Sensitivity Comparison of Laboratory-Cultured and Field-Collected Amphipod Corophium multisetosum in Toxicity Tests
The feasibility of using lab-cultured amphipods Corophium multisetosum (Stock 1952) to evaluate the toxicity of contaminants present within marine sediments was studied. This was done by comparing the sensitivity of lab-cultured amphipods in a cadmium toxicity test and to toxic sediment samples, dur...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology 2010-04, Vol.84 (4), p.390-394 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 394 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 390 |
| container_title | Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology |
| container_volume | 84 |
| creator | Menchaca, Iratxe Belzunce, María Jesús Franco, Javier Garmendia, Joxe Mikel Montero, Natalia Revilla, Marta |
| description | The feasibility of using lab-cultured amphipods Corophium multisetosum (Stock 1952) to evaluate the toxicity of contaminants present within marine sediments was studied. This was done by comparing the sensitivity of lab-cultured amphipods in a cadmium toxicity test and to toxic sediment samples, during a 10-days bioassay, with field collected individuals. Different responses were observed between field and cultured individuals. Cadmium test indicated high temporal variability in the LC₅₀ values of field amphipods (2.40-6.55 mg L⁻¹). Sensitivity of cultured amphipods was within the seasonal range of the field individuals (5.81 mg L⁻¹, LC₅₀). However, culture amphipods showed much lower sensitivity in toxic sediment samples. Our results indicate that sensitivity should be determined using a sediment matrix, if the assessment of toxicity is based upon bioassays performed with cultured burrower-amphipods. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00128-010-9960-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744704874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2012265511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-455505c86e139a5eb5938d0766055b504cc9692349c5b76e5f26ddf60ec1d2393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS1ERYeWB2ADERtWaa9_Yy-riALSSCw6XVuO7RRXSRzspGLeHo9SEGLBxva1v3vOlQ9CbzFcYYDmOgNgImvAUCslyvIC7TCjpAYJ8BLtoEA1kwKfo9c5PxaaS0JeoXMCFARuyA7lOz_lsISnsByrNo6zSSHHqYp9tTddTGaJ6Vi367CsybvKTK66DX5wdRuHwdul3N2M8_cwR1faUyzHdazGwofsl5hLEabqEH8Ge3I4-LzkS3TWmyH7N8_7Bbq__XRov9T7b5-_tjf72jIilppxzoFbKTymynDfcUWlg0YI4LzjwKxVQhHKlOVdIzzviXCuF-AtdoQqeoE-brpzij_W4qzHkK0fBjP5uGbdMNYAkw0r5Id_yMe4pqkMp7GiigiKZYHwBtkUc06-13MKo0lHjUGf8tBbHrrkoU956NMI756F12707k_H7wAKQDYgl6fpwae_nP-j-n5r6k3U5qEkpu_vCGAKWBJZ_of-ArMSny8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>193926318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity Comparison of Laboratory-Cultured and Field-Collected Amphipod Corophium multisetosum in Toxicity Tests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Menchaca, Iratxe ; Belzunce, María Jesús ; Franco, Javier ; Garmendia, Joxe Mikel ; Montero, Natalia ; Revilla, Marta</creator><creatorcontrib>Menchaca, Iratxe ; Belzunce, María Jesús ; Franco, Javier ; Garmendia, Joxe Mikel ; Montero, Natalia ; Revilla, Marta</creatorcontrib><description>The feasibility of using lab-cultured amphipods Corophium multisetosum (Stock 1952) to evaluate the toxicity of contaminants present within marine sediments was studied. This was done by comparing the sensitivity of lab-cultured amphipods in a cadmium toxicity test and to toxic sediment samples, during a 10-days bioassay, with field collected individuals. Different responses were observed between field and cultured individuals. Cadmium test indicated high temporal variability in the LC₅₀ values of field amphipods (2.40-6.55 mg L⁻¹). Sensitivity of cultured amphipods was within the seasonal range of the field individuals (5.81 mg L⁻¹, LC₅₀). However, culture amphipods showed much lower sensitivity in toxic sediment samples. Our results indicate that sensitivity should be determined using a sediment matrix, if the assessment of toxicity is based upon bioassays performed with cultured burrower-amphipods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00128-010-9960-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20306172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: New York : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Amphipoda - drug effects ; Animals ; Aquatic Pollution ; Bioassays ; Cadmium ; Cadmium - toxicity ; Comparative studies ; Contaminants ; Contaminated sediments ; Corophium multisetosum ; Crustaceans ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental Pollutants - toxicity ; Geologic Sediments - chemistry ; Marine ; Marine pollution ; Marine sediments ; Pollution ; Sediment samplers ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Toxicity ; Toxicity Tests ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2010-04, Vol.84 (4), p.390-394</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-455505c86e139a5eb5938d0766055b504cc9692349c5b76e5f26ddf60ec1d2393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-455505c86e139a5eb5938d0766055b504cc9692349c5b76e5f26ddf60ec1d2393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00128-010-9960-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00128-010-9960-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20306172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Menchaca, Iratxe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belzunce, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garmendia, Joxe Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montero, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revilla, Marta</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity Comparison of Laboratory-Cultured and Field-Collected Amphipod Corophium multisetosum in Toxicity Tests</title><title>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</title><addtitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><addtitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><description>The feasibility of using lab-cultured amphipods Corophium multisetosum (Stock 1952) to evaluate the toxicity of contaminants present within marine sediments was studied. This was done by comparing the sensitivity of lab-cultured amphipods in a cadmium toxicity test and to toxic sediment samples, during a 10-days bioassay, with field collected individuals. Different responses were observed between field and cultured individuals. Cadmium test indicated high temporal variability in the LC₅₀ values of field amphipods (2.40-6.55 mg L⁻¹). Sensitivity of cultured amphipods was within the seasonal range of the field individuals (5.81 mg L⁻¹, LC₅₀). However, culture amphipods showed much lower sensitivity in toxic sediment samples. Our results indicate that sensitivity should be determined using a sediment matrix, if the assessment of toxicity is based upon bioassays performed with cultured burrower-amphipods.