Diet, Prey Selection, and Predation Impact of Black-Backed Jackals in South Africa

To investigate the role of black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) as predators, we studied diet, prey selection, and predation impact of jackals on 2 game ranches in South Africa that differed in ungulate diversity and biomass. Results showed that large (>15 kg) ungulate species dominated jackal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2010-07, Vol.74 (5), p.1030-1042
Hauptverfasser: KLARE, UNN, KAMLER, JAN F., STENKEWITZ, UTE, MACDONALD, DAVID W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1042
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1030
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 74
creator KLARE, UNN
KAMLER, JAN F.
STENKEWITZ, UTE
MACDONALD, DAVID W.
description To investigate the role of black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) as predators, we studied diet, prey selection, and predation impact of jackals on 2 game ranches in South Africa that differed in ungulate diversity and biomass. Results showed that large (>15 kg) ungulate species dominated jackal diets throughout the year on both the less diverse (range of ingested biomass across seasons  =  39–78%) and more diverse (26–69%) game ranch. Other important food items included medium-sized mammals (1–3 kg; 1–26%) and fruit (2–69%), whereas small mammals comprised 3–11% of ingested biomass across seasons on both sites. Jackals were not random in consumption of ungulates, and consumption patterns suggested jackals actively hunted certain species rather than consumed them as carrion. During ungulate birthing periods, jackals consumed almost exclusively those ungulate species that were hiders (i.e., fawns were hidden in tall vegetation away from herd) regardless of ungulate densities, suggesting that primarily fawns were preyed upon. Among hiders, there was a negative relationship (P  =  0.01) between body size and percent of population consumed by jackals, indicating smaller species were more susceptible than larger species to jackal predation. Consequently, springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) were always selected over other ungulate species on both sites, and this species was the most impacted by jackal predation. In contrast, ungulate species that were followers (i.e., fawns immediately followed mothers within protection of the herd) were scarcely or not at all consumed by jackals, regardless of body size or density. Medium-sized mammals were selectively consumed over ungulates, and there was a negative relationship (P < 0.01) between consumption of berries and ungulates, indicating alternative food resources influenced consumption of ungulates on our study sites. Our results will help wildlife managers in Africa identify ungulate species susceptible to jackal predation, and can be used to develop management strategies for reducing jackal predation in areas where it is problematic.
doi_str_mv 10.2193/2009-211
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745644379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40665177</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40665177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4159-e636c27a585f84619f37701727a287184f891e6b1eb0245c006b9471cec018b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtv1DAQhS1EJZZSiT-AZPFA-9BQj-PYyWNvLF0tBdEbb5bjnQhvs_HWzgr23-M0qEhIffF4znw6mjmEvAX2kUOVH3HGqowDvCCT1KqMl6BekgljnGeFgB-vyOsYl4zlAKWckO9nDvtD-i3gll5hi7Z3vjukplsM2sIMLb1YrY3tqW_oSWvsfXaSHlzQWSqmjdR19Mpv-p_0uAnOmjdkp0ky7v2tu-Tm0_n16eds_nV6cXo8z2oBRZWhzKXlyhRl0ZRCQtXkSjFQSeKlglI0ZQUoa8CacVFYxmRdCQUWLYOylvku2R9918E_bDD2euWixbY1HfpN1EoUUohcVYl8_x-59JvQpeW0TEFUCh6hgxGywccYsNHr4FYmbDUwPUSrh2jTDxKajegv1-L2WU7P7r5MpRys3438MvY-PPGCSVmAUv_8XOzx99PchHstVa4KfXc51fOZvL6E27keLv8w8rXzvsPnF_0D_hyZQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>603197179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diet, Prey Selection, and Predation Impact of Black-Backed Jackals in South Africa</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>KLARE, UNN ; KAMLER, JAN F. ; STENKEWITZ, UTE ; MACDONALD, DAVID W.</creator><creatorcontrib>KLARE, UNN ; KAMLER, JAN F. ; STENKEWITZ, UTE ; MACDONALD, DAVID W.</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the role of black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) as predators, we studied diet, prey selection, and predation impact of jackals on 2 game ranches in South Africa that differed in ungulate diversity and biomass. Results showed that large (&gt;15 kg) ungulate species dominated jackal diets throughout the year on both the less diverse (range of ingested biomass across seasons  =  39–78%) and more diverse (26–69%) game ranch. Other important food items included medium-sized mammals (1–3 kg; 1–26%) and fruit (2–69%), whereas small mammals comprised 3–11% of ingested biomass across seasons on both sites. Jackals were not random in consumption of ungulates, and consumption patterns suggested jackals actively hunted certain species rather than consumed them as carrion. During ungulate birthing periods, jackals consumed almost exclusively those ungulate species that were hiders (i.e., fawns were hidden in tall vegetation away from herd) regardless of ungulate densities, suggesting that primarily fawns were preyed upon. Among hiders, there was a negative relationship (P  =  0.01) between body size and percent of population consumed by jackals, indicating smaller species were more susceptible than larger species to jackal predation. Consequently, springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) were always selected over other ungulate species on both