Framework to Evaluate Ecological and Social Outcomes of Collaborative Management: Lessons from Implementation with a Northern Arizona Collaborative Group

As collaborative groups gain popularity as an alternative means for addressing conflict over management of public lands, the need for methods to evaluate their effectiveness in achieving ecological and social goals increases. However, frameworks that examine both effectiveness of the collaborative p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental management (New York) 2010, Vol.45 (1), p.132-144
Hauptverfasser: Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A, Aguilar-González, Bernardo, Loeser, Matthew R. R, Sisk, Thomas D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 144
container_issue 1
container_start_page 132
container_title Environmental management (New York)
container_volume 45
creator Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A
Aguilar-González, Bernardo
Loeser, Matthew R. R
Sisk, Thomas D
description As collaborative groups gain popularity as an alternative means for addressing conflict over management of public lands, the need for methods to evaluate their effectiveness in achieving ecological and social goals increases. However, frameworks that examine both effectiveness of the collaborative process and its outcomes are poorly developed or altogether lacking. This paper presents and evaluates the utility of the holistic ecosystem health indicator (HEHI), a framework that integrates multiple ecological and socioeconomic criteria to evaluate management effectiveness of collaborative processes. Through the development and application of the HEHI to a collaborative in northern Arizona, the Diablo Trust, we present the opportunities and challenges in using this framework to evaluate the ecological and social outcomes of collaborative adaptive management. Baseline results from the first application of the HEHI are presented as an illustration of its potential as a co-adaptive management tool. We discuss lessons learned from the process of selecting indicators and potential issues to their long-term implementation. Finally, we provide recommendations for applying this framework to monitoring and adaptive management in the context of collaborative management.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00267-009-9400-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745631240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743594069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5f36aed5498d853172f82aa47b7b0c5244eb68f26be6af6dd4a931d649a1635c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokPhAdiAxYZV4Po3NrtqNC2VBrooldhZN4kzTUniwU5aDW_C2-IyI1XqArGy5Xu-z7YOIa8ZfGAA5ccEwHVZANjCSoBi94QsmBS8yFP7lCxAaFkwxb8fkRcp3QCAMEY9J0fMWqENLxfk92nEwd-F-INOga5usZ9x8nRVhz5suhp7imNDL0Pd5e3FPNVh8ImGli5D32MVIk7dradfcMSNH_w4faJrn1IYE21jGOj5sO3_nmcujPSum64p0q8hTtc-jvQkdr_CiI_azmKYty_Jsxb75F8d1mNydbr6tvxcrC_Ozpcn66KWykyFaoVG3yhpTWOUYCVvDUeUZVVWUCsupa-0abmuvMZWN41EK1ijpUWmharFMXm_793G8HP2aXJDl2qf3zP6MCdXSqUF4xL-gxQqe9A2k-8ekTdhjmP-huOgVQmlNRlie6iOIaXoW7eN3YBx5xi4e79u79dlme7er9vlzJtD8VwNvnlIHIRmgO-BlEfjxseHm__V-nYfajE43MQuuatLDkwAM8CYkOIPvUm8Kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206570798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Framework to Evaluate Ecological and Social Outcomes of Collaborative Management: Lessons from Implementation with a Northern Arizona Collaborative Group</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A ; Aguilar-González, Bernardo ; Loeser, Matthew R. R ; Sisk, Thomas D</creator><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A ; Aguilar-González, Bernardo ; Loeser, Matthew R. R ; Sisk, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><description>As collaborative groups gain popularity as an alternative means for addressing conflict over management of public lands, the need for methods to evaluate their effectiveness in achieving ecological and social goals increases. However, frameworks that examine both effectiveness of the collaborative process and its outcomes are poorly developed or altogether lacking. This paper presents and evaluates the utility of the holistic ecosystem health indicator (HEHI), a framework that integrates multiple ecological and socioeconomic criteria to evaluate management effectiveness of collaborative processes. Through the development and application of the HEHI to a collaborative in northern Arizona, the Diablo Trust, we present the opportunities and challenges in using this framework to evaluate the ecological and social outcomes of collaborative adaptive management. Baseline results from the first application of the HEHI are presented as an illustration of its potential as a co-adaptive management tool. We discuss lessons learned from the process of selecting indicators and potential issues to their long-term implementation. Finally, we provide recommendations for applying this framework to monitoring and adaptive management in the context of collaborative management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9400-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19936827</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: New York : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adaptive management ; Aquatic Pollution ; Arizona ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Collaboration ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Decision making ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Forestry Management ; Natural resource management ; Nature Conservation ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Public lands ; Public-Private Sector Partnerships ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Trends ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2010, Vol.45 (1), p.132-144</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5f36aed5498d853172f82aa47b7b0c5244eb68f26be6af6dd4a931d649a1635c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5f36aed5498d853172f82aa47b7b0c5244eb68f26be6af6dd4a931d649a1635c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00267-009-9400-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-009-9400-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936827$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-González, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeser, Matthew R. