Magnus Effects on Stability of Wraparound-Finned Missiles
Wraparound fins are widely used as aerodynamic stabilizers for unguided missiles. Wraparound-finned configurations have more complicated flight dynamics when compared with configurations with planar fins. General linear free flight dynamic stability criteria of unguided missiles with wraparound fins...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of spacecraft and rockets 1998-07, Vol.35 (4), p.467-472 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 472 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 467 |
container_title | Journal of spacecraft and rockets |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Tanrikulu, Omer Mahmutyazicioglu, Gokmen |
description | Wraparound fins are widely used as aerodynamic stabilizers for unguided missiles. Wraparound-finned configurations have more complicated flight dynamics when compared with configurations with planar fins. General linear free flight dynamic stability criteria of unguided missiles with wraparound fins are well known. However, until now simplified criteria that consider a static side moment due to wraparound fins as the only significant out-of-plane effect have been utilized in design. It is shown that the simplified stability criteria are not reliable, and more general stability criteria that take both the classical Magnus side moment and the static side moment due to wraparound fins into account have to be used. Another outcome is that the roll direction is extremely important in terms of stability of wraparound-finned configurations. A linear free flight dynamic stability analysis of the U.S. Air Force research model is performed as a case study by using available aeroballistic range test data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/2.3377 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745941846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26638016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-6a89a8f28112c913bab87ab337bdd7adbcedd2956b1b60e7c63b25701c22892d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hoKg3nQmJ20-LmVsKmx4oeJlSJpEMrq2Ni24f2_nBHUXXp2L8_Cc874InRM8gZxkNzChlPMDNCI5pSnjMjtEI4wB0ozl-BidxLjCmDDB5AjJpX6r-pjMvHdFF5O6Sp46bUIZuk1S--S11Y1u676y6TxUlbPJMsQYShdP0ZHXZXRn33OMXuaz5-l9uni8e5jeLlJNOe1SpoXUwoMgBApJqNFGcG2GF421XFtTOGtB5swQw7DjBaMGco5JASAkWDpGVztv09bvvYudWodYuLLUlav7qHiWy4yIjA3k5b8kMEbFEHwAL_bAVd231ZBCAWGEAwbyS1e0dYyt86ppw1q3G0Ww2jatQG2bHsDrHaiD1r9UX1vVWK98X5ad--h-Lv9F94SfRGeHTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161720216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnus Effects on Stability of Wraparound-Finned Missiles</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tanrikulu, Omer ; Mahmutyazicioglu, Gokmen</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanrikulu, Omer ; Mahmutyazicioglu, Gokmen</creatorcontrib><description>Wraparound fins are widely used as aerodynamic stabilizers for unguided missiles. Wraparound-finned configurations have more complicated flight dynamics when compared with configurations with planar fins. General linear free flight dynamic stability criteria of unguided missiles with wraparound fins are well known. However, until now simplified criteria that consider a static side moment due to wraparound fins as the only significant out-of-plane effect have been utilized in design. It is shown that the simplified stability criteria are not reliable, and more general stability criteria that take both the classical Magnus side moment and the static side moment due to wraparound fins into account have to be used. Another outcome is that the roll direction is extremely important in terms of stability of wraparound-finned configurations. A linear free flight dynamic stability analysis of the U.S. Air Force research model is performed as a case study by using available aeroballistic range test data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/2.3377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Aerodynamic stability ; Dynamic stability ; Finned projectiles ; Fins ; Flight dynamics ; Free flight ; Magnus effect ; Missile configurations ; Missiles ; Stability analysis ; Stability criteria ; System stability</subject><ispartof>Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 1998-07, Vol.35 (4), p.467-472</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Jul/Aug 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-6a89a8f28112c913bab87ab337bdd7adbcedd2956b1b60e7c63b25701c22892d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-6a89a8f28112c913bab87ab337bdd7adbcedd2956b1b60e7c63b25701c22892d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanrikulu, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmutyazicioglu, Gokmen</creatorcontrib><title>Magnus Effects on Stability of Wraparound-Finned Missiles</title><title>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</title><description>Wraparound fins are widely used as aerodynamic stabilizers for unguided missiles. Wraparound-finned configurations have more complicated flight dynamics when compared with configurations with planar fins. General linear free flight dynamic stability criteria of unguided missiles with wraparound fins are well known. However, until now simplified criteria that consider a static side moment due to wraparound fins as the only significant out-of-plane effect have been utilized in design. It is shown that the simplified stability criteria are not reliable, and more general stability criteria that take both the classical Magnus side moment and the static side moment due to wraparound fins into account have to be used. Another outcome is that the roll direction is extremely important in terms of stability of wraparound-finned configurations. A linear free flight dynamic stability analysis of the U.S. Air Force research model is performed as a case study by using available aeroballistic range test data.