Evaluation of proton-conducting membranes for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer
The chemical stability, sulfur dioxide transport, ionic conductivity, and electrolyzer performance have been measured for several commercially available and experimental proton exchange membranes (PEMs) for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer (SDE). The SDEs function is to produce hydro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of power sources 2010-05, Vol.195 (9), p.2823-2829 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2829 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2823 |
container_title | Journal of power sources |
container_volume | 195 |
creator | Elvington, Mark C. Colón-Mercado, Héctor McCatty, Steve Stone, Simon G. Hobbs, David T. |
description | The chemical stability, sulfur dioxide transport, ionic conductivity, and electrolyzer performance have been measured for several commercially available and experimental proton exchange membranes (PEMs) for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer (SDE). The SDEs function is to produce hydrogen by using the Hybrid Sulfur (HyS) Process, a sulfur-based electrochemical/thermochemical hybrid cycle. Membrane stability was evaluated using a screening process where each candidate PEM was heated at 80
°C in 60
wt% H
2SO
4 for 24
h. Following acid exposure, chemical stability for each membrane was evaluated by FTIR using the ATR sampling technique. Membrane SO
2 transport was evaluated using a two-chamber permeation cell. SO
2 was introduced into one chamber whereupon SO
2 transported across the membrane into the other chamber and oxidized to H
2SO
4 at an anode positioned immediately adjacent to the membrane. The resulting current was used to determine the SO
2 flux and SO
2 transport. Additionally, membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) were prepared from candidate membranes to evaluate ionic conductivity and selectivity (ionic conductivity vs. SO
2 transport) which can serve as a tool for selecting membranes. MEAs were also performance tested in a HyS electrolyzer measuring current density vs. a constant cell voltage (1
V, 80
°C in SO
2 saturated 30
wt% H
2SO
4). Finally, candidate membranes were evaluated considering all measured parameters including SO
2 flux, SO
2 transport, ionic conductivity, HyS electrolyzer performance, and membrane stability. Candidate membranes included both PFSA and non-PFSA polymers and polymer blends of which the non-PFSA polymers, BPVE-6F and PBI, showed the best selectivity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745605686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378775309020394</els_id><sourcerecordid>745605686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-12a7bbe1774cf24fdf677a5b776ab2b582dd0efb5607cf9db53c8458d51f78a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOBCEQRYnRxPHxC4aNcdUtNE3D7DTGV2LiRrcSGgrDhGlG6Pb19TIZdaur2px7q-ogdERJTQntThf1YhXfcpxS3RAyrymtCaNbaEalYFUjON9GM8KErITgbBft5bwghFAqyAw9Xb7qMOnRxwFHh1cpjnGoTBzsZEY_POMlLPukB8jYxYSnDNgPWOM8BTclbH189xawhVUMOvlPsBgCmDHF8PEJ6QDtOB0yHH7PffR4dflwcVPd3V_fXpzfVabl7VjRRou-BypEa1zTOus6ITTvheh03_RcNtYScD3viDBubnvOjGy5tJw6ITVn--hk01seeJkgj2rps4EQyuVxykq0Jco72f2DZLydd3Ld2W1Ik2LOCZxaJb_U6UNRotbm1UL9mFdr84pSVcyX4PH3Cp2NDq7oMz7_ppuGSSnnrHBnGw6KmVcPSWXjYTBgfSoKlY3-r1VfpsGfug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>743549685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of proton-conducting membranes for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Elvington, Mark C. ; Colón-Mercado, Héctor ; McCatty, Steve ; Stone, Simon G. ; Hobbs, David T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elvington, Mark C. ; Colón-Mercado, Héctor ; McCatty, Steve ; Stone, Simon G. ; Hobbs, David T.</creatorcontrib><description>The chemical stability, sulfur dioxide transport, ionic conductivity, and electrolyzer performance have been measured for several commercially available and experimental proton exchange membranes (PEMs) for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer (SDE). The SDEs function is to produce hydrogen by using the Hybrid Sulfur (HyS) Process, a sulfur-based electrochemical/thermochemical hybrid cycle. Membrane stability was evaluated using a screening process where each candidate PEM was heated at 80
°C in 60
wt% H
2SO
4 for 24
h. Following acid exposure, chemical stability for each membrane was evaluated by FTIR using the ATR sampling technique. Membrane SO
2 transport was evaluated using a two-chamber permeation cell. SO
2 was introduced into one chamber whereupon SO
2 transported across the membrane into the other chamber and oxidized to H
2SO
4 at an anode positioned immediately adjacent to the membrane. The resulting current was used to determine the SO
