Predicting Behavior of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella Serovars, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Pork Products during Single and Repeated Temperature Abuse Periods

Tools for predicting growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 (THERM; temperature history evaluation for raw meats) have been developed using ground pork and sausage. THERM tools have been tested with three types of pork sausage but not with other pork products or du...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of food protection 2009-10, Vol.72 (10), p.2114-2124
Hauptverfasser: Ingham, Steven C, Vang, Song, Levey, Ben, Fahey, Lisa, Norback, John P, Fanslau, Melody A, Senecal, Andre G, Burnham, Greg M, Ingham, Barbara H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2124
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2114
container_title Journal of food protection
container_volume 72
creator Ingham, Steven C
Vang, Song
Levey, Ben
Fahey, Lisa
Norback, John P
Fanslau, Melody A
Senecal, Andre G
Burnham, Greg M
Ingham, Barbara H
description Tools for predicting growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 (THERM; temperature history evaluation for raw meats) have been developed using ground pork and sausage. THERM tools have been tested with three types of pork sausage but not with other pork products or during sequential temperature abuse periods. We conducted inoculation studies (five strains each of S. aureus and/or Salmonella plus E. coli O157:H7) with simulated cooling of warm sausages, inprocess warming of bratwurst, isothermal temperature abuse of pork frankfurter batter, and two sequential periods of 13, 15.6, or 21.1°C temperature abuse of breakfast sausage, natural (additive-free) chops, and enhanced (phosphate solution-injected) loins. In sequential temperature abuse studies, a temperature abuse period (≥24 h) occurred before and after either refrigeration (5°C for 24 h), or freezing (−20°C for 24 h) and thawing (24 h at 5°C). Pathogen growth predictions from THERM developed using ground pork and sausage were compared with experimental results of 0 to 3.0 log CFU of growth. Across all temperature abuse conditions, qualitative predictions (growth versus no growth) made using the pork tool (n = 133) and the sausage tool (n = 115) were accurate (51 and 50%, respectively), fail-safe (44 and 50%), or fail-dangerous (5 and 0%). Quantitative predictions from the two tools were accurate (29 and 22% , respectively), fail-safe (59 and 73%), or fail-dangerous (12 and 5%). Pathogen growth was greater during the second sequential temperature abuse period but not significantly so (P > 0.05). Both THERM tools provide useful qualitative predictions of pathogen growth in pork products during isolated or sequential temperature abuse events.
doi_str_mv 10.4315/0362-028X-72.10.2114
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745926398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1935947811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-eb56718222d6496fb1f5928e611b0be0e6bcf6aacc07d7bafee5ea2e61d48fa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9r1TAYxoMo7nj0G4gGQbyxM3_atPFujumEwQ52A-_C2-TtTmdP0yXtYB_I72nqOUzwJoE3v-d5kjyEvObsOJe8-MSkEhkT1c-sFMdpKDjPn5AV13meaabLp2T1iByRFzHeMsaEFuo5OeK6kpLJYkV-bwK6zk7dcEO_4BbuOx-ob2k9wbh96L311s6Rwhxwjh9pDf3OD9j3QGsM_h5CGsLg6Fm0Wwyd3XZAre87esmL8vN5SbuBbnz4RTfBu9lOkbo5LGF1Wnr8q_2BI8KEjl7hbsQAUwqjJ80ckW6Sp3fxJXnWQh_x1WFfk-uvZ1en59nF5bfvpycXmc1VMWXYFKrklRDCqVyrtuFtoUWFivOGNchQNbZVANay0pUNtIgFgkjnLq9aEHJNPux9x-DvZoyT2XXRLs8d0M_RlHnyUzL93pq8-4-89XMY0uWMkFwKxrROUL6HbPAxBmzNGLodhAfDmVlKNEtDZmnIlGIZLiUm2ZuD99zs0P0THVpLwPsDANFC3wYYbBcfOZHSlRYL93bPteAN3ITEXNeCccm40mVeCfkHnOqv3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231320099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Behavior of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella Serovars, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Pork Products during Single and Repeated Temperature Abuse Periods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ingham, Steven C ; Vang, Song ; Levey, Ben ; Fahey, Lisa ; Norback, John P ; Fanslau, Melody A ; Senecal, Andre G ; Burnham, Greg M ; Ingham, Barbara H</creator><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Steven C ; Vang, Song ; Levey, Ben ; Fahey, Lisa ; Norback, John P ; Fanslau, Melody A ; Senecal, Andre G ; Burnham, Greg M ; Ingham, Barbara H</creatorcontrib><description>Tools for predicting growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 (THERM; temperature history evaluation for raw meats) have been developed using ground pork and sausage. THERM tools have been tested with three types of pork sausage but not with other pork products or during sequential temperature abuse periods. We conducted inoculation studies (five strains each of S. aureus and/or Salmonella