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sisk, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><title>Framework to Evaluate Ecological and Social Outcomes of Collaborative Management: Lessons from Implementation with a Northern Arizona Collaborative Group</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environmental Management</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>As collaborative groups gain popularity as an alternative means for addressing conflict over management of public lands, the need for methods to evaluate their effectiveness in achieving ecological and social goals increases. However, frameworks that examine both effectiveness of the collaborative process and its outcomes are poorly developed or altogether lacking. This paper presents and evaluates the utility of the holistic ecosystem health indicator (HEHI), a framework that integrates multiple ecological and socioeconomic criteria to evaluate management effectiveness of collaborative processes. Through the development and application of the HEHI to a collaborative in northern Arizona, the Diablo Trust, we present the opportunities and challenges in using this framework to evaluate the ecological and social outcomes of collaborative adaptive management. Baseline results from the first application of the HEHI are presented as an illustration of its potential as a co-adaptive management tool. We discuss lessons learned from the process of selecting indicators and potential issues to their long-term implementation. Finally, we provide recommendations for applying this framework to monitoring and adaptive management in the context of collaborative management.</description><subject>Adaptive management</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Public lands</subject><subject>Public-Private Sector Partnerships</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokPhAdiAxYZV4Po3NrtqNC2VBrooldhZN4kzTUniwU5aDW_C2-IyI1XqArGy5Xu-z7YOIa8ZfGAA5ccEwHVZANjCSoBi94QsmBS8yFP7lCxAaFkwxb8fkRcp3QCAMEY9J0fMWqENLxfk92nEwd-F-INOga5usZ9x8nRVhz5suhp7imNDL0Pd5e3FPNVh8ImGli5D32MVIk7dradfcMSNH_w4faJrn1IYE21jGOj5sO3_nmcujPSum64p0q8hTtc-jvQkdr_CiI_azmKYty_Jsxb75F8d1mNydbr6tvxcrC_Ozpcn66KWykyFaoVG3yhpTWOUYCVvDUeUZVVWUCsupa-0abmuvMZWN41EK1ijpUWmharFMXm_793G8HP2aXJDl2qf3zP6MCdXSqUF4xL-gxQqe9A2k-8ekTdhjmP-huOgVQmlNRlie6iOIaXoW7eN3YBx5xi4e79u79dlme7er9vlzJtD8VwNvnlIHIRmgO-BlEfjxseHm__V-nYfajE43MQuuatLDkwAM8CYkOIPvUm8Kg</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A</creator><creator>Aguilar-González, Bernardo</creator><creator>Loeser, Matthew R. R</creator><creator>Sisk, Thomas D</creator><general>New York : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Framework to Evaluate Ecological and Social Outcomes of Collaborative Management: Lessons from Implementation with a Northern Arizona Collaborative Group</title><author>Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A ; Aguilar-González, Bernardo ; Loeser, Matthew R. R ; Sisk, Thomas D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5f36aed5498d853172f82aa47b7b0c5244eb68f26be6af6dd4a931d649a1635c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adaptive management</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Public lands</topic><topic>Public-Private Sector Partnerships</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-González, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeser, Matthew R. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sisk, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A</au><au>Aguilar-González, Bernardo</au><au>Loeser, Matthew R. R</au><au>Sisk, Thomas D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Framework to Evaluate Ecological and Social Outcomes of Collaborative Management: Lessons from Implementation with a Northern Arizona Collaborative Group</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Environmental Management</stitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>132-144</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>As collaborative groups gain popularity as an alternative means for addressing conflict over management of public lands, the need for methods to evaluate their effectiveness in achieving ecological and social goals increases. However, frameworks that examine both effectiveness of the collaborative process and its outcomes are poorly developed or altogether lacking. This paper presents and evaluates the utility of the holistic ecosystem health indicator (HEHI), a framework that integrates multiple ecological and socioeconomic criteria to evaluate management effectiveness of collaborative processes. Through the development and application of the HEHI to a collaborative in northern Arizona, the Diablo Trust, we present the opportunities and challenges in using this framework to evaluate the ecological and social outcomes of collaborative adaptive management. Baseline results from the first application of the HEHI are presented as an illustration of its potential as a co-adaptive management tool. We discuss lessons learned from the process of selecting indicators and potential issues to their long-term implementation. Finally, we provide recommendations for applying this framework to monitoring and adaptive management in the context of collaborative management.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>New York : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19936827</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-009-9400-y</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-152X
ispartof Environmental management (New York), 2010, Vol.45 (1), p.132-144
issn 0364-152X
1432-1009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745631240
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adaptive management
Aquatic Pollution
Arizona
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Collaboration
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Decision making
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Environment
Environmental Management
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Forestry Management
Natural resource management
Nature Conservation
Program Evaluation - methods
Public lands
Public-Private Sector Partnerships
Stakeholders
Sustainability
Trends
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
title Framework to Evaluate Ecological and Social Outcomes of Collaborative Management: Lessons from Implementation with a Northern Arizona Collaborative Group
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A38%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Framework%20to%20Evaluate%20Ecological%20and%20Social%20Outcomes%20of%20Collaborative%20Management:%20Lessons%20from%20Implementation%20with%20a%20Northern%20Arizona%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Mu%C3%B1oz-Erickson,%20Tischa%20A&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=132-144&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-009-9400-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743594069%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206570798&rft_id=info:pmid/19936827&rfr_iscdi=true