Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute hand infections

Twenty-six patients with severe hand infections requiring operative drainage and admission to hospital were entered into a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. This was to test the use of a functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator and a non-functioning transcutaneous elec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hand surgery, British volume British volume, 1987, Vol.12 (2), p.267-268
Hauptverfasser: Quinton, D.N., Sloan, J.P., Theakstone, Julie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 268
container_issue 2
container_start_page 267
container_title Journal of hand surgery, British volume
container_volume 12
creator Quinton, D.N.
Sloan, J.P.
Theakstone, Julie
description Twenty-six patients with severe hand infections requiring operative drainage and admission to hospital were entered into a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. This was to test the use of a functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator and a non-functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief in the first three postoperative days. Those patients with a functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator required significantly less analgesia. They also demonstrated highly significant improvement in their range of total active movement over those patients with a non-functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator. We recommend the use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator after operation to reduce pain and improve mobility.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0266-7681(87)90030-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_elsev</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745633566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0266768187900301</els_id><sourcerecordid>745633566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e155t-6c200c9d17844a185f7eefafe34137fa82fa1fcbf57d769f41aec5b88b39f1113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQQIMoWFf_gYfe1EM10zQfvQiy6xcseFnPIU0nGOmm2rT7-02teBpmeAyPR8gl0FugIO5oKUQhhYJrJW9qShkt4IhkwFlZlCXAMcn-kVNyFuMnpRS4rDKy2Q0mRDuNJmA_xRw7tOPgrenygMMB8zj6_dSZ0fch9yE3CcX8w4Q2bS6x6R7PyYkzXcSLv7ki70-Pu_VLsX17fl0_bAsEzsdC2JJSW7cgVVUZUNxJRGccsgqYdEaVzoCzjeOylaJ2FRi0vFGqYbUDALYiV8vfr6H_njCOeu-jxa5b5LWsuGCMC5HI-4XEpHPwOOhoPQaLrR-StG57r4HquZ6e0-g5jVZS_9bTwH4AKnJkRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>745633566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute hand infections</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Quinton, D.N. ; Sloan, J.P. ; Theakstone, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Quinton, D.N. ; Sloan, J.P. ; Theakstone, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Twenty-six patients with severe hand infections requiring operative drainage and admission to hospital were entered into a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. This was to test the use of a functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator and a non-functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief in the first three postoperative days. Those patients with a functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator required significantly less analgesia. They also demonstrated highly significant improvement in their range of total active movement over those patients with a non-functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator. We recommend the use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator after operation to reduce pain and improve mobility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-7681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(87)90030-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of hand surgery, British volume, 1987, Vol.12 (2), p.267-268</ispartof><rights>1987</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quinton, D.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloan, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theakstone, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute hand infections</title><title>Journal of hand surgery, British volume</title><description>Twenty-six patients with severe hand infections requiring operative drainage and admission to hospital were entered into a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. This was to test the use of a functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator and a non-functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief in the first three postoperative days. Those patients with a functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator required significantly less analgesia. They also demonstrated highly significant improvement in their range of total active movement over those patients with a non-functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator. We recommend the use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator after operation to reduce pain and improve mobility.</description><issn>0266-7681</issn><issn>1532-2211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQQIMoWFf_gYfe1EM10zQfvQiy6xcseFnPIU0nGOmm2rT7-02teBpmeAyPR8gl0FugIO5oKUQhhYJrJW9qShkt4IhkwFlZlCXAMcn-kVNyFuMnpRS4rDKy2Q0mRDuNJmA_xRw7tOPgrenygMMB8zj6_dSZ0fch9yE3CcX8w4Q2bS6x6R7PyYkzXcSLv7ki70-Pu_VLsX17fl0_bAsEzsdC2JJSW7cgVVUZUNxJRGccsgqYdEaVzoCzjeOylaJ2FRi0vFGqYbUDALYiV8vfr6H_njCOeu-jxa5b5LWsuGCMC5HI-4XEpHPwOOhoPQaLrR-StG57r4HquZ6e0-g5jVZS_9bTwH4AKnJkRw</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>Quinton, D.N.</creator><creator>Sloan, J.P.</creator><creator>Theakstone, Julie</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute hand infections</title><author>Quinton, D.N. ; Sloan, J.P. ; Theakstone, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e155t-6c200c9d17844a185f7eefafe34137fa82fa1fcbf57d769f41aec5b88b39f1113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quinton, D.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloan, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theakstone, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hand surgery, British volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quinton, D.N.</au><au>Sloan, J.P.</au><au>Theakstone, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute hand infections</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hand surgery, British volume</jtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>267-268</pages><issn>0266-7681</issn><eissn>1532-2211</eissn><abstract>Twenty-six patients with severe hand infections requiring operative drainage and admission to hospital were entered into a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. This was to test the use of a functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator and a non-functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief in the first three postoperative days. Those patients with a functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator required significantly less analgesia. They also demonstrated highly significant improvement in their range of total active movement over those patients with a non-functioning transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator. We recommend the use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator after operation to reduce pain and improve mobility.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0266-7681(87)90030-1</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-7681
ispartof Journal of hand surgery, British volume, 1987, Vol.12 (2), p.267-268
issn 0266-7681
1532-2211
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745633566
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute hand infections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A51%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_elsev&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcutaneous%20electrical%20nerve%20stimulation%20in%20acute%20hand%20infections&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hand%20surgery,%20British%20volume&rft.au=Quinton,%20D.N.&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=267-268&rft.issn=0266-7681&rft.eissn=1532-2211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0266-7681(87)90030-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_elsev%3E745633566%3C/proquest_elsev%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=745633566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0266768187900301&rfr_iscdi=true