2 flux and SO
2 transport. Additionally, membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) were prepared from candidate membranes to evaluate ionic conductivity and selectivity (ionic conductivity vs. SO
2 transport) which can serve as a tool for selecting membranes. MEAs were also performance tested in a HyS electrolyzer measuring current density vs. a constant cell voltage (1
V, 80
°C in SO
2 saturated 30
wt% H
2SO
4). Finally, candidate membranes were evaluated considering all measured parameters including SO
2 flux, SO
2 transport, ionic conductivity, HyS electrolyzer performance, and membrane stability. Candidate membranes included both PFSA and non-PFSA polymers and polymer blends of which the non-PFSA polymers, BPVE-6F and PBI, showed the best selectivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.031</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSODZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Alternative fuels. Production and utilization ; Applied sciences ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fuels ; Hybrid Sulfur Process ; Hydrogen ; Proton exchange membrane ; Sulfur dioxide transport</subject><ispartof>Journal of power sources, 2010-05, Vol.195 (9), p.2823-2829</ispartof><rights>2009 David T. Hobbs</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-12a7bbe1774cf24fdf677a5b776ab2b582dd0efb5607cf9db53c8458d51f78a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-12a7bbe1774cf24fdf677a5b776ab2b582dd0efb5607cf9db53c8458d51f78a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378775309020394$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22388893$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elvington, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colón-Mercado, Héctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCatty, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Simon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, David T.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of proton-conducting membranes for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer</title><title>Journal of power sources</title><description>The chemical stability, sulfur dioxide transport, ionic conductivity, and electrolyzer performance have been measured for several commercially available and experimental proton exchange membranes (PEMs) for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer (SDE). The SDEs function is to produce hydrogen by using the Hybrid Sulfur (HyS) Process, a sulfur-based electrochemical/thermochemical hybrid cycle. Membrane stability was evaluated using a screening process where each candidate PEM was heated at 80
°C in 60
wt% H
2SO
4 for 24
h. Following acid exposure, chemical stability for each membrane was evaluated by FTIR using the ATR sampling technique. Membrane SO
2 transport was evaluated using a two-chamber permeation cell. SO
2 was introduced into one chamber whereupon SO
2 transported across the membrane into the other chamber and oxidized to H
2SO
4 at an anode positioned immediately adjacent to the membrane. The resulting current was used to determine the SO
2 flux and SO
2 transport. Additionally, membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) were prepared from candidate membranes to evaluate ionic conductivity and selectivity (ionic conductivity vs. SO
2 transport) which can serve as a tool for selecting membranes. MEAs were also performance tested in a HyS electrolyzer measuring current density vs. a constant cell voltage (1
V, 80
°C in SO
2 saturated 30
wt% H
2SO
4). Finally, candidate membranes were evaluated considering all measured parameters including SO
2 flux, SO
2 transport, ionic conductivity, HyS electrolyzer performance, and membrane stability. Candidate membranes included both PFSA and non-PFSA polymers and polymer blends of which the non-PFSA polymers, BPVE-6F and PBI, showed the best selectivity.</description><subject>Alternative fuels. Production and utilization</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Hybrid Sulfur Process</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Proton exchange membrane</subject><subject>Sulfur dioxide transport</subject><issn>0378-7753</issn><issn>1873-2755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOBCEQRYnRxPHxC4aNcdUtNE3D7DTGV2LiRrcSGgrDhGlG6Pb19TIZdaur2px7q-ogdERJTQntThf1YhXfcpxS3RAyrymtCaNbaEalYFUjON9GM8KErITgbBft5bwghFAqyAw9Xb7qMOnRxwFHh1cpjnGoTBzsZEY_POMlLPukB8jYxYSnDNgPWOM8BTclbH189xawhVUMOvlPsBgCmDHF8PEJ6QDtOB0yHH7PffR4dflwcVPd3V_fXpzfVabl7VjRRou-BypEa1zTOus6ITTvheh03_RcNtYScD3viDBubnvOjGy5tJw6ITVn--hk01seeJkgj2rps4EQyuVxykq0Jco72f2DZLydd3Ld2W1Ik2LOCZxaJb_U6UNRotbm1UL9mFdr84pSVcyX4PH3Cp2NDq7oMz7_ppuGSSnnrHBnGw6KmVcPSWXjYTBgfSoKlY3-r1VfpsGfug</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Elvington, Mark C.