Can Additional Experimental Data in Humans Verify the Finite Element- Based Bone Remodeling Algorithm?

A finite element-based bone remodeling study in human was conducted in the lumbar spine. This was done to examine the validity of the bone remodeling algorithm by comparing to experimental data. A non-linear 3-D finite element model of the normal ligamentous lumbar spine of L3 to L5 was generated. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The open spine journal 2010-01, Vol.2, p.12-16
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Christian, Gehrchen, PMartin, Kiaer, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue
container_start_page 12
container_title The open spine journal
container_volume 2
creator Wong, Christian
Gehrchen, PMartin
Kiaer, Thomas
description A finite element-based bone remodeling study in human was conducted in the lumbar spine. This was done to examine the validity of the bone remodeling algorithm by comparing to experimental data. A non-linear 3-D finite element model of the normal ligamentous lumbar spine of L3 to L5 was generated. Two different material configurations were assigned to the finite element model. Two analyses with the non-site specific iterative bone remodeling algorithm were conducted with strain energy density as remodeling signal. The experimental data was bone mineral content measurements in the lumbar spine of 87 test subjects. The finite element-based bone remodeling data were compared to the experimental bone mineral content data. For both bone remodeling analyses there were a statistical significant difference between the bone remodeling data and experimental data for 6 out of 8 regions of interest. The bone remodeling data showed too small agreement to confirm the validity of the bone remodeling algorithm.
doi_str_mv 10.2174/1876532701002010012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745631980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>745631980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_7456319803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNisFuwjAQRC2kSkDhC7jsrae0dhISc0JAgzgjxBVZZAOL7DWNHQn-vkTqB_Qyo3nzhJgp-ZmqMv9SuizmWVpKJWXah0oHYtTTpMdDMQ7hJmWRa61HotkYhlVdUyTPxkL1uGNLDjm-xreJBohh1znDAY6vp3lCvCJsiSkiVBZ7NYG1CVjD2jPCHp2v0RJfYGUvvqV4dcuJeGuMDTj963fxsa0Om11yb_1PhyGeHIUzWmsYfRdOZT4vMrXQMvu_-Qsulk6K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>745631980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Additional Experimental Data in Humans Verify the Finite Element- Based Bone Remodeling Algorithm?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wong, Christian ; Gehrchen, PMartin ; Kiaer, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Christian ; Gehrchen, PMartin ; Kiaer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>A finite element-based bone remodeling study in human was conducted in the lumbar spine. This was done to examine the validity of the bone remodeling algorithm by comparing to experimental data. A non-linear 3-D finite element model of the normal ligamentous lumbar spine of L3 to L5 was generated. Two different material configurations were assigned to the finite element model. Two analyses with the non-site specific iterative bone remodeling algorithm were conducted with strain energy density as remodeling signal. The experimental data was bone mineral content measurements in the lumbar spine of 87 test subjects. The finite element-based bone remodeling data were compared to the experimental bone mineral content data. For both bone remodeling analyses there were a statistical significant difference between the bone remodeling data and experimental data for 6 out of 8 regions of interest. The bone remodeling data showed too small agreement to confirm the validity of the bone remodeling algorithm.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1876-5327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2174/1876532701002010012</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The open spine journal, 2010-01, Vol.2, p.12-16</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrchen, PMartin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiaer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Can Additional Experimental Data in Humans Verify the Finite Element- Based Bone Remodeling Algorithm?</title><title>The open spine journal</title><description>A finite element-based bone remodeling study in human was conducted in the lumbar spine. This was done to examine the validity of the bone remodeling algorithm by comparing to experimental data. A non-linear 3-D finite element model of the normal ligamentous lumbar spine of L3 to L5 was generated. Two different material configurations were assigned to the finite element model. Two analyses with the non-site specific iterative bone remodeling algorithm were conducted with strain energy density as remodeling signal. The experimental data was bone mineral content measurements in the lumbar spine of 87 test subjects. The finite element-based bone remodeling data were compared to the experimental bone mineral content data. For both bone remodeling analyses there were a statistical significant difference between the bone remodeling data and experimental data for 6 out of 8 regions of interest. The bone remodeling data showed too small agreement to confirm the validity of the bone remodeling algorithm.</description><issn>1876-5327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNisFuwjAQRC2kSkDhC7jsrae0dhISc0JAgzgjxBVZZAOL7DWNHQn-vkTqB_Qyo3nzhJgp-ZmqMv9SuizmWVpKJWXah0oHYtTTpMdDMQ7hJmWRa61HotkYhlVdUyTPxkL1uGNLDjm-xreJBohh1znDAY6vp3lCvCJsiSkiVBZ7NYG1CVjD2jPCHp2v0RJfYGUvvqV4dcuJeGuMDTj963fxsa0Om11yb_1PhyGeHIUzWmsYfRdOZT4vMrXQMvu_-Qsulk6K</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Wong, Christian</creator><creator>Gehrchen, PMartin</creator><creator>Kiaer, Thomas</creator><scope>7QP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Can Additional Experimental Data in Humans Verify the Finite Element- Based Bone Remodeling Algorithm?</title><author>Wong, Christian ; Gehrchen, PMartin ; Kiaer, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_7456319803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrchen, PMartin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiaer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The open spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Christian</au><au>Gehrchen, PMartin</au><au>Kiaer, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Additional Experimental Data in Humans Verify the Finite Element- Based Bone Remodeling Algorithm?</atitle><jtitle>The open spine journal</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>12</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>12-16</pages><eissn>1876-5327</eissn><abstract>A finite element-based bone remodeling study in human was conducted in the lumbar spine. This was done to examine the validity of the bone remodeling algorithm by comparing to experimental data. A non-linear 3-D finite element model of the normal ligamentous lumbar spine of L3 to L5 was generated. Two different material configurations were assigned to the finite element model. Two analyses with the non-site specific iterative bone remodeling algorithm were conducted with strain energy density as remodeling signal. The experimental data was bone mineral content measurements in the lumbar spine of 87 test subjects. The finite element-based bone remodeling data were compared to the experimental bone mineral content data. For both bone remodeling analyses there were a statistical significant difference between the bone remodeling data and experimental data for 6 out of 8 regions of interest. The bone remodeling data showed too small agreement to confirm the validity of the bone remodeling algorithm.</abstract><doi>10.2174/1876532701002010012</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1876-5327
ispartof The open spine journal, 2010-01, Vol.2, p.12-16
issn 1876-5327
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745631980
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Can Additional Experimental Data in Humans Verify the Finite Element- Based Bone Remodeling Algorithm?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A59%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Additional%20Experimental%20Data%20in%20Humans%20Verify%20the%20Finite%20Element-%20Based%20Bone%20Remodeling%20Algorithm?&rft.jtitle=The%20open%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Wong,%20Christian&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=12-16&rft.eissn=1876-5327&rft_id=info:doi/10.2174/1876532701002010012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E745631980%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=745631980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true