Correlation of portable wear metal analyzer (PWMA-2) and Baird A/E35U-3 oil analysis data

Correlation of the Perkin-Elmer Corporation portable wear metal analyzer, version two (PWMA-2) and the Baird Corporation A/E35U-3 spectrometric oil analysis data is accomplished by curve fitting of data from aircraft, bearing test rigs, and organometallic oil samples analyzed on both instruments. Ea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wear 1989, Vol.133 (2), p.245-255
Hauptverfasser: Wright, Robert L., Centers, Phillip W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 255
container_issue 2
container_start_page 245
container_title Wear
container_volume 133
creator Wright, Robert L.
Centers, Phillip W.
description Correlation of the Perkin-Elmer Corporation portable wear metal analyzer, version two (PWMA-2) and the Baird Corporation A/E35U-3 spectrometric oil analysis data is accomplished by curve fitting of data from aircraft, bearing test rigs, and organometallic oil samples analyzed on both instruments. Each of nine wear metal elements (iron, silver, aluminum, chromium, copper, magnesium, nickel, silicon and titanium) was separately fitted to linear, logarithmic, power law and low order polynomial curves. Power law curve fits were best for most of the elements, especially in the important low concentration (0–5 ppm) range, where U.S. Air Force gas turbine aircraft engines typically operate. The power law curve was applied to all the elements to construct correlation algorithms, with a general uncertainty in correlation values of about 0.5–1 ppm or 10%, whichever was the greater. The coefficients of determination for the power law curve fits ranged from 0.935 for aluminum to 0.993 for iron. The fit for silicon was poor for any type of curve (the best coefficient of determination was 0.564 for the power law curve fit) and therefore correlation of silicon values is not recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0043-1648(89)90039-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745739672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0043164889900392</els_id><sourcerecordid>745739672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-69e85aeaffacd30a748947cca9b0c0e752d481e2ceb7ae5a5030dc1909ea8bfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB__wEV22sVoMplMko1QS31ARRcWcRVukzsQmU5qMir119tacenqwuE7B-5HyAln55zx-oKxShS8rvSZNkPDmDBFuUMGXCtRlFKpXTL4Q_bJQc6vjDFuZD0gL-OYErbQh9jR2NBlTD3MW6SfCIkusIeWQgft6gsTPXt8vh8V5XCdeHoFIXk6upgIOSsEjeEXzCFTDz0ckb0G2ozHv_eQzK4nT-PbYvpwczceTQtXatkXtUEtAaFpwHnBQFXaVMo5MHPmGCpZ-kpzLB3OFaAEyQTzjhtmEPS88eKQnG53lym-vWPu7SJkh20LHcb3bFUllTC1KtdktSVdijknbOwyhQWkleXMbkTajSW7sWS1sT8i7aZ2ua3h-ouPgMlmF7Bz6ENC11sfw_8D3zM7eQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>745739672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of portable wear metal analyzer (PWMA-2) and Baird A/E35U-3 oil analysis data</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wright, Robert L. ; Centers, Phillip W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wright, Robert L. ; Centers, Phillip W.</creatorcontrib><description>Correlation of the Perkin-Elmer Corporation portable wear metal analyzer, version two (PWMA-2) and the Baird Corporation A/E35U-3 spectrometric oil analysis data is accomplished by curve fitting of data from aircraft, bearing test rigs, and organometallic oil samples analyzed on both instruments. Each of nine wear metal elements (iron, silver, aluminum, chromium, copper, magnesium, nickel, silicon and titanium) was separately fitted to linear, logarithmic, power law and low order polynomial curves. Power law curve fits were best for most of the elements, especially in the important low concentration (0–5 ppm) range, where U.S. Air Force gas turbine aircraft engines typically operate. The power law curve was applied to all the elements to construct correlation algorithms, with a general uncertainty in correlation values of about 0.5–1 ppm or 10%, whichever was the greater. The coefficients of determination for the power law curve fits ranged from 0.935 for aluminum to 0.993 for iron. The fit for silicon was poor for any type of curve (the best coefficient of determination was 0.564 for the power law curve fit) and therefore correlation of silicon values is not recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(89)90039-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>instrumentation ; measurement</subject><ispartof>Wear, 1989, Vol.133 (2), p.245-255</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-69e85aeaffacd30a748947cca9b0c0e752d481e2ceb7ae5a5030dc1909ea8bfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(89)90039-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,4010,27904,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wright, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centers, Phillip W.