plus E. coli O157:H7) with simulated cooling of warm sausages, inprocess warming of bratwurst, isothermal temperature abuse of pork frankfurter batter, and two sequential periods of 13, 15.6, or 21.1°C temperature abuse of breakfast sausage, natural (additive-free) chops, and enhanced (phosphate solution-injected) loins. In sequential temperature abuse studies, a temperature abuse period (≥24 h) occurred before and after either refrigeration (5°C for 24 h), or freezing (−20°C for 24 h) and thawing (24 h at 5°C). Pathogen growth predictions from THERM developed using ground pork and sausage were compared with experimental results of 0 to 3.0 log CFU of growth. Across all temperature abuse conditions, qualitative predictions (growth versus no growth) made using the pork tool (n = 133) and the sausage tool (n = 115) were accurate (51 and 50%, respectively), fail-safe (44 and 50%), or fail-dangerous (5 and 0%). Quantitative predictions from the two tools were accurate (29 and 22% , respectively), fail-safe (59 and 73%), or fail-dangerous (12 and 5%). Pathogen growth was greater during the second sequential temperature abuse period but not significantly so (P &gt; 0.05). Both THERM tools provide useful qualitative predictions of pathogen growth in pork products during isolated or sequential temperature abuse events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-72.10.2114</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19833035</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFPRDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Des Moines, IA: International Association for Food Protection</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Animals ; Bacteria ; bacterial colonization ; bacterial contamination ; Beef ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony Count, Microbial ; computer software ; Consumer Product Safety ; cooling ; E coli ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli O157 - growth &amp; development ; Escherichia coli O157:H7 ; Experiments ; Food Handling - methods ; Food industries ; Food Microbiology ; food pathogens ; Food safety ; Freezing ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Growth models ; heat treatment ; Humans ; Kinetics ; Laboratories ; Mathematical functions ; Meat and meat product industries ; Meat processing ; meat products ; Meat Products - microbiology ; microbial growth ; model validation ; Models, Biological ; Pathogens ; Pork ; Poultry ; predictive microbiology ; probabilistic models ; Refrigeration ; Risk Assessment ; Salmonella ; Salmonella - growth &amp; development ; simulation models ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development ; Swine ; Temperature ; temperature history evaluation for raw meats ; temperature profiles ; Thawing</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2009-10, Vol.72 (10), p.2114-2124</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright International Association for Food Protection Oct 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-eb56718222d6496fb1f5928e611b0be0e6bcf6aacc07d7bafee5ea2e61d48fa23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-eb56718222d6496fb1f5928e611b0be0e6bcf6aacc07d7bafee5ea2e61d48fa23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/231320099?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22006925$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19833035$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vang, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levey, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norback, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanslau, Melody A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senecal, Andre G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnham, Greg M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Barbara H</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Behavior of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella Serovars, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Pork Products during Single and Repeated Temperature Abuse Periods</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>Tools for predicting growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 (THERM; temperature history evaluation for raw meats) have been developed using ground pork and sausage. THERM tools have been tested with three types of pork sausage but not with other pork products or during sequential temperature abuse periods. We conducted inoculation studies (five strains each of S. aureus and/or Salmonella plus E. coli O157:H7) with simulated cooling of warm sausages, inprocess warming of bratwurst, isothermal temperature abuse of pork frankfurter batter, and two sequential periods of 13, 15.6, or 21.1°C temperature abuse of breakfast sausage, natural (additive-free) chops, and enhanced (phosphate solution-injected) loins. In