) and 0.094A (0.0656A–0.132A)
kg
t
−1, and 0.0147A (0.0092–0.0225A), 0.0210A (0.0129A–0.0317A), and 0.0231A (0.0142A–0.0348A) for those with both ESP and wet flue-gas desulfurization (wet-FGD). SO
2 and NO
X emission factors for Chinese power plants were smaller than those of U.S. EPA AP-42 database, due mainly to lower heating values of coals in China. PM emission factors for units with ESP, however, were generally larger than AP-42 values, because of poorer removal efficiencies of Chinese dust collectors. For units with advanced emission control technologies, more field measurements are needed to reduce emission factor uncertainties.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.017</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1352-2310 |
ispartof | Atmospheric environment (1994), 2010-04, Vol.44 (12), p.1515-1523 |
issn | 1352-2310 1873-2844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_746003037 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Atmospheric pollution Atmospherics Boilers China Coal Coal-fired power plant Earth, ocean, space Electric power generation Electric power plants Emission Emission factor Emissions control Exact sciences and technology External geophysics General processes of purification and dust removal Meteorology Monte Carlo simulation Particles and aerosols Pollution Prevention and purification methods Uncertainty |
title | Establishment of a database of emission factors for atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A07%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishment%20of%20a%20database%20of%20emission%20factors%20for%20atmospheric%20pollutants%20from%20Chinese%20coal-fired%20power%20plants&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Zhao,%20Yu&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1515&rft.epage=1523&rft.pages=1515-1523&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E746003037%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777089271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231010000439&rfr_iscdi=true |