sites, and this species was the most impacted by jackal predation. In contrast, ungulate species that were followers (i.e., fawns immediately followed mothers within protection of the herd) were scarcely or not at all consumed by jackals, regardless of body size or density. Medium-sized mammals were selectively consumed over ungulates, and there was a negative relationship (P &lt; 0.01) between consumption of berries and ungulates, indicating alternative food resources influenced consumption of ungulates on our study sites. Our results will help wildlife managers in Africa identify ungulate species susceptible to jackal predation, and can be used to develop management strategies for reducing jackal predation in areas where it is problematic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2009-211</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Antidorcas marsupialis ; Biomass ; black-backed jackal ; Body size ; Canis mesomelas ; Carnivores ; Consumption patterns ; Culling ; Diet ; Diets ; Environmental protection ; Fawns ; Food consumption ; Food resources ; Fruits ; game ranch ; Ingestion ; Jackals ; Mammals ; MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION ; Predation ; Predators ; Prey ; Prey selection ; ranching ; scat analysis ; South Africa ; Springbok ; Ungulates ; Vegetation ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2010-07, Vol.74 (5), p.1030-1042</ispartof><rights>The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2010 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jul 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4159-e636c27a585f84619f37701727a287184f891e6b1eb0245c006b9471cec018b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4159-e636c27a585f84619f37701727a287184f891e6b1eb0245c006b9471cec018b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40665177$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40665177$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KLARE, UNN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAMLER, JAN F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STENKEWITZ, UTE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, DAVID W.</creatorcontrib><title>Diet, Prey Selection, and Predation Impact of Black-Backed Jackals in South Africa</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>To investigate the role of black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) as predators, we studied diet, prey selection, and predation impact of jackals on 2 game ranches in South Africa that differed in ungulate diversity and biomass. Results showed that large (&gt;15 kg) ungulate species dominated jackal diets throughout the year on both the less diverse (range of ingested biomass across seasons  =  39–78%) and more diverse (26–69%) game ranch. Other important food items included medium-sized mammals (1–3 kg; 1–26%) and fruit (2–69%), whereas small mammals comprised 3–11% of ingested biomass across seasons on both sites. Jackals were not random in consumption of ungulates, and consumption patterns suggested jackals actively hunted certain species rather than consumed them as carrion. During ungulate birthing periods, jackals consumed almost exclusively those ungulate species that were hiders (i.e., fawns were hidden in tall vegetation away from herd) regardless of ungulate densities, suggesting that primarily fawns were preyed upon. Among hiders, there was a negative relationship (P  =  0.01) between body size and percent of population consumed by jackals, indicating smaller species were more susceptible than larger species to jackal predation. Consequently, springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) were always selected over other ungulate species on both sites, and this species was the most impacted by jackal predation. In contrast, ungulate species that were followers (i.e., fawns immediately followed mothers within protection of the herd) were scarcely or not at all consumed by jackals, regardless of body size or density. Medium-sized mammals were selectively consumed over ungulates, and there was a negative relationship (P &lt; 0.01) between consumption of berries and ungulates, indicating alternative food resources influenced consumption of ungulates on our study sites. Our results will help wildlife managers in Africa identify ungulate species susceptible to jackal predation, and can be used to develop management strategies for reducing jackal predation in areas where it is problematic.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Antidorcas marsupialis</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>black-backed jackal</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Canis mesomelas</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Consumption patterns</subject><subject>Culling</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diets</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fawns</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>game ranch</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Jackals</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Prey selection</subject><subject>ranching</subject><subject>scat analysis</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Springbok</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtv1DAQhS1EJZZSiT-AZPFA-9BQj-PYyWNvLF0tBdEbb5bjnQhvs_HWzgr23-M0qEhIffF4znw6mjmEvAX2kUOVH3HGqowDvCCT1KqMl6BekgljnGeFgB-vyOsYl4zlAKWckO9nDvtD-i3gll5hi7Z3vjukplsM2sIMLb1YrY3tqW_oSWvsfXaSHlzQWSqmjdR19Mpv-p_0uAnOmjdkp0ky7v2tu-Tm0_n16eds_nV6cXo8z2oBRZWhzKXlyhRl0ZRCQtXkSjFQSeKlglI0ZQUoa8CacVFYxmRdCQUWLYOylvku2R9918E_bDD2euWixbY1HfpN1EoUUohcVYl8_x-59JvQpeW0TEFUCh6hgxGywccYsNHr4FYmbDUwPUSrh2jTDxKajegv1-L2WU7P7r5MpRys3438MvY-PPGCSVmAUv_8XOzx99PchHstVa4KfXc51fOZvL6E27keLv8w8rXzvsPnF_0D_hyZQw</recordid><startdate>201007</startdate><enddate>201007</enddate><creator>KLARE, UNN</creator><creator>KAMLER, JAN F.