sequential temperature abuse studies, a temperature abuse period (≥24 h) occurred before and after either refrigeration (5°C for 24 h), or freezing (−20°C for 24 h) and thawing (24 h at 5°C). Pathogen growth predictions from THERM developed using ground pork and sausage were compared with experimental results of 0 to 3.0 log CFU of growth. Across all temperature abuse conditions, qualitative predictions (growth versus no growth) made using the pork tool (n = 133) and the sausage tool (n = 115) were accurate (51 and 50%, respectively), fail-safe (44 and 50%), or fail-dangerous (5 and 0%). Quantitative predictions from the two tools were accurate (29 and 22% , respectively), fail-safe (59 and 73%), or fail-dangerous (12 and 5%). Pathogen growth was greater during the second sequential temperature abuse period but not significantly so (P &gt; 0.05). Both THERM tools provide useful qualitative predictions of pathogen growth in pork products during isolated or sequential temperature abuse events.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bacterial colonization</subject><subject>bacterial contamination</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>computer software</subject><subject>Consumer Product Safety</subject><subject>cooling</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157:H7</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>food pathogens</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>heat treatment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>Meat processing</subject><subject>meat products</subject><subject>Meat Products - microbiology</subject><subject>microbial growth</subject><subject>model validation</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>predictive microbiology</subject><subject>probabilistic models</subject><subject>Refrigeration</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>temperature history evaluation for raw meats</subject><subject>temperature profiles</subject><subject>Thawing</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9r1TAYxoMo7nj0G4gGQbyxM3_atPFujumEwQ52A-_C2-TtTmdP0yXtYB_I72nqOUzwJoE3v-d5kjyEvObsOJe8-MSkEhkT1c-sFMdpKDjPn5AV13meaabLp2T1iByRFzHeMsaEFuo5OeK6kpLJYkV-bwK6zk7dcEO_4BbuOx-ob2k9wbh96L311s6Rwhxwjh9pDf3OD9j3QGsM_h5CGsLg6Fm0Wwyd3XZAre87esmL8vN5SbuBbnz4RTfBu9lOkbo5LGF1Wnr8q_2BI8KEjl7hbsQAUwqjJ80ckW6Sp3fxJXnWQh_x1WFfk-uvZ1en59nF5bfvpycXmc1VMWXYFKrklRDCqVyrtuFtoUWFivOGNchQNbZVANay0pUNtIgFgkjnLq9aEHJNPux9x-DvZoyT2XXRLs8d0M_RlHnyUzL93pq8-4-89XMY0uWMkFwKxrROUL6HbPAxBmzNGLodhAfDmVlKNEtDZmnIlGIZLiUm2ZuD99zs0P0THVpLwPsDANFC3wYYbBcfOZHSlRYL93bPteAN3ITEXNeCccm40mVeCfkHnOqv3w</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Ingham, Steven C</creator><creator>Vang, Song</creator><creator>Levey, Ben</creator><creator>Fahey, Lisa</creator><creator>Norback, John P</creator><creator>Fanslau, Melody A</creator><creator>Senecal, Andre G</creator><creator>Burnham, Greg M</creator><creator>Ingham, Barbara H</creator><general>International Association for Food Protection</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Predicting Behavior of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella Serovars, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Pork Products during Single and Repeated Temperature Abuse Periods</title><author>Ingham, Steven C ; Vang, Song ; Levey, Ben ; Fahey, Lisa ; Norback, John P ; Fanslau, Melody A ; Senecal, Andre G ; Burnham, Greg M ; Ingham, Barbara H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-eb56718222d6496fb1f5928e611b0be0e6bcf6aacc07d7bafee5ea2e61d48fa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bacterial colonization</topic><topic>bacterial contamination</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>computer software</topic><topic>Consumer Product Safety</topic><topic>cooling</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157:H7</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>food pathogens</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>heat treatment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>Meat processing</topic><topic>meat products</topic><topic>Meat Products - microbiology</topic><topic>microbial growth</topic><topic>model validation</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>predictive microbiology</topic><topic>probabilistic models</topic><topic>Refrigeration</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>temperature history evaluation for raw meats</topic><topic>temperature profiles</topic><topic>Thawing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vang, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levey, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norback, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanslau, Melody A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senecal, Andre G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnham, Greg