</description><subject>Amphipoda - drug effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Cadmium - toxicity</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contaminated sediments</subject><subject>Corophium multisetosum</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - toxicity</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine pollution</subject><subject>Marine sediments</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Sediment samplers</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0007-4861</issn><issn>1432-0800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS1ERYeWB2ADERtWaa9_Yy-riALSSCw6XVuO7RRXSRzspGLeHo9SEGLBxva1v3vOlQ9CbzFcYYDmOgNgImvAUCslyvIC7TCjpAYJ8BLtoEA1kwKfo9c5PxaaS0JeoXMCFARuyA7lOz_lsISnsByrNo6zSSHHqYp9tTddTGaJ6Vi367CsybvKTK66DX5wdRuHwdul3N2M8_cwR1faUyzHdazGwofsl5hLEabqEH8Ge3I4-LzkS3TWmyH7N8_7Bbq__XRov9T7b5-_tjf72jIilppxzoFbKTymynDfcUWlg0YI4LzjwKxVQhHKlOVdIzzviXCuF-AtdoQqeoE-brpzij_W4qzHkK0fBjP5uGbdMNYAkw0r5Id_yMe4pqkMp7GiigiKZYHwBtkUc06-13MKo0lHjUGf8tBbHrrkoU956NMI756F12707k_H7wAKQDYgl6fpwae_nP-j-n5r6k3U5qEkpu_vCGAKWBJZ_of-ArMSny8</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Menchaca, Iratxe</creator><creator>Belzunce, María Jesús</creator><creator>Franco, Javier</creator><creator>Garmendia, Joxe Mikel</creator><creator>Montero, Natalia</creator><creator>Revilla, Marta</creator><general>New York : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Sensitivity Comparison of Laboratory-Cultured and Field-Collected Amphipod Corophium multisetosum in Toxicity Tests</title><author>Menchaca, Iratxe ; Belzunce, María Jesús ; Franco, Javier ; Garmendia, Joxe Mikel ; Montero, Natalia ; Revilla, Marta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-455505c86e139a5eb5938d0766055b504cc9692349c5b76e5f26ddf60ec1d2393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Amphipoda - drug effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Cadmium - toxicity</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contaminated sediments</topic><topic>Corophium multisetosum</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - toxicity</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine pollution</topic><topic>Marine sediments</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Sediment samplers</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Menchaca, Iratxe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belzunce, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garmendia, Joxe Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montero, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revilla, Marta</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Menchaca, Iratxe</au><au>Belzunce, María Jesús</au><au>Franco, Javier</au><au>Garmendia, Joxe Mikel</au><au>Montero, Natalia</au><au>Revilla, Marta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity Comparison of Laboratory-Cultured and Field-Collected Amphipod Corophium multisetosum in Toxicity Tests</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle><stitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</stitle><addtitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>390</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>390-394</pages><issn>0007-4861</issn><eissn>1432-0800</eissn><abstract>The feasibility of using lab-cultured amphipods Corophium multisetosum (Stock 1952) to evaluate the toxicity of contaminants present within marine sediments was studied. This was done by comparing the sensitivity of lab-cultured amphipods in a cadmium toxicity test and to toxic sediment samples, during a 10-days bioassay, with field collected individuals. Different responses were observed between field and cultured individuals. Cadmium test indicated high temporal variability in the LC₅₀ values of field amphipods (2.40-6.55 mg L⁻¹). Sensitivity of cultured amphipods was within the seasonal range of the field individuals (5.81 mg L⁻¹, LC₅₀). However, culture amphipods showed much lower sensitivity in toxic sediment samples. Our results indicate that sensitivity should be determined using a sediment matrix, if the assessment of toxicity is based upon bioassays performed with cultured burrower-amphipods.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>New York : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20306172</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00128-010-9960-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-4861 |
| ispartof | Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2010-04, Vol.84 (4), p.390-394 |
| issn | 0007-4861 1432-0800 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744704874 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Amphipoda - drug effects Animals Aquatic Pollution Bioassays Cadmium Cadmium - toxicity Comparative studies Contaminants Contaminated sediments Corophium multisetosum Crustaceans Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental Pollutants - toxicity Geologic Sediments - chemistry Marine Marine pollution Marine sediments Pollution Sediment samplers Soil Science & Conservation Toxicity Toxicity Tests Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control |
| title | Sensitivity Comparison of Laboratory-Cultured and Field-Collected Amphipod Corophium multisetosum in Toxicity Tests |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T07%3A49%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20Comparison%20of%20Laboratory-Cultured%20and%20Field-Collected%20Amphipod%20Corophium%20multisetosum%20in%20Toxicity%20Tests&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20environmental%20contamination%20and%20toxicology&rft.au=Menchaca,%20Iratxe&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=390&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=390-394&rft.issn=0007-4861&rft.eissn=1432-0800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00128-010-9960-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2012265511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=193926318&rft_id=info:pmid/20306172&rfr_iscdi=true |