</creator><creator>STENKEWITZ, UTE</creator><creator>MACDONALD, DAVID W.</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201007</creationdate><title>Diet, Prey Selection, and Predation Impact of Black-Backed Jackals in South Africa</title><author>KLARE, UNN ; KAMLER, JAN F. ; STENKEWITZ, UTE ; MACDONALD, DAVID W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4159-e636c27a585f84619f37701727a287184f891e6b1eb0245c006b9471cec018b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Antidorcas marsupialis</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>black-backed jackal</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Canis mesomelas</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Consumption patterns</topic><topic>Culling</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diets</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fawns</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>game ranch</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Jackals</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Prey selection</topic><topic>ranching</topic><topic>scat analysis</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Springbok</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KLARE, UNN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAMLER, JAN F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STENKEWITZ, UTE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, DAVID W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KLARE, UNN</au><au>KAMLER, JAN F.</au><au>STENKEWITZ, UTE</au><au>MACDONALD, DAVID W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diet, Prey Selection, and Predation Impact of Black-Backed Jackals in South Africa</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2010-07</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1030</spage><epage>1042</epage><pages>1030-1042</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>To investigate the role of black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) as predators, we studied diet, prey selection, and predation impact of jackals on 2 game ranches in South Africa that differed in ungulate diversity and biomass. Results showed that large (&gt;15 kg) ungulate species dominated jackal diets throughout the year on both the less diverse (range of ingested biomass across seasons  =  39–78%) and more diverse (26–69%) game ranch. Other important food items included medium-sized mammals (1–3 kg; 1–26%) and fruit (2–69%), whereas small mammals comprised 3–11% of ingested biomass across seasons on both sites. Jackals were not random in consumption of ungulates, and consumption patterns suggested jackals actively hunted certain species rather than consumed them as carrion. During ungulate birthing periods, jackals consumed almost exclusively those ungulate species that were hiders (i.e., fawns were hidden in tall vegetation away from herd) regardless of ungulate densities, suggesting that primarily fawns were preyed upon. Among hiders, there was a negative relationship (P  =  0.01) between body size and percent of population consumed by jackals, indicating smaller species were more susceptible than larger species to jackal predation. Consequently, springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) were always selected over other ungulate species on both sites, and this species was the most impacted by jackal predation. In contrast, ungulate species that were followers (i.e., fawns immediately followed mothers within protection of the herd) were scarcely or not at all consumed by jackals, regardless of body size or density. Medium-sized mammals were selectively consumed over ungulates, and there was a negative relationship (P &lt; 0.01) between consumption of berries and ungulates, indicating alternative food resources influenced consumption of ungulates on our study sites. Our results will help wildlife managers in Africa identify ungulate species susceptible to jackal predation, and can be used to develop management strategies for reducing jackal predation in areas where it is problematic.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2009-211</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2010-07, Vol.74 (5), p.1030-1042
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745644379
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal behavior
Antidorcas marsupialis
Biomass
black-backed jackal
Body size
Canis mesomelas
Carnivores
Consumption patterns
Culling
Diet
Diets
Environmental protection
Fawns
Food consumption
Food resources
Fruits
game ranch
Ingestion
Jackals
Mammals
MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION
Predation
Predators
Prey
Prey selection
ranching
scat analysis
South Africa
Springbok
Ungulates
Vegetation
Wildlife
Wildlife management
title Diet, Prey Selection, and Predation Impact of Black-Backed Jackals in South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T01%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diet,%20Prey%20Selection,%20and%20Predation%20Impact%20of%20Black-Backed%20Jackals%20in%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=KLARE,%20UNN&rft.date=2010-07&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1030&rft.epage=1042&rft.pages=1030-1042&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2009-211&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40665177%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=603197179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40665177&rfr_iscdi=true