M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Barbara H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ingham, Steven C</au><au>Vang, Song</au><au>Levey, Ben</au><au>Fahey, Lisa</au><au>Norback, John P</au><au>Fanslau, Melody A</au><au>Senecal, Andre G</au><au>Burnham, Greg M</au><au>Ingham, Barbara H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Behavior of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella Serovars, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Pork Products during Single and Repeated Temperature Abuse Periods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2114</spage><epage>2124</epage><pages>2114-2124</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><coden>JFPRDR</coden><abstract>Tools for predicting growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 (THERM; temperature history evaluation for raw meats) have been developed using ground pork and sausage. THERM tools have been tested with three types of pork sausage but not with other pork products or during sequential temperature abuse periods. We conducted inoculation studies (five strains each of S. aureus and/or Salmonella plus E. coli O157:H7) with simulated cooling of warm sausages, inprocess warming of bratwurst, isothermal temperature abuse of pork frankfurter batter, and two sequential periods of 13, 15.6, or 21.1°C temperature abuse of breakfast sausage, natural (additive-free) chops, and enhanced (phosphate solution-injected) loins. In sequential temperature abuse studies, a temperature abuse period (≥24 h) occurred before and after either refrigeration (5°C for 24 h), or freezing (−20°C for 24 h) and thawing (24 h at 5°C). Pathogen growth predictions from THERM developed using ground pork and sausage were compared with experimental results of 0 to 3.0 log CFU of growth. Across all temperature abuse conditions, qualitative predictions (growth versus no growth) made using the pork tool (n = 133) and the sausage tool (n = 115) were accurate (51 and 50%, respectively), fail-safe (44 and 50%), or fail-dangerous (5 and 0%). Quantitative predictions from the two tools were accurate (29 and 22% , respectively), fail-safe (59 and 73%), or fail-dangerous (12 and 5%). Pathogen growth was greater during the second sequential temperature abuse period but not significantly so (P &gt; 0.05). Both THERM tools provide useful qualitative predictions of pathogen growth in pork products during isolated or sequential temperature abuse events.</abstract><cop>Des Moines, IA</cop><pub>International Association for Food Protection</pub><pmid>19833035</pmid><doi>10.4315/0362-028X-72.10.2114</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-028X
ispartof Journal of food protection, 2009-10, Vol.72 (10), p.2114-2124
issn 0362-028X
1944-9097
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745926398
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Animals
Bacteria
bacterial colonization
bacterial contamination
Beef
Biological and medical sciences
Colony Count, Microbial
computer software
Consumer Product Safety
cooling
E coli
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli O157 - growth & development
Escherichia coli O157:H7
Experiments
Food Handling - methods
Food industries
Food Microbiology
food pathogens
Food safety
Freezing
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Growth models
heat treatment
Humans
Kinetics
Laboratories
Mathematical functions
Meat and meat product industries
Meat processing
meat products
Meat Products - microbiology
microbial growth
model validation
Models, Biological
Pathogens
Pork
Poultry
predictive microbiology
probabilistic models
Refrigeration
Risk Assessment
Salmonella
Salmonella - growth & development
simulation models
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development
Swine
Temperature
temperature history evaluation for raw meats
temperature profiles
Thawing
title Predicting Behavior of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella Serovars, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Pork Products during Single and Repeated Temperature Abuse Periods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A48%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Behavior%20of%20Staphylococcus%20aureus,%20Salmonella%20Serovars,%20and%20Escherichia%20coli%20O157:H7%20in%20Pork%20Products%20during%20Single%20and%20Repeated%20Temperature%20Abuse%20Periods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Ingham,%20Steven%20C&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2114&rft.epage=2124&rft.pages=2114-2124&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft.coden=JFPRDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028X-72.10.2114&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1935947811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231320099&rft_id=info:pmid/19833035&rfr_iscdi=true