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of portable wear metal analyzer (PWMA-2) and Baird A/E35U-3 oil analysis data</title><title>Wear</title><description>Correlation of the Perkin-Elmer Corporation portable wear metal analyzer, version two (PWMA-2) and the Baird Corporation A/E35U-3 spectrometric oil analysis data is accomplished by curve fitting of data from aircraft, bearing test rigs, and organometallic oil samples analyzed on both instruments. Each of nine wear metal elements (iron, silver, aluminum, chromium, copper, magnesium, nickel, silicon and titanium) was separately fitted to linear, logarithmic, power law and low order polynomial curves. Power law curve fits were best for most of the elements, especially in the important low concentration (0–5 ppm) range, where U.S. Air Force gas turbine aircraft engines typically operate. The power law curve was applied to all the elements to construct correlation algorithms, with a general uncertainty in correlation values of about 0.5–1 ppm or 10%, whichever was the greater. The coefficients of determination for the power law curve fits ranged from 0.935 for aluminum to 0.993 for iron. The fit for silicon was poor for any type of curve (the best coefficient of determination was 0.564 for the power law curve fit) and therefore correlation of silicon values is not recommended.</description><subject>instrumentation</subject><subject>measurement</subject><issn>0043-1648</issn><issn>1873-2577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB__wEV22sVoMplMko1QS31ARRcWcRVukzsQmU5qMir119tacenqwuE7B-5HyAln55zx-oKxShS8rvSZNkPDmDBFuUMGXCtRlFKpXTL4Q_bJQc6vjDFuZD0gL-OYErbQh9jR2NBlTD3MW6SfCIkusIeWQgft6gsTPXt8vh8V5XCdeHoFIXk6upgIOSsEjeEXzCFTDz0ckb0G2ozHv_eQzK4nT-PbYvpwczceTQtXatkXtUEtAaFpwHnBQFXaVMo5MHPmGCpZ-kpzLB3OFaAEyQTzjhtmEPS88eKQnG53lym-vWPu7SJkh20LHcb3bFUllTC1KtdktSVdijknbOwyhQWkleXMbkTajSW7sWS1sT8i7aZ2ua3h-ouPgMlmF7Bz6ENC11sfw_8D3zM7eQA</recordid><startdate>1989</startdate><enddate>1989</enddate><creator>Wright, Robert L.</creator><creator>Centers, Phillip W.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1989</creationdate><title>Correlation of portable wear metal analyzer (PWMA-2) and Baird A/E35U-3 oil analysis data</title><author>Wright, Robert L. ; Centers, Phillip W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-69e85aeaffacd30a748947cca9b0c0e752d481e2ceb7ae5a5030dc1909ea8bfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>instrumentation</topic><topic>measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centers, Phillip W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wear</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, Robert L.</au><au>Centers, Phillip W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of portable wear metal analyzer (PWMA-2) and Baird A/E35U-3 oil analysis data</atitle><jtitle>Wear</jtitle><date>1989</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>255</epage><pages>245-255</pages><issn>0043-1648</issn><eissn>1873-2577</eissn><abstract>Correlation of the Perkin-Elmer Corporation portable wear metal analyzer, version two (PWMA-2) and the Baird Corporation A/E35U-3 spectrometric oil analysis data is accomplished by curve fitting of data from aircraft, bearing test rigs, and organometallic oil samples analyzed on both instruments. Each of nine wear metal elements (iron, silver, aluminum, chromium, copper, magnesium, nickel, silicon and titanium) was separately fitted to linear, logarithmic, power law and low order polynomial curves. Power law curve fits were best for most of the elements, especially in the important low concentration (0–5 ppm) range, where U.S. Air Force gas turbine aircraft engines typically operate. The power law curve was applied to all the elements to construct correlation algorithms, with a general uncertainty in correlation values of about 0.5–1 ppm or 10%, whichever was the greater. The coefficients of determination for the power law curve fits ranged from 0.935 for aluminum to 0.993 for iron. The fit for silicon was poor for any type of curve (the best coefficient of determination was 0.564 for the power law curve fit) and therefore correlation of silicon values is not recommended.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0043-1648(89)90039-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1648
ispartof Wear, 1989, Vol.133 (2), p.245-255
issn 0043-1648
1873-2577
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745739672
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects instrumentation
measurement
title Correlation of portable wear metal analyzer (PWMA-2) and Baird A/E35U-3 oil analysis data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A39%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20portable%20wear%20metal%20analyzer%20(PWMA-2)%20and%20Baird%20A/E35U-3%20oil%20analysis%20data&rft.jtitle=Wear&rft.au=Wright,%20Robert%20L.&rft.date=1989&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=255&rft.pages=245-255&rft.issn=0043-1648&rft.eissn=1873-2577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0043-1648(89)90039-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E745739672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=745739672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0043164889900392&rfr_iscdi=true