</creator><creator>Colón-Mercado, Héctor</creator><creator>McCatty, Steve</creator><creator>Stone, Simon G.</creator><creator>Hobbs, David T.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of proton-conducting membranes for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer</title><author>Elvington, Mark C. ; Colón-Mercado, Héctor ; McCatty, Steve ; Stone, Simon G. ; Hobbs, David T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-12a7bbe1774cf24fdf677a5b776ab2b582dd0efb5607cf9db53c8458d51f78a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Alternative fuels. Production and utilization</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Hybrid Sulfur Process</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Proton exchange membrane</topic><topic>Sulfur dioxide transport</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elvington, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colón-Mercado, Héctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCatty, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Simon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, David T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of power sources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elvington, Mark C.</au><au>Colón-Mercado, Héctor</au><au>McCatty, Steve</au><au>Stone, Simon G.</au><au>Hobbs, David T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of proton-conducting membranes for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of power sources</jtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2823</spage><epage>2829</epage><pages>2823-2829</pages><issn>0378-7753</issn><eissn>1873-2755</eissn><coden>JPSODZ</coden><abstract>The chemical stability, sulfur dioxide transport, ionic conductivity, and electrolyzer performance have been measured for several commercially available and experimental proton exchange membranes (PEMs) for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer (SDE). The SDEs function is to produce hydrogen by using the Hybrid Sulfur (HyS) Process, a sulfur-based electrochemical/thermochemical hybrid cycle. Membrane stability was evaluated using a screening process where each candidate PEM was heated at 80
°C in 60
wt% H
2SO
4 for 24
h. Following acid exposure, chemical stability for each membrane was evaluated by FTIR using the ATR sampling technique. Membrane SO
2 transport was evaluated using a two-chamber permeation cell. SO
2 was introduced into one chamber whereupon SO
2 transported across the membrane into the other chamber and oxidized to H
2SO
4 at an anode positioned immediately adjacent to the membrane. The resulting current was used to determine the SO
2 flux and SO
2 transport. Additionally, membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) were prepared from candidate membranes to evaluate ionic conductivity and selectivity (ionic conductivity vs. SO
2 transport) which can serve as a tool for selecting membranes. MEAs were also performance tested in a HyS electrolyzer measuring current density vs. a constant cell voltage (1
V, 80
°C in SO
2 saturated 30
wt% H
2SO
4). Finally, candidate membranes were evaluated considering all measured parameters including SO
2 flux, SO
2 transport, ionic conductivity, HyS electrolyzer performance, and membrane stability. Candidate membranes included both PFSA and non-PFSA polymers and polymer blends of which the non-PFSA polymers, BPVE-6F and PBI, showed the best selectivity.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.031</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-7753 |
ispartof | Journal of power sources, 2010-05, Vol.195 (9), p.2823-2829 |
issn | 0378-7753 1873-2755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745605686 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Alternative fuels. Production and utilization Applied sciences Energy Exact sciences and technology Fuels Hybrid Sulfur Process Hydrogen Proton exchange membrane Sulfur dioxide transport |
title | Evaluation of proton-conducting membranes for use in a sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolyzer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T20%3A40%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20proton-conducting%20membranes%20for%20use%20in%20a%20sulfur%20dioxide%20depolarized%20electrolyzer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20power%20sources&rft.au=Elvington,%20Mark%20C.&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2823&rft.epage=2829&rft.pages=2823-2829&rft.issn=0378-7753&rft.eissn=1873-2755&rft.coden=JPSODZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E745605686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=743549685&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378775309020394&rfr_iscdi=true |