</description><subject>Aerodynamic stability</subject><subject>Dynamic stability</subject><subject>Finned projectiles</subject><subject>Fins</subject><subject>Flight dynamics</subject><subject>Free flight</subject><subject>Magnus effect</subject><subject>Missile configurations</subject><subject>Missiles</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Stability criteria</subject><subject>System stability</subject><issn>0022-4650</issn><issn>1533-6794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hoKg3nQmJ20-LmVsKmx4oeJlSJpEMrq2Ni24f2_nBHUXXp2L8_Cc874InRM8gZxkNzChlPMDNCI5pSnjMjtEI4wB0ozl-BidxLjCmDDB5AjJpX6r-pjMvHdFF5O6Sp46bUIZuk1S--S11Y1u676y6TxUlbPJMsQYShdP0ZHXZXRn33OMXuaz5-l9uni8e5jeLlJNOe1SpoXUwoMgBApJqNFGcG2GF421XFtTOGtB5swQw7DjBaMGco5JASAkWDpGVztv09bvvYudWodYuLLUlav7qHiWy4yIjA3k5b8kMEbFEHwAL_bAVd231ZBCAWGEAwbyS1e0dYyt86ppw1q3G0Ww2jatQG2bHsDrHaiD1r9UX1vVWK98X5ad--h-Lv9F94SfRGeHTg</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Tanrikulu, Omer</creator><creator>Mahmutyazicioglu, Gokmen</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>Magnus Effects on Stability of Wraparound-Finned Missiles</title><author>Tanrikulu, Omer ; Mahmutyazicioglu, Gokmen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-6a89a8f28112c913bab87ab337bdd7adbcedd2956b1b60e7c63b25701c22892d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamic stability</topic><topic>Dynamic stability</topic><topic>Finned projectiles</topic><topic>Fins</topic><topic>Flight dynamics</topic><topic>Free flight</topic><topic>Magnus effect</topic><topic>Missile configurations</topic><topic>Missiles</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Stability criteria</topic><topic>System stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanrikulu, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmutyazicioglu, Gokmen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanrikulu, Omer</au><au>Mahmutyazicioglu, Gokmen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnus Effects on Stability of Wraparound-Finned Missiles</atitle><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>472</epage><pages>467-472</pages><issn>0022-4650</issn><eissn>1533-6794</eissn><abstract>Wraparound fins are widely used as aerodynamic stabilizers for unguided missiles. Wraparound-finned configurations have more complicated flight dynamics when compared with configurations with planar fins. General linear free flight dynamic stability criteria of unguided missiles with wraparound fins are well known. However, until now simplified criteria that consider a static side moment due to wraparound fins as the only significant out-of-plane effect have been utilized in design. It is shown that the simplified stability criteria are not reliable, and more general stability criteria that take both the classical Magnus side moment and the static side moment due to wraparound fins into account have to be used. Another outcome is that the roll direction is extremely important in terms of stability of wraparound-finned configurations. A linear free flight dynamic stability analysis of the U.S. Air Force research model is performed as a case study by using available aeroballistic range test data.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/2.3377</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4650 |
ispartof | Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 1998-07, Vol.35 (4), p.467-472 |
issn | 0022-4650 1533-6794 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745941846 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerodynamic stability Dynamic stability Finned projectiles Fins Flight dynamics Free flight Magnus effect Missile configurations Missiles Stability analysis Stability criteria System stability |
title | Magnus Effects on Stability of Wraparound-Finned Missiles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T12%3A10%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnus%20Effects%20on%20Stability%20of%20Wraparound-Finned%20Missiles&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20spacecraft%20and%20rockets&rft.au=Tanrikulu,%20Omer&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=472&rft.pages=467-472&rft.issn=0022-4650&rft.eissn=1533-6794&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/2.3